• About

Feb 17/Ukraine a powder keg tonight as ceasefire stalls/Also Grexit looks like it is the order of the day/no changes in GLD and SLV inventory/gold and silver whacked/

February 17, 2015 · by harveyorgan · in Uncategorized · 1 Comment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Good evening Ladies and Gentlemen:

Here are the following closes for gold and silver today:

Gold: $1208.10 up $18.40   (comex closing time)
Silver: $16.36 down 92 cents  (comex closing time)

 

 

In the access market 5:15 pm

 

 

Gold $1209.30
silver $16.51

 

For the past two days, we have seen a lot of important stories on two fronts:

 

i) The Greek crisis

ii) the failed Ukrainian ceasefire.

We have multiple stories on both fronts to keep you up to date on these very important developments.

 

We also have an update on the west coast freighter backlog which may cripple the USA economy

 

Gold/silver trading:  see kitco charts on right side of the commentary.

 

Today, we really had no change with respect to the Greek situation.

 

Following is a brief outline on gold and silver comex figures for today:

The gold comex today had a poor delivery day, registering 0 notices served for nil oz.  Silver comex registered 0 notices for nil oz .

 

Three months ago the comex had 303 tonnes of total gold. Today the total inventory rests at 256.51 tonnes for a loss of 47 tonnes over that period.

 

In silver, the open interest fell slightly by 21 contracts despite the fact that Friday’s silver price was up by 50 cents. The total silver OI continues to remain relatively high with today’s reading at 171,015 contracts. The bankers refuse to add more non backed silver paper.

We had 0 notices filed  for nil oz

 

 

In gold we had another surprisingly fall in OI even though gold was up $6.40 yesterday. The total comex gold OI rests tonight at 384,240 for a loss of 2,481 contracts. Today we had  0 notices served upon for nil oz.  We are also coming pretty close to rock bottom OI gold support being around 359,000.

 

 

 

Today, we had no changes with respect to inventory at the GLD/Inventory 768.26 tonnes.

 

 

In silver, /SLV  no change in  of silver inventory to the SLV/Inventory 320.327

 

 

We have a few important stories to bring to your attention today…

Let’s head immediately to see the major data points for today

.

First: GOFO rates: the crooks are no longer reporting.

 

 

Let us now head over to the comex and assess trading over there today.

Here are today’s comex results:

 

 

The total gold comex open interest fell by another 2481 contracts today from  386,721 all the way down to 384,240 even though gold was up by $6.40 on Friday (at the comex close). We are now in the big delivery month of the active February contract and here the OI fell by 50 contracts from 651 down to 601. We had 36 contracts served upon on Friday. Thus we lost 14 contracts or  an additional 1400 oz will not stand for delivery for the February contract. The next contract month of March saw it’s OI fall by 148 contracts down to 1012. The next big active delivery month is April and here the OI fell by 2,472 contracts down to 257,281. The estimated volume today (which is just comex sales during regular business hours of 8:20 until 1:30 pm est) was poor at 102,829. The confirmed volume on Friday ( which includes the volume during regular business hours  + access market sales the previous day) was also poor at 102,831 contracts even with much help from the HFT boys. Today we had 0 notices filed for nil oz.

And now for the wild silver comex results.  Silver OI surprisingly fell by a tiny 21 contracts from  171,036 all the way down to 171,015 even though  silver was up by 50 cents on Friday. The bankers are still not able to shake any silver leaves from the silver tree and thus the reason for continuous raids by the bankers. I guess the CME needs to resort to another silver margin hike as this would be the only way to shake some longs to depart. We are now in the non active contract month of February and here the OI rose by 20 contracts rising to 56. We had 0 notices filed on Friday so we  gained 20 silver contracts or an additional 100,000 oz of silver will stand for delivery in this February contract month. The next big active contract month is March and here the OI fell by only 2,902 contracts down to 73,641.  First day notice for the gold and silver February contract months is on Friday, Feb 27.2015 or 8 trading days away.  The March OI is extremely high. The estimated volume today was huge at 51,368 contracts  (just comex sales during regular business hours. The confirmed volume on Friday was excellent (regular plus access market)  at 62,620 contracts.  We had 0 notices filed for nil oz today.

February initial standings

 

Feb 17.2015

Gold

Ounces

Withdrawals from Dealers Inventory in oz nil oz
Withdrawals from Customer Inventory in oz   16,075.000  oz (Scotia/500 kilobars
Deposits to the Dealer Inventory in oz nil
Deposits to the Customer Inventory, in oz  32150.00 oz (1000 kilobars (Scotia)
No of oz served (contracts) today 0 contracts (nil oz)
No of oz to be served (notices)  601 contracts (60,100 oz)
Total monthly oz gold served (contracts) so far this month  586 contracts(58,600 oz)
Total accumulative withdrawals  of gold from the Dealers inventory this month

Total accumulative withdrawal of gold from the Customer inventory this month

 164,143.3 oz

Today, we had 0 dealer transactions

we had 0 dealer withdrawals:

total dealer withdrawal: nil oz

 

 

we had 0 dealer deposit:

 

 

total dealer deposit: nil oz

 

 

we had 1 customer withdrawals

i ) Out of Scotia;  16,075.000 oz  (500 kilobars)

 

total customer withdrawal: 16,075.000 oz

 

 

we had 1 customer deposits:

 

i) Into Scotia:  32,150.000 oz (1000 kilobars)

 

total customer deposits;  32,150.000 oz

 

We had 0 adjustments

 

Today, 0 notices was issued from JPMorgan dealer account and 0 notices were issued from their client or customer account. The total of all issuance by all participants equates to 0 contract of which 0 notices were stopped (received) by JPMorgan dealer and 0 notices were stopped (received) by JPMorgan customer account.

To calculate the total number of gold ounces standing for the December contract month, we take the total number of notices filed for the month (586) x 100 oz  or 58,600 oz , to which we add the difference between the OI for the front month of February (601 contracts)  minus the number of notices served today x 100 oz (0 contracts) x 100 oz = 118,700 oz, the amount of gold oz standing for the February contract month.( 3.692 tonnes)

Thus the initial standings:

586 (notices filed for the month x( 100 oz) or 58,600 oz + { 601 (OI for the front month of Feb)- 0 (number of notices served upon today) x 100 oz per contract} = 118,700 oz total number of ounces standing for the February contract month. (3.692 tonnes)

 

we lost 14 contracts or 1400 oz will not stand in this February contract month.

 

Total dealer inventory: 804,950.959 oz or 25.03 tonnes

Total gold inventory (dealer and customer) = 8.247 million oz. (256.51) tonnes)

 

Several weeks ago we had total gold inventory of 303 tonnes, so during this short time period 47 tonnes have been net transferred out. However I believe that the gold that enters the gold comex is not real.  I cannot see continual additions of strictly kilobars.

 

 

end

 

 

 

And now for silver

 

February silver: initial standings

feb 17 2015:

Silver

Ounces

Withdrawals from Dealers Inventory nil oz
Withdrawals from Customer Inventory 1,222,866.38  oz (Brinks, CNT HSBC)
Deposits to the Dealer Inventory  nil
Deposits to the Customer Inventory nil oz
No of oz served (contracts) 0 contracts  (nil oz)
No of oz to be served (notices) 56 contracts (280,000 oz)
Total monthly oz silver served (contracts) 384 contracts (1,920,000 oz)
Total accumulative withdrawal of silver from the Dealers inventory this month
Total accumulative withdrawal  of silver from the Customer inventory this month  4,638,344.1 oz

Today, we had 0 deposit into the dealer account:

total dealer deposit: nil   oz

 

we had 0 dealer withdrawal:

total dealer withdrawal: nil oz

 

We had 0 customer deposits:

 

 

total customer deposit: nil oz

 

We had 3 customer withdrawals:

i) Out of Brinks:  417,786.17 oz

ii) Out of HSBC: 762,603.900 oz

 

iii) Out of CNT: 42,476.310 oz

 

 

 

total customer withdrawal: 1,222,866.38 oz

 

we had 0 adjustments

 

Total dealer inventory: 67.850 million oz

Total of all silver inventory (dealer and customer) 175.115 million oz

.

The total number of notices filed today is represented by 0 contracts for nil oz. To calculate the number of silver ounces that will stand for delivery in February, we take the total number of notices filed for the month (384) x 5,000 oz    = 1,920,000 oz  to which we add the difference between the OI for the front month of February (56)- the number of notices served upon today (0) x 5,000 oz per contract = 2,200,000 oz,  the number of silver oz standing for the February contract month

Initial standings for silver for the February contract month:

384 contracts x 5000 oz= 1,920,000 oz + (56) OI for the front month – (0) number of notices served upon x 5000 oz per contract =  2,200,000 oz, the number of silver ounces standing.

we gained 100 contracts or an additional 100,000 oz will stand in this month of February.

 

for those wishing to see the rest of data today see:

http://www.harveyorgan.wordpress.com or http://www.harveyorganblog.com

 

end

 

 

The two ETF’s that I follow are the GLD and SLV. You must be very careful in trading these vehicles as these funds do not have any beneficial gold or silver behind them. They probably have only paper claims and when the dust settles, on a collapse, there will be countless class action lawsuits trying to recover your lost investment.

There is now evidence that the GLD and SLV are paper settling on the comex.

***I do not think that the GLD will head to zero as we still have some GLD shareholders who think that gold is the right vehicle to be in even though they do not understand the difference between paper gold and physical gold. I can visualize demand coming to the buyers side:

i) demand from paper gold shareholders

ii) demand from the bankers who then redeem for gold to send this gold onto China

vs no sellers of GLD paper.

 

 

 

And now the Gold inventory at the GLD:

 

Feb 17/no changes in gold inventory at the GLD/Inventory 768.26 tonnes

 

feb 13. we another another withdrawal f 3.25 tonnes of gold from the GLD/Inventory 768.26 tonnes

 

 

Feb 12: we had a withdrawal of 1.8 tonnes of gold from the GLD/Inventory 771.51 tonnes

 

Feb 11.no change in gold inventory at the GLD/Inventory 773.31 tonnes

 

Feb 10 no change in gold inventory at the GLD/inventory 773.31 tonnes

Feb 9 no change in gold inventory at the GLD/Inventory 773.31 tonnes

 

feb 6/ no change in gold inventory tonight/inventory 773.31 tonnes

feb 5. we had another addition of 5.38 tonnes of gold to the GLD/Inventory tonight at 773.31 tonnes

Feb 4/2015; we had another addition of 2.99 tonnes added to the GLD inventory/Inventory tonight 767.93

Feb 3.2015: today a withdrawal  of 1.79 tonnes of  gold inventory removed from the GLD/Inventory at  764.94

feb 2/ a huge addition of 8.36 tonnes of “paper” gold inventory/Inventory tonight at 766.73 tonnes

jan 30. we had no change in gold inventory/Inventory at 758/37 tonnes

Jan 29/we had an addition of 5.67 tonnes of gold inventory at the GLD/Inventory at 758.37 tonnes

Jan 28/no changes in gold inventory at the GLD/Inventory at 952.44 tonnes

Jan 27.we had a monstrous “paper” addition of 9.26 tonnes of gold into the GLD tonight/Inventory at 952.44 tonnes

 

 

 

 

 

Feb 17/2015 /we had no changes in gold inventory at the GLD

inventory: 768.26 tonnes.

The registered vaults at the GLD will eventually become a crime scene as real physical gold departs for eastern shores leaving behind paper obligations to the remaining shareholders. There is no doubt in my mind that GLD has nowhere near the gold that say they have and this will eventually lead to the default at the LBMA and then onto the comex in a heartbeat (same banks).

GLD : 768.26 tonnes.

 

 

end

 

 

And now for silver (SLV):

 

Feb 17 no changes in silver inventory at the SLV/Inventory at 320.327 million oz

 

Feb 13 no change in silver inventory at the SLV/inventory at 320.327 million oz.

 

Feb 12 no change in silver inventory at the SLV/inventory at 320.327 million oz

 

Feb 11 no change in silver inventory at the SLV/inventory at 320.327 million oz

 

 

Feb 10 no change in silver inventory at the SLV/inventory at 320.327 million oz

 

 

Feb 9  no change in silver inventory/SLV inventory at 320.327 million oz

 

 

Feb 6  no change in silver inventory/SLV’s silver inventory at 320.327 million oz.

 

Feb 5.we had no change in silver inventory/320.327 million oz/

 

Feb 4/we had a small withdrawal of 136,000 oz of silver from the SLV vaults/Inventory/320.327 million oz

feb 3.2015: we had a good addition of 1.149 million oz of silver inventory/inventory 320.463 million oz

Feb 2 no change in silver inventory at the SLV/inventory at 319.314

million oz.

jan 30  no change in silver inventory at the SLV/inventory at 319.314

million oz

Jan 29/no change in silver inventory/SLV inventory at 319.314 million oz

Jan 28/no changes in silver inventory/SLV inventory at 319.314 million oz

Jan 27/no change in silver inventory/SLV inventory at 319.314 million oz

 

 

 

feb 17/2015 we had no change in silver inventory/

SLV inventory registers: 320.327 million oz

 

 

end

 

 

And now for our premiums to NAV for the funds I follow:

Note: Sprott silver fund now for the first time into the negative to NAV

Sprott and Central Fund of Canada.
(both of these funds have 100% physical metal behind them and unencumbered and I can vouch for that)

 

Central fund figures not available tonight:

1. Central Fund of Canada: traded at Negative  5.9% percent to NAV in usa funds and Negative 5.8 % to NAV for Cdn funds!!!!!!!

Percentage of fund in gold 61.4%

Percentage of fund in silver:38.1%

cash .5%

 

( feb17/2015)

 

2. Sprott silver fund (PSLV): Premium to NAV rises to + 3.91%!!!!! NAV (Feb 13/2015)

3. Sprott gold fund (PHYS): premium to NAV rises to -.06% to NAV(feb 17 /2015)

Note: Sprott silver trust back  into positive territory at +3.91%.

Sprott physical gold trust is back into negative territory at -.06%

Central fund of Canada’s is still in jail.

 

 

end

 

 

And now for your most important physical stories on gold and silver today:

 

 

 

Early gold trading from Europe early Tuesday  morning:

 

 

(courtesy Mark O’Byrne)

 

NSA Trojan Firmware Widespread, U.S. International Tech Reputation May Suffer. Tech Privacy has Been a Myth. A New Stone Age Beckons

 

 

By admin February 17, 2015 0 Comments

Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on linkedinMore Sharing Services0

MARKET UPDATE
Today’s AM fix was 1,221.75 USD, 1,072.56 EUR and 793.86 GBP per ounce.
Yesterday’s AM fix was USD 1,233.50, EUR 1,81.12 and GBP 801.91 per ounce.

The U.S. market was closed yesterday for a national holiday.

New NSA spying scandal emerges, highlighting the scale of cyber wars

– Agency can access hard-drives made by major U.S. producers

– Computers in over 30 countries, including NATO allies, were hacked

– Iran and Russia were main targets

– Revelations may impact technology sector in the U.S. as institutions around the world seek alternatives

Kaspersky Lab, the Moscow-based cyber security firm whose report into international hacking was previewed by the New York Times Yesterday, has exposed that the NSA has had the capacity to snoop on most U.S.-made computers since 2001.

The report claims that the NSA attained access to “firmware” code from all the major Western computer manufacturers – which runs every time a computer is switched on – and figured out how to lodge malicious software in the code.

The terminology may be foreign to you but imagine if you will what your world would be like if the digital records of your wealth and property titles simply vanished or became corrupted. Imagine the screen just going dark. It sounds alarmist but that is exactly the sum total of the high stakes games now being played out by the world’s superpowers – you and I are the pawns.

The global economy is thoroughly integrated and processes and knowhow are increasingly delivered on distributed architecture made up of lattices of public and private networks. This approach has wonderful benefits and can deliver scale and flexibility and speed in equal measure. But therein lies the risk, the physical spying infrastructure with engineered back doors must remain hidden in order to be effective and useful to the spies who placed them there. What the intelligence community has done has created the mother of all “single point of failures” and the potential for calamity and social disintegration is almost too great to countenance. They assume that with adequate controls these systems can be kept safe and used effectively. They said the same about nuclear procurement and weaponised viruses.

The fact is that in time marketable information will always eventually leak and be traded. Enemy interests would likely, as a priority action, seek to seize control of this infrastructure and either use it to attack American interest and allies or exploit its data collection capabilities – perhaps they already do. Remember, Snowden was a contractor and the access he had was incredible. The sheer arrogance of what they have done is staggering.

Reuters reports

Kaspersky’s reconstructions of the spying programs show that they could work in disk drives sold by more than a dozen companies, comprising essentially the entire market. They include Western Digital Corp, Seagate Technology Plc, Toshiba Corp, IBM, Micron Technology Inc and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd.

A Kaspersky spokesman, Costin Raiu said “There is zero chance that someone could rewrite the [hard drive] operating system using public information,” indicating that the NSA was given the sensitive code by manufacturers.

Over 30 countries were targeted, including NATO allies. Britain, France, Belgium and Germany all had systems violated.

The revelations that telecommunications systems were infiltrated in Germany will likely be met with interest in that country, following previous revelations that the NSA had tapped the cell phone of Angela Merkel.

Both Iran and Russia experienced a high level of NSA hacking, along with China, Pakistan, India, Afghanistan, Syria and Mali.

In Iran, a full range of systems were were targeted, including those of the government, diplomatic and energy agencies, finance, telecommunications and research institutions and universities.

Russia’s military was targeted as were the energy sector and research and medical sectors among others.

The NSA declined to comment on the allegations. Reuters was able to get confirmation of the revelations from former NSA employees.

It is too early at this point to speculate on the implications of the report. It may be that the story will simply fade away. Or, as is often the case, it may be the tip of the iceberg with further, more damaging details to follow.

“Kaspersky on Monday published the technical details of its research, a move that could help infected institutions detect the spying programs, some of which trace back as far as 2001,” the Moscow Times reports.

The revelations may have a negative impact on the U.S. technology industry. China has already been drafting regulations, requiring bank technology suppliers to submit their software code for inspection.

Why on earth would a foreign marketplace import American technology if they know that there is a very good chance the technology will be countermanded and the data use against the owner? It is akin to wheeling in a Trojan horse when actually knowing what lays hidden inside.

Ultimately this strategy could serve to severely hobble the American tech industry, the American economy and ultimately American jobs. This is an example of shortsighted leadership, militaristic thinking. The supporters will argue that industrial data can be traded and used to give U.S. companies a leg up on foreign competitors and perhaps this is true, but such help would be very time sensitive and probably slow in propagating given the speed of commercial development.

The case for low tech, old fashioned bullion ownership has never been stronger and if this story does not give you serious pause for thought …well not much else will!

In previous updates we have detailed the threat that cyber-terrorism and cyber-warfare poses to western economies  and to the western way of life. The Kaspersky report shows how pervasive the activity is.

The potential of the rivals of the West to collapse the western currency system – and with it savings and pensions – is real. Gold is not subject to to cyber warfare and will protect its owners from cyber warfare-induced currency crises.

Breaking News and Updates Here

end

 

(courtesy David Stockman/Egon von Greyerz and Andrew Maguire/Kingworldnews/Eric King/GATA)

 

Stockman, von Greyerz, and Maguire at King World News

Submitted by cpowell on Fri, 2015-02-13 20:59. Section: Daily Dispatches

3:58p ET Friday, February 13, 2015

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

At King World News, former U.S. budget director David Stockman reviews the evidence that central banks are losing control of the markets:

http://kingworldnews.com/david-stockman-world-central-banks-edge-despera…

Swiss gold fund manager Egon von Greyerz concurs:

http://kingworldnews.com/man-predicted-collapse-euro-swiss-franc-time-ru…

And metals trader Andrew Maguire reports that gold-buying governments continue to exploit the price smashes in the London market:

http://kingworldnews.com/andrew-maguire-sovereigns-buying-massive-tonnag…

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.

 

 

 

end

 

(courtesy Chris Powell/GATA.Ronan Manly)

 

Ronan Manly: How the IMF got its Nagpur vault and gave up on Shanghai

Submitted by cpowell on Sat, 2015-02-14 02:04. Section: Daily Dispatches

9:05p ET Friday, February 13, 2015

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

In the second installment of his series about the gold vaults of the International Monetary Fund, gold researcher and GATA consultant Ronan Manly explains how Nagpur, India, got on the list and how Shanghai, China, came off it. Manly’s report is headlined “The IMF’s Gold Depositories — Part 2: Nagpur and Shanghai, the Indian and Chinese Connections” and it’s posted at Bullion Star here:

https://www.bullionstar.com/blog/ronan-manly/imfs-gold-depositories-part…

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.

 

 

end

 

(courtesy John Embry/Kingworldnews/GATA)

At KWN, Embry notes laughably counterintuitive action in monetary metals

Submitted by cpowell on Tue, 2015-02-17 20:00. Section: Daily Dispatches

3p ET Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

Sprott Asset Management’s John Embry today discusses with King World News the laughably counterintuitive action in the monetary metals — their getting smashed down in the New York futures market “in the face of a news backdrop that should be sending them up sharply.” Embry’s interview is excerpted at the KWN blog here:

http://kingworldnews.com/50-year-veteran-says-paul-craig-roberts-right-w…

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.

 

 

 

For your interest

 

(courtesy GATA)

 

 

Caliphs are long gone but their money is still pretty good

Submitted by cpowell on Tue, 2015-02-17 19:50. Section: Daily Dispatches

Divers in Caesarea Find Largest Treasure of Gold Coins Ever Discovered in Israel

From the Jerusalem Post
Jerusalem, Israel
Tuesday, February 17, 2015

http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Divers-in-Caesarea-find-largest-treasur…

The largest treasure of gold coins discovered in Israel was found in recent weeks on the seabed in the ancient harbor in Caesarea National Park, the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA) said on Tuesday.

A group of divers from the diving club in the harbor reported the find to the IAA whose officials then went with the divers to the location with a metal detector and uncovered almost 2,000 gold coins from the Fatimid period (11th century CE) in different denominations: a dinar, half dinar, and quarter dinar, of various dimensions and weight.

Kobi Sharvit, director of the Marine Archaeology Unit of the Israel Antiquities Authority said there is probably a shipwreck near the find of an official Fatimid treasury boat which was on its way to the central government in Cairo after collecting taxes. Sharvit said the coins were meant to pay the salaries of the Fatimid military garrison which was stationed in Caesarea, or in the alternative the coins belonged to a large merchant ship.

Sharvit said the divers, Tzvika Feuer, Kobi Tweena, Avivit Fishler, Yoav Lavi and Yoel Miller, were model citizens for reporting the treasure to the IAA.

“They discovered the gold and have a heart of gold that loves the country and its history,” he said.

The Law of Antiquities provides for a punishment of up to five years in jail for the illegal removal or sale of antiquities.

The IAA reported that the earliest coin exposed in the treasure is a quarter dinar minted in Palermo, Sicily in the second half of the ninth century CE. Most of the discovered coins belong to the Fatimid caliphs Al-Ḥākim (996–1021 CE) and his son Al-Ẓāhir (1021–1036), and were minted in Egypt and North Africa.

The Fatimids, who came from North Africa, developed the ancient city of Caesarea and other coastal cities in the area.

Robert Cole, an expert numismaticist with the IAA said the coins are in an excellent state of preservation, and despite the fact they were at the bottom of the sea for about a thousand years, they did not require any cleaning or conservation intervention from the metallurgical laboratory.

“Several of the coins that were found in the assemblage were bent and exhibit teeth and bite marks, evidence they were ‘physically’ inspected by their owners or the merchants,” Cole said.

 

end

 

(courtesy GATA)

 

Gold lures Turkish savers looking for security

Submitted by cpowell on Sun, 2015-02-15 16:18. Section: Daily Dispatches

By Agence France-Presse
via Al Arabiaya, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Sunday, February 15, 2015

ISTANBUL, Turkey — From the outside, it looks like any other automatic bank machine on the streets of Istanbul. But rather than notes, this one distributes small pieces of gold.

Gold is hugely prized in Turkey not just for ornamentation or investment by banks but as a secure way for private individuals to hold their savings.

Many people in Turkey — which has one of the lowest private savings rates among major economies — keep gold as security for a “rainy day” rather than products offered by banks.

According to estimates, Turks hold some 3,500 tonnes of gold. Banks have sought to capitalise on the tradition by offering accounts denominated in gold.

“We were thinking about putting all that gold back into the financial system somehow, so we decided to create gold accounts for our clients,” said Seda Yilmaz, marketing manager of the Kuveyt Turk Bank, the first to do so, in 2007. “So we bought one kilo of gold, and the demand on the first day was three kilos. It was a very good decision, so we decided to move ahead.”

Eight years on, Kuveyt Turk manages 200,000 gold accounts with different products allowing sales by cheque, bank transfer, or mobile phone. …

… For the remainder of the report:

http://english.alarabiya.net/en/business/economy/2015/02/15/Gold-s-spark…

 

end

 

(courtesy Washington Post/GATA)

In EPA’s expected ‘veto’ of Pebble Mine in Alaska, foes see a vein of overreach

Submitted by cpowell on Mon, 2015-02-16 13:34. Section: Daily Dispatches

By Joby Warrick
Washington Post
Sunday, February 16, 2015

Just north of Iliamna Lake in southwestern Alaska is an empty expanse of marsh and shrub that conceals one of the world’s great buried fortunes: A mile-thick layer of virgin ore said to contain at least 6.7 million pounds — or $120 billion worth — of gold.

As fate would have it, a second treasure sits precisely atop the first: the spawning ground for the planet’s biggest runs of sockeye salmon, the lifeline of a fishery that generates $500 million a year.

Between the two is the Obama administration, which has all but decided that only one of the treasures can be brought to market. How the White House came to side with fish over gold is a complex tale that involves millionaire activists, Alaska Natives, lawsuits, and one politically explosive question: Can the federal government say no to a property owner before he has a chance to explain what he wants to do? …

… For the remainder of the report:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/internal-memos-spu..

 

 

 

end

 

(courtesy London’s Financial times)

 

 

The more central banks suppress interest rates, the more they’ll suppress gold

Submitted by cpowell on Mon, 2015-02-16 17:55. Section: Daily Dispatches

‘Financial repression’ can work only if it’s comprehensive. No escape from the fiat system can be allowed.

* * *

Negative Rates to Shake Up Financial System, Experts Say

Ralph Atkins and Elaine Moore
Financial Times
Monday, February 16, 2015

LONDON — Falls in European interest rates into negative territory could profoundly affect the workings of the financial system and there is little chance of benchmark borrowing costs rising in the year ahead, top investment managers and strategists have warned.

Yields, which move inversely with prices, have this year dropped below zero on a rapidly expanding range of European governments’ bonds — and even some corporate bonds. The declines, which are driven by the European Central Bank’s “quantitative easing,” mean historically low borrowing costs. But senior finance experts interviewed by the Financial Times saw worrying side-effects.

“This could be the makings of a completely new environment for global bond markets,” said Andrew Milligan, head of global strategy at Standard Life Investments, at the FT’s debt capital markets conference in London. “If it actually becomes permanent … there could be some very significant capital flows.” …

Negative interest rates mean investors, in effect, pay to lend their money. Jerome Booth, former head of research at Ashmore Group, said: “It is perfectly acceptable for a government to try to get a negative yield — it sounds a good deal. The problem is: Why would investors do it?”

The ECB’s action has forced countermoves by central banks outside the eurozone. Danish and Swedish five-year bond yields ended last week at minus 0.48 per cent and minus 0.04 per cent.

Neil Williams, group chief economist at Hermes Investment Management, said: “It smacks, surely, of the first signs of what you could call a currency war. Not all central banks can push their currency down sufficiently to stoke up demand . … I am not so sure it is the solution.”

Some $2 trillion of European government bonds over more than one year’s maturity have negative yields, according to JPMorgan.

Yields are also negative on Swiss government bonds, and this month turned negative on some euro-denominated debt issued by Nestle, the Swiss food manufacturer.

… For the complete report:

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/b3bda780-b39f-11e4-9449-00144feab7de.html

 

 

end

 

(courtesy UK Telegraph/Crictlow/GATA)

 

Russian oil exec gets it: Futures markets aren’t manipulated — they ARE the manipulation

Submitted by cpowell on Mon, 2015-02-16 18:55. Section: Daily Dispatches

Rigged, Manipulated, and Opaque: The $3  trillion Oil Market Needs Reform

By Andrew Critchlow
The Telegraph, London
Sunday, February 15, 2015

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/1141468…

Igor Sechin is an uncompromising figure. The head of Russian energy giant Rosneft and right-hand man of President Vladimir Putin launched an extraordinary attack on the entire global system for the supply, pricing and control of the world’s energy resources during the recent IP Week gathering in London.

According to Mr Sechin, energy markets are being manipulated by a powerful alliance of forces, from Washington to Riyadh and Vienna, which present a long-term risk to the global economy.

In his speech last week to executives from the cream of the world’s energy companies, he took aim at the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec), the US Department of Energy and the specialist energy media, which ultimately determine how much we pay for a gallon of petrol when filling up, or for our quarterly electricity bill.

Of course, Mr Sechin’s hyperbole must be taken with a pinch of salt.

Russia’s economy is feeling the brunt of the oil-price war effectively launched by Opec last November when the cartel decided to keep its production quotas unchanged at 30m barrels per day (bpd) — roughly a third of global supply.

The move was largely orchestrated by Saudi Arabia and a clutch of its close Gulf Arab allies within the Vienna-based grouping; it sent oil markets into freefall within seconds of the 12 oil ministers leaving the secretariat, which sits a short walking distance away from the city’s grand Liechtenstein Palace.

Opec had “lost its teeth,” growled Mr Sechin in Russian last week, and had essentially conspired with the US and European powers to drive the oil price artificially lower in a unilateral economic assault on Russia and Iran.

But he didn’t stop there. America, he said, was “protectionist” by maintaining a crude oil export ban since the 1970s, which he argued was distorting global markets.

However, the real “haymaker” punch he aimed at the global energy system came with the accusation that oil futures markets in London and New York, which set the price of the world’s most vital energy commodity, are essentially being rigged by a feral cabal of speculators and traders.

“We need to control the influence of financial players,” he said. And it’s not just the perfidious “barrow boy” traders who are destabilising world energy markets, according to Mr Sechin; the specialist media which help to formulate prices are also in on the act.

Although Russia’s top energy executive — a central figure in the Kremlin — was certainly playing to the crowd, he also has a point.

Global energy markets are a complete mess and impossible to decipher for anyone other than the most expert of hydrocarbon aficionados.

The world’s population is expected to have grown by another 1.1bn by 2025 but we are unlikely to have found a viable alternative to fossil fuels by then.

So the chaos that is the entire hydrocarbons ecosystem, from supply through to trading, poses a real systemic risk to global growth.

To begin with, control and regulation of global oil and gas reserves is entirely unfit for purpose. More than 60pc of the world’s remaining hydrocarbons is tightly controlled by national governments in the Middle East, which are inclined either to use their vast energy reserves as a political weapon, or restrict access to private companies.

Opening up some of the world’s largest oil fields in Saudi Arabia or Kuwait to international companies would reduce significantly the overall cost of energy for consumers, while still guaranteeing that these countries have a steady and lucrative stream of oil revenues for decades to come.

With the world expected to need to require another 21m bpd of crude oil by 2040, the existing organisational structures that bind the energy industry together are beginning to fragment.

Opec, which has been the dominant force in the global energy system for the past 50 years, is beginning to disintegrate as the vested interests of its various members are increasingly no longer served by its collective authority.

When the furious Venezuelan Opec veteran Rafael Ramirez stormed out of the organisation’s building in November, after being shot down by his Saudi counterpart Ali al-Naimi, it showed that its members have very little in common other than their oil reserves.

And there also remains the question of actually how much oil Opec does have. Although the group’s headquarters pumps out reams of research and figures, many experts question its veracity and independence.

However, are the US and the so-called non-Opec producers any better?

America’s current shale revolution appears to be just as chaotic and unregulated as the previous booms — dating back to when Edward Drake sank his first well in the backwoods of Pennsylvania in 1859 — which have incidentally ended in bust.

Mr Sechin warned last week that the current shale boom could be another “dotcom bubble” about to burst after drillers, loaded up on risky debt, and hedge funds piled in to make a quick buck over the last five years.

Even Tony Hayward, former chief executive of BP and now head of Genel Energy, had to agree that a liquidity squeeze in the shale fields of Dakota represents a real risk to the market.

However, it is on the trading side that oil markets are perhaps at their most opaque. Although US and European regulators have launched several probes into the way oil is traded, very little tangible change has come from the investigations in terms of lasting reform.

In the European Union, this has even extended to the way in which certain information companies collect price data from trading sources, which is ultimately used to help set benchmarks such as Brent.

Mr Sechin’s solution to the problem of controlling volatile energy markets would be to limit the share of futures trading compared with trading of physical deliveries.

Without an overarching global regulator with teeth and the authority to work across borders, very little of the comprehensive reform that energy markets require will apparently ever happen.

That role could be filled by the Paris-based International Energy Agency (IEA), which has just named Fatih Birol as its new executive director.

But the IEA, created in the early 1970s in response to the crisis triggered by the Yom Kippur war, has arguably failed to act as a counterbalance to the power of Opec and an industry that is increasingly out of control.

 

 

end

 

 

 

 

Koos Jansen details how the World Council underestimates China’s gold demand;

 

(courtesy Koos Jansen/GATA)

 

 

Koos Jansen details how the World Gold Council underestimates China’s gold demand

Submitted by cpowell on Tue, 2015-02-17 14:48. Section: Daily Dispatches

9:45a ET Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

Gold researcher, Bullion Star market analyst, and GATA consultant Koos Jansen today explains in painstaking detail why he has concluded that China’s effective gold demand is much higher than what the World Gold Council estimates it to be. Jansen’s analysis is posted at Bullion Star here:

https://www.bullionstar.com/blog/koos-jansen/koos-jansen-vs-wgcgfmscpm-u…

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.

 

 

end

 

 

 

 

Two back to back important commentaries from Bill Holter:

 

Here is the first:

 

 

 

How would you know if you are “a crazy”?

 

During a normal week, easily two or three topics come up which are obvious enough to deserve writing about.  Often times, there are too many topics to choose from and several topics need to be written about in one article.  Nearly never has a week gone by over the last several years where nothing notable stands out and I get stuck dreaming up what to write about.  Every once in a while, a topic will come up where I just have to shake my head and burst out laughing at the same time, today is one of them!
  Before I get started I need to frame this piece with a question for you.  Have you ever stood all alone on an issue while the vast majority took the other side and mocked you or jeered at you?  If you have, then you know it’s a lonely feeling and makes you wonder about yourself. Have you ever wondered if you are crazy?  How would you know, REALLY know, if you are “crazy” or not?  It’s not as if you could put a thermometer in your mouth or strap on a blood pressure monitor and wait a minute or two to get “the verdict”.  Think about this, 600 years ago you were considered crazy if you believed the Earth was actually round.  Just 15 years ago you were considered a nut job if you did not own any dot-com stocks.  10 years ago you were completely off your rocker if you believed the real estate market was topping and bankruptcies were sure to follow.
  What about now?  The good news is this, now we have a “definition” as to whether or not you are “a crazy”!  And…courtesy of a coin dealer?  Peter Hug, the director of the precious metals division for Kitco has defined for us what “a crazy” is.  Mr. Hug commented at a conference last month
http://money.cnn.com/2015/02/12/investing/buy-gold-market-fear/index.html?iid=HP_LN , at least 25% of U.S. gold buyers are “crazies”!  So, at least now we know whether we are crazy or not and have a yardstick to measure our sanity!
  Seriously, when I first saw the headline, I didn’t know what to make of it.  While beginning to read the article and realized the “executive” was Peter Hug, I burst out laughing.  I am sure you have personally had an experience where there were just too many thoughts in your mind going in so many different directions regarding the same topic…this is my moment and I can only thank Peter for dropping such a “funny” yet “disparaging” topic in my lap!
  So, if you buy gold or even bought gold in the past, you have a better than 25% chance of being “a crazy”.  If you have done the math, or not, and come to the conclusion that going further into debt to solve a debt problem won’t work …you are “a crazy”.  If you believe that more liquidity will not solve a solvency problem …you are a crazy.  If you see 50 million people in the “bread line” via food stamps, your eyes are lyin’ to you.  If you see 90 million people drop out of the workforce and conclude something is really wrong, you need Lasik surgery …and you are a crazy.  If you leave the supermarket and have to leave some items behind because you didn’t bring enough money …(even though it is the same amount of money you used to bring) and conclude there is inflation, you need new batteries for your calculator!
  Before going any further, I do want to point out that Peter Hug works for a coin dealer.  This is the same coin dealer who used to employ the infamous Jon “Nitwit” Nadler.  Over the years, I have written several pieces about Mr. Nadler and his obviously warped logic.  Day after day Jon Nadler was bearish on gold, yet the spokesman for a bullion dealer.  He was always front and center, always bearish and like the guy with a sandwich board walking the street in front of the butcher shop …”our beef is spoiled!”.  When Jon Nadler finally moved on, I thought Kitco had maybe figured it out?  I thought they might have seen it was not such a good idea to have Jane Fonda representing a gun manufacturer …clearly I was wrong!
  What Peter Hug has said is SO wrong on so many different levels I am having a hard time writing this.  Does he realize he just completely offended over 25% of his audience, his clients!?  Does he not understand he actually offended a number probably closer to 100% of his audience?  Does he really believe that his “caveat” saying “U.S. customers” will win favor with sane Canadian customers?  Does he realize how stupid he sounds by telling people “all is well, nothing to worry about”?  Really?  Is he saying brilliant Canadian minds like Eric Sprott and John Embry are “crazy” or are they not because they don’t buy odd lots of between 1 and 32 ounces?  I have to ask, does he really believe what he is saying?  Has he truly done logic regarding the global monetary system and come to the conclusion everything will be OK?   Might this actually qualify a “crazy”?
  There really was not too much “meat” to the CNNMoney article but it did say “yet inflation is nonexistent, heck, deflation is more of a concern in parts of the world”.   I have written on this topic before, “money” is THE best asset class to hold during a deflation.  Playing the “deflation card” is just plain wrong and not born out in history, gold’s absolute best performance environment is not inflation, on the contrary, it is deflation.  I spelled this out   http://blog.milesfranklin.com/mr-deflation-is-delusional many months ago.  What the deflationists are missing is that “dollars”, whether they be U.S., Canadian, or the European, Japanese, Brazilian or whatever “type”, are all DEBT based.  All currencies on the planet today are “fiat”, none can be considered “money”.  The difference between “currency” and “money” is huge in reality, nonexistent however in current thought.  This is a true statement and one that apparently only “the crazies” understand!
   I asked the question “how would you know if you are crazy”.  I would answer this by saying obviously you must be nuts if you employ someone who disparages your products, and worse, your customers.  I would ask if it was “crazy” for Canada or mother Britain sell their gold reserves for $300 per ounce or less?  This question of sanity has come into my mind many times as I began to build precious metals positions since 1997.  Many times and especially in the early years, my position was very “lonely” and took a lot of fortitude to stand tall.  I have looked at the “fiat question” from what seems like at least 1,000 different angles and always come up with the same answer, fiat and debt, the current system we live with will mathematically fail.  In a nutshell, anyone capable of breathing will admit there is currently a global “debt problem”.  If you are able to understand that global currencies themselves are debt based …then making the leap to “debt currencies are at least a part of, if not the core of the problems we have today”.
  Mr. Hug claimed that “playing the fear card” works and is used in the U.S., not so much in Canada.  I would respond, do I write what I write because a precious metals dealer pays me to?  No, I write what I believe and what I have always written since 2007.  Miles Franklin pays me because my message and thought process is similar to theirs and I suppose they like my delivery.  Would I allow Miles Franklin to publish my work if they did not believe in their own product?  Would I ever write anything I do not fully believe?  Would I ever call our customer base a bunch of “crazies”?  No, no no, one thousand times no!  Let me say this, have some people purchased precious metals for the “wrong” reasons?  The answer of course is yes they have.  Some have bought gold because they believe it will “go up”.  This is not the reason to own gold.  Do I care if someone buys gold for the wrong reason?  Yes and no.  Obviously it would be better for an owner to have a full understanding but owning it for the wrong reason will still work financially even if it is a surprise.  I guess you could say, saving oneself by mistake is not such a bad thing.
  To finish, it is my opinion that anyone who has no precious metals at all is making a huge mistake.  Would I call them “crazy”?  No, uninformed?  Lacking the process called “logic”?  Living on the edge of financial destruction?  Yes in all cases.  The end of the world is not coming (hopefully), the end of the current monetary system and world financial order surely is.  The West, led by the U.S. cannot mathematically continue what they are doing.  Being in “cash” historically has ALWAYS been the best place to be when the baton is passed from one reserve currency to the next.  Historically, THE BEST and purest “cash” has always been gold, this is not crazy …this is fact!  Regards,  Bill Holter
end
And now the second:
xxxx
Very strange silver and gold?
Very strange happenings in all things financial, perhaps the most strange is located within the COMEX.  First, for the last year and a half or more, we watched as gold and silver open interest steadily rises for several months and then suddenly falls in collapse fashion.  The rise and collapse in open interest have not been parallel in gold and silver, often times they have been directly inverse as they now are currently.  Open interest in gold is currently close to multi year lows while silver’s open interest is near multi year highs.  Why is this?  Why would these two metals have opposite moves in open interest?   Some might say because of “spreading” or ratio trades being long one while short two the other or what have you, I don’t think so.
  Going back for the last 18 months or so, we have seen an anomaly which previously did not exist.  It seems as if the open interest in both gold and silver build and build and build leading up to about two weeks prior to first notice day.  I have written about this several times and pointed out the huge open interest just prior to FND.  Currently for example, the open interest in March silver with only 9 trading days left is about 380 million ounces.  For perspective, this amount is in relation to 67 million ounces COMEX has registered and available to deliver and about 175 million ounces held in both the registered and eligible categories.  Another astonishing comparison of these 380 million ounces would be to total global silver production of 800 million ounces.  With only nine days left, COMEX contracts open for March are almost 50% of ALL annual silver production!  For a little more perspective and in comparison in paper terms, this is less than $8 billion …or in reality, absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things.
  Each and every COMEX expiration for the last year and a half has witnessed an implosion of open interest going into a major delivery month and then during the month.  It used to be traders would “roll” out and into the next big delivery month, this has changed and is the reason we are seeing such large drops in OI, very few are “rolling”.  This really does not make any sense because there is almost zero premium paid to roll out.  There used to be a $3-$5 premium in gold (and can be explained by higher interest rates in the past), now however, the premium is less than $1.  What I am trying to say is that there is almost no disincentive or deterrent to rolling, yet very little gets rolled?  It is this anomaly which has caused the dichotomy in OI for gold and silver, the only common large delivery month they share is December.  The “build” of open interest and following collapses are happening because their big delivery months are staggered and don’t coincide with each other.
  But why?  Why does open interest collapse each time?  Conspiracy theorists believe many of these contracts are “bought out” with a premium paid to make potential delivery demands simply go away.  In the past, I was not sure and didn’t know what to think.  I now believe this is probably occurring, here is why:  A few years ago when gold or silver went into first notice day, there would be however many contracts standing for delivery and they all would be delivered on within the next two days.  You see, there is absolutely ZERO incentive for a short not to deliver as soon as possible because of the carrying costs involved.  Why would a short wait until the last few days of the delivery month when they must pay storage fees for the extra three weeks or more?  The simple answer is “they wouldn’t”.  One last point on this, the “delivery” is consummated when the short delivers the metal.  The long can stand for delivery but does not know when, or what day the delivery will take place.  It is ultimately the short who knows what day they will deliver.
  Another very strange anomaly and one which never ever happened until this last year is the odd fact of “longs” who are standing for delivery at the beginning of the month, slowly just bleed away during the delivery period.  For instance, February gold saw its open interest decline by nearly 90% over the last two weeks of trading to finish with 26.85 tons left standing.  Since then, amazingly the amount standing and demanding delivery has contracted from 27 tons to just about three tons!  90% of those initially standing for delivery have vanished? Who would do this?  First, remember this, all longs MUST have 100% of the contract value in cash, in their account from first notice day on.  Who would put the full money up to purchase and be delivered on …only to walk away?  I challenge anyone to give me a credible reason for this, especially since it is a new phenomenon.  Please don’t tell me something like “no one really wants delivery” because I will answer you with three words, “the Chinese do”.  In fact, China imported over 250 tons of gold in January, nearly 100 times the size of the February COMEX delivery, 10 times the size of what COMEX claims as available for delivery and well more than COMEX holds in total …in just ONE MONTH!  To me, this stinks to high heaven.  For open interest to decline 90% DURING the delivery process is highly suspect and reeks of the shorts being unable to deliver because of the question, “why would a fully funded long turn away from taking possession?”.  This has never ever happened to this extent as far as I know.
  A few of the other very strange happenings within COMEX are as follows: the vast majority of inventory movements for the last year or so has been divisible by “32.15”.ounces.  This is important because 32.15 ounces are equal to 1 kilo.  COMEX deals in, and is contracted in 100 ounce bars.  Three kilos for example are equal to 96.45 ounces, just shy of 100 ounces.  Last year, JP Morgan reported the movement of 321,500 ounces for three consecutive weeks, (10,000 kilos),  is this not an oddity in itself?  Also, kilo bars are 99.99% pure gold, 100 ounce bars are 99.5% pure.  Although these are only apart by 1/2% purity, who would want to be on the losing end of the 1/2% purity?  This amounts to one half of an ounce of gold …or about $600 for every 100 ounces.
  Another very odd and statistical impossibility is the reporting of 100 ounce bar movements.  These bars are cast and then weighed out to 3 decimal points (99.723 or 100.295 for example), they can only land at 100.000 one time out of 1,000 statistically.  Yet, day after day we are seeing reports of these “.000” (triple zero) movements within inventory.  This cannot possibly be correct!  Another crazy oddity has been happening in the silver inventory, repeatedly 2,900.000 ounces are being reported as moving.  How can this be?  The number is not divisible by 32.15, it is a “triple zero” entry and COMEX is predominantly a 5,000 ounce contract (except for the minis).  I have no explanation for this and cannot even dream up a scenario.
  One must wonder where the CFTC has been during all of this?  Or any other regulatory agency for that matter?  All of these anomalies are not just “coincidence” and are blatantly obvious to anyone willing to take even a small peak at what’s going on.  I have maintained all along we would end up with a two tier market, the physical markets and an increasingly irrelevant paper market.  The above evidence argues that the “tricks” employed by paper are now larger, more frequent and far easier to detect.
  I plan to write tomorrow regarding the new “fix” process and how China will soon be a part of it.  Couple this with a Chinese new year, a fracturing Europe and very likely war over Ukraine amongst other financial happenings.  I believe the process of discernible difference between paper metal and physical metal pricing may very well be here and now, we will soon see?  Regards,  Bill Holter
end

And now for the important paper stories for today:

 

 

Early Tuesday morning trading from Europe/Asia

1. Stocks mixed on major Asian bourses  / the  yen falls  to 118.77

1b Chinese yuan vs USA dollar/ yuan slightly weakens  to 6.2551
2 Nikkei down 17.68 or 0.10%

3. Europe stocks mixed  // USA dollar index up to 93.91/

3b Japan 10 year yield huge rise to .42%/ (Japan buying 100% of bond issuance)/Japanese yen vs usa cross now at 118.77/everybody watching the huge support levels of 117.20 and that level acting as a catapult for the markets. Poor Japanese auction causes the yield to rise

3c Nikkei now  above 17,000/

3e The USA/Yen rate still  below the 120 barrier this morning/
3fOil: WTI 53.13 Brent: 62.12 /all eyes are focusing on oil prices. This should cause major defaults as derivatives blow up.

3g/ Gold down /yen down;

3h/ Japan is to buy the equivalent of 108 billion usa dollars worth of bonds per MONTH or $1.3 trillion

Japan’s GDP equals 5 trillion usa/thus bond purchases of 26% of GDP

3i Japan to buy 100% of all new Japanese debt and by 2018 they will have 25% of all Japanese debt. Fifty percent of Japanese budget financed with debt (see Von Greyerz)

3j Oil rises this morning for  WTI  and Brent

3k  The EU and Greece fail to come to an agreement/

3l  Greek 10 year bond yield :9.55% (down 10 basis points in yield)

3m Gold at $1221.50. dollars/ Silver: $16.75

3n USA vs Russian rouble:  ( Russian rouble  up 3/4 roubles per dollar in value)  62.42!!!!!!

3 0  oil  into the 53 dollar handle for WTI and 62 handle for Brent

3p  ECB removes Greek sovereign collateral in their investment strategy (on Feb 11). This leaves only ELA funding for the next two weeks. Maximum allowed 60 billion euros for this funding. They also limit the amount of treasuries that Greek can issue.  Greece rejects any more EU funds and thus rejects the European ultimatum to accept this funding!!

the ECB raised the limit on ELA for Greece to 65 billion Euros by raising the amount of treasury bills that can be purchased to 20 billion euros.

3Q  SNB (Swiss National Bank) still intervening again driving down the SF/window dressing/Swiss rumours of intervention to keep the  soft peg at 1.05 Swiss Francs/euro and major support for the Euro.

3r inflation in the UK area lowest in quite some time at .3%

3s   German confidence ZEW high.

3t Battles rage on in Ukrainian city of Debaltseve.  Ceasefire ignored.

 

4. USA 10 yr treasury bond at 2.04% early this morning. Thirty year rate well below 3%  (2.65%!!!!)/yield curve flattens/foreshadowing recession
5. Details: Ransquawk, Bloomberg/Deutsche bank Jim Reid

 

 

(courtesy zero hedge)/your early morning trading from Asia and Europe)

 

 

Futures Rebound On Collapse In Greek Negotiations, After Europe’s Largest Derivatives Exchange Breaks

 

There was a brief period this morning when market prices were almost determined by non-central banks. Almost.Because shortly before the European market open, atechnical failure on the Eurex exchange – Europe’s largest derivatives market – prevented trading in euro-area bond futures the day after Greek debt talks collapsed. Derivatives which, as a reminder, are no longer used for hedging but to directly “generate alpha” and to trade risk with massive leverage.

Initially, traders were unhappy, “it’s  concerning to those wanting to trade given the geopolitical concerns surrounding Greece” said one. “Very unfortunate day to experience problems” added another.” But the real reason for today’s unexpected market shut down was to avoid early indiscriminate selling of course, following yesterday latest Greek fiasco.

And sure enough, after initially seeing significant downward pressure expressed mostly by the EURUSD, which nobody could capitalize on of course courtesy of the broken Eurex, risk both in Europe and the US has since rebounded courtesy of the ECB, SNB and BIS, led by the EURUSD (because a Grexit threat which according to Commerzbank has been raised from 25% to 50% is bullish for the artificial currency), which is now at yesterday’s pre-negotiations highs, and US futures are about to go green.

Aside from market “glitches”, which are now to be expected every time there is a less than “priced to perfection” development, focus for the European open largely resided in yesterday’s breakdown in talks between Greece and the Eurogroup after Greek officials rejected a draft proposal which sought to increase the flexibility of the existing bailout programme and extend it by 6 months. This latest update subsequently led to a relatively pessimistic open for Europe, with index futures and Bunds eventually opening lower and higher respectively after a delayed start to Eurex trade. Furthermore, in terms of Greek assets, Greek bonds opened lower with Greek 3y’s higher by 176bps to 18.7%, ASE down 4%, Greek banking index down 8.6%, however the ASE pared its losses throughout the European morning, with the Greek banking index residing in positive territory (+3%) as the market anticipates an eventual deal. Of note, JPM suggest outflows of EUR 2bln per week which if continues means there will be no deposits for Greek banks to lend from. This means Greek banks could stop lending in 14 weeks.

Nonetheless, as the session progressed, European equities managed to pull away from their worst levels with Bunds coming off their best levels in a pullback of yesterday’s price action, with a bulk of the move taking place before yesterday’s Eurex close. Furthermore, one thing to bear in mind is that Greek Finance Minister Varoufakis said there will undoubtedly be an agreement on debt discussions and will do everything that is necessary to secure an agreement over the next few days.

Asian markets traded mixed amid dampened risk appetite after yesterday’s Eurogroup and Greek bailout crunch meeting reached an impasse. Nonetheless, the Hang Seng (+0.25%) and Shanghai Comp (+0.76%) outperformed, the latter poised for the best pre-holiday rally since 2007, ahead of the week-long Lunar New Year holiday. Elsewhere, the Nikkei 225 (-0.1%) finished relatively flat just shy of the 18,000 level after recovering earlier losses bolstered by late JPY weakness.

In FX markets, AUD has managed to hold on to its gains after the RBA’s Feb 3rd meeting minutes, which were perceived to be less dovish-than-expected. The central bank failed to provide a clear guidance on its future rate path and largely reiterated comments previously seen. Markets are now pricing a 56% chance of the RBA cutting rates by 25bps in March vs. 74% chance before the release of the minutes. From a data perspective, the main release so far has been that of UK CPI with both the Y/Y and M/M printing a record low (Y/Y 0.3% vs Exp. 0.4%, M/M -0.9% vs Exp. -0.8%). Nonetheless, GBP actually saw a bout of strength following the release, given the inflation levels were very much in-fitting with the findings of the BoE’s QIR.

Elsewhere, EUR saw some broad-based strength after EUR/GBP tripped stops through 0.7400 to the upside heading into the UK CPI report, while German and Euro-zone ZEW data failed to impact EUR, but did see Bunds continue to edge below 159.00.

In the commodity complex, gold and silver weakened overnight as prices halted a 3-day consecutive advance, with buying from China expected to dwindle heading into the week-long Lunar New Year holiday. Copper traded relatively range-bound with prices managing to eke out mild gains as stimulus hopes for China increased following more poor data from the world’s largest copper consumer which showed property prices fell by 5.1%, its largest decline on record.

In energy markets, WTI and Brent crude futures have traded in the green throughout the session underpinned by a weak USD and weekend comments from Kuwait oil minister who suggested oil will continue to recover in H2.

Summary: European shares rise from intraday lows to trade little changed with the travel & leisure and tech sectors underperforming and basic resources, oil & gas outperforming.  Talks between Greece and its creditors ended abruptly Monday night, Greece rejected European proposals to stick to the existing terms of its bailout. U.K. inflation slows more than forecast to record low. Chinese new-home prices recorded biggest y/y decline ever. European car sales growth accelerated in January. Indonesia unexpectedly cuts rate. The Swedish and German markets are the worst-performing larger bourses, the Italian the best. The euro is stronger against the dollar. Japanese 10yr bond yields fall; Greek yields increase. Commodities gain, with silver, zinc underperforming and natural gas outperforming. U.S. Empire manufacturing, NAHB housing market index,  mortgage delinquencies, mortgage foreclosures due later.

Market Wrap

  • S&P 500 futures down 0.2% to 2089.6
  • Stoxx 600 little changed at 376.4
  • US 10Yr yield down 2bps to 2.03%
  • German 10Yr yield up 1bps to 0.34%
  • MSCI Asia Pacific down 0.1% to 143.3
  • Gold spot down 0.7% to $1222.8/oz
  • Eurostoxx 50 -0.5%, FTSE 100 +0.3%, CAC 40 -0.4%, DAX -0.6%, IBEX -0.4%, FTSEMIB +0.3%, SMI -0%
  • Asian stocks little changed with the Shanghai Composite outperforming and the ASX underperforming.
  • MSCI Asia Pacific down 0.1% to 143.3
  • Nikkei 225 down 0.1%, Hang Seng up 0.2%, Kospi up 0.2%, Shanghai Composite up 0.8%, ASX down 0.5%
  • Euro up 0.32% to $1.1391
  • Dollar Index down 0.1% to 94.11
  • Italian 10Yr yield down 3bps to 1.64%
  • Spanish 10Yr yield up 1bps to 1.59%
  • French 10Yr yield little changed at 0.66%
  • S&P GSCI Index up 0.3% to 427.4
  • Brent Futures up 1.1% to $62.1/bbl, WTI Futures up 0.9% to $53.2/bbl
  • LME 3m Copper down 0.8% to $5705/MT
  • LME 3m Nickel down 1.2% to $14430/MT
  • Wheat futures up 1.6% to 537.8 USd/bu

Bulletin Headline Summary from Bloomberg and RanSquawk

  • European markets retrace some of yesterday’s Greek/Eurogroup sell-off despite yesterday’s breakdown in talks
  • UK CPI saw both the Y/Y and M/M printing a record low, however GBP actually saw a bout of strength following the release given the levels were in-fitting with the findings of the BoE’s QIR
  • Looking ahead, there is US Empire Manufacturing (1330GMT/0730CST), speakers in the form of ECB’s Noyer (Soft Dove), Fed’s Plosser (Non-Voter, Hawk) and BoE’s Haldane (Neutral)
  • Treasuries steady as Greece edged closer to a euro exit after region’s finance ministers said there will be no more talks on financial support unless the Greek government requests an extension of its existing bailout program.
  • The standoff between Greece and its creditors risks triggering a simultaneous cash and credit crunch, which could drive the country out of the euro area
  • Draghi’s plan to jolt the euro zone out of its economic malaise by buying EU1.1t ($1.3t) of bonds may be hamstrung even before it starts amid a dearth of new supply and a lack of willing sellers
  • Britain’s inflation rate fell more than forecast to a record-low 0.3% as food and fuel prices plunged
  • German investor confidence as measured by the ZEW Center rose to 53 in February, a one-year high, from 48.4 in January
  • A cease-fire in eastern Ukraine is being ignored in the strategic transport hub of Debaltseve, where raging battles risk undermining a fragile peace accord sealed after all-night talks last week in Belarus
  • Thousands of people marched through Copenhagen in freezing winds to remember the victims of a weekend shooting that police say may have been an attempt to copy the massacre at Charlie Hebdo in Paris
  • A federal judge in Texas has ordered a halt, at least temporarily, to Obama’s executive actions on immigration, siding with Texas and 25 other states that filed a lawsuit opposing the initiatives: NYT
  • Sovereign yields mixed; Greece 10Y yield surges ~55bps to 10.21%. Asian stocks gain, European stocks and U.S. equity-index futures mostly lower. Brent and WTI higher, gold and copper decline

US Event Calendar

  • 8:30am: Empire Manufacturing, Feb., est. 8.50 (prior 9.95)
  • 10:00am: NAHB Housing Market Index, Feb., est. 58 (prior 57)
  • 4:00pm: Net Long-term TIC Flows, Dec. (prior $33.5b)
    • Total Net TIC Flows. Dec. (prior -$6.3b)
  • Mortgage Foreclosures, 4Q (prior 2.39%)
  • Mortgage Delinquencies, 4Q (prior 5.85%)
  • 12:45pm: Fed’s Plosser speaks in Philadelphia

DB’s Jim Reid as traditional concludes the overnight event summary

Perhaps it was never going to be quite close enough to one minute to midnight for an agreement as the two sides held their ground and talks therefore collapsed. The Eurogroup continues to insist on Greece applying for an extension to their existing programme whereas Greece wants a bridge loan ahead of a new deal as they view the current one as having failed.

So where are we left? If there is going to be an extension to the program beyond expiry on 28th February then it has to be agreed by the end of this week to allow ratification by various member state parliaments. There’s been talk of another Eurogroup meeting that could be held on Friday but one side would have to back down and listening to the Eurogroup President Dijsselbloem one would think it would have to be Greece. An alternative would be for Greece to apply for a fresh ESM loan post Feb 28th but as Mark Wall pointed out last night, the conditionality would likely be every bit as tough and may meet resistance from member states given its a new loan not an extension of an existing one.

Comments from Greek finance minister Varoufakis after talks ended suggested that Greece would be prepared to extend the current programme so long as the terms are satisfactory. Speaking shortly after, Varoufakis was quoted as saying on Reuters that ‘I have no doubt that, within the next 48 hours Europe is going to come together and we shall find the phrasing that is necessary so that we can submit it and move on to do the real work that is necessary’. Greek press Ekathimerini reported meanwhile that Varoufakis had earlier in the day been happy to sign a communiqué provided by the EC and Monetary Affairs Commissioner Moscovici which allowed for a four-month loan agreement in return for certain conditions, however this statement was later changed in the Eurogroup to an extension of the current program which Varoufakis then rejected. At this point Dijsselbloem then halted the meetings and put the pressure on the Greek side to come forward with a proposal ahead of a possible Friday meeting.

DB’s resident expert George Saravelos suggests the conditions of any extension or new deal are becoming clearer. We know that specific conditions will be mandatory either way through a commitment to fulfill financial obligations, a commitment to not take unilateral actions and a commitment to conclude the programme. In return Greece would be granted ‘flexibility’ potentially around the fiscal path and structural reforms. George also notes that the program conclusion on the 28th February is not the point of no return, but the soonest of when Greek banks are no longer able to access additional ELA at the ECB or when the Greek government runs out of financing. Ultimately George still believes we still have the same three step process for Greece in firstly requesting for a new program, secondly negotiating the substance and thirdly passing this through parliament. The difference now is that time pressure has only increased after yesterday’s outcome. George’s report is attached below for those interested.

In terms of the market reaction post meeting, having traded some +0.2% firmer in the lead up to yesterday’s meeting, the Euro dropped around -0.8% – as headlines started to filter through the wires – to trade at an intraday low of -0.6% versus the Dollar. The currency did pare back some of the losses however but is still -0.5% below the pre-meeting levels at $1.136 as we go to print. The broader risk off tone lent support to Bunds last night with the 10y yield dropping to 0.334% having earlier traded closer to 0.35% pre-meeting. S&P 500 futures this morning are trading some -0.4% softer and 10yr US Treasury yields are 4bps lower. Asian bourses however are generally mixed. The Nikkei (-0.04%) and ASX (-0.52%) are lower although the Hang Seng (+0.24%) and Shanghai Composite (+0.80%) are firmer as we go to print. China property market data continued to be weak but some saw small signs of stabilisation in the data even as prices continued to fall. Chinese markets are closed for a week of holiday as of tomorrow.

Back to markets yesterday, with the US closed for a public holiday the focus was on Europe although in reality it was a fairly subdued trading session with the market somewhat on hold in the lead up to the meeting. Sentiment was lower leading up to the meeting and not helped by pessimistic comments by German finance minister Schaeuble in the lead up. The Stoxx 600 closed -0.14% whilst the DAX (-0.37%) and CAC (-0.16%) finished lower. Greek equities meanwhile finished 3.83% lower and 3y yields widened 175bps. Data took a backseat to the Greece events as the Euro-area reported a larger than expected trade surplus (€23.3bn vs. €19bn expected). In terms of oil, brent (-0.2%) meanwhile was more or less unchanged.

Elsewhere, conflict in the Ukraine appears to be continuing with the first reported deaths announced yesterday since the ceasefire officially commenced. Reuters reported that pro-Russian rebels encircled Ukrainian government forces with Kiev saying that they would not pull back heavy guns whilst a truce is being negotiated. Russian equities yesterday closed -2.04% weaker although Ukrainian equities (+0.96%) closed higher.

It’s a busier day data-wise today. Starting in Europe we kick off with inflation data in the UK. The ZEW survey for Germany and the Euro-area will also be of focus this morning. With markets open again in the US, we get the NAHB housing market index for February along with the NY Fed Empire manufacturing reading. The Fed’s Plosser will also be due to speak today, specifically on monetary policy.

 

end

 

 

 

 

Sunday night;  Japanese yen slides again after disappointing GDP

again. He is not getting the required wage gains;

 

(courtesy zero hedge/Sunday night)-

 

 

JPY Slides After Japanese GDP Disappoints (Again); Economy Minister “Hopes” For Wage Increases

 

It appears “hope” is a strategy in Japan. With business spending (capex grew at a mere 0.1%) and private consumption (+0.3% – which Amari defined as “solid private demand supporting economic recovery”) both coming in considerably below estimates, Japanese GDP QoQ SAAR grew at+2.2% (missing expectations of 3.7%) but real GDP growth was negative for the 3rd quarter in a row. Of course the GDP deflator grew at 2.3%, beating expectations, is desperately clung to by Japan’s economy minster Amari as evidence of the end of deflation in Japan.

 

Real GDP growth negative for 3rd quarter in a row…

 

Japanese GDP Deflator surged (again) to 2.3% – its largest on record… (since 1995)

 

And on th eback of that load of crap… Japan’s Economy Minister Amari said the following:

  • *AMARI: DEFLATOR SHOWS CONDITIONS FAVORABLE FOR DEFLATION EXIT
  • *AMARI: JOB, INCOME CONDITIONS MAY CONTINUE TO IMPROVE
  • *AMARI: HOPES FOR WAGE INCREASES AGAIN THIS YEAR

But

  • *AMARI: CONSUMER SENTIMENT HAS IMPROVED CONSIDERABLY

Which – as far as we remember – sentiment never actually spent any money… actions speak louder than surveys…

  • *AMARI: CONDITIONS FOR ECONOMIC UPTURN ARE FORMING

Oh yes they are… any year now..

 

 

end

 

 

 

Baltic Dry Index at an all time low of 522.  The huge Chinese COSCO shipping company disassembles 8 ships.

 

Monday night

 

China’s COSCO Dis-Assembles 8 Ships Amid Glut As Baltic Dry Hits Another Record Low

 

You know things are bad in the ship-building business when… amid considerably larger than expected losses,China’s COSCO announced that it has dis-assembled 8 vessels in January alone (including 3 bulk carriers) and will be decommissioning and disposing of them as it awaits a “more conducive” environment. It appears that is not coming anytime soon, as The Baltic Dry Index just hit 522 – a new all-time low (down a stunning 53 of the last 55 days).

As COSCO explains in its HKSE Statement:

The board of directors (the “Board”) of the Company wishes to inform the shareholders of the Company (the “Shareholders”) and potential investors that the Group had disassembled eight vessels (collectively, the “Vessels”), including five container vessels (Hutuo He, Xinhui He, Zhaoqing He, Yangjiang He and Yongding He) and three bulk carriers (Peng Jie, Peng Nian and Peng Cai) from 1 January 2015 to 31 January 2015.

 

The Vessels, with the aggregate capacity of 257,657 deadweight tons, were disposed of as scrapped vessels to different purchasers, all of which are independent third parties of the Company, at a total consideration of approximately RMB82.2 million. According to the unaudited financial results of the Company for the month ended 31 January 2015, realized losses incurred from the disassembly of the Vessels amounted to approximately RMB182.24 million.

As a result of the decommissioning of the Vessels, the average age of vessels owned by COSCON and COSCO Bulk has decreased, while the oil saving level and overall environmental friendliness of the vessels have improved. The Board considers that the decommissioning of the Vessels is conducive to enhancing the overall operational competitiveness of the shipping fleet of the Company and is in the interest of the Company and the Shareholders as a whole.

*  *  *

The future doesn’t exactly look hopeful…

 

Remember what is key here is that The Baltic Dry Index – unlike so much of our modern world – is not financialized… in other words, it has not become bastardized by the daily needs of algo-high-freaks and central planners ability to provide margin-buffering liquidity to any and all positions… The Baltic Dry is ‘real’, it is the world economy’s “red pill” for want of a better analogy when all around we see the “blue pill” manipulated markets (and data) and the blissful ignorance of illusion.

 

 

end

 

 

 

Sunday night

 

South Korea’s largest shipbuilder reports a 3 billion loss as shipping rates falter badly.  Again the Baltic Dry Index falters to 530.

 

World’s Largest Shipbuilder Reports $3 Billion Loss As Baltic Dry Index Hits New Record-er Low

 

“Some Shipping Folks Are Sinking…” South Korea’s Hyundai Heavy Industries, the world’s largest shipbuilder, has reported operating loss of KRW 3.25 trillion in 2014, or about USD $2.96 billion. The operating loss in 2014 is compared to a profit of KRW 802 billion in 2013.

As GCaptain blog reports,

In the fourth quarter, South Korea’s Hyundai Heavy Industries’ revenues were up 11.6 % from the previous quarter to KRW 13.8641 trillion thanks to increased working days, receipt of change orders from clients and the progress of mega-sized EPC projects in offshore and onshore businesses, the company reported.

 

However, in year-over-year (YoY) terms, HHI witnessed a slight drop of 6.5 % in revenues as low oil prices hurt the refinery business, according to HHI.

Mal-investment-driven excess supply, debt-saturated inequality-driven demand shrinkage, or both?

 

At 530, The Baltic Dry Index is at fresh record-erer lows…

 

It appears some folks were over-building a little…

 

Charts: Bloomberg

 

end

 

The Chinese economy is faltering badly.  Today Chinese home prices suffer with the biggest annual drop ever:

 

(courtesy zero hedge)

 

Chinese Home Prices Suffer Biggest Annual Drop Ever: Why This Matters

 

While the world’s attention is glued to events in Greece, the real action continues to evolve quietly thousands of kilometers east, in China, where the near record surge in new loans remains unable to offset the dramatic slowdownin shadow banking issuance. And while China’s bubble-chasing, animal spirits have recently reoriented themselves from real estate to the stock market, it is the real estate that holds the bulk of China’s wealth. The problem here is that as China reported overnight, new-home prices in the world’s most populous country just recorded their biggest annual decline ever!

On a sequential basis, housing prices in the primary market fell 0.4% mom in January, more than the 0.3% decline in December. 64 out of 70 cities monitored by China’s National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) saw housing prices fall from the previous month (vs. 67 out of 70 cities in December). The largest month-over-month price fall came from Quanzhou, a lower tier city in Fujian province.

Broken down by Goldman, on a year-over-year, population-weighted basis, housing prices were down -5.0% (vs. -4.3% yoy in December). Hangzhou continued to be the city with the largest price correction, with the yoy housing price down 10.1%, vs. 9.9% in December.

What’s worse, is that the tepid dead-cat bounce seen in the past few months has once again ended and is now headed lower yet again.

 

In other words, the beneficial impact of the recent surge in credit creation and excess liquidity has already faded when it comes to primary Chinese wealth assets because recall that while in the US 28% of household wealth is in real estate, with the remainder in financial assets in China it is the opposite:

 

… and as we noted previously, China is now rapidly becoming like the US, where any excess liquidity is flowing direct into the P/E expanding stock bubble instead, in turn leading to a collapse in the M2 which as we noted recently just tumbled to the lowest reading on record as China joins every other nation whose conventional monetary pipeline has become clogged as a result of chasing stock market bubbles.

end
And now for the all important Greek Crisis.  I will highlight the important chronological stories from Monday through to tonight:

 

Monday:  The Eurogroup meeting abruptly ended..many were dazed and did not know what happened:

 

First the official discussion of the abrupt ending of the meeting;

 

(courtesy zero hedge)

 

Eurogroup Meeting Over – Talks Have Broken Down; Risk Slides After Greece Says “Won’t Take Orders On Bailout” – Live Feed

 

UPDATE: *EU FINANCE MINISTERS’ TALKS WITH GREECE OVER FOR TODAY, GREECE SAYS WON’T TAKE ORDERS ON BAILOUT

EU President Jeroen Dijsselbloem to explain just how far apart they are now…

http://europa.eu/!Kq38bW

*  *  *

Dijsselbloem headlines:

  • *DIJSSELBLOEM SAYS MINISTERS WERE DISAPPOINTED BY WEEKEND TALKS
  • *DIJSSELBLOEM SAYS BEST WOULD BE EXTENSION FOR GREEK PROGRAM
  • *DIJSSELBLOEM SAYS EXTENSION WOULD ALLOW FLEXIBILITY FOR GREECE
  • *DIJSSELBLOEM SAYS EXTENSION WOULD INVOLVE COMMITMENTS
  • *DIJSSELBLOEM SAYS WOULD NEED AGREEMENT TO ROLL BACK MEASURES
  • *DIJSSELBLOEM SAYS WE STAND READY TO CONTINUE DISCUSSIONS
  • *DIJSSELBLOEM SAYS IT’S UP TO GREECE TO DECIDE ON EXTENSION
  • *DIJSSELBLOEM SAYS COULD BE EXTRA EUROGROUP ON FRIDAY
  • *DIJSSELBLOEM SAYS WE HAVE THIS WEEK, BUT THAT’S ABOUT IT

So the 10-day ultimatum was just extended by 40%? Clearly The EU is worried.

*  *  *

Well that didn’t last long. It seems – just as earlier in the week – the ability for either side in this Euro-system death match game of chicken to find any common ground to even start negotiations remains lost:

  • GREEK GOVT OFFICIAL SAYS THAT “IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, THERE CANNOT BE A DEAL TODAY”
  • EUROGROUP DISCUSSED “UNREASONABLE”, “UNACCEPTABLE” DRAFT TEXT INSISTING ON EXTENDING BAILOUT

Full statement (and rejected phrase) (h/t @EdConwaySky)

*  *  *

The reaction…

*  *  *

EURUSD is tumbling and S&P Futures are falling fast.

 

and Greek Bank Bonds had been hinting at problems all day…

 

Further comments:

  • *GREEK GOVT OFFICIAL SAYS NO AGREEMENT POSSIBLE AT EUROGROUP
  • *GREEK GOVT OFFICIAL SAYS EU PROPOSALS `ABSURD,’ `UNACCEPTABLE’

Greek govt official says in e-mailed note that Eurogroup Chairman Jeroen Dijsselbloem’s proposals for the country to observe its existing bailout commitments are “absurd,” “unacceptable.”

 

 

As Reuters reports,

A Greek government official said that a draft text presented to euro zone finance ministers meeting in Brussels on Monday spoke of Greece extending its current bailout package and as such was “unreasonable” and would not be accepted.

 

Without specifying who put forward the text to the meeting chaired by Dutch Finance Minister Jeroen Dijsselbloem, the official said: “Some people’s insistence on the Greek government implementing the bailout is unreasonable and cannot be accepted.

 

“Those who keep returning to this issue are wasting their time. Under such circumstances, there cannot be a deal today.”

*  *  *

So this is the next key event:

Over in Frankfurt, the ECB Governing Council will meet on Wednesday.

 

Close attention will be paid to any decision the governors take on Greece and its lenders’ access to central-bank liquidity. Already, Greek banks, which have been hurt by an outflow of deposits due to the country’s political and financial uncertainty over the last two months, can no longer use their government’s bonds to get liquidity from the ECB, depending instead on more expensive emergency funding from their own central bank.

But of course that still leaves the uncomfortable post-Eurogroup press conference and statement which we suspect will be even more uncomfortable than last week’s for Dijsselbloem.

Zee Germans are not happy and, as KeepTalkingGreece reports, are now suggesting Tsipras replace varoufakis at the negotiating table…

An SPD politician from Merkels’ social-democrat coalition suggested s that Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras should replaces Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis as he apparently creates lots of confusion, German politicians cannot understand.

 

SPD executive board member, Joachim Poß, wrote in an e-mail for his party colleagues:

 

“Greek Finance Minister Varoufakis has best demonstrated with his performance  until now, that he is not up to the demands of such an office. In the interest of the Greek people and in view of the difficult situation, Prime Minister Tsipras should consider to replace Mr Varoufakis with a political experienced, realistic-efficient person.” (Handelsblatt)

 

I suppose Varoufakis is an overwhelming challenge for some petty-minded politicians. He is much more than they can take. Or they just want a Yes-Man.

*  *  *

 

end

 

Monday:

 

Yanis V in his press conference explains that he was ready to sign a document handed to him prior to the meeting..but the document was changed..I wonder who changed the document???

Greek FinMin Varoufakis “It’s Plan A, There Is No Plan B” Press Conference – Live Feed

 

We’ve heard the Eurogroup’s side, now it is Greece’s turn…

  • *GREECE’S VAROUFAKIS SAYS EUROGROUP TALKS WERE ‘COLLEGIAL’
  • *VAROUFAKIS: GREECE SEEKING ‘SUSTAINABLE LONG-TERM CONTRACT’
  • *VAROUFAKIS SAYS `NO DOUBT’ GREECE WILL STRIKE AID ACCORD
  • *VAROUFAKIS: ILLOGICAL TO ASK GREECE TO COMPLETE PLAN IT REJECTS
  • *VAROUFAKIS: GREECE WAS `HAPPY’ WITH DRAFT TEXT FROM MOSCOVICI
  • *VAROUFAKIS: GREECE PREPARED TO TAKE NO BUDGET-BUSTING ACTION
  • *VAROUFAKIS: GREECE REJECTS ANY RECESSION-INDUCING MEASURES
  • *VAROUFAKIS: GREECE WANTS MORE THAN COSMETIC CHANGES TO RESCUE
  • *VAROUFAKIS: GREECE UNHAPPY WITH EUROGROUP’S `FLEXIBILITY’ TERM
  • *VAROUFAKIS: GREECE EXPECTS EUROGROUP TO DROP ULTIMATUM
  • *VAROUFAKIS: GREECE `READY AND WILLING’ TO DO WHATEVER IT TAKES
  • *VAROUFAKIS: GREECE WANTS `HONORABLE SETTLEMENT’
  • *VAROUFAKIS SAYS GREECE ISN’T BLUFFING, HAS NO PLAN B
  • *VAROUFAKIS: GREECE WILL REMAIN MEMBER OF EURO AREA
  • *VAROUFAKIS: GREEK GOVERNMENT IS PRO-EUROPEAN TRUTH TELLER
  • *VAROUFAKIS SAYS GREECE SHOULDN’T BE TREATED AS DEBT COLONY

 

*  *  *

Live Feed

http://europa.eu/!xJ97xU

* * *

Just for clarity – here is the difference between Troike expectations and the reality that occurred in Greece…

end

 

Monday:

 

The Germans are angry:

 

(courtesy zero hedge)

 

 

German Lawmaker Demands All Payments To Greece Be “Immediately Stopped”

 

Following the reported withdrawal of what Greece deemed as an acceptable draft document to move forward – replaced by an “absurd, unacceptable” draft by EU President Dijsselbloem – it appears the Germans are none too happy. A senior lawmaker from Angela Merkel’s Christian Union bloc has demanded that following this ‘rejection’ of the Eurogroup’s plan, all payments to Greece should be immediately stopped.

As Bloomberg reports,

Hans Michelbach, a senior lawmaker from Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Union bloc in parliament, says in e-mailed statement that EU needs to react to Greece’s rejection of euro area’s proposal.

  • Payments must be immediately stopped and money kept as collateral to secure Greek debt payments
  • Talks’ breakdown forces ECB to halt any aid
  • Athens let last deadline lapse,national parliaments now won’t have enough time to approve any solution found at later stage

*  *  *

The rift is clearly deepening on both sides…

 

 

 

 end
Monday:
No wonder the Greeks were upset:
The two versions of which the former was substituted for the latter.
It looks like it was a classic bait and switch
(courtesy zero hedge)

Redlined Comparison Of The Eurogroup Draft Varoufakis Was Ready To Sign, And The Draft He Rejected

Just like last week, the reason for the bitterly acrimonious collapse of today’s Eurogroup attempt to resolve the Greek crisis, was in the wording of the proposed final Eurogroup draft. And, just like last week, while the Greek FinMin was initially willing to sign a specific draft (in this case penned by Moscovici), it was subsequently revised to a draft which Varoufakis threw up all over, leading to a premature end of today’s discussions, one which for the second time in a week prevented the Eurogroup from even issuing a joint statement.

So what exactly was the reason for the Greek disagreement?

Now that both the acceptable, pre-revision (source), and rejected, post-revision (source) texts are available, we can find precisely which inserted and deleted words resulted in a surge in the Greek’s blood pressure.

Presenting: the red-line (or rather blue-line) comparison between the two drafts, none of which was ultimately signed by anyone.

Some of the key variations:

  • the addition that the Greek authorities “intend to successfully conclude the programme taking into account the new government plans“, something which when listening to the Varoufakis presser was clearly not the case.
  • the addition that Greek authorities will commit to “refrain from unilateral action”
  • the addition of specific reform parameters including “tax policy, privatisation, labour market, financial sector and pensions”
  • the addition of a Greek commitment (notagreement) to guarantee (not ensure) “debt sustainability in line with the targets agreed in the November 2012 Eurogroup statement.”

And the punchline: the language about the “six month technical extension” not of the current loan agreement as an intermediate step, but of the “programme”, and the addition of the explicit “bridge” language.

No mention of the Troika in either of the drafts.

The question of just who ordered the last minute change will remain unanswered, but we suggest all inquiries be directed to the country with the 49 area code.

 

 

end

 

Tuesday: un up to date discussion on what will happen next:

 

Greece: What Happened Today, And What Happens Next

 

After today’s second in one week Eurogroup fiasco, things for Greece are getting perilously close to the endgame. Either that, or Yanis Varoufakis, who earlier said he is“not bluffing”, is conducting a master class in just that. So for all those confused what happened earlier, and more importantly, what may happen next, here is Deutsche Bank’s George Saravelos with a handy summary of the next steps.

From Deutsche Bank

Greece Update – Again no decision, but options are clear

Today’s second Eurogroup meeting on Greece was cut short, again concluding in deadlock. The atmosphere remains tense, but through all the multiple and conflicting headlines, the subsequent Eurogroup press conference provides us with a clear framework on how the Greek crisis will progress over the next few days and weeks.

First, Eurogroup chair Dijsselbloem has formally confirmed that Europe’s preferred path forward is a Greek request to legally extend the current program that expires on February 28th. Such a request needs to materialize by the end of the week, to give time to six national parliaments (inclusive of the Netherlands, Germany and Finland) to pass this extension through into legislation. Failing this deadline Dijsselbloem confirmed that the only option that would then be left to Greece would be a request for a fresh 3rd ESM program. All in all, the starting point therefore remains the same as the one we had outlined a few weeks ago: semantics aside, Greece can choose to either extend the program or apply for a new one.

Second, it is now also clear that either program extension, or a potential new program will require specific conditions. Eurogroup head Dijsselbloem specified three conditions, which are also apparent in the leaked Eurogroup draft statement that was rejected by the Greek side: a commitment to fulfill financial obligations (ie. repay debt), a commitment to not take unilateral actions (ie. to not reverse prior program policy) while negotiations are under way, and a commitment to conclude the program, or – implicitly in the case of a new program – to maintain the broad principles of current policies. In return, Greece will be granted “flexibility”, potentially around both the fiscal path and the mix of structural reforms being implemented.

Third, the binding dates for Greece have now also become apparent. Program conclusion on February 28th is not the point of “no return”, but instead the soonest of when Greek banks are no longer able to access additional ELA at the ECB window OR when the Greek government runs out of financing. The latter would make the government incapable of meeting ongoing commitments to the IMF and other obligations, in turn rendering GGB-based collateral inadmissible to the ECBs ELA that would then be suspended.

From this perspective, the next point of focus is not only the Greek government’s position over the next few daysbut also Wednesday’s ECB meeting, where Greek bank ELA usage is under bi-weekly review. A more explicit statement around when and how ELA usage would be capped by the ECB would be an additional means of raising the pressure on the Greek government.

Ultimately, then, we are still left with the same three-step process to reach a conclusion to the Greek crisis.

  • Step 1 consists of a request for a new program or an application for a 3rd ESM program with Greece committing to some a prior conditionality.
  • Step 2 consists of negotiating the substance around this conditionality, in particular the prior actions that would need to be fulfilled to disburse funding to Greece.
  • Step 3 would consist of passing such prior actions through the Greek parliament and ultimately servicing Greece’s loan obligations.

The more each of these steps is delayed, the shorter the timespans available and the greater the risks of failure.

 

 

end

 

Tuesday:  what the worst case scenario looks like:

 

(courtesy zero hedge)

 

 

How To Trade The Grexit Scenarios, And What The “Worst-Case” Looks Like

 

 

 

When it comes to trading the possibility of a Grexit, Bloomberg strategist Vassilis Karamanis writes,that there are three possible outcomes.

Scenario 1: Greece exits the euro

  • Probability of Grexit is now increased to 50% from 25%, Commerzbank economists including Christoph Weil write in client note
  • EUR/USD will probably fall sharply to 1.07 area, with ample room to test parity in 2015, three traders in London say
  • EUR will drop 5% vs USD in a matter of few weeks, a buy-side trader in Southern Europe says
  • September 2003 low of 1.0765 and March 2003 low at 1.0504 are levels to watch for before 1.0073, 76.4% fibo of Oct. 2000/July 2008 rise

Scenario 2: Capital controls are imposed on Greek banks

  • Should ECB turn off ELA liquidity, capital controls might be needed, Barclays’ economists including Antonio Garcia Pascual write in client note
  • EUR/USD may test recent 1.1098 low and fall to 1.10 psychological lvl, where heavy demand is purported, the traders note
  • 1.10 sees significant option barrier protection, two of the traders say

Scenario 3: Agreement is reached within the next days

  • Bailout deal remains base-case scenario, Goldman Sachs analysts write in client note
  • Should a compromise be reached by Friday, EUR may test 1.1600/50 area on back of relief rally, all four traders agree
  • Monetary policy divergence would resume as main theme once again, two of them say
  • EUR/USD was bottoming around 1.1541/46 on Jan.19-21, before ECB announced QE program on Jan. 22

Of course, since it is now Draghi’s determination to keep injecting as much paper money into the system as is necessary to keep pushing asset prices to all time highs, any rebound in the EUR will be short-lived.

Furthermore, Commerzbank AG on Monday raised the probability it assigns to a Greek euro exit to 50 percent from 25 percent after euro-area finance ministers’ talks in Brussels broke down. Bank of America Merrill Lynch strategists, including Athanasios Vamvakidis, wrote in a client note Feb. 10 that the Greek government “can potentially get through the IMF payments in March, but would have difficulties after May.”

And in case that wasn’t enough, here is again Bloomberg laying out how a worst-case scenario could unfold.

The Greek government, companies and lenders have all effectively lost access to international markets, due to the uncertainty over the country’s future. The current sources of liquidity are bailout funds from the euro-area nations, the currency bloc’s crisis fund, the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank’s Emergency Liquidity Assistance.

 

Failure to strike a compromise means that these payments would cease. This means that the state would be unable to service its debt obligations, which stand at 22 billion euros ($25 billion) this year, excluding treasury bills, according to the 2015 budget. Greek aid talks in Brussels ended abruptly Monday.

 

“If the ECB considers the talks to have stalled, there is a risk that it will suspend ELA, perhaps leaving Greece with no choice but to exit the euro zone,” Jennifer McKeown, senior economist at Capital Economics Ltd. in London said by e-mail.

 

Lack of access to bailout funds would also mean that the Greek state wouldn’t be able to repay its 15 billion euros outstanding of short-term debt held by the country’s lenders. At present, Greek banks continuously roll over bills, helping the government stay afloat. The ECB decision not to accept Greek bills as collateral for financing operations and accelerating deposit outflows are limiting the ability of banks to buy new bills.

All of which would finally lead to what everyone’s known for years is inevitable: the return of the Drachma

With no access to any source of financing,the insolvent state and its banks would have to start using a new currency, or a currency equivalent, as no economy can survive without cash. This would be the start of a de-facto exit from the euro area, caused by Greece’s inability to deal with a stripping of liquidity worth as much as 96 billion euros, according to Bloomberg calculations below.

Finally, here is a list of the loans Greece would loses access to in case of a Grexit:

  • There are 10.9 billion euros in European Financial Stability Facility notes, kept as a buffer in Greece’s Financial Stability Fund, which can be used for bank recapitalization purposes. If these funds are not requested for such use, or if there is no political decision on the Eurogroup for other usage of this amount until Feb. 28, then the buffer will be canceled and returned to the EFSF, its director Klaus Regling has said.
  • In 2012, euro-area member states agreed to pass on to Greece profits their national central banks and the ECB made on their Greek bonds portfolio, subject to the condition that the country would abide by its bailout commitments. According to the latest IMF review of the Greek bailout, projected revenue from this agreement in 2015 and 2016 is 3.7 billion euros. Another 1.9 billion euros are still outstanding from 2014. These rebates are conditional upon “a strong implementation by the country of the agreed reform measures in the program period as well as in the post-program surveillance period,” euro-area finance ministers said in November 2012. In other words, the country’s creditors have no obligation to pass on these profits, if Greece rejects its bailout terms.
  • If Greece completes the last review of its current bailout, or asks for its extension, then it will be able to claim 1.8 billion euros still outstanding from the EFSF’s commitments. The government has said it plans to forsake this money, which is still on the table, as its disbursement is linked to belt-tightening measures and other conditions with which it disagrees.
  • Even though the euro-area-backed bailout expires on Feb. 28, a parallel support program by the IMF is set to run until early next year. The previous Greek government had said it wanted to convert outstanding IMF tranches into a credit line, together with a parallel credit line backed by EFSF funds. Failure to agree on a program with the euro area would mean that the IMF won’t disburse the outstanding tranches of its own program, worth about 12.5 billion euros. Disbursement of IMF funds is subject to the same belt-tightening measures as euro area tranches and which Greece’s government rejects.
  • Greek banks have also lost market access and are bleeding deposits, while they have very few assets eligible as collateral for normal ECB financing. They are being kept afloat thanks to the ELA lifeline extended by the Bank of Greece, subject to approval by the ECB. ELA access, which currently stands at 65 billion euros, is only extended to solvent lenders. If, at the end of this month, there’s no agreement securing Greece’s financing, then the Greek sovereign could become insolvent and default on its own banks. The ECB could then discontinue access to ELA funds.

Naturally, the implication of all this is that Greece has “no choice” but to grovel in shame, and retract its hard-line negotiating stance if it wishes to enjoy the fruits of the ECB’s money printing labor.

There is one problem: Greece continues to not play ball with the group of unelected Eurocrats, for whom the Greek behavior is simply confounding – after all how can anyone reject “free money” (even if that it means nothing but ongoing debt slavery).

So with Europe having made it very clear that the only possible next step is for Greece to approach Europe next and request a bailout extension as the Austrian FinMin explained earlier:

“There won’t be a meeting where we have to listen to how the world is working,” Austrian Finance Minister Hans Joerg Schelling said in an interview Tuesday. “There will be a meeting only where it’s clear, the letter is there, the request is there, the conditions are confirmed.”

… Greece has refused to take the hint.

 

So why are futures rallying, and why is the EURUSD acting as if yesterday’s fiasco never happened? This is why.

end
Schauble gives Greece another 10 day ultimatum:
(courtesy zero hedge)

Schauble Gives Athens Another 10-Day Ultimatum, Says “Up To Greek Government If It Wants To Keep Euro”

Those who thought yesterday’s trial balloon headline barrage would be bad, you ain’t seen nothing yet. It all started with Spain’s economy minister who knows if the Greek revolt gains traction his career will be cut short by a Podemos surge, said:

  • THERE IS NO ULTIMATUM FOR GREECE

Which is ironic considering it was just back on February 6 when Eurogroup head DieselBoom explicitly gave Greece an ultimatum…

  • GREECE MUST APPLY FOR BAILOUT EXTENSION ON FEB 16 AT THE LATEST

… and ultimatum Greece has soundly ignored. And therein lies the rub, because Europe is not used to being ignore, and certainly not used to having its non-ultimatum ultimatums snubbed.

Which is why moments ago the biggest gun of all, German FinMin Schauble came out, with the following:

  • SCHAEUBLE SAYS GREECE MUST DECIDE WHETHER IT WANTS A PROGRAM

It already has: the answer is no.

  • SCHAEUBLE SAYS GREEK SITUATION ISN’T GETTING BETTER

Wait, what? It was only a year ago when both the IMF’s Christine Lagarde and then-Greek PM Samaras were praising the Grecovery. Were they lying, or was the “W” in Wreckovery silent.

And finally, the gloves has fully come off:

  • SCHAUEBLE: UP TO GREEK GOVT TO DECIDE IF IT WANTS TO KEEP EURO

Because at the end of the day, this is the biggest leverage Europe has: as Greece continues to play hard to catch, Europe has finally made it clear that it never was about reform, or democratic process, or anything that idealistic socialists find near and dear. No: it was always and only about the artificial currency, without which trillions in legacy wealth will disappear into thin air, as will German’s export miracle.

So just in case the first Ultimatum was not clear enough, here is the second and final one:

  • SCHAEUBLE: GREEK PROGRAM EXTENSION BACKING NEEDED BY FEB. 27

And as everyone knows, if it isn’t Germany’s way, it is the Autobahn. Which reminds us: perhaps for Greece it is time for another call into the Eurasian Economic Union?

end
Prime Minister Tsipras is defiant and warns Germany they cannot step back from promises committed during the election:
(courtesy zero hedge)

“Greek Democracy Can’t Be Threatened” Defiant Tsipras Warns “Won’t Step Back From Promises”

The rhetoric from both sides in Europe is hotting up but we suggest Tsipras’ comments seem far more personal and existential than the Eurogroup’s beligerence for now:

  • *TSIPRAS: GREEK DEMOCRACY CAN’T BE THREATENED
  • *TSIPRAS: GREEK GOVT NOT IN A HURRY, WON’T COMPROMISE
  • *TSIPRAS: GREECE WON’T TAKE A STEP BACK FROM PROMISES TO PEOPLE

With a “strong mandate” to save the country, Tsipras adds that he wants “a solution, not rupture.”

Additionally, he noted:

  • *TSIPRAS: GREECE HASN’T OVERCOME ITS FINANCIAL PROBLEMS
  • *TSIPRAS: GREEKS NOW FEEL PROUD, WORTHY
  • *TSIPRAS: GREECE CAN’T BE TREATED AS A COLONY
  • *TSIPRAS: GREECE CAN’T BE TREATED AS EUROPE’S PARIAH
  • *TSIPRAS: GREECE WILL MANAGE TO EXIT ITS DEBT TRAP
  • *TSIPRAS: GREEK, EUROPEAN PEOPLE SUPPORT GOVT’S RED LINES
  • *TSIPRAS: GOVT HAS STRONG MANDATE TO SAVE COUNTRY, PEOPLE
  • *TSIPRAS: GREEK GOVT NOT IN A HURRY, WON’T COMPROMISE
  • *TSIPRAS: GREEK GOVT WILL UPHOLD ITS ELECTION PLEDGES
  • *TSIPRAS: GREECE WON’T TAKE A STEP BACK FROM PROMISES TO PEOPLE
  • *TSIPRAS: GREECE WANTS SOLUTION NOT RUPTURE

*  *  *

 end

And now for that other hot spot, Russia:

 

(courtesy zero hedge)

After Conducting Navy Drills In East Mediterranean, Russia Puts Airborne Troops In Volgograd On Alert

 

While the latest Ukraine “ceasefire” is all but dead following such headlines as:

  • Kiev security forces open fire on DPR, LPR republics’ positions – Basurin
  • Fighting Strains Ukraine Truce; Russia Criticizes EU Blacklist
  • Battle rages for town where Ukraine rebels reject ceasefire

… perhaps a better question is what just what is Russia doing in the East Mediterranean (as in close by to both Greece and Cyprus) where as Interfax reported earlier, the Russian navy conducted tests. Bloomberg adds that the “Russian Navy vessels fire artillery rounds at sea, air training targets as part of tests in eastern part of Mediterranean, Interfax reports, citing statement by Defense Ministry.”

This happens hours after Interfax also reported that the Russian Air Force conducted a practice bombing drill in the south of Russia, in which about 10 airplanes took part.

And finally, moments ago, Interfax (and Bloomberg) made it a trifecta when it reported that

  • RUSSIA PUTS AIRBORNE TROOPS ON ALERT IN VOLGOGRAD REGION: IFX
  • ASSAULT LANDING UNIT OF AIRBORNE TROOPS ALERTED IN VOLGOGRAD REGION

As a reminder, Volgograd is about 150 miles east of Ukraine.

 

As a further reminder, over the weekend German Der Spiegel warned, citing former Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov “Now the threat of a war is higher than during the Cold War.” Perhaps events such as these further escalating into an out of control cascade is precisely what he was referring to.

 

end

 

The truce fails.  The town of Debaltseve is surrounded.  Three hundred Ukrainian soldiers surrender.

 

(courtesy zero hedge)

 

 

Ukraine “Truce” Fails: Withdrawal Deadline Passes, Debaltseve Situation Deteriorating

 

UPDATE: *POROSHENKO SAYS UN MUST NOT ALLOW FULL-SCALE WAR IN EUROPE

As the game of chicken between Greece and the Eurogroup hots up, it appears another – potentially far more deadly – is escalating in Ukraine as neither side is willing to follow through on the terms of the Minsk Summit peace deal – removing heavy weaponry from the frontlines – as a key deadline passes without agreement.As The Guardian reports, The Ukrainian military have stated that “as soon as the militants cease fire, the Ukrainian side will begin to withdraw heavy weaponry from the frontline,” and the pro-Russian separatists proclaim, “We do not have the right [to stop fighting for Debaltseve],” adding that as far as the truce,“we have everything ready for a mutual withdrawal. We will not do anything unilaterally – that would make our soldiers targets.”

As The Guardian reports, and Interfax confirms, the situation in Debaltseve is deteriorating…

Kiev on Tuesday reported artillery strikes overnight around the key transportation hub of Debaltseve while the situation in the rest of the conflict zone appeared to be calm.

 

An Associated Press reporter heard sustained shelling around Debaltseve – where government troops are encircled – on Tuesday morning, some coming from Grad rocket launchers.

 

A senior rebel representative told Reuters that the separatists cannot “morally” stop fighting for control of the town.

 

Denis Pushilin also said rebels could not withdraw heavy weaponry, as set out in the deal, unless Ukrainian forces did so as well.

 

“We do not have the right [to stop fighting for Debaltseve]. It’s even a moral thing. It’s internal territory,”Pushilin said in the rebel stronghold of Donetsk.

 

“We have to respond to fire, to work on destroying the enemy’s fighting positions.”

 

Asked about plans to carry out the agreement to withdraw big guns, he said: “We are ready at any time, we have everything ready for a mutual withdrawal. We will not do anything unilaterally – that would make our soldiers targets.”

As AP reports, Russia-backed rebels in eastern Ukraine claimed Tuesday to have taken the key transportation hub of Debaltseve as both parties faced a deadline to start pulling back heavy weapons from the front line.

Fierce fighting on Tuesday appeared to be focused on Debaltseve, a government-held town surrounded by rebel forces that both sides claim to be on their side of the cease-fire line. The issue was not resolved under a cease-fire agreement negotiated last week by the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Germany and France.

 

Separatist leaders said in remarks carried by the rebel mouthpiece Donetsk News Agency on Tuesday afternoon that their forces have pushed the Ukrainian army out of Debaltseve, gaining control over most of the town.

 

…

 

Rupert Colville, spokesman for the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, told a briefing in Geneva on Tuesday that the UN is “alarmed” by reports of continued shelling in the areas and have not yet been able to get reliable information on the casualties there and the wellbeing of civilians.

 

“It is unclear how many civilians are still there,” he said. “We are particularly concerned about the civilians trapped in the area – we believe there may be a few thousand hiding in cellars, struggling to get food, water and other basic necessities.”

 

  • *DONETSK REBELS SAY HUNDREDS OF GOVT SOLDIERS SURRENDERED: IFX
  • *POROSHENKO TOLD MERKEL EU MUST RESPOND TO REBEL, RUSSIA ACTIONS

As the following AP clip shows, there are no signs of Ukraine weapons withdrawal at all…

 

As The Guardian reports, neither side is willing to move first…

Ukrainian government troops and Russia-backed rebels failed to start pulling back heavy weaponry from the frontline in eastern Ukraine on Tuesday as a deadline to do so passed.

 

Under a ceasefire agreement negotiated by the leaders of Ukrae, Russia, Germany and France last week, the warring sides were to begin withdrawing heavy weapons from the front line on Tuesday.

 

Anatoliy Stelmakh, a Ukrainian military spokesman, said in televised comments early on Tuesday that the separatists continued to attack their positions overnight and that the pullout hinged on the ceasefire being fully observed.

 

“As soon as the militants cease fire, the Ukrainian side will begin to withdraw heavy weaponry from the frontline,” he said.

*  *  *

So despite the market’s kneejerk exuberance last week, it seems the Minsk Summit peace deal is about as effective as the last peace deal… time for more sanctions and costs…

  • *POROSHENKO CALLS FOR `TOUGH’ EU REACTION TO DEBALTSEVE ATTACKS

 

end

 

Putin responds>>>>

 

 

(courtesy zero hedge)

 

 

“Optimistic” Putin Says US Already Supplying Arms To Ukraine

 

Vladimir Putin says he is “more optimist than pessimist” on Ukraine, but warns that there will be “no end to war if Kiev believes in a military solution.” Noting that he believes there has been an “overall decrease” in military activity, he notes that Debaltseve was “possible to forecast,” and then proclaims:

  • *PUTIN SAYS U.S. ARMS ALREADY BEING SUPPLIED TO UKRAINE

Of course, we already have “YouTube” proof of American military presence in Ukraine (which for Washington would have been good enough to wage war) but Putin offers no specific proof and adds rather pointedly that “most Ukraine troops want no part of fractricidal war.”

 

Putin was speaking at a press conference with Hungary’s President Orban, and added:

  • *PUTIN SAYS HOPEFUL BOTH SIDES IN UKRAINE TO COMPLY WITH ACCORDS
  • *PUTIN SEES OVERALL DECREASE IN MILITARY ACTIVITY IN UKRAINE
  • *PUTIN SAYS HE’S MORE OF AN OPTIMIST THAN PESSIMIST ON UKRAINE
  • *PUTIN: KEY GOAL TO SAVE LIVES OF PEOPLE TRAPPED IN DEBALTSEVE
  • *PUTIN SAYS MOST UKRAINE TROOPS WANT NO PART IN FRATRICIDAL WAR

adding that

  • *PUTIN SAYS DEBALTSEVE STANDOFF WAS POSSIBLE TO FORECAST

And here’s why – because Debaltseve is really just a front guard staging point:

 

And finally:

  • *PUTIN SAYS U.S. ARMS ALREADY BEING SUPPLIED TO UKRAINE

*  *  *

One wonders how Merkel will respond if Putin shows her proof?

 

 

end

 

 

 

Chris Martenson does a terrific job analyzing the true nature of the conflict between the Ukrainians and the rebels:

 

 

 

 

(courtesy Chris Martenson/Peak Prosperity)

 

The US’ Suicidal Strategy On Ukraine

 

Submitted by Chris Martenson via Peak Prosperity,

Ukraine is back in the news cycle and for good reason. The previous cease-fire has broken, fighting is intensifying, and the western-supported and installed leadership in Kiev is losing the campaign.  At this point, the West’s choice is to either double down and bet even more on a badly failing set of policies, or admit it has lost this round and seek to deescalate the situation.

Meanwhile, Europe has finally woken up to the risks and seems to be ready to carve out a different path than the US. A lot hinges on the apparent ‘truce’ deal between Russia and Europe’s leaders this week.

As the President Hollande of France put it on Feb 7th, “If we don’t find not just a compromise but a lasting peace agreement, we know perfectly well what the scenario will be. It has a name, it’s called war.” Of course – since the deal’s signing, shelling has continued with more deaths.

He’s not simply referring to an escalation of the factions fighting within Ukraine. He’s warning about the real deal:  a wider conflict that could easily spread into Europe, and possibly, the embroil powers across the world.

A Recipe For Unrest

As I’ve written previously, the West, especially the US, was instrumental in toppling the democratically-elected President of Ukraine back in February 2014. US officials were caught on tape plotting the coup, and then immediately supported the hastily-installed and extremist officials that now occupy the Kiev leadership positions.

In short, the crisis in Ukraine was not the result of Russia’s actions, but the West’s. Had the prior President, Yanukovych, not been overthrown, it’s highly unlikely that Ukraine would be embroiled in a nasty civil war. Relations between Russia and the West would be in far better repair.

Russia, quite predictably and understandably, became alarmed at the rise of fascism and Nazi-sympathetic powers on its border. Remember the repeated statements by Kiev officials recommending extermination of the Russian speakers who make up the majority living in Eastern Ukraine. Were a parallel situation happening in Canada, for example, I would fully expect the US to be similarly and seriously interested and involved in the outcome.

The only people seemingly surprised by this predictable Russian reaction towards protecting its people and border interests are the neocons at the US State Department who instigated the conflict in the first place. In my experience, these are dangerous people principally because they seem to lack perspective and humility.

Ukraine’s Civil War

Going Poorly For The Regime

Looking at the state of things, it’s not going well militarily for the Kiev regime. Huge losses and persistent reports of low morale among Ukrainian troops tell the tale: Kiev is losing badly.

Let’s begin with the reports of the fighting in Ukraine which have recently intensified:

Ukraine bloodshed intensifies ahead of peace summit

Feb 11, 2015

 

Kiev (AFP) – Intense fighting in Ukraine, including a devastating rocket strike on Kiev’s military headquarters in the east, killed at least 37 people on Tuesday, the eve of a four-way peace summit.

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko said rockets for the first time hit the military’s command centre in Kramatorsk, the government’s administrative capital in the region, well behind the frontlines and far from rebel positions.

 

The latest fighting also saw rebels seek to encircle railway hub Debaltseve and Ukrainian forces launch a counter-offensive around the strategic port of Mariupol.

(Source)

The rebels have encircled and ruined a number of Kiev forces over the past several months in what are called ‘cauldrons’, where the encircled forces are slowly ground down and destroyed. This appears to have finally happened in Debatlseve, which would be just another in a long string of heavy losses for Kiev.

The losses in prior cauldrons have been staggeringly high, with many analysts concluding that Kiev has been underreporting losses by as much as 90%.

I cannot vouch for all of these sources. But the following is a typical example of reporting coming from the front lines of the Ukraine conflict, which directly contradicts the official Kiev war reports:

Ukraine hides devastating losses as Russia-backed fighters surge forward

Jan 25, 2015

 

ARTYOMOVSK, Ukraine – An ashen-faced man in a loose-fitting military uniform shuffles past a blood-soaked stretcher propped against the wall. Slowly stirring a cup of tea, he watches Ukrainian military officials announce the day’s casualties – one killed and 20 wounded.

 

“Don’t believe what they tell you,” he says, checking the door is closed before continuing.

 

“There are many, many more. At least 280 were injured in just one day last week and 30 or 40 killed. There were many more killed this week, Debaltseve and Konstantinovka are the worst cities now. I take 18 wounded to Kharkiv myself every day.”

 

The man, who didn’t want to be named, is a medic in Ukraine’s overstretched, under-resourced army. Clearly traumatized, he speaks quietly and hesitantly, barely audible over the low rumble of artillery fire from the outskirts of town.

 

His words confirm Ukraine’s worst-kept secret – that the Ukrainian army is drastically understating its casualties.But only now is the scale of that understatement starting to become clear.

 

On Jan. 22, the director of Kostiantynivka hospital told Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe monitors that in the last two weeks that the number of soldiers admitted has “increased dramatically, with figures comparable to those in August and September 2014.”

 

Between Aug. 10 and Sept. 3, when Russian troops first entered Ukraine in support of a beleaguered rebel force on the brink of defeat, the Kyiv Post estimates at least 200 servicemen were killed.

 

Many of the recent casualties are coming from areas around the besieged town of Debaltseve, a strategic rail junction between Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts,where thousands of Ukrainian soldiers are struggling to prevent being surrounded and cut off from Ukrainian lines.

 

The town’s defenders – and its civilian population – have faced an incessant artillery bombardment from three sides since Russian-backed rebels launched a massive offensive all along the front line last week.

(Source)

I have read enough first-hand reports to suspect that this article is pretty close to the truth. The contradicting numbers in the statements from the Kiev regime about losses are very hard to believe.

Part of what plagues Kiev’s forces is the age-old problem of fielding an unmotivated force. Not everybody is excited to be fighting against people from within their own country. Moreover, training is poor, equipment and ammunition are in poor shape and supply, and pay is often late in coming if it comes at all. This is a very usual litany of problems that have plagued struggling armies through the centuries.

On the other side of the battle lines, you have people fighting for their homes, their families and their ethnic community, which the Kiev regime has promised to exterminate if and when it’s given the chance.

Dubious Reporting

It’s interesting to contrast foreign reporting with US reporting on the conflict:

As fighting deepens in eastern Ukraine, casualties rise and truce is all but dead

Jan 20, 2015

 

MOSCOW — Intensifying battles, mounting death tolls and new accusations of Russian interference in eastern Ukrainehave marked some of the worst fighting between government troops and pro-Russian separatists since last summer, rendering a months-old cease-fire agreement effectively defunct.

 

The two sides have been trading heavy fire at the Donetsk airport, a prize that, though more symbolic than strategic, has been at the center of punishing recent attacks that have reduced much of the facility to rubble.Each side has claimed control of the airport at various points, and militia and army fighters there continued to launch strikes against each other over the past several days.

 

The U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey R. Pyatt, bolstered Ukraine’s accusations Tuesday, saying the United States was alarmed by what he called a Russian-provoked military escalation, coupled with the arrival of large quantities of weaponry from Russian territory, according to the Russian Interfax news service.

 

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin told reporters Tuesday that pro-Russian separatists were “taking advantage” of the military’s compliance to seize “very substantial territory — more than 500 square kilometers.”

(Source)

Let’s decode this piece of writing from the Washington Post and provide some essential context that is, regrettably, missing far too often from US media sources when reporting on the Ukraine conflict.

To begin, there’s the assertion once again that Russia has been supplying “large quantities” of weapons to the separatists.  While this may or may not be true, not one shred of satellite or other imagery or any other evidence has been provided by the US to support that charge.

In this day and age it is literally not possible to move large amounts of heavy weaponry across open land without satellites and/or drones taking pictures of them.

Furthermore, in this case the charges are being levied by one Geoffrey Pyatt, the infamous US ambassador to Ukraine who was caught on tape discussing the imminent coup of then-President Yanukovych. He also famously tweeted out a crudely doctored photo purporting to show that the missile attack on MH-17 came from the separatists — evidence that was quickly defrauded by the intelligence community.

Why the Washington Post would report anything from Pyatt as worthy of our serious consideration given his blighted track record so far is a complete mystery to me. It would be like recommending your friend to a doctor you knew had committed gross malpractice multiple times.

Next, the separatists are not ‘taking advantage’ of a one-sided lull in the fighting to claim territory. They have been winning battle after battle. What they have taken advantage of is the poor training and lackluster military strategy undertaken by Kiev’s forces.

It should also be noted that the above article presents the status of the conflict an even match.  There’s no indication that one side is winning or losing.

This is par for the course with US media reports these days and it’s really a disturbing indication that the shoddy journalistic ethics on display during the horrendously mis-reported weapons of mass destructions lies that led to the most recent US attack on Iraq are still with us today.

It’s quite sad, really. Because when it comes to an issue as important as a potential conflict with Russia, the US owes it to itself to get the facts right. The stakes are worthy of that.

As a final point about the shortcomings of the Washington Post piece above concerns the heavily contested Donetsk airport. Five days prior to the above article’s publication, the airport had been clearly reported by other outlets to have already been lost by Kiev forces:

Russia-backed separatists seize Donetsk airport in Ukraine

Jan 15, 2015

 

Russian-backed separatists announced that they have captured the shattered remains of the Donetsk airport terminalin eastern Ukraine and plan to claw back more territory, further dashing hopes for a lasting peace agreement.

 

The airport, on the fringes of the rebel stronghold of Donetsk, has been at the centre of bitter battles since May. Control over it was split between the separatists and Ukrainian forces, who had held onto the main civilian terminal. Reduced to little more than a shell-strewn wreck, the building is of limited strategic importance but has great symbolic value.

 

An AP reporter saw a rebel flag hoisted over that building Thursday, although fighting still appeared to be ongoing. Ukraine insisted government troops were holding their positions at the airport.

(Source)

Instead of the airport being up for grabs as the WaPo article implies, it has had the rebel flag flying over it as of five days ago. It’s clearly in the hands of one side, the separtists’. That’s a huge difference, and is just one more example of heavily slanted writing that passes for news in the US these days.

But leaving the shoddy reporting aside, the main summary here is that the intense fighting in Ukraine has resulting in mounting losses for Kiev.

All of which provides the context for this week’s hurriedly-brokered ‘peace summit’ that will involve France, Germany, Russia and Ukraine.

Splitting Away

Europe has begun the process of splitting away from the US on the matter of Russia and Ukraine.

What’s interesting is that an emergency meeting is being convened amongst several of the top leaders in the world, but looks who’s suspiciously absent from the talks:

Merkel and Hollande’s surprise Moscow visit raises hopes of Ukraine deal

Feb 5, 2015

 

The leaders of Germany and France abruptly announced a summit with the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, in Moscow on Friday in response to overtures from the Kremlin, raising hopes of a breakthrough in the year-old Ukraine conflict.

 

The sudden and unusual decision by the chancellor, Angela Merkel, and the president, François Hollande, to travel to Moscow, with the French leader talking of decisions of war and peace, increased the stakes in the crisis while also raising suspicions that the Kremlin was seeking to split Europe and the US. Putin was said to have made “initiatives” to the European leaders in recent days.

 

Merkel and Hollande met the Ukrainian president, Petro Poroshenko, in Kiev on Thursday evening but left without making any comment.

 

EU diplomats and officials said that growing US talk of arming Ukraine was pushing the Russians and Europeans towards a diplomatic deal, with both sides keen to avoid weapons deliveries but also to keep the US on the sidelines of the diplomacy.

(Source)

Note the progression of what transpired, which we can piece together from this and other articles. US Secretary of State John Kerry was in Kiev meeting with the president and prime minister of Ukraine, but did not attend similar meetings with Hollande and Merkel held on the same day.

Then Hollande and Merkel jet straight off to Moscow for high level talks.

Missing in action from the Germany-France-Ukraine-Russia talks is John Kerry, President Obama, or any other ranking US official. This speaks volumes about where we are in this narrative.

When the US started down this path of confrontation with Russia, which remains a complete strategic mystery to nearly all thoughtful observers, there were two large possible outcomes: isolating Russia and fracturing its growing ties with Europe, or accidentally fracturing the strong ties between the US and Europe.

Oops. Looks like we’ve opened Door #2.

I didn’t know how serious it was until I read this:

Kerry Insists ‘There Is No Split’ With Europe on Russia, Ukraine

Feb 8, 2015

 

MUNICH — Secretary of State John Kerry on Sunday denied any divisions between the U.S. and Europe over how to handle Russia, as Germany announced another high-level summit aimed at stemming the crisis in Ukraine.

 

Kerry told a security conference in Munich that he wanted to “assure everybody there is no division, there is no split” between Washington and its European allies amid the crisis in Ukraine.

 

“We are united, we are working closely together,” he told the conference following meetings with his French and German counterparts. “We all agree that this challenge will not end through military force. We are united in our diplomacy.”

(Source)

It’s not terribly hard to read through that diplomatic double-speak here. The US is “united in our diplomacy” with Europe, even though the US was apparently not invited to be part of the biggest gathering of heads of state on what could be the flash point for a major regional war.

Nice try, John.

There’s a saying that news is never official until it’s denied. Well, I guess that makes it official: there’s an emerging split between the US and Europe over the matter of Russia and Ukraine. And it’s about time.

The key issue, apparently, is that the US, true to form, is ready to send in military arms to the Ukraine regime, and Europe thinks that’s a bad idea for multiple reasons. I could not agree more.

After all, when has the US arming one side of a regional conflict led to regional peace and a good outcome for the citizens of any particular area? If you can’t think of any recent examples, neither can I.  The track record of late is nothing short of being a complete disaster for the people of the various countries involved.  Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Yemen, and Nicaragua come to mind.

But the people of Ukraine have to be kicking themselves right about now. Not only did they fall for the rosy promises of change and hope peddled by the West, they also believed the West would be a better partner for them than Russia.  Worse, instead of finding a way to have both as partners, they adopted the West’s idea that it had to be one or the other. And now their country is being rent apart.

Why We Should Care, Deeply

So what? the average American might ask. Ukraine is half a world away. Who cares what happens there?

Putting aside the humanitarian reasons for not prolonging or intensifying a regional conflict, we risk not just only America’s century-long ties with western Europe, but possibly the next world war. We are pushing our agenda and armaments right up against the Russian border — for reasons that are still completely opaque at this time — and Russia, understandably, will simply not stand for that.

In Part 2: America Vs Russia: What’s At Risk, we explore in depth what’s truly at risk here, why a lasting peace agreement in Ukraine is highly unlikely to happen anytime soon, and the biggest risks concerned citizens in the West should prepare for right now.

Click here to access Part 2 of this report (free executive summary; enrollment required for full access)

 

end

 

 

 

 

Dr Roberts weighs in on the latest Minsk peace deal and he also believes that the ceasefire will not last

 

(courtesy Paul Craig Roberts)

 

The Minsk Peace Deal: Farce Or Sellout?

 

Submitted by Paul Craig Roberts,

Judging by the report on RT I conclude that the Ukraine peace deal worked out in Minsk by Putin, Merkel, Hollande, and Poroshenko has little chance of success.

As Washington is not a partner to the Minsk peace deal, how can there be peace when Washington has made policy decisions to escalate the conflict and to use the conflict as a proxy war between the US and Russia?

The Minsk agreement makes no reference to the announcement by Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges, commander of US Army Europe, that Washington is sending a battalion of US troops to Ukraine to train Ukrainian forces how to fight against Russian and rebel forces. The training is scheduled to begin in March, about two weeks from now. Gen. Hodges says that it is very important to recognize that the Donetsk and Luhansk forces “are not separatists, these are proxies for President Putin.”

How is there a peace deal when Washington has plans underway to send arms and training to the US puppet government in Kiev?

Looking at the deal itself, it is set up to fail. The only parties to the deal who had to sign it are the leaders of the Donetsk and Lugansk break-away republics. The other signers to the Minsk deal are an OSCE representative which is the European group that is supposed to monitor the withdrawal of heavy weapons by both sides, a former Ukrainian president Viktor Kuchma, and the Russian ambassador in Kiev. Neither the German chancellor nor the French, Ukrainian, and Russian presidents who brokered the deal had to sign it.

In other words, the governments of Germany, France, Ukraine, and Russia do not appear to be empowered or required to enforce the agreement. According to RT, “the declaration was not meant to be signed by the leaders, German foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said.”

The terms of the agreement depend on actions of the Ukrainian parliament and prime minister, neither of which are under Poroshenko’s control, and Poroshenko himself is a figurehead under Washington’s control. Moreover, the Ukrainian military does not control the Nazi militias. As Washington and the right-wing elements in Ukraine want conflict with Russia, peace cannot be forthcoming.

The agreement is nothing but a list of expectations that have no chance of occurring.

One expectation is that Ukraine and the republics will negotiate terms for future local elections in the provinces that will bring them back under Ukraine’s legal control. The day after the local elections, but prior to the constitutional reform that provides the regions with autonomy, Kiev takes control of the borders with Ukraine and between the provinces. I read this as the total sell-out of the Donetsk and Lugansk republics. Apparently, that is the way the leaders of the republics see it as well, as Putin had to twist their arms in order to get their signatures to the agreement.

 

Another expectation is that Ukraine will adopt legislation on self-governance that would be acceptable to the republics and declare a general amnesty for the republics’ leaders and military forces.

 

Negotiations between Kiev and the autonomous areas are to take place that restore Kiev’s taxation of the autonomous areas and the provision of social payments and banking services to the autonomous areas.

 

After a comprehensive constitutional reform in Ukraine guaranteeing acceptable (and undefined) autonomy to the republics, Kiev will take control over the provinces’ borders with Russia.

 

By the end of 2015 Kiev will implement comprehensive constitutional reform that decentralizes the Ukrainian political system and provides privileges of autonomy to the Donetsk and Lugansk regions.

 

Both Putin and Poroshenko are both reported as stating that the main thing achieved is a ceasefire starting on February 15.

 

The ceasefire is of no benefit to the Donetsk and Lugansk republics as they are prevailing in the conflict. Moreover, the deal requires the republics’ forces to give up territory and to pull back to the borders of last September and to eject fighters from France and other countries who have come to the aid of the break-away republics. In other words, the agreement erases all of Kiev’s losses from the conflict that Kiev initiated.

All of the risks of the agreement are imposed on the break-away republics and on Putin. The provinces are required to give up all their gains while Washington trains and arms Ukrainian forces to attack the provinces. The republics have to give up their security and trust Kiev long before Kiev votes, assuming it ever does, autonomy for the republics.

Moreover, if the one-sided terms of the Minsk agreement result in failure, Putin and the republics will be blamed.

Why would Putin make such a deal and force it on the republics? If the deal becomes a Russian sell-out of the republics, it will hurt Putin’s nationalist support within Russia and make it easier for Washington to weaken Putin and perhaps achieve regime change. It looks more like a surrender than a fair deal.

Perhaps Putin’s strategy is to give away every advantage in the expectation that the deal will fail, and the Russian government can say “we gave away the store and the deal still failed.”

Washington’s coup in Kiev and the attack on the Russian-speaking Ukrainians in the east and south is part of Washington’s strategy to reassert its uni-power position.Russia’s independent foreign policy and Russia’s growing economic and political relationships with Europe became problems for Washington. Washington is using Ukraine to attack and to demonize Russia and its leader and to break-up Russia’s economic and political relations with Europe. That is what the sanctions are about. A peace deal in Ukraine on any terms other than Washington’s is unacceptable to Washington. The only acceptable deal is a deal that is a defeat for Russia.

It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the Russian government made a strategic mistake when it did not accept the requests of the break-away provinces to be united with Russia. The people in the Donetsk and Lugansk provinces favored unification with the same massive majorities that the people in Crimea showed. If the provinces had been united with Russia, it would have been the end of the conflict. Neither Ukraine nor Washington is going to attack Russian territory.

By failing to end the conflict by unification, Putin set himself up as the punching bag for Western propaganda. The consequence is that over the many months during which the conflict has been needlessly drawn out, Putin has had his image and reputation in the West destroyed. He is the “new Hitler.” He is “scheming to restore the Soviet Empire.” “Russia ranks with ebola and the Islamist State as the three greatest threats.” “RT is a terrorist organization like Boco Haram and the Islamist State.” And so on and on. This CNN interview with Obama conducted by Washington’s presstitute Fareed Zakaria shows the image of Putin based entirely on lies that rules in the West.

Putin could be no more demonized even if the Russian military had invaded Ukraine, conquered it, and reincorporated Ukraine in Russia of which Ukraine was part for centuries prior to the Soviet collapse and Ukraine’s separation from Russia at Washington’s insistence.

The Russian government might want to carefully consider whether Moscow is helping Washington to achieve another victory in Ukraine.

 

 

end

 

Oil related stories

 

 

 

oil rig count is not sufficient to slow USA oil production:

 

(courtesy Goldman Sachs)

 

“The Rig Count Decline Is Not Sufficient To Slow US Production” Goldman Warns

 

While so much has been made of the considerable decline in US rig counts as the driver behind the recent price bounce in oil, Goldman Sachs’ Damien Courvalin pours cold water all over that narrative as he explains that the rig count decline is still not sufficient, in our view, to achieve the slowdown in US production growth required to balance the oil market. Worse yet, he concludes, with the producer hedging that has occurred over the past weeks and the recent wave of equity issuance, the risk that the US production slowdown will be delayed is high, meaning oil prices will need to remain lower in the coming quarters in order for the announced capex guidance and rig reduction to materialize into sufficiently lower production growth.

 

Via Goldman Sachs,

Current rig count implies US production growth of 600 kb/d yoy by 4Q15

US rig count continues to decline The decline in the US oil rig count continued last week with 84 rigs down, comprising 52 horizontal rigs, 18 vertical rigs and 14 directional rigs. Like the prior week, the Permian basin oil posted another significant decline in horizontal rigs, with large cuts in the counties with the highest well productivity. While the momentum in the US rig count cuts suggests that the US rebalancing is on track, recent comments by E&Ps suggest that these indiscriminant rig cuts reflect an initial focus on cost cutting rather than asset optimization (high grading), providing limited information on the future path of the rig count.

Expanding our analysis to the Niobrara

We expand our analysis to include the horizontal rigs of the Niobrara oil play . This allows us to capture 83% of US production growth, vs. 76% with the three big shale plays previously (Permian, Bakken and Eagle Ford). This larger universe further captures 70% of US horizontal oil rigs.

Current US rig count implies US 4Q15 production up 600 kb/d yoy

Applying the methodology that we introduced last week, the current US horizontal rig count implies that US oil production growth from these four major shale plays will reach 600 kb/d yoy by 4Q15, under our assumption of continued trend growth productivity gains at the well and rig level.

Rig Counts’ Snapshot

Bottom-up Approach: Mapping US production back to the county level

In order to quantify the impact of the oil rig count decline, we decompose oil production from the four shale plays considered (Permian, Eagle Ford, Bakken and Niobrara) at the county level, separating the contribution of well and rig performance. We identify for each of the 99 counties (47 in Permian, 15 in Eagle Ford and 18 in Bakken, 19 in Niobrara) the recent rig productivity (wells drilled per rig per month) and well productivity (well production per month) and use the February 13 county level rig count to estimate production from these oil plays. This bottom-up approach matches the EIA’s measure of production relatively well for the Big 3 and Niobrara shale plays. Our county sample still captures 85% of the production growth of these four plays, and ultimately 83% of the US Lower 48 oil production growth in 2014 (Exhibits 5 & 6). We therefore find this bottom-up production breakdown of these four shale plays as a useful barometer to future US production growth.

Caveats: While our analysis does not include vertical rigs, its low count and the corresponding low productivity wells leave us comfortable in leaving them aside for now. We also do not take into account the backlog of uncompleted wells for now, with this likely to have a significantly larger impact and would bring US oil production growth above our estimates.

 

Which leaves 2 scenarios – one static well and rig productivity and one trend well and productivity growth… both slowing down the decline in production growth

 


*  *  *

The Bottom Line – It’s Still not enough

The rig count decline is still not sufficient, in our view, to achieve the slowdown in US production growth required to balance the oil market. The flexibility in cutting non-contracted rigs and associated cost deflation along with the producer hedging that has occurred over the past weeks and the recent wave of equity issuance raise the risk that the US production slowdown will be delayed. As a result, we reiterate our view that oil prices need to remain lower in the coming quarters in order for the announced capex guidance and rig reduction to materialize into sufficiently lower production growth.

 

end

 

(courtesy Michael Snyder)

 

 

 

Why The Price Of Oil Is More Likely To Fall To 20 Rather Than Rise To 80

 

Submitted by Michael Snyder via The Economic Collapse blog,

This is just the beginning of the oil crisis.  Over the past couple of weeks, the price of U.S. oil has rallied back above 50 dollars a barrel.  In fact, as I write this, it is sitting at $52.93.  But this rally will not last.  In fact, analysts at the big banks are warning that we could soon see U.S. oil hit the $20 mark.  The reason for this is that the production of oil globally is still way above the current level of demand.  Things have gotten so bad that millions of barrels of oil are being stored at sea as companies wait for the price of oil to go back up.

But the price is not going to go back up any time soon.  Even though rigs are being shut down in the United States at the fastest pace since the last financial crisis, oil production continues to go up.  In fact, last week more oil was produced in the U.S. than at any time since the 1970s.  This is really bad news for the economy, because the price of oil is already at a catastrophically low level for the global financial system.  If the price of oil stays at this level for the rest of the year, we are going to see a whole bunch of energy companies fail, billions of dollars of debt issued by energy companies could go bad, andtrillions of dollars of derivatives related to the energy industry could implode.  In other words, this is a recipe for a financial meltdown, and the longer the price of oil stays at this level (or lower), the more damage it is going to do.

The way things stand, there is simply just way too much oil sitting out there.  And anyone that has taken Economics 101 knows that when supply far exceeds demand, prices go down…

Oil prices have gotten crushed for the last six months. The extent to which that was caused by an excess of supply or by a slowdown in demand has big implications for where prices will head next. People wishing for a big rebound may not want to read farther.

 

Goldman Sachs released an intriguing analysis on Wednesday that shows what many already suspected: The big culprit in the oil crash has been an abundance of oil flooding the market. A massive supply shock in the second half of last year accounted for most of the decline. In December and January, slowing demand contributed to the continued sell-off.

At this point so much oil has already been stored up that companies are running out of places to put in all.  Just consider the words of Goldman Sachs executiveGary Cohn…

“I think the oil market is trying to figure out an equilibrium price. The danger here, as we try and find an equilibrium price, at some point we may end up in a situation where storage capacity gets very, very limited. We may have too much physical oil for the available storage in certain locations. And it may be a locational issue.”

 

“And you may just see lots of oil in certain locations around the world where oil will have to price to such a cheap discount vis-a-vis the forward price that you make second tier, and third tier and fourth tier storage available.”

 

[…] “You could see the price fall relatively quickly to make that storage work in the market.”

The market for oil has fundamentally changed, and that means that the price of oil is not going to go back to where it used to be.  In fact, Goldman Sachs economist Sven Jari Stehn says that we are probably heading for permanently lower prices…

The big take-away: “[T]he decline in oil has been driven by an oversupplied global oil market,” wrote Goldman economist Sven Jari Stehn. As a result, “the new equilibrium price of oil will likely be much lower than over the past decade.”

So how low could prices ultimately go?

As I mentioned above, some analysts are throwing around $20 as a target number…

The recent surge in oil prices is just a “head-fake,” and oil as cheap as $20 a barrel may soon be on the way, Citigroup said in a report on Monday as it lowered its forecast for crude.

 

Despite global declines in spending that have driven up oil prices in recent weeks, oil production in the U.S. is still rising, wrote Edward Morse, Citigroup’s global head of commodity research. Brazil and Russia are pumping oil at record levels, and Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Iran have been fighting to maintain their market share by cutting prices to Asia. The market is oversupplied, and storage tanks are topping out.

 

A pullback in production isn’t likely until the third quarter, Morse said. In the meantime, West Texas Intermediate Crude, which currently trades at around $52 a barrel, could fall to the $20 range “for a while,” according to the report.

Keep in mind that the price of oil is already low enough to be a total nightmare for the global financial system if it stays here for the rest of 2015.

If we go down to $20 and stay there, a global financial meltdown is virtually guaranteed.

Meanwhile, the “fracking boom” in the United States that generated so many jobs, so much investment and so much economic activity is now turning into a “fracking bust”…

The fracking-for-oil boom started in 2005, collapsed by 60% during the Financial Crisis when money ran out, but got going in earnest after the Fed had begun spreading its newly created money around the land. From the trough in May 2009 to its peak in October 2014, rigs drilling for oil soared from 180 to 1,609: multiplied by a factor of 9 in five years! And oil production soared, to reach 9.2 million barrels a day in January.

It was a great run, but now it is over.

In the months ahead, the trickle of good paying oil industry jobs that are being lost right now is going to turn into a flood.

And this boom was funded with lots and lots of really cheap money from Wall Street.  I like how Wolf Richter described this in a recent article…

That’s what real booms look like. They’re fed by limitless low-cost money – exuberant investors that buy the riskiest IPOs, junk bonds, leveraged loans, and CLOs usually indirectly without knowing it via their bond funds, stock funds, leveraged-loan funds, by being part of a public pension system that invests in private equity firms that invest in the boom…. You get the idea.

As all of this bad paper unwinds, a lot of people are going to lose an extraordinary amount of money.

Don’t get caught with your pants down.  You will want your money to be well away from the energy industry long before this thing collapses.

And of course in so many ways what we are facing right now if very reminiscent of 2008.  So many of the same patterns that have played out just prior to previous financial crashes are happening once again.  Right now, oil rigs are shutting down at a pace that is almost unprecedented.  The only time in recent memory that we have seen anything like this was just before the financial crisis in the fall of 2008.  Here is more from Wolf Richter…

In the latest reporting week, drillers idled another 84 rigs, the second biggest weekly cut ever, after idling 83 and 94 rigs in the two prior weeks. Only 1056 rigs are still drilling for oil, down 443 for the seven reporting weeks so far this year and down 553 – or 34%! – from the peak in October.

 

Never before has the rig count plunged this fast this far:

 

Fracking Bust

 

What if the fracking bust, on a percentage basis, does what it did during the Financial Crisis when the oil rig count collapsed by 60% from peak to trough? It would take the rig count down to 642!

But even though rigs are shutting down like crazy, U.S. production of oil has continued to rise…

Rig counts have long been used to help predict future oil and gas production. In the past week drillers idled 98 rigs, marking the 10th consecutive decline. The total U.S. rig count is down 30 percent since October, an unprecedented retreat. The theory goes that when oil rigs decline, fewer wells are drilled, less new oil is discovered, and oil production slows.

 

But production isn’t slowing yet. In fact, last week the U.S. pumped more crude than at any time since the 1970s. “The headline U.S. oil rig count offers little insight into the outlook for U.S. oil production growth,” Goldman Sachs analyst Damien Courvalin wrote in a Feb. 10 report.

Look, it should be obvious to anyone with even a basic knowledge of economics that the stage is being set for a massive financial meltdown.

This is just the kind of thing that can plunge us into a deflationary depression.  And when you combine this with the ongoing problems in Europe and in Asia, it is easy to see that a “perfect storm” is brewing on the horizon.

Sadly, a lot of people out there will choose not to believe until the day the crisis arrives.

By then, it will be too late to do anything about it.

 

 

end

 

 

 

 

Your more important currency crosses early Tuesday morning:

 

 

Eur/USA 1.1425  up  .0093  (with every country on earth buying euros to support it due to the Greek crisis)

USA/JAPAN YEN 118.77  up .290

GBP/USA 1.5378 up .0024

USA/CAN 1.2380 down .0098

This morning in Europe, the euro is up, trading now just above the 1.14 level at 1.1425 as Europe is supported by other nations keeping the Euro afloat,  Europe reacts to deflation, announcements of massive stimulation,  and the Greek crisis .   In Japan Abe went all in with Abenomics with another round of QE purchasing 80 trillion yen from 70 trillion on Oct 31. The yen continues to trade in yoyo fashion as this morning it settled down again in Japan by 29 basis points and settling just below the 120 barrier to 118.77 yen to the dollar. The pound was up this morning as it now trades well above the 1.53 level at 1.5378.(very worried about the health of Barclays Bank and the FX/precious metals criminal investigation/Dec  12 a new separate criminal investigation on gold,silver oil manipulation). The Canadian dollar was well up again  and is trading  at 1.2380 to the dollar. It seems that the 4 major global carry  trades are being unwound. (1) The total dollar global short is 9 trillion USA, and as such we now witness a sea of red blood on the streets as derivatives blow up with the massive rise in the dollar against all paper currencies.We also have the second big yen carry trade unwind as the yen refuses to blow past the 120 level.(3) the Nikkei vs gold carry trade. (4) short Swiss Franc/long assets  (European housing), the Nikkei, etc. These massive carry trades are terribly offside as they are being unwound. It is  causing deflation as the world reacts to a lack of demand. Bourses around the globe are reacting in kind to these events as well as the potential for a GREXIT.

The NIKKEI: Tuesday morning : down 17.68 or.10%

Trading from Europe and Asia:
1. Europe stocks mixed

2/ Asian bourses mixed    … Chinese bourses: Hang Sang in the green ,Shanghai in the green,  Australia in the red: /Nikkei (Japan) red/India’s Sensex in the green/

Gold very early morning trading: $1221.50

silver:$16.75

 

Early Tuesday morning USA 10 year bond yield: 2.04% !!!  up 3  in basis points from Friday night/ (getting ominous)

USA dollar index early Tuesday morning: 93.92  down 29 cents from Friday’s close.

 

 

This ends the early morning numbers.

 

 

 

And now for your closing numbers for Tuesday:

 

 

 

Closing Portuguese 10 year bond yield: 2.36% down 2 in basis points from Friday

 

Closing Japanese 10 year bond yield: .40% !!! down 2 in basis points from Friday and this is worth watching

 

Your closing Spanish 10 year government bond,  Tuesday up 6 in basis points in yield from Friday night.

Spanish 10 year bond yield: 1.61% !!!!!!

 

Your Tuesday closing Italian 10 year bond yield: 1.67% up 6 in basis points from Friday:

 

 

trading 6 basis points higher than Spain.

 

IMPORTANT CURRENCY CLOSES FOR TODAY

 

Closing currency crosses for Friday night/USA dollar index/USA 10 yr bond:

Euro/USA: 1.1416  up .0084

USA/Japan: 119.30 down .815

Great Britain/USA: 1.5361 up .0007

USA/Canada: 1.2382 down .0033

 

 

The euro rose quite a bit  this afternoon despite the negative news on the Greece crisis and the continual war raging in the Ukraine  (the ceasefire announced for Sunday has been violated).  It was up by 84 basis  points finishing the day well above  the 1.14 level to 1.1416. The yen was well down in the afternoon, and it was down  by closing  to the tune of 82 basis points and closing well above  the 119 cross at 119.30. The British pound gained a little  ground during the afternoon session and was up on  the day closing at 1.5361. The Canadian dollar was up again today due to the higher oil price.  It closed at 1.2382 to the USA dollar

As explained above, the short dollar carry trade is being unwound, the yen carry trade , the Nikkei/gold carry trade, and finally the long dollar/short Swiss franc carry trade are all being unwound and these reversals are  causing massive derivative losses. And as such these massive derivative losses is the powder keg that will destroy the entire financial system. The losses on the oil front will no doubt produce many dead bodies. The last asset still rising are the stock exchanges.

 

 

Your closing 10 yr USA bond yield: 2.15 up 10 in basis points from Friday

(very ominous)

Your closing USA dollar index: 94.07 down 13 cents on the day.

 

 

European and Dow Jones stock index closes:

 

England FTSE  up 41.08 points or 0.60%

Paris CAC up 2.04 or 0.04%

German Dax down  27.61 or 0.25%

Spain’s Ibex up  8.50 or 0.08%

Italian FTSE-MIB up 100.41 or 0.47%

 

 

The Dow: up 2823. or 0.16%

Nasdaq; down 1.57 or 0.03%

 

 

OIL: WTI 53.06 !!!!!!!

Brent: 62.15!!!!

 

 

Closing USA/Russian rouble cross: 62.43 up  3/4  roubles per dollar on the day.

 

closing UKrainian UAH:  (hryvnia)  26.40 UAH to the dollar.

Since November the currency has lost half its value.

 

 

 

And now for your more important USA economic stories for today:

 

Your New York trading for today:

 

(courtesy zero hedge)

 

Stocks Close At Record Highs; Shrug Off Schaeuble Shocker

 

 

When even CNBC is playing ‘our’ song… you just know that “everything is awesome”

 

Early European hours saw US equity futures leap gazelle-like as JPY momo (cough BoJ after their miracle bid stick-save in JGBs earlier in the evening) lifted them on no news… then crappy US data… more Greek asset weakness… Europe flat… and the US Open – BTFAAPL!!!… liftathon… Greek news – Awesome – oh wait that’s no news at all! – forget it BTFATH!!!! and that’s how we reached 2100 in the S&P 500…

From the moment when Greek Talks Failed yesterday…

 

From Friday’s close, a miraculous meltup in th elast minute or two dragged everything green…

 

…ensuring magically that the S&P 500 closes perfectly at 2100!! Are you fucking kidding me?

 

Who needs a VIX smash when you can manipulate the shit out of AAPL at will…

 

Builders and Banks did well (despite crap NAHB sentiment), Utes and Discretionary lagged… Healthcare won overall as Biotechs just bubbled further…

 

All About USDJPY and the BOJ manipulating the shit out of it (via Gold/GOFO, JPY)

 

Credit markets dumped this afternoon

 

Bonds were monkey-hammered… an early safety bid was eviscerated as 30Y yields ripped from -5bps at 2.60 to +8bps at 2.72% – a 13bps intraday swing… but note as Schaeuble poured cold water on the hope, bonds started to rally…

 

Year-To-Date, Treasury yields have round-tripped…now all buty 2Y is higher on the year

 

The USDollar is now unchanged from Friday – given back all of its gains from yesterday on EUR weakness as EURUSD rallied back into the green on the week. JPY was notable under performer…

 

Despite the USD weakness today, gold and silver were unceremoniously dumped to prove that “everything is awesome”… Copper also dipper but Crude – after early weakness went entirely algo-plectic – soaring once again into the NYMEX close…

 

The machines – and thus the central banks – are back in charge of oil… the volume in Silver and Crude during the early carnage suggests this was either total and utter manipulation or a forced close…

 

 

*  *  *

So to summarize: Earnings expectations continue to plunge to 10-month lows… US Macro data is a disaster (worst in world since start of year) at 11-month lows… Ukraine’s cease-fire is not working… The Greek-EU drama has NOT changed as Greece’s request to extend loan with no commitments will be screamed at by Schaeuble “nein nein nein”… Energy stocks are trading at a 28x dot-com-esque multiple… and stocks are at record highs…

 

Charts: Bloomberg

 

 

 

end

 

The West coast backlog continues to worsen:

 

(courtesy Noel Randewich/Reuters)

 

Freighter backlog worsens outside major West Coast ports

BY NOEL RANDEWICH

Cranes and containers are seen at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, California February 6, 2015 in this aerial image. REUTERS/Bob Riha Jr

Cranes and containers are seen at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, California February 6, 2015 in this aerial image.

CREDIT: REUTERS/BOB RIHA JR

RELATED TOPICS

  • U.S. »

(Reuters) – Growing numbers of freighters were backed up around the two busiest U.S. cargo hubs on Sunday because of a dispute between shipping companies and dockworkers that has led to a partial shutdown of ports along the West Coast.

With cargo delays rippling through the U.S. economy, Japanese carmaker Honda Motor Co Ltd said it planned to slow production at some of its North American plants starting on Monday because of a lack of parts from Asia.

Under pressure to address the months-long strife, President Barack Obamaon Saturday dispatched U.S. Labor Secretary Tom Perez to California to help broker an agreement.

By Sunday morning, 34 container ships, tankers and other cargo vessels were waiting to dock at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, California, up from 32 on Saturday, said Lee Peterson, a spokesman for the port of Long Beach.

Cargo ships waiting at anchor and unable to load their goods were visible from highways and beaches for miles along the coast, an unusual spectacle, he said.

Those delays have slowed deliveries of a wide range of goods, from agricultural produce to housewares and apparel, leading retailers to pressure Obama to intervene.

Honda, which had already resorted to transporting some parts by airplane, said it would adjust production at plants making models including the Civic, CR-V, Accord and Acura.

“This is a fluid situation due to the uncertainty of the situation at the West Coast ports,” spokesman Mark Morrison told Reuters by email. “At this time, we do not have a sufficient supply of several critical parts to keep the production lines running smoothly and efficiently.”

The Obama administration’s move to send Perez came after shippers vowed to prevent the loading and unloading of freight through Monday from container ships at the 29 ports, barring a settlement in talks with the dock workers’ union.

The shipping companies said they were unwilling to pay union workers higher wages for weekend shifts and the Presidents’ Day holiday on Monday while productivity declined and cargo backups reached the point of near gridlock, after months of chronic congestion in freight traffic.

The Department of Labor is working on Perez’s schedule, spokeswoman Xochitl Hinojosa said on Sunday.

“The secretary will meet with the parties to urge them to resolve their dispute quickly at the bargaining table,” she said.

On Friday, negotiators for the union representing 20,000 dockworkers at the ports and management’s bargaining agent, the Pacific Maritime Association, agreed to a federal mediator’s request for a 48-hour news blackout. The two sides held a bargaining session on Thursday that marked their first face-to-face meeting in nearly a week.

(Additional reporting by Jeff Mason in Rancho Mirage, Calif.; Editing by Stephen Powell, Nick Zieminski and Peter Cooney)

 

(Reuters) – Growing numbers of freighters were backed up around the two busiest U.S. cargo hubs on Sunday because of a dispute between shipping companies and dockworkers that has led to a partial shutdown of ports along the West Coast.

With cargo delays rippling through the U.S. economy, Japanese carmaker Honda Motor Co Ltd said it planned to slow production at some of its North American plants starting on Monday because of a lack of parts from Asia.

Under pressure to address the months-long strife, President Barack Obamaon Saturday dispatched U.S. Labor Secretary Tom Perez to California to help broker an agreement.

By Sunday morning, 34 container ships, tankers and other cargo vessels were waiting to dock at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, California, up from 32 on Saturday, said Lee Peterson, a spokesman for the port of Long Beach.

Cargo ships waiting at anchor and unable to load their goods were visible from highways and beaches for miles along the coast, an unusual spectacle, he said.

Those delays have slowed deliveries of a wide range of goods, from agricultural produce to housewares and apparel, leading retailers to pressure Obama to intervene.

Honda, which had already resorted to transporting some parts by airplane, said it would adjust production at plants making models including the Civic, CR-V, Accord and Acura.

“This is a fluid situation due to the uncertainty of the situation at the West Coast ports,” spokesman Mark Morrison told Reuters by email. “At this time, we do not have a sufficient supply of several critical parts to keep the production lines running smoothly and efficiently.”

The Obama administration’s move to send Perez came after shippers vowed to prevent the loading and unloading of freight through Monday from container ships at the 29 ports, barring a settlement in talks with the dock workers’ union.

The shipping companies said they were unwilling to pay union workers higher wages for weekend shifts and the Presidents’ Day holiday on Monday while productivity declined and cargo backups reached the point of near gridlock, after months of chronic congestion in freight traffic.

The Department of Labor is working on Perez’s schedule, spokeswoman Xochitl Hinojosa said on Sunday.

“The secretary will meet with the parties to urge them to resolve their dispute quickly at the bargaining table,” she said.

On Friday, negotiators for the union representing 20,000 dockworkers at the ports and management’s bargaining agent, the Pacific Maritime Association, agreed to a federal mediator’s request for a 48-hour news blackout. The two sides held a bargaining session on Thursday that marked their first face-to-face meeting in nearly a week.

(Additional reporting by Jeff Mason in Rancho Mirage, Calif.; Editing by Stephen Powell, Nick Zieminski and Peter Cooney)

 

 

end

 

USA home builder sentiment continues to falter:

 

(courtesy zero hedge)

 

Homebuilder Sentiment Slides, Buyer Traffic Plunges, Weather Blamed

 

Homebuilder Sentiment slipped from 57 to 55 in February – missing extyrapolated expectations of a 58 print by the most in over 6 months. Present sales slipped very modestly, future expectations remained flat (and hope-strewn) as Prospective Buyers Traffic tumbled from 44 to 39. Of course, the blame for this weakness and dramatic drop in prospective buyer traffic – The Weather!! Except we note that the Northeast region (one of the hardest hit by the storms) rose from 43 to 48.

 

Buyer traffic tumbled…

 

But the Northeast region saw an improvement (even as Midwest did suffer)…

 

“Overall, builder sentiment remains fairly solid, with this slight downturn largely attributable to the unusually high snow levels across much of the nation,” said NAHB Chairman Tom Woods, a home builder from Blue Springs, Mo.

*  *  *

So The Weather hurt Midwest traffic BUT did actually helped NorthEast traffic?

 

Charts: Bloomberg

 

end

 

The all important Empire index (New York Manufacturing Index) misses again as the economy continues to falter:

 

(courtesy Empire index/zero hedge)

 

Empire Fed Slides, Misses As New Orders Tumble And Hope Collapses

 

Following January’s bounce back from December’s collapse to 2-year lows, Empire Fed fell back modestly in Feb. Against expectations of a small drop to 8.00 (from 9.95), it printed 7.78 – basically flat now for 2 years. Under the hood things are a lot more concerning as New Orders tumbled from 6.09 to 1.22 and number of employees slipped from 13.68 to 10.11. What is perhaps the most concerning for the ever-hopeful multiple expanding dreams of equity market wealth, future business expectations collapsed from 48.35 to 25.58– the biggest drop since Jan 09 (along with a plunge in expected workweek from 11.58 to 1.22).

 

Empire Fed has gone nowhere in 2 years…

 

As “hope” collapse at its fastest pace since Jan 09…

 

Firms Less Optimistic

Indexes assessing the six-month outlook, though generally positive, conveyed considerably less optimism about future business activity than in recent months. The index for future general business conditions plunged twenty-three points to 25.6, its lowest level in more than two years. The future new orders and shipments indexes also posted significant declines. The future prices paid index fell several points to 27.0, and the future prices received index declined ten points to 5.6, its lowest level in more than five years. The index for expected number of employees, though lower, remained positive at 24.7. The capital expenditures index surged eighteen points to 32.6, its highest level in more than three years, and the technology spending index rose to 19.1.

Margin collapse

Empire Fed future prices received declined ten points to 5.6, its lowest level in more than five years

Charts: Bloomberg

 

 

end

 

 

Wolf Richter comments on the huge rise in the USA inventories which are not matched by sales.  We are reaching an area not seen since 2009, the Lehman  moment…

 

a must read..

 

(courtesy Wolf Richter/David Stockman’s Contra Corner)

 

http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com/something-rotten-is-piling-up-inventorysales-ratio-highest-since-september-2008/

David Stockman’s Contra Corner

 

 

Something Rotten is Piling up

Inventory Sales Ratio highest since 2008:

by Wolf Richter • February 13, 2015

We do have more work to do in the US,” admitted John Bryant, CEO of Kellogg’s which makes Pringles, Pop Tarts, Kashi Cereal, and a million other things that consumers are increasingly reluctant or unable to buy. He was trying to explain the crummy quarterly results and the big-fat operating loss of $422 million, along with a lousy outlook that sent its stock careening down 4.5% during the rest of the day.

A peculiar side note: he also said that the “Russian business posted good results in the quarter and for the full year” – despite the ruble crash and whatever sanctions might have gotten in the way.

Then in the evening, ConAgra, with brands like Healthy Choice for consumers and something yummy they call “commercial food” for restaurants, cut its fiscal 2015 earnings guidance, citing a laundry list of problems, including the “strengthening dollar” and “a higher-than-planned mark-to-market loss from certain commodity index hedges.” But it blamed two operating issues “for the majority of the EPS cut: “a highly competitive bidding environment” and “execution shortfalls.”

 

 

After which confession time still wasn’t over: it would be “evaluating the need” for additional write-offs. What had gone well? Cost cutting – “strong SG&A efficiencies,” the statement called it. But the pandemic cost-cutting by corporate America represents wages and other companies’ sales.

It’s tough out there for companies that have to deal with the over-indebted, under-employed, strung-out American consumers with fickle loyalties and finicky tastes, who have been subjected to this corporate cost-cutting for years.

And so retail sales, according to the Commerce Department, dropped a seasonally adjusted 0.8% in January. That’s on top of a 0.9% decline in December. The hitherto inconceivable is happening: folks are saving money on gas, but not everyone is immediately spending all that money! It’s so inconceivable that I warned about it and other effects of the oil price crash two months ago: “Wall Street promises a big boost to US GDP,” I wrote. “What have these folks been smoking?”

But even excluding gasoline sales, retail sales were flat last month after edging down 0.2% in December. And sure, some of the savings from gasoline will be spent eventually, but there are plenty of Americans with enough money left over every month to where their spending patterns aren’t influenced by the price of gas.

But this report, an advance estimate that is subject to potentially large revisions, covers only spending at retailers and restaurants, a portion of total consumer spending, which includes healthcare and anything else that consumers pay out of their noses for. And year-over-year, retail sales actually rose 3.3%, with food services sales up 11.3%, auto sales up 10.7% thanks to prodigious subprime financing, while sales at gas stations sagged 23.5%.

So from just the retail sales report, the consumer situation remains murky.

But there is another gauge that is moving deeper and deeper into the red. It has been deteriorating consistently since last summer. A couple of days ago, I reported that wholesale inventories were ballooning in relationship to sales, a red flag in our era when just-in-time delivery and lean inventories have been honed into an art to minimize how much working capital and physical space gets tied up. The crucial inventories-to-sales ratio for wholesalers had reached the highest level since the financial crisis.

Now the Commerce Department released total business sales and inventories for December, which include sales and inventories at retailers, wholesalers, and manufactures – the entire channel. And it’s even worse.

Combined sales by retailers, wholesalers, and manufacturers, adjusted seasonally but not for price changes, totaled a $1,331.2 billion, down 0.9% from November, and up only 0.9% from December 2013 – not even beating inflation.

Retailers were able to keep their inventories stable in relationship to sales, which inched up 2.6% year-over-year. So the inventory-to-sales ratio remained at 1.43.

Further up the channel, wholesalers saw sales rise only 1.43%, but their inventories stacked up, and the inventories-to-sales ratio hit 1.22, up from 1.16 a year earlier.

And manufactures? That great “manufacturing renaissance” in the US? Year over year, sales declined 0.9%, but inventories rose 2.7%, and the inventories-to-sales ratio jumped to 1.34 from 1.29 a year earlier.

For all three combined, the inventories-to-sales ratio rose to 1.33 in December, after climbing methodically since the summer. The last time it was rising to this level was in September 2009 – the Lehman Moment – when sales up the entire channel were beginning to grind to a near halt, a terrible condition that morphed into the Great Recession. That propitious September, the inventories-to-sales reached 1.32, still a smidgen below where it is today:

US-Business-inventories-sales-ratio-2005_2014-Dec

Optimistic merchants and manufacturers expect sales to rise. They plan for it and order accordingly. If sales boom and draw down inventories, the inventories-to-sales ratio remains lean. That’s the rosy scenario. But that hasn’t been happening recently.

In our less rosy reality, sales are not keeping up with expectations, and inventories are piling up. The increase in inventories adds to GDP, and so from that point of view, they beautify the numbers. But from the business point of view, growing inventories caused by lagging sales can turn into a nightmare. And unless sales can somehow be cranked up for all businesses across the entire country to bring down these inventories, orders to suppliers will be trimmed – and that ricochets nastily around the economy with all kinds of unpleasant secondary fireworks.

“Here in Houston a number of projects have been canceled, engineers are put on ‘hold,’ and everyone is waiting for the other shoe to drop,” an engineer in the energy sector wrote. “Not pushing the panic button by any means” is how the Texas banking regulator phrased it. But it’s looming in front of everyone. Read… Oil Bust Hits Office Construction Boom, Banks, Suppliers – But Hey, “So Far” No Apocalypse

end

 

Michael Snyder picks up on Wolf Richter’s analysis of the large inventory buildup and we are record inventory per sales ratios.  This has happened just prior to the collapse of 2008.  The second is a sharp rise in the 10 year treasuries.
Michael Snyder believes that these two events are harbingers of a financial collapse happening shortly.
(courtesy Michael Snyder)

Two More Harbingers Of Financial Doom That Mirror The Crisis Of 2008

Submitted by Michael Snyder via The Economic Collapse blog,

The stock market continues to flirt with new record highs,but the signs that we could be on the precipice of the next major financial crisis continue to mount.  Acouple of days ago, I discussed the fact that the U.S. dollar is experiencing a tremendous surge in value just like it did in the months prior to the financial crisis of 2008.  And previously, I have detailed how the price of oilhas collapsed, prices for industrial commodities are tanking and market behavior is becoming extremely choppy.

All of these are things that we witnessed just before the last market crash as well.  It is also important to note that orders for durable goods are declining and the Baltic Dry Index has dropped to the lowest level on record.  So does all of this mean that the stock market is guaranteed to crash in 2015?  No, of course not.  But what we are looking for are probabilities.  We are looking for patterns.  There are multiple warning signs that have popped up repeatedly just prior to previous financial crashes, and many of those same warning signs are now appearing once again.

One of these warning signs that I have not discussed previously is the wholesale inventories to sales ratio.  When economic activity starts to slow down, inventory tends to get backed up.  And that is precisely what is happening right now.  In fact, as Wolf Richter recently wrote about, the wholesale inventories to sales ratio has now hit a level that we have not seen since the last recession…

In December, the wholesale inventory/sales ratio reached 1.22, after rising consistently since July last year, when it was 1.17. It is now at the highest – and worst – level since September 2009, as the financial crisis was winding down:

 

Wolf Richter

 

Rising sales gives merchants the optimism to stock more. But because sales are rising in that rosy scenario, the inventory/sales ratio, depicting rising inventories and rising sales, would not suddenly jump. But in the current scenario, sales are not keeping up with inventory growth.

Another sign that I find extremely interesting is the behavior of the yield on 10 year U.S. Treasury notes.  As Jeff Clark recently explained, we usually see a spike in the 10 year Treasury yield about the time the market is peaking before a crash…

The 10-year Treasury note yield bottomed on January 30 at 1.65%. Today, it’s at 2%. That’s a 35-basis-point spike – a jump of 21% – in less than two weeks.

And it’s the first sign of an impending stock market crash.

 

10 Year Yield - Stansberry

 

And the 30Y was even worse…

 

 

 

As I explained last September, the 10-year Treasury note yield has ALWAYS spiked higher prior to an important top in the stock market.

 

For example, the 10-year yield was just 4.5% in January 1999. One year later, it was 6.75% – a spike of 50%. The dot-com bubble popped two months later.

In 2007, rates bottomed in March at 4.5%. By July, they had risen to 5.5% – a 22% increase. The stock market peaked in September.

 

Let’s be clear… not every spike in Treasury rates leads to an important top in the stock market. But there has always been a sharp spike in rates a few months before the top.

Once again, just because something has happened in the past does not mean that it will happen in the future.

But the fact that so many red flags are appearing all at once has got to give any rational person reason for concern.

Yes, the Dow gained more than 100 points on Thursday.  But on Thursday we also learned that retail sales dropped again in January.  Overall, this has been the worst two month drop in retail sales since 2009…

Following last month’s narrative-crushing drop in retail sales, despite all that low interest rate low gas price stimulus, January was more of the same as hopeful expectations for a modest rebound were denied. Falling 0.8% (against a 0.9% drop in Dec), missing expectations of -0.4%, this is the worst back-to-back drop in retail sales since Oct 2009. Retail sales declined in 6 of the 13 categories.

And economic activity is rapidly slowing down on the other side of the planet as well.

For example, Chinese imports and exports both fell dramatically in January…

Chinese imports collapsed 19.9% YoY in January, missing expectations of a modest 3.2% drop by the most since Lehman. This is the biggest YoY drop since May 2009 and worst January since the peak of the financial crisis. Exports tumbled 3.3% YoY (missing expectations of 5.9% surge) for the worst January since 2009. Combined this led to a $60.03 billion trade surplus in January – the largest ever. But apart from these massive imbalances, everything is awesome in the global economy (oh apart from The Baltic Dry at record lows, Iron Ore near record lows, oil prices crashed, and the other engine of the world economy – USA USA USA – imploding).

In light of so much bad economic data, it boggles my mind that stocks have been doing so well.

 

But this is typical bubble behavior.  Financial bubbles tend to be very irrational and they tend to go on a lot longer than most people think they will.  When they do finally burst, the consequences are often quite horrifying.

It may not seem like it to most people, but we are right on track for a major financial catastrophe.  It is playing out right in front of our eyes in textbook fashion.  But it is going to take a little while to unfold.

Unfortunately, most people these days do not have the patience to watch long-term trends develop. Instead, we have been trained by the mainstream media to have the attention spans of toddlers.  We bounce from one 48-hour news cycle to the next, eagerly looking forward to the next “scandal” that is going to break.

And when the next financial crash does strike, the mainstream media is going to talk about what a “surprise” it is.  But for those that are watching the long-term trends, it is not going to be a surprise at all.  We will have seen it coming a mile away.

 

 

 

end

 

 

 

We  will see you on Wednesday.

bye for now

Harvey,

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
Like Loading...

Related

One comment

  1. Maury Hafernik's avatar
    Maury Hafernik · February 18, 2015 - 4:05 am · Reply→

    Why does so much of your text show in such VERY light print? This makes reading it very difficult

    LikeLike

Leave a comment Cancel reply

← Feb 13/GLD loses 3.25 tonnes/SLV remains same/No real change in the Greek crisis/Ukraine still a battleground/Isis attack close to USA base/
Feb 18/Small withdrawal of .3 tonnes at GLD/no changes at SLV/Fed to keep “patience” longer before raising rates/ECB blinks and raises ELA for Greek banks by 3 billion euros/Sovereign Greece has only one week of cash left./Western ports in chaos/ →

Donate

Click here if you wish to send a donation. I sincerely appreciate it as this site takes a lot of preparation.

Archive

Spot Gold

Spot Silver

Blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Comment
  • Reblog
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • harveyorganblog.com
    • Join 235 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • harveyorganblog.com
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d