GOLD: $1267.75 up $11.45
Silver: $17.33 up 21 cent(s)
Closing access prices:
Gold $1267.11
silver: $17.35
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
SHANGHAI GOLD FIX: FIRST FIX 10 15 PM EST (2:15 SHANGHAI LOCAL TIME)
SECOND FIX: 2:15 AM EST (6:15 SHANGHAI LOCAL TIME)
SHANGHAI FIRST GOLD FIX: $1266.89 DOLLARS PER OZ
NY PRICE OF GOLD AT EXACT SAME TIME: 1255.55
PREMIUM FIRST FIX: $10.34
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
SECOND SHANGHAI GOLD FIX: $1265.00
NY GOLD PRICE AT THE EXACT SAME TIME: 1265.90
Premium of Shanghai 2nd fix/NY:$12.38
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
LONDON FIRST GOLD FIX: 5:30 am est $1257.10
NY PRICING AT THE EXACT SAME TIME: $1257.25
LONDON SECOND GOLD FIX 10 AM: $1265.85
NY PRICING AT THE EXACT SAME TIME. $1266.60
For comex gold:
MAY/
NOTICES FILINGS TODAY FOR APRIL CONTRACT MONTH: 1 NOTICE(S) FOR 100 OZ.
TOTAL NOTICES SO FAR: 529 FOR 52900 OZ (1.6457 TONNES)
For silver:
For silver: MAY
21 NOTICES FILED TODAY FOR 105,000 OZ/
Total number of notices filed so far this month: 4615 for 23,035,000 oz
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
END
We have now entered options expiry week:
options expiry on the OTC/LBMA gold/silver contracts: May 31/2017 at around 12 noon.
The big news of the day is the huge open interest at the gold comex for the upcoming June delivery month. We may have a monstrous amount of gold ounces seeking delivery. We have so far 126,399 contracts still standing vs last yr’s 88,374 with 2 days to go before first day notice. This should be interesting to watch!
Let us have a look at the data for today
.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In silver, the total open interest FELL BY 1,585 contract(s) DOWN to 201,865 DESPITE THE RISE IN PRICE OF SILVER THAT TOOK PLACE WITH YESTERDAY’S TRADING (UP 9 CENT(S). IT IS OBVIOUS THAT WE ARE GETTING SOME BANKER SHORT COVERING IN CONJUNCTION WITH BANKER DELTA HEDGING. In ounces, the OI is still represented by just OVER 1 BILLION oz i.e. 1.0099 BILLION TO BE EXACT or 144% of annual global silver production (ex Russia & ex China).
FOR THE NEW FRONT MAY MONTH/ THEY FILED: 21 NOTICE(S) FOR 105,000 OZ OF SILVER
In gold, the total comex gold ROSE BY 2983 contracts WITH THE RISE IN THE PRICE OF GOLD ($2.95 with YESTERDAY’S TRADING). The total gold OI stands at 473,848 contracts. SO FAR WE HAVE NOT HAD OUR USUAL OBLITERATION OF OPEN INTEREST AS WE ENTER FIRST DAY NOTICE. I WILL BE MONITORING THIS!! THE BANKERS SUPPLIED THE NECESSARY SHORT PAPER IN TOTAL CONTRAST TO SILVER. WE MAY HAVE WITNESSED SOME OF THOSE LONG CALLS HIDDEN IN THE EFP’S BEING EXERCISED FOR THE JUNE CONTRACT MONTH
we had 1 notice(s) filed upon for 100 oz of gold.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
With respect to our two criminal funds, the GLD and the SLV:
GLD:
We had no changes in tonnes of gold at the GLD
Inventory rests tonight: 847.45 tonnes
.
SLV
Today: another huge changes in inventory/another withdrawal of 946,000 oz with the price of silver rising?
THE SLV Inventory rests at: 340.976 million oz
Here is a strange fact for the CFTC to price discover:
when the record OI occurred on April 21, the price of silver was at $18.42 (OI record 234,000 contracts. Interestingly the SLV inventory on April 21 was 325 million oz and today it is 340 million dollars and the price of silver is $1.09 less. And the comex is a price discovery mechanism????
end
.
First, here is an outline of what will be discussed tonight:
1. Today, we had the open interest in silver FELL BY 1,585 contract DOWN TO 201,865, (AND now moving away from THE NEW COMEX RECORD SET ON FRIDAY/APRIL 21/2017 AT 234,787), WITH THE RISE IN PRICE FOR SILVER WITH YESTERDAY’S TRADING (9 CENTS). NO QUESTION THAT WE HAD SHORT COVERING BY THE BANKERS ALONG WITH SOME BANKER DELTA HEDGING.
(report Harvey)
.
2.a) The Shanghai and London gold fix report
(Harvey)
2 b) Gold/silver trading overnight Europe, Goldcore
(Mark O’Byrne/zerohedge
and in NY: Bloomberg
3. ASIAN AFFAIRS
i)Late THURSDAY night/FRIDAY morning: Shanghai closed UP 2.28 POINTS OR 0.07% / /Hang Sang CLOSED UP 8.49 POINTS OR 0.03% The Nikkei closed DOWN 126.29 POINTS OR 0.64%/Australia’s all ordinaires CLOSED DOWN 0.64%/Chinese yuan (ONSHORE) closed WELL UP at 6.8560/Oil DOWN to 48.63 dollars per barrel for WTI and 51.06 for Brent. Stocks in Europe OPENED IN THE RED ..Offshore yuan trades 6.8224 yuan to the dollar vs 6.85603 for onshore yuan. NOW THE OFFSHORE IS HUGELY STRONGER TO THE ONSHORE YUAN/ ONSHORE YUAN STRONGER (TO THE DOLLAR) AND THE OFFSHORE YUAN IS A MUCH STRONGER TO THE DOLLAR AND THIS IS COUPLED WITH THE SLIGHTLY WEAKER DOLLAR. CHINA NOT HAPPY WITH THE NEWS THAT ITS DEBT HAS BEEN DOWNGRADED BUT IS HAPPY WITH THE WEAKER DOLLAR/CHINA UNDERGOES MASSIVE INTERVENTION LAST NIGHT
3a)THAILAND/SOUTH KOREA/NORTH KOREA
i)NORTH KOREA/SOUTH KOREA
b) REPORT ON JAPAN
c) REPORT ON CHINA
i)CHINA/GREAT BRITAIN
huge story last night: the yuan rises sharply on Chinese central bank intervention and cable (British Pound/USA dollar) cracks on poor confidence numbers ahead of the British June election
( zero hedge)
ii) China/USA
(courtesy zero hedge)
4. EUROPEAN AFFAIRS
5. RUSSIAN AND MIDDLE EASTERN AFFAIRS
i)EGYPT
This saddens me greatly; Gunman kills 23 Coptic Christians in an Egyptian attack, many of whom are children. The attack occurred in Minya, 140 miles south of Egypt
( zerohedge)
ii)ESTONIA/RUSSIA
This does not look good. Estonia which borders with Russia and is a firm NATO country expels two Russian diplomats and no reasons given. Russia responds that this unfriendly action will not go unanswered. Remember the Estonia has weapons pointing towards Russia
( zero hedge)
6 .GLOBAL ISSUES
ESPN/Sports’ Bubble
A great commentary on another bubble bursting: the sports bubble and ESPN
( William Anderson/Mises Institute)
7. OIL ISSUES
i)Finally Wall Street gets the picture and throws up on OPEC. Barclay’s is very negative on the future of oil pricing as they see no light at the end of the tunnel
( zero hedge)
ii)This ought to be “good” for the price of oil: USA crude production hits a 21 month high and rig counts rises for the 19th straight week;
( zero hedge)
8. EMERGING MARKET
9. PHYSICAL MARKETS
( GATA/Jim Rickards)
iv)An important commentary from Ronan Manly on gold withdrawals from the Shanghai gold Exchange
(Ronan Manly/GATA)
v) Gresham’s Law to almost perfection (they left out gold and silver) as Bitcoin rises to 2,600 per coin
( zero hedge)
v b) Then Bitcoin crashed again late in the day:
(zero hedge)
vi)A good start: now we need to see the other 49 states peal state capital gain taxes on gold and silver as well as other countries:
( SchiffGold.com)
vii)In the latest data from Swiss exports of refined gold, India tops the list for the 4th consecutive month. Total for the last 4 months: 167.2 tonnes. Normally Switzerland supplies around 47% of India’s gold needs. Thus you can safely say that India will import another round of 1000+ tonnes of gold. Also remember that this is recorded gold. India smuggles a huge amount of gold into the country to avoid the 10% tax.
( Lawrie Williams/Sharp Pixley)
10. USA stories
i)My goodness: this is ridiculous. Washington Post writes that Kushner is under FBI scrutiny. The facts suggest otherwise:
( zero hedge)
ii)Trump will appeal the travel ban to the Supreme Court
( zero hedge)
iii)Trump takes on the Germans with their huge trade surplus with the uSA. Trump vows to stop this
( zerohedge)
iv)A bill in California to raise the minimum wage to $15.00 will no doubt cause a huge number of teenagers to be fired especially if the Democrats wins Congress in 2018.
( zero hedge)
( zerohedge)
(courtesy zero hedge)
( zero hedge)
viii) Soft data report U. of Michigan confidence report shows a huge divide between Republicans and Democrats. However what it does agree with on both sides, it that it is time to sell your house
(courtesy zero hedge)
ix)FISA court blasts the FBI for their disregard for rules and illegally shares spy data with private contractors
( zerohedge)
x)The G7 leaders got nowhere with Trump to back a climate deal and that was to be expected.
(courtesy zero hedge)
Let us head over to the comex:
The total gold comex open interest ROSE BY 2,983 CONTRACTS UP to an OI level of 473,848 WITH THE RISE IN THE PRICE OF GOLD ( $2.90 with YESTERDAY’S trading). SO FAR WE HAVE NOT HAVE OUR USUAL OBLITERATION OF OPEN INTEREST AS WE ENTER FIRST DAY NOTICE. I WILL BE MONITORING THIS!! THE BANKERS SUPPLIED THE NECESSARY SHORT PAPER AS LONGS STAMPEDED INTO THE GOLD ARENA YESTERDAY. WE MAY HAVE ALSO WITNESSED THE EXERCISING OF LONG CALLS IN THE JUNE GOLD CONTRACT MONTH. We are now in the contract month of MAY and it is one of the POORER delivery months of the year. In this MAY delivery month we had A LOSS OF 7 contract(s) FALLING TO 23. We had 4 notices filed yesterday so we LOST 3 GOLD CONTRACTS OR AN ADDITIONAL 300 gold ounce will NOT stand for delivery and 3 contracts were cash settled through the EFP route where they receive a cash bonus plus a future gold contract.
The next big active month is June/2017 and here the OI LOST A MUCH SMALLER THAN ANTICIPATED 25,527 contracts DOWN to 126,399. The non active July contract GAINED another 6 contracts to stand at 1510 contracts. The next big active month is August and here the OI gained 26,264 contracts up to 211,005. FIRST DAY NOTICE IS WEDNESDAY MAY 31.2017 AND WE HAVE TWO MORE READING DAYS AFTER TODAY: TUESDAY AND WEDNESDAY.
OH OH!! WE HAVE NOW SURPASSED last year’s huge open interest as on May 26 2016 we had at this exact time: 88,374 contracts of JUNE 2016 CONTRACTS OPEN.( compared to JUNE 2017: 126,399)WITH EXACTLY 2 DAYS TO GO BEFORE FIRST DAY NOTICE FOR BOTH YEARS.
For the June 2016 contract month initially 48.189 tonnes stood for delivery. Eventually a huge 48.552 tonnes stood.
TONIGHT OUR BANKER FRIENDS ARE QUITE NERVOUS WHEN THEY LOOK OUT THE WINDOW AND SEE THE HIGH OPEN INTEREST THAT IS STILL STANDING IN GOLD FOR JUNE 2017.
We had 1 notice(s) filed upon today for 100 oz
The non active June contract LOST 67 contracts to stand at 623. The next big active month will be July and here the OI LOST 3035 contracts DOWN to 142,224.
For those keeping score, the initial amount of silver oz that stood for delivery for the May 2016 contract month: 28.01 million oz. By conclusion of the month only 13.58 million oz stood and the rest was cash settled.(EFP ROUTE)
The line in the sand is $18.50 for silver and again it has been defended by the criminal bankers. Once this level is pierced, the monstrous billion oz of silver shorts will blow up. The bankers are defending the Alamo with their last stand at the $18.50 mark. THE NEW RECORD HIGH IN OPEN INTEREST WAS SET FRIDAY APRIL 21/2017 AT: 234,787.
We had 21 notice(s) filed for 105,000 oz for the MAY 2017 contract
VOLUMES: for the gold comex
Today the estimated volume was 218,091 contracts which is FAIR
Yesterday’s confirmed volume was 275,167 contracts which is GOOD (BUT MANY ROLLOVERS).
volumes on gold are STILL HIGHER THAN NORMAL!
| Gold | Ounces |
| Withdrawals from Dealers Inventory in oz | nil |
| Withdrawals from Customer Inventory in oz |
nil
|
| Deposits to the Dealer Inventory in oz | nil oz |
| Deposits to the Customer Inventory, in oz |
NIL
|
| No of oz served (contracts) today |
1 notice(s)
100 OZ
|
| No of oz to be served (notices) |
22 contracts
2200 oz
|
| Total monthly oz gold served (contracts) so far this month |
529 notices
52900 oz
1.6457 tonnes
|
| Total accumulative withdrawals of gold from the Dealers inventory this month | NIL oz |
| Total accumulative withdrawal of gold from the Customer inventory this month | 230,129.2 oz |
Today, 0 notice(s) were issued from JPMorgan dealer account and 0 notices were issued from their client or customer account. The total of all issuance by all participants equates to 1 contract(s) of which 0 notices were stopped (received) by jPMorgan dealer and 0 notice(s) was (were) stopped/ Received) by jPMorgan customer account.
March 2016: 2.311 tonnes (March is a non delivery month)
| Silver | Ounces |
| Withdrawals from Dealers Inventory | nil |
| Withdrawals from Customer Inventory |
1,353,429.270 oz
Brinks
SCOTIA
JPMorgan
|
| Deposits to the Dealer Inventory |
nil oz
|
| Deposits to the Customer Inventory |
559,691.100 oz
HSBC
|
| No of oz served today (contracts) |
21 CONTRACT(S)
(105,000 OZ)
|
| No of oz to be served (notices) |
20 contracts
( 100,000 oz)
|
| Total monthly oz silver served (contracts) | 4615 contracts (23,075,000 oz) |
| Total accumulative withdrawal of silver from the Dealers inventory this month | NIL oz |
| Total accumulative withdrawal of silver from the Customer inventory this month | 8,111,049.1 oz |
| Gold COT Report – Futures | ||||||
| Large Speculators | Commercial | Total | ||||
| Long | Short | Spreading | Long | Short | Long | Short |
| 241,752 | 81,985 | 63,428 | 112,114 | 286,405 | 417,294 | 431,818 |
| Change from Prior Reporting Period | ||||||
| 20,220 | -12,823 | 8,769 | -1,605 | 29,827 | 27,384 | 25,773 |
| Traders | ||||||
| 167 | 95 | 97 | 51 | 59 | 259 | 217 |
| Small Speculators | ||||||
| Long | Short | Open Interest | ||||
| 45,278 | 30,754 | 462,572 | ||||
| 167 | 1,778 | 27,551 | ||||
| non reportable positions | Change from the previous reporting period | |||||
| COT Gold Report – Positions as of | Tuesday, May 23, 2017 | |||||
| Silver COT Report: Futures | |||||
| Large Speculators | Commercial | ||||
| Long | Short | Spreading | Long | Short | |
| 96,531 | 45,358 | 27,962 | 53,195 | 117,182 | |
| -3,611 | -11,780 | -2,371 | -2,417 | 4,233 | |
| Traders | |||||
| 102 | 52 | 46 | 35 | 37 | |
| Small Speculators | Open Interest | Total | |||
| Long | Short | 203,459 | Long | Short | |
| 25,771 | 12,957 | 177,688 | 190,502 | ||
| -3,269 | -1,750 | -11,668 | -8,399 | -9,918 | |
| non reportable positions | Positions as of: | 155 | |||
NPV for Sprott and Central Fund of Canada
Sprott’s hostile 3.1 billion bid to take over Central Fund of Canada
(courtesy Sprott/GATA)
Sprott makes hostile $3.1 billion bid for Central Fund of Canada
Submitted by cpowell on Thu, 2017-03-09 01:19. Section: Daily Dispatches
From the Canadian Press
via Canadian Broadcasting Corp. News, Toronto
Wednesday, March 8, 2017
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/sprott-takeover-bid-central-fund-c…
Toronto-based Sprott Inc. said Wednesday it’s making an all-share hostile takeover bid worth $3.1 billion US for rival bullion holder Central Fund of Canada Ltd.
The money-management firm has filed an application with the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta seeking to allow shareholders of Calgary-based Central Fund to swap their shares for ones in a newly-formed trust that would be substantially similar to Sprott’s existing precious metal holding entities.
The company is going through the courts after its efforts to strike a friendly deal were rebuffed by the Spicer family that controls Central Fund, said Sprott spokesman Glen Williams.
“They weren’t interested in having those discussions,” Williams said.
Sprott is using the courts to try to give holders of the 252 million non-voting class A shares a say in takeover bids, which Central Fund explicitly states they have no right to participate in. That voting right is reserved for the 40,000 common shares outstanding, which the family of J.C. Stefan Spicer, chairman and CEO of Central Fund, control.
If successful through the courts, Sprott would then need the support of two-thirds of shareholder votes to close the takeover deal, but there’s no guarantee they will make it that far.
“It is unusual to go this route,” said Williams. “There’s no specific precedent where this has worked.”
Sprott did have success last year in taking over Central GoldTrust, a similar fund that was controlled by the Spicer family, after securing support from more than 96 percent of shareholder votes cast.
The firm says Central Fund’s shares are trading at a discount to net asset value and a takeover by Sprott could unlock US$304 million in shareholder value.
Central Fund did not have any immediate comment on the unsolicited offer. Williams said Sprott had not yet heard from Central Fund on the proposal but that some shareholders had already contacted them to voice their support.
Sprott’s existing precious metal holding companies are designed to allow investors to own gold and other metals without having to worry about taking care of the physical bullion.
end
And now the Gold inventory at the GLD
May 26./no change in inventory at the GLD/Inventory rests at 847.45 tonnes
May 25./no change in inventory at the GLD/Inventory rests at 847.45 tonnes
May 24/no change in inventory at the GLD/inventory rests at 847.45 tonnes
May 23/a paper withdrawal of 5.03 tonnes of gold from the GLD/Inventory rests at 847.45 tonnes
May 22/A DEPOSIT OF 1.77 TONNES IN GOLD INVENTORY AT THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 852.48 TONNES
May 19/NO CHANGE IN GOLD INVENTORY AT THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 850.71 TONNES
May 18/a withdrawal of 1.18 tonnes of gold from the GLD/Inventory rests at 850.71
May 17/no change in the GLD inventory/inventory rests at 851.89 tonnes
May 16./ no change in the GLD inventory/inventory rests at 851.89 tonnes
May 15/no change in the GLD inventory/inventory rests at 851.89 tonnes
May 12/no changes in GLD/inventory rests at 851.89 tonnes
may 11/no changes in GLD inventory/inventory rests at 851.89 tonnes
May 10/no changes in GLD inventory/inventory rests at 851.89 tonnes/
May 9/a withdrawal of 1.19 tonnes from the GLD/Inventory rests tonight at 851.89 tonnes
May 8/no change in inventory at the GLD/Inventory rests at 853.08 tonnes
May 5/no changes in inventory at the GLD/Inventory rests at 853.08 tonnes
May 4/A tiny change in inventory at the GLD /a withdrawal of .28 tonnes to pay for fees/inventory rests at 853.08 tonnes
May 3/no change in inventory at the GLD/Inventory rest at 853.36 tonnes
May 2/no change in inventory at the GLD/Inventory rests at 853.36 tonnes
May 1/ no changes in inventory at the GLD/inventory rests at 853.36 tonnes
April 28/no changes in inventory at the GLD/Inventory rests at 853.36 tonnes
April 27/a small withdrawal of .89 tonnes/Inventory is now at 853.36 tonnes
APRIL 26/we had no changes at the GLD/Inventory rests at 854.25 tonnes
April 25/2017/A WITHDRAWAL OF 5.92 TONNES OF GOLD FROM THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 854.25 TONNES
April 24/a deposit of 1.48 tonnes of gold into the GLD/inventory rests at 860.17 tonnes
April 21/A DEPOSIT OF 4.44 TONNES OF GOLD INTO THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 858.69 TONNES
APRIL 20/A WITHDRAWAL OF 6.51 TONNES FROM THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 854.25 TONNES
April 19/ A DEPOSIT OF 11.84 TONNES INTO THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 860.76 TONNES
end
Now the SLV Inventory
May 26/another paper withdrawal of 946,000 oz of silver from the SLV with silver rising/inventory rests at 340.976 million oz
May 25/no change in silver inventory at the SLV/Inventory rests at 341.922 million oz
May 24./a “paper” withdrawal of 1.893 million oz from the SLV/inventory rests tonight at 341.922 million oz
May 23/no change in silver inventory at the SLV/inventory rests at 343.815 million oz
May 19/no change in silver inventory at the SLV/Inventory rests at 343.815 million oz.
may 18/2017/another big deposit of 1.42 million oz added to the SLV/inventory rests at 343.815 million oz.
may 17/no change in silver inventory at the SLV/Inventory rests at 342.395 million oz/
May 16./we had a huge addition of 1.416 million oz of silver into the SLV/inventory rests at 342.395 million oz
May 15/no changes in silver inventory/inventory rests at 340.979 million oz/
May 12/a huge change in silver: a deposit of 2.369 million oz/inventory rests at 340.979 million oz
May 11/no changes in silver inventory at the SLV/Inventory rests at 338.610 million oz
May 10/ a gigantic 3.833 million oz of silver added to the SLV and this occurred with the constant whacking of silver for the past 17 trading sessions/inventory rests at 338.610 million oz
may 9Again, no movement of inventory at the SLV. Inventory rests at 334.777 million oz
May 8/no change in silver inventory at the SLV/inventory rests at 334.777 million oz/
May 5/Strange!! no change in silver inventory at the SLV/Inventory rests tonight at 334.777 million oz
May 4/a very tiny withdrawal of 144,000 oz to pay for fees/inventory rests tonight at 334.777 million oz/
May 3/strange!! with the drop in price of silver we had no change in inventory at the SLV/inventory rests at 334.921 million oz
May 2/extremely strange again/a huge 3.502 million oz deposit into the SLV despite silver being in the toilet for the past several trading days.Inventory 334.921 million oz
may 1/extremely strange/with silver being walloped these past several days, the inventory rises again by a huge 1.136 million oz/(maybe someone can explain this phenomena??)
April 28/Strange again!! no change in inventory at the SLV/Inventory remains at 330.283 million oz (no liquidation with a drop in silver price??)
April 27.2017/Strange!! no change in inventory at the SLV/Inventory remains at 330.283 million oz (no liquidation???)
APRIL 26/2017/another huge deposit of 2.934 million oz into the SLV/Inventory rests at 330.283 million oz
April 25/a huge deposit of 1.98 million of into inventory/inventory rests at 327.349 million oz/
April 24/no changes in inventory at the SLV/Inventory rests at 325.361 million oz/
April 21/A WITHDRAWAL OF 719,000 OZ OF SILVER AT THE SLV/INVENTORY RESTS AT 325.361 MILLION OZ/
APRIL 20/NO CHANGES IN INVENTORY AT THE SLV/INVENTORY RESTS AT 326.308 MILLION OZ
Major gold/silver trading/commentaries for FRIDAY
GOLDCORE/BLOG/MARK O’BYRNE.
GOLD/SILVER
Silver Bullion In Secret Bull Market
Silver Bullion In Secret Bull Market
by Sean Broderick of Uncommon Wisdom Daily
Do you think silver is poised to go higher?
I sure do. That’s because I’m watching what is going on in the world’s silver ETFs. I’m also watching the mountain of forces that are piling up to push the metal higher.
Look at this chart. It shows all the metal held by the world’s physical silver ETFs (black line). And all the metal held by the world’s physical gold ETFs (blue line) …
![]() |
I showed you this same chart last week. Since then, silver ETFs have added another 8 million ounces. At the same time, gold ETFs have added only 56,000 ounces.
In fact, since late April, silver ETFs have added 31 million ounces of the metal. Gold ETF holdings over that time frame have zigged and zagged. But those are basically flat.
Kind makes you go “hmm,” doesn’t it?
Why is someone stocking up on all that silver?
I can think of a few reasons why …
Silver ore in mines is getting less-rich. That makes sense, because miners dig up the rich stuff first. And silver, like gold, is a depleting asset. That’s why primary silver miners’ average yield has fallen from 13 ounces per ton in 2005 to 7.4 ounces per ton in 2016. This is a 43% decline in just 12 years.
Silver is an industrial metal. Half of silver demand is for industry. It will be affected by China’s economic and industrial outlook. Both of those are improving. Though silver demand dropped last year, it is zig-zagging higher.
Global silver production keeps falling. In fact, silver production fell more than demand last year. That is probably why prices went up 9.3% last year.
The Silver Institute reported that global silver production peaked in 2015. It takes years to bring a new silver mine online. And let me tell you, there aren’t a lot of new silver projects around.
Looking at that earlier chart of silver ETFs, the recent demand trend looks clear. (Up!) Now ask yourself, “What happens when silver demand goes higher?”

Last year, the physical deficit was 52.2 million ounces, according to Thomson Reuters. That was the third deficit in a row. And that trend is not about to change anytime soon …Well, when you put together rising demand and falling supply, you get a deficit.
Another Massive Deficit This Year
This year, it should be four years of deficit in a row. Banking giant HSBC has forecast a 132 million-ounce deficit for 2017. That’s more than double last year’s deficit.
Sure, not everyone agrees on the exact amount of silver supply … demand … or silver in storage. That’s what makes a market.
But the forecasts of a deficit are backed up by what we can see on the ground. Chile’s silver production dropped 26% in the first quarter.
Now, some will tell you that the silver market is always in deficit lately. And the market never seems to care.
That’s true … to a point. That’s because the deficit can be made up by above-ground stockpiles. But stockpiles will only last so long.
And that brings me back to that chart I showed you. I think someone is betting that the time for a price squeeze is edging closer.
Solar Demand Could be Key
The difference may be photovoltaic demand. It climbed from 57.2 million ounces in 2015 to 76.6 million ounces in 2016. And the solar buildout is still ramping up.
![]() |
Forecasts by GTM Research predict that solar installations will double from 2015 to 2021.
I find that solar forecasts that go more than a couple years out are generally unreliable. So far, they’ve always underestimated real demand.
On the other hand, remember that the solar industry is getting more-efficient in its silver use. Still, add it all up, and the demand trend looks big.
That’s longer term. Is there a driver of silver prices in the short term? Yes!
Let me show you one more chart. I snagged this from our friends at BullionVault.com. It shows how hedge funds are betting on silver right now.

I’d say silver could go ballistic.Hedge funds are making a lot of bearish bets on silver. But keep in mind that hedge funds are often wrong. What do you suppose will happen if and when they have to cover those bearish bets?
As published yesterday on Uncommon Wisdom Daily
News and Commentary
PRECIOUS-Gold rises as Asian stocks, dollar slip after oil slump (Reuters.com)
Gold prices halt two-session skid as dollar stalls (MarketWatch.com)
Jobless claims edge up; goods trade deficit widens (Reuters.com)
LBMA launches code of conduct for precious metals markets (IndiaTimes.com)
Gold used to deliver anticancer drugs into tumours (ScienceDaily.com)
Alasdair Macleod: Debts, Bastiat, and modern economics
Submitted by cpowell on Thu, 2017-05-25 14:55. Section: Daily Dispatches
10:56a ET Thursday, May 25, 2017
Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:
GoldMoney research director Alasdair Macleod today criticizes what he considers the central flaw of Keynesian economics — its failure to account for what is real but unseen. Macleod’s commentary is headlined “Debts, Bastiat, and Modern Economics” and it’s posted at GoldMoney here:
https://wealth.goldmoney.com/research/goldmoney-insights/alasdair-macleo…
CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
CPowell@GATA.org
END
A good story..
Russian explorers find a billion roubles in an abandoned mine and all of it worthless. It would have been better to have converted the roubles into gold
(courtesy BBC)
Russian explorers find ‘swamp’ of Soviet money, all worthless
Submitted by cpowell on Thu, 2017-05-25 16:11. Section: Daily Dispatches
… Yet the czar’s old gold rubles are more valuable than ever.
* * *
By Maria Kiseleva and Alistair Coleman
British Broadcasting Corp., London
Thursday, May 25, 2017
A group of explorers in Russia have found around a billion roubles in old Soviet money at an abandoned mine, but it’s all completely worthless.
The group from St. Petersburg, who publish a blog on abandoned sites across Russia, came across the money after following rumors that large quantities of cash had been dumped in old missile silos near Moscow after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Komsomolskaya Pravda news website reports:
http://www.spb.kp.ru/daily/26683.4/3705974/
After travelling for several hours across rough terrain in Russia’s Vladimir region, they found the mine literally overflowing with cash.
The site contains an estimated one billion roubles ($18 million or L13.5 million at current exchange rates, or $33.3 million at the “official” Soviet rate in 1991) in Soviet Union banknotes of various denominations issued between 1961 and 1991, all no longer legal tender in the Russian Federation. The mine had been flooded in recent years, leaving what was essentially a swamp of banknotes bearing the face of Vladimir Lenin, the explorers’ YouTube channel shows. …
… For the remainder of the report:
END
Jim Richards take on the embarrassing gold/silver manipulation scheme. I kind of disagree with him on the China situation. It is my belief that when China cannot get enough gold for its citizens, it will then crash the comex and that is when the game ends
(courtesy GATA/Jim Rickards)
Jim Rickards: The golden conspiracy buys time for China to hedge its dollar surplus
Submitted by cpowell on Fri, 2017-05-26 02:36. Section: Daily Dispatches
8:37p MT Thursday, May 25, 2017
Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:
In commentary posted today at the Daily Reckoning, headlined “The Golden Conspiracy,” geopolitical analyst, fund manager, and best-selling author James G. Rickards writes that manipulation of the gold market is so obvious that it’s embarrassing and that it is a conspiracy of central banks to help China obtain enough gold inexpensively to hedge its enormous foreign exchange position in U.S. dollars.
This sounds very much like the hypothesis developed five years ago by the economists and fund managers Paul Brodsky and Lee Quaintance and brought to your attention by GATA:
http://www.gata.org/node/11373
Rickards writes: “Here’s the problem: If you took the lid off of gold, ended the price manipulation, and let gold find its level, China would be left in the dust. It wouldn’t have enough gold relative to the other countries, and because the price of gold would be skyrocketing, they could never acquire it fast enough. They could never catch up. All the other countries would be on the bus while the Chinese would be off.
“When you have this reset, and when everyone sits down around the table, China’s the second largest economy in the world. They have to be on the bus. That’s why the global effort has been to keep the lid on the price of gold through manipulation. I tell people, if I were running the manipulation, I’d be embarrassed because it’s so obvious at this point.”The price is being suppressed until China gets the gold that they need. Once China gets the right amount of gold, then the cap on gold’s price can come off. At that point, it doesn’t matter where gold goes because all the major countries will be in the same boat. As of right now, however, they’re not, so China has to catch up. …
“The price of gold will go significantly higher in the years ahead. But contrary to what you read in the blogs, gold won’t go higher because China is confronting the U.S. or launching a gold-backed currency.
“It will go higher when all central banks, China’s and the U.S.’ included, confront the next global liquidity crisis, worse than the one in 2008, and individual citizens stampede into gold to preserve wealth in a world that has lost confidence in all central banks.
“When that happens, physical gold may not be available at all.”
Rickards’ commentary can be found at the Daily Reckoning here:
https://dailyreckoning.com/the-golden-conspiracy/
CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
CPowell@GATA.org
END
An important commentary from Ronan Manly on gold withdrawals from the Shanghai gold Exchange
(courtesy Ronan Manly/GATA)
Ronan Manly: Update on Shanghai Gold Exchange withdrawals and premiums
Submitted by cpowell on Fri, 2017-05-26 03:14. Section: Daily Dispatches
9:16p MT Thursday, May 25, 2017
Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:
Gold researcher Ronan Manly reports today that withdrawals of metal from the Shanghai Gold Exchange were strong in 2016 but there are signs that China is slowing the liberalization of its gold market. Manly’s analysis is headlined “An Update on SGE Vault Withdrawals and SGE Price Premiums” and it’s posted at Bullion Star here:R
https://www.bullionstar.com/blogs/ronan-manly/update-sge-vault-withdrawa…
CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
CPowell@GATA.org
END
Gresham’s Law to almost perfection (they left out gold and silver) as Bitcoin rises to 2,600 per coin
(courtesy zero hedge)
Bitcoin Rebounds To $2,600 As Gresham’s Law Looms
Bitcoin has rebounded to $2600 this morning (after touching $2200 late yesterday, and $2760 highs yesterday) as Korean prices and US prices are converging (Korbit still trading at around $3200)
Bitcoin is trading around $2600 on US exchanges…
And $3200 on Korea’s Korbit…
As Alhambra Investments’ Jeffrey Snider details, Bitcoins are a remarkable bit of innovative technology. When they were first introduced quietly at the end of October 2008, nobody noticed it or the fitting timing. The design paper for the cryptocurrency was published anonymously at the very same moment the dominant global currency, the eurodollar, was undergoing its severe reckoning. The latter is in many ways like the former, since the eurodollar is not a thing just like Bitcoins. In many respects, it, too, is a cryptocurrency and as such confounds a great deal of “expert” analysis.
The price of a Bitcoin, meaning its exchange rate, has exploded more recently, though not for the first time. If we reckon it as a currency, then the other side implication of this price action is that the dollar has fallen in value relative to it. That it has survived and in some places thrived after eight and a half years is meaningful, but what we don’t know is whether it is that because of the potential for Bitcoins or because of the constant malfunction of the “dollar.”
There is more than a fair hint of Gresham’s Law at work. For those unfamiliar, Gresham’s Law is a stated maxim on currency, thought up in 1858 by Scottish banker Henry Dunning Macleod and named for 16th century English financier Sir Thomas Gresham. Ironically, I suppose, Macleod’s thoughts on 19th economics mirror what would become of this idea.
I can hardly express the disappointment I felt at reading them…for the purpose of describing the actual principles and mechanisms of commerce they were absolutely worthless. They were merely a chaos of confusion and contradictions…In fact, they were in no sense a science, but the butchery of a science. I saw that the greatest opportunity that had come to any man since Galileo had come to me, and I then determined to devote myself to the construction of a real science of Economics on the model of the already established physical sciences.
The “them” Macleod referred to were Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and John Stuart Mill, among others. Intending to establish economics as actual science, his concern was as the whole of it was about exchange, where value was specific to only supply and demand. Therefore, in the case of multiple currencies artificiality would lead to drastic inequalities as a matter of self-evident principle. Or, as Gresham’s Law is commonly stated, bad money drives out good money.
Throughout human history there was rarely a single form of currency. In most cases, any economic system would often run with several concurrently. The early Colonial United States was practically fixed to Spanish gold doubloons, often short were English guineas or French Louis d’Ors. It was messy but in so many ways very elegant; a system of checks and balances beyond the reach of governments.
Are we seeing something similar here? Is the Bitcoin so undervalued, the “dollar” so overvalued, that the former are being hoarded while the latter discounted toward oblivion? Not quite, but, again, there is the suggestion.
The issue is purely acceptance, meaning that those exchanging Bitcoins north of $2,000 per are betting on wider recognition and therefore the cryptocurrency increasingly supplanting other forms, including maybe the eurodollar itself. This is not specific to Bitcoin, as the blockchain technology behind it is what really drives the relentless interest. To put it simply and bluntly, the world’s leaders have all failed in monetary terms, so should anyone be surprised that alternative means are occasionally, if not consistently, sought?
Here is where it gets sticky, though, as there are tremendous barriers to that possibility. The biggest is, of course, the US government who after appropriating a coinage monopoly is not going to so easily relinquish it (though I should point out this is also true of replacing the eurodollar). Several years ago, they made that amply clear when the IRS ruled Bitcoins within its taxing authority, and not as money. I wrote at the time:
In other words, you cannot avoid taxation by paying employees in Bitcoins instead of dollars. Further, the IRS is subjecting merchandise trade to its $600 filing limitation – if you paid two Bitcoins to Overstock.com for a new flatscreen you are supposed to issue Overstock a 1099 (this is not a joke)…
When you paid two Bitcoins for that flatscreen from Overstock, you are supposed to calculate the value of the Bitcoins at which they were attained and compare that to the fair value of the flatscreen. If the latter is greater than the former, the IRS has ruled it a taxable gain. And that subjects you to a further taxation test about whether that gain is “capital” or “ordinary.”
This is no trivial matter, for what ultimately will guide any currency to full establishment is its acceptability to the public. The modern person is a creature of convenience, a fact established by almost every facet of modern life. The chartalists were right on that count, as what matters for currency is no longer value but expediency, a factor over which the government unfortunately holds enormous sway in this regard. We may lament this state of affairs, the loss of money as property, but it does us no good to ignore it or wish it wasn’t so.
And so the balance under Gresham’s Law, as it were, is one of possible inconvenience under Bitcoin versus the inertia of the eurodollar though it doesn’t work. If the latter rises past some critical threshold, then we would expect this element or corollary of Gresham’s Law to increase exponentially (a run on “dollars” converted into Bitcoins?). Though I am as pessimistic about the state of the eurodollar system as anyone, if not more so, I’m not sure it will get that far as anything more than a true “tail event.” In other words, the entire system would have to break down catastrophically and with no alternate form of viable money on the horizon. The first part could happen, but I just don’t see the second part.
For Bitcoins, however, if there is a path to full currency status it is likely in future generations of the technology that address version 1.0’s weaknesses, including anticipating how the government will surely intervene to block it. Until you can whip out your phone and pay in Bitcoins without issuing a 1099 and calculating the capital gains tax on the transaction (or maybe there will be an app that will do both?) the potential is limited to largely the specific forms of commerce currently open to them (more so black market or darknet).
I doubt that is what the current “price” of $2,800 is anticipating, so it is a fair question to ask whether recent price action invokes the word bubble. I can’t answer it mostly because my interests are almost all on the other side, meaning that I can’t help but be encouraged that entrenched dissatisfaction over the state of global money is driving it. That said, I continue to believe we are a couple blockchain generations away from true viability, though if nothing changes we could get there sooner than you might think.
end
A good start: now we need to see the other 49 states peal state capital gain taxes on gold and silver as well as other countries:
(courtesy SchiffGold.com)
Arizona Governor Signs Bill To Repeal State Capital Gains Taxes On Gold & Silver
Good news for precious metals investors in Arizona.
On Monday, Gov. Doug Ducey signed a bill into law that eliminates states capital gains taxes on gold and silver specie. It’s tax repeal will not only benefit Arizonans who invest in gold and silver, it will also facilitate their use as currency and undermine the Federal Reserve’s monopoly on money.
Rep. Mark Finchem (R-Tucson) sponsored HB2014. The legislation eliminates state capital gains taxes on income “derived from the exchange of one kind of legal tender for another kind of legal tender.” The bill defines legal tender as “a medium of exchange, including specie, that is authorized by the United States Constitution or Congress for the payment of debts, public charges, taxes and dues.” “Specie” means coins having precious metal content.
In effect, passage into law will “legalize the Constitution” by treating gold and silver specie as money.
The new law will go into effect Aug. 9, 2017.
Getting Gov. Ducey’s signature on the bill was a major victory, and the culmination of more than five years of work by supporters of sound money in the Grand Canyon State. Similar legislation passed the legislature in 2013, 2015, and 2016, but Gov. Jan Brewer vetoed the first two bills, and Gov Doug Ducey killed last year’s effort.
Grassroots support was crucial in pushing this legislation across the finish line this year. A dedicated group of volunteers lobbied for the bill, and Ron Paul traveled to Arizona and testified on its behalf.
We ought not to tax money – and that’s a good idea. It makes no sense to tax money,” he said. “Paper is not money, it’s fraud.”
The new law’s impact goes beyond mere tax policy. During an event after his Senate committee testimony, Paul pointed out that it’s really about the size and scope of government.
If you’re for less government, you want sound money. The people who want big government, they don’t want sound money. They want to deceive you and commit fraud. They want to print the money. They want a monopoly. They want to get you conditioned, as our schools have conditioned us, to the point where deficits don’t matter.”
AN IMPORTANT STEP FORWARD
The new law allows taxpayers to deduct the amount of any net capital gain derived from the exchange of one kind of legal tender for another kind of legal tender or specie (gold and silver coins) from their gross income on their state income tax. In other words, individuals buying gold or silver bullion, or utilizing gold and silver in a transaction, would no longer be subject to state taxes on the exchange.
“What the IRS has figured out at the federal level is to target inflation as a gain. They call it capital gains,” Finchem said during a committee hearing. He noted that the bill would help Arizona residents “protect their conversion of one kind of currency for another.”
Passage into law marks an important first step towards currency competition. If sound money gains a foothold in the marketplace against Federal Reserve notes, the people would be able to choose the time-tested stability of gold and silver over the central bank’s rapidly-depreciating paper currency. The freedom of choice expanded by HB2014 will help allow Arizona residents to secure the purchasing power of their money.
Ron Paul said he considered the Arizona bill to be “very important” because it would also serve as an educational effort for other states.
“The responsibility is on the states to follow the Constitution,” Paul said.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Currently, all debts and taxes in Arizona must be paid with either Federal Reserve Notes (dollars), authorized as legal tender by Congress, or with coins issued by the U.S. Treasury — very few of which have gold or silver in them.
But the United States Constitution states in Article I, Section 10, “No State shall…make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts.”
The Arizona law takes a step towards that constitutional requirement, ignored for decades in every state. Such a tactic would undermine the monopoly or the Federal Reserve by introducing competition into the monetary system.
Professor William Greene is an expert on constitutional tender and said when people in multiple states actually start using gold and silver instead of Federal Reserve Notes, it would effectively nullify the Federal Reserve and end the federal government’s monopoly on money.
“Over time, as residents of the state use both Federal Reserve notes and silver and gold coins, the fact that the coins hold their value more than Federal Reserve notes do will lead to a “reverse Gresham’s Law” effect, where good money (gold and silver coins) will drive out bad money (Federal Reserve notes). As this happens, a cascade of events can begin to occur, including the flow of real wealth toward the state’s treasury, an influx of banking business from outside of the state – as people in other states carry out their desire to bank with sound money – and an eventual outcry against the use of Federal Reserve notes for any transactions.”
Once things get to that point, Federal Reserve notes would become largely unwanted and irrelevant for ordinary people. Nullifying the Fed on a state by state level can get us there.
end
Then Bitcoin crashed again late in the day:
(zero hedge)
Bitcoin Is Crashing (Again)
While Bitcoin is still up 13% on the week (its 8th weekly ruse of the last 9), the dollar price of the virtual currency is collapsing again in US trading (after a big rebound during the Asian session)…
Just as with yesterday, there is no immediate news catalyst for the flush.
Meanwhile, the huge arb with South Korea bitcoin pricing remains, and as of this moment is still nearly $1000.
Today’s drop is the biggest since January (for now)…
end
In the latest data from Swiss exports of refined gold, India tops the list for the 4th consecutive month. Total for the last 4 months: 167.2 tonnes. Normally Switzerland supplies around 47% of India’s gold needs. Thus you can safely say that India will import another round of 1000+ tonnes of gold. Also remember that this is recorded gold. India smuggles a huge amount of gold into the country to avoid the 10% tax.
(courtesy Lawrie Williams/Sharp Pixley)
LAWRIE WILLIAMS: India top importer of Swiss gold for fourth successive month
There’s probably no better indicator of the pick-up this year in Indian gold demand, after a dismal 2016, than the levels of Swiss exports to the world’s second most populous nation. In April, India was again the principal export destination for Swiss re-refined gold, as it has been every month so far this year. In the four months of the year so far India has imported no less than 167.2 tonnes of gold from the small European nation’s plethora of top-rated gold refiners. At this rate India will import around 500 tonnes of gold from Switzerland alone and, historically, it only sources a little under half its reported gold imports from Switzerland – in Q1 this year India reported total gold imports of 249 tonnes, of which 47.7%, or 119.2 tonnes came in from Switzerland.
While as my colleague Julian Phillips notes in a recent post on www.lawrieongold.com the early year peak is perhaps already behind us, ahead of the monsoon season, but then gold demand tends to pick up again from September on as the harvest comes in, and ahead of the Dhanteras and Diwali festivals in October and then again with peak wedding season coming in in November and December. Indian Hindu weddings tend to take place on auspicious dates throughout the year apart from from mid-July to end-October – Chaturmas – a period deemed inauspicious for Hindu weddings.
Julian Phillips thus puts estimated Indian gold demand this year as likely being around 1,000 tonnes plus, although this would likely be boosted by smuggled metal, while the World Gold Council (WGC) put India’s consumer demand last year at 675.5 tonnes. There may be an element of the jewellery sector restocking ahead of an expected Goods and Services Tax imposition due to come in in mid-year which could reduce second half imports, but regardless it looks as though Indian demand is due for a major pick-up this year which will enhance the yellow metal’s fundamentals.
But let’s take a closer look at the latest Swiss gold export levels courtesy of the latest chart from Nick Laird’swww.goldchartsrus.com website from Australia.
![]()
Once again the chart demonstrates a couple of things we have been emphasising in the past. First and foremost is that comfortably over 90% of Swiss gold exports are headed for Asia and the Middle East, with India and greater China accounting for over 80% alone. Secondly it is noticeable that the volume of Swiss gold headed directly into mainland China is substantially more than that heading into Hong Kong which further emphasises the point that movements of gold in and out of Hong Kong can no longer in any way be considered a proxy for total Chinese demand. While the Swiss percentages may not show the whole picture as other gold exporting nations may well still be routing their gold sales destined for mainland China through the former British Crown Colony, it is unlikely that this can nowadays account for much more than half the total mainland China import levels – if that.
The Swiss gold import figures also continue to show an interesting trend. Out of a total of 131.3 tonnes of gold imported some of the largest amounts come from normally gold consuming states – the UAE, Hong Kong and Thailand which between them accounted for a little over half the total of Swiss gold imports. Indeed Hong Kong and Thailand were actually net exporters of gold to Switzerland in April. We can only assume that these distortions in the gold flow patterns are due to gold traders and fabricators taking account of rising gold prices and re-exporting excess inventory, or unsold jewellery and artefacts back to Switzerland for remelting and re-refining back to perhaps more in-demand small metric sized bars and coins.
24 May 2017
-END-
Your early FRIDAY morning currency, Asian stock market results, important USA/Asian currency crosses, gold/silver pricing overnight along with the price of oil Major stories overnight
1 Chinese yuan vs USA dollar/yuan A LOT STRONGER 6.85603(REVALUATION NORTHBOUND /OFFSHORE YUAN MOVES HUGELY STRONGER TO ONSHORE AT 6.8224/ Shanghai bourse CLOSED UP 2.28 POINTS OR 0.07% / HANG SANG CLOSED UP 8,49 POINTS OR 0.03%
2. Nikkei closed DOWN 126.29 POINTS OR 0.64% /USA: YEN FALLS TO 110.98
3. Europe stocks OPENED IN THE RED ( /USA dollar index RISES TO 97.26/Euro DOWN to 1.1195
3b Japan 10 year bond yield: FALLS TO +.042%/ !!!!(Japan buying 100% of bond issuance)/Japanese yen vs usa cross now at 110.98/ THIS IS TROUBLESOME AS BANK OF JAPAN IS RUNNING OUT OF BONDS TO BUY./JAPAN 10 YR YIELD FINALLY IN THE POSITIVE/BANK OF JAPAN LOSING CONTROL OF THEIR YIELD CURVE AS THEY PURCHASE ALL BONDS TO GET TO ZERO RATE!!
3c Nikkei now JUST BELOW 17,000
3d USA/Yen rate now well below the important 120 barrier this morning
3e WTI:: 48.63 and Brent: 51.06
3f Gold UP/Yen UP
3g Japan is to buy the equivalent of 108 billion uSA dollars worth of bond per month or $1.3 trillion. Japan’s GDP equals 5 trillion usa./“HELICOPTER MONEY” OFF THE TABLE FOR NOW /REVERSE OPERATION TWIST ON THE BONDS: PURCHASE OF LONG BONDS AND SELLING THE SHORT END
Japan to buy 100% of all new Japanese debt and by 2018 they will have 25% of all Japanese debt. Fifty percent of Japanese budget financed with debt.
3h Oil DOWN for WTI and DOWN for Brent this morning
3i European bond buying continues to push yields lower on all fronts in the EMU. German 10yr bund FALLS TO +.326%/Italian 10 yr bond yield DOWN to 2.104%
3j Greek 10 year bond yield FALLS to : 5.982% ???
3k Gold at $1266.40/silver $17.26 (8:15 am est) SILVER BELOW RESISTANCE AT $18.50
3l USA vs Russian rouble; (Russian rouble UP 1/100 in roubles/dollar) 56.88-
3m oil into the 48 dollar handle for WTI and 51 handle for Brent/
3n Higher foreign deposits out of China sees huge risk of outflows and a currency depreciation (already upon us). This can spell financial disaster for the rest of the world/China forced to do QE!! as it lowers its yuan value to the dollar/GOT A HUGE SIZED REVALUATION NORTHBOUND
JAPAN ON JAN 29.2016 INITIATES NIRP. THIS MORNING THEY SIGNAL THEY MAY END NIRP. TODAY THE USA/YEN TRADES TO 110.98 DESTROYING JAPANESE CITIZENS WITH HIGHER FOOD INFLATION
30 SNB (Swiss National Bank) still intervening again in the markets driving down the SF. It is not working: USA/SF this morning 0.9728 as the Swiss Franc is still rising against most currencies. Euro vs SF is 1.0890 well above the floor set by the Swiss Finance Minister. Thomas Jordan, chief of the Swiss National Bank continues to purchase euros trying to lower value of the Swiss Franc.
3p BRITAIN VOTES AFFIRMATIVE BREXIT/LOWER PARLIAMENT APPROVES BREXIT COMMENCEMENT/ARTICLE 50 COMMENCES MARCH 29/2017
3r the 10 Year German bund now POSITIVE territory with the 10 year FALLS to +0.326%
The bank withdrawals were causing massive hardship to the Greek bank. the Greek referendum voted overwhelming “NO”. Next step for Greece will be the recapitalization of the banks and that will be difficult.
4. USA 10 year treasury bond at 2.2340% early this morning. Thirty year rate at 2.904% /POLICY ERROR)GETTING DANGEROUSLY HIGH
5. Details Ransquawk, Bloomberg, Deutsche bank/Jim Reid.
(courtesy Jim Reid/Bloomberg/Deutsche bank/zero hedge)
Global Rally Fizzles After “OPEC Shock” In “Slow Risk-Off Session”
S&P futures were fractionally lower from yesterday’s record high as European stocks declined and Asian stocks were mixed, pressured by yesterday’s 5% plunge in crude after OPEC unexpectedly “failed to surprise” markets, and announced the bare minimum supply cut extension that was expected by oil traders, who in turn puked long positions.
It wasn’t just oil: it has been a slow risk-off session as Bloomberg phrased it, ahead of the long weekend for U.S. and U.K. markets, with the key carry pair, USD/JPY breaking below 111.00 as the USD continues to weakens, while the GBP tumbled 0.5%, after the latest poll shows Tory lead narrowing. As futures declined, fixed income markets ground higher as the 2s10s hits flattest level YTD. European equity markets open lower led by oil related stocks after yesterday’s heavy sell-off in oil. Automakers also weaker after possible Trump comments on German car exports. Gold well supported amid general risk-off.
Most of the early attention, however, was on the market’s reaction to yesterday’s oil selloff. “To say that yesterday’s performance was disappointing for bulls is an understatement,” Tamas Varga, analyst at PVM Oil Associates wrote in an emailed report quoted by Bloomberg. “It is, however, not a foregone conclusion that the trend is definitely turning. The question now is whether yesterday’s sharp drop in oil prices was a panic long-liquidation or the technical picture is now firmly turning bearish.”
Stocks from Tokyo to Europe were dragged down by oil producers as oil headed for a weekly loss after falling the most in three weeks on Thursday as OPEC’s move to prolong supply cuts for nine months disappointed investors hoping for more.
“Markets ultimately found the renewed deal among OPEC and friends underwhelming,” Cole Akeson, a strategist at Sberbank CIB in Moscow, wrote in a note. “Essentially, the market consensus seems to have come around to a view that regardless of what effect on global inventories the deal may have for now, OPEC and its partners have little insight as to what to do later on.”
Before this week’s deal, oil had climbed back above $51 a barrel after Saudi Arabia and non-OPEC member Russia rallied support from the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and other nations to extend the supply pact into 2018. However, as the chart below shows, that proved to be too optimstic for a market which no longer will buy simple on OPEC jawboning, but demands results.

With oil in the spotlight, Japan’s Topix index slipped 0.6%, trimming its weekly advance to 0.6%. Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 Index fell 0.7 percent, with BHP Billiton Ltd. dropping 2 percent. South Korea’s Kospi rose 0.5 percent to another record. The index is up 2.9 percent for the week, the biggest gain in two months. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index was flat, keeping its weekly gain at 1.8 percent, while the Shanghai Composite increased 0.1 percent.
The Stoxx Europe 600 Index dropped 0.4% with oil and gas producers falling 1.2%. S&P 500 futures were little changed, after rising 0.4% on Thursday to new all time highs driven by a narrow basket of tech stocks.
Elsewhere, as discussed last night, the British pound tumbled over 0.5% to $1.2861 and looked set for its biggest one-day slide in over three weeks and steepest one-week decline since early April, after a poll showed the Conservative party lead narrowed after the Manchester attack, and as investors in Asia sold the currency after U.K.’s first-quarter economic growth missed estimates. The poll results come less than two weeks before the June 8 general election.

“With this kind of momentum and almost two weeks to go until the vote, not only is this not going to be the breeze that May anticipated when she called the snap election last month, it could yet turn into a humiliating defeat for the Conservative leader and her party,” said Craig Erlam, senior market analyst at OANDA. “Coming on the back of losses yesterday, it’s turning into a rotten end to the week for the pound.”
Elsewhere, confirming that the reason for the sharp spike in the Yuan over the past two days, the biggest move since January, was direct government intervention, overnight Bloomberg reported that China is considering changes to the way it calculates the yuan’s daily reference rate against the dollar “to reduce exchange-rate volatility while undermining efforts to increase the role of market forces” in Asia’s largest economy. Policy makers may add a “counter-cyclical factor” to the yuan’s daily fixing, according to a government statement on Friday. Analysts said the change would give authorities more control over the fixing and restrain the influence of market pricing.
Overnight, both the onshore and offshore yuan rose to three-month highs on continued speculation the Chinese government will continue to support the currency and stock markets. The currency advanced for a second day on talk state-backed funds were propping up Chinese assets Thursday following Moody’s downgrade of China’s credit rating.
In currencies, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index fell 0.1 percent, poised for a second week of declines. The pound slid 0.5 percent to $1.2875 (see above). The yen rose 0.7 percent to 111.11 per dollar, after dropping 0.3 percent on Thursday. The euro strengthened 0.2 percent to $1.1227
After its sharp drop on Thursday, oil edged higher in early trading but remained on the back foot after tumbling 5% in the previous session. On Thursday in Vienna, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and some non-OPEC producers agreed to extend a pledge to cut around 1.8 million barrels per day (bpd) until the end of the first quarter of 2018 – disappointing investors betting on longer or larger curbs.
Friday economic data include annualized GDP, durable goods orders and University of Michigan indexes.
Bulletin Headline Summary from RanSquawk
- European equities enter the North American crossover lower as energy names underperform following yesterday’s OPEC announcement
- GBP has been placed under pressure after the latest polling data shows the race for Downing Street getting closer
- Looking ahead, highlights include US GDP, Durables and Uni. Of Michigan
Market Snapshot
- S&P 500 futures down 0.1% to 2,411.55
- STOXX Europe 600 down 0.4% to 390.42
- MXAP up 0.01% to 152.86
- MXAPJ down 0.08% to 499.83
- Nikkei down 0.6% to 19,686.84
- Topix down 0.6% to 1,569.42
- Hang Seng Index up 0.03% to 25,639.27
- Shanghai Composite up 0.07% to 3,110.06
- Sensex up 0.8% to 30,983.82
- Australia S&P/ASX 200 down 0.7% to 5,751.66
- Kospi up 0.5% to 2,355.30
- German 10Y yield fell 1.4 bps to 0.348%
- Euro up 0.1% to 1.1225 per US$
- Brent futures up 0.8% to $51.84/bbl
- Italian 10Y yield fell 1.9 bps to 1.826%
- Spanish 10Y yield fell 2.2 bps to 1.562%
- Brent futures up 0.8% to $51.84/bbl
- Gold spot up 0.8% to $1,265.34
- U.S. Dollar Index down 0.1% to 97.11
Top overnight news
- Political uncertainty in the U.K. rose after the race between the ruling Conservative party and opposing Labour party narrowed, raising prospects that the Tory majority will be smaller than expected and this could have implications on the Brexit process.
- The Federal Reserve is ‘very close’ to where it needs to be on policy and shouldn’t be thinking in terms of major increases in the policy rate, St. Louis Fed President James Bullard tells reporters in Tokyo
- Focus on U.S. President Donald Trump’s G-7 summit visit which will involve debates on climate change, free trade, terrorism and security
- China is considering changes to the way it calculates the yuan’s daily reference rate against the dollar, a move that’s likely to reduce exchange-rate volatility while undermining efforts to increase the role of market forces in Asia’s largest economy
- The OPEC’s historic pact to extend oil supply cuts has left markets guessing on the group’s long term plans and its exit strategy
Asia equity markets traded mixed as the region failed to take the baton from another record setting day on Wall St, with oil names dampened following the weakness across the energy complex. This saw commodity-related sectors in ASX 200 (-0.7%) underperform as they felt the brunt of the 5% declines in crude prices due to disappointment from the OPEC output extension deal. A firmer JPY kept the Nikkei 225 (-0.3%) subdued, while Hang Seng (Unch.) and Shanghai Comp. (+0.2%) traded choppy amid a reserved liquidity operation by the PBoC and continued pessimistic comments from Moody’s following the recent sovereign rating downgrade. 10yr JGBs traded higher amid a downbeat risk tone, while the BoJ were also present in the market under its bond buying operation for JPY 750b1n of JGBs in the belly to super-long end. Moody’s stated that China growth will slow, while it added that China may lose Al rating if there are signs debt keeps increasing and debt surpasses expectations.
Top Asian News
- Taiwan’s Economy Grew 2.6% Y/y in 1Q; Survey Est. +2.6%
- China Confirms It’s Considering Changing Yuan Fixing Formula
- Vanguard to Triple Shanghai Staff by Year-End as China Opens
- SBI Said to Pick BofA, Deutsche Bank for $2 Billion Offering
- Incoming Philippine BSP Governor Discusses His Plans: Q&A
- China Money Funneled to Far-Flung Homes Flags Bubble Trouble
- Hong Kong Dollar Heads for Biggest Weekly Drop Since Early 2016
European equities trade with modest losses, largely stemming from the disappointed/scepticism amongst investors over OPEC’s decision to only extend the current output cut by 9-months. Following this announcement crude prices slipped, WTI hitting a low of USD 48.21, subsequently large energy names felt the brunt of this. Although, crude prices have seen a modest reprieve this morning with WTI consolidating above USD 49. Across credit markets, EGB’s have been kept afloat with support from FTQ flow, upside in bunds has met resistance at the 161.55 area, a breach may see a move to the 18th May highs situated at 162.02. As we approach month-end, Citi expect healthy extensions for European and UK bonds, with OATs set to benefit the most.
Top European News
- Retirement Savings Gap Is Seen Climbing to $400 Trillion by 2050
- EU to Demand Full ECJ Jurisdiction on Rights Post-Brexit: Doc.
- Italian Manufacturing Morale Falls Amid Concerns Over Recovery
- Portugal Asks to Make EU9.7b Early Repayment to IMF: IGCP
- Barclays Bid to Cut Africa Stake Still With S. Africa Regulator
- Restaurant Group Surges Most in 9 Months on ‘Reassuring’ Update
In currencies, GBP has been pressured with market attention being placed on the most recent polls which have shown a narrowing lead for PM May and her Conservative party over the Labour party. As such, GBP has tripped below 1.2900 to eye up support layered in around 1.2850-1.2844, a break through this could see a test to the May 4th low at 1.2831. USD-index continued to ease as one of the more dovish FOMC speakers, Bullard sounded the alarm over the path of inflation, most of this seen against the JPY, which has run through support at 111.50. Elsewhere, the slip in commodities pressures AUD yet again, this continues to drive AUD/NZD lower which is now hovering around 3-month lows, given that NZD has remained firm in the wake of New Zealand’s strong budget position.
In commodities, WTI and Brent crude futures have staged a modest recovery from yesterday’s lows to enter the North American crossover modestly higher with the usual value-buyers entering the market amid no new developments on the fundamental side since yesterday’s OPEC-inspired sell-off. In terms of newsflow for the complex, things have remained relatively light as markets take a breather from yesterday. In metals markets, Gold has seen mild support with the safe-haven asset underpinned amid a cautious risk tone, which also kept copper subdued.
Looking at the day ahead now, the focus will be on the US this afternoon where there are a number of important releases due. First up is the second estimate of Q1 GDP where the consensus is for an upward revision in growth to +0.9% qoq from +0.7%. Our US colleagues expect a small upward revision to +0.8% qoq. Importantly for growth in the current quarter we’ll also receive the April durable and capital goods orders report where the consensus is for a weak headline durable goods orders print to be offset by a healthy gain in both ex-transportation orders (+0.4% mom expected) and core capex orders (+0.5% mom expected). Also due out this afternoon is the final May University of Michigan consumer sentiment print where it’s worth keeping an eye on the various inflation expectations indicators too.
US Event Calendar
- 8:30am: GDP Annualized QoQ, est. 0.9%, prior 0.7%; Personal Consumption, est. 0.4%, prior 0.3%; GDP Price Index, est. 2.3%, prior 2.3%; Core PCE QoQ, est. 2.0%, prior 2.0%
- 8:30am: Durable Goods Orders, est. -1.5%, prior 0.9%, revised 1.7%; Durables Ex Transportation, est. 0.4%, prior 0.0%, revised 0.8%
- Cap Goods Orders Nondef Ex Air, est. 0.5%, prior 0.5%; Cap Goods Ship Nondef Ex Air, est. 0.5%, prior 0.5%, revised 0.3%
- 10am: U. of Mich. Sentiment, est. 97.5, prior 97.7
- U. of Mich. Current Conditions, prior 112.7
- U. of Mich. Expectations, prior 88.1
- U. of Mich. 1 Yr Inflation, prior 2.6%
- U. of Mich. 5-10 Yr Inflation, prior 2.3%
DB’s Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap
With markets already with one eye on the long weekend holidays in the US and UK it’s not been the most inspiring last 24 hours. Really it has been all about Oil after prices fell sharply yesterday in the wake of OPEC and non-OPEC producers agreeing to extend the production cut deal by 9 months into 2018. That was pretty much as guided to although the disappointment reflected in the price action appeared to be twofold with cuts not being deepened and no new producers joining the pact. It did however appear that there was some optionality left open for cuts being extended beyond the additional 9 months should prices decline. It was also noted that the importance of the five-year rolling average of OECD inventory was cemented and our commodity strategists highlight that this helps solidify their expectations that output controls will eventually be extended at least until the end of 2018, and more likely than not into 2019 (you can find more details in their report here https://goo.gl/aE1ehM).
After touching a high of $52.00/bbl yesterday morning, post the headlines WTI proceeded to tumble and finished the day down -4.79% at $48.90/bbl and back to the lowest level in a week. It was also the third biggest daily decline this year. This morning it is down another -0.90% too. The biggest impact on other asset classes yesterday was Oil-sensitive currencies with the likes of the Russian Ruble (-0.90%), Norwegian Krone (-0.79%) and Canadian Dollar (-0.57%) all weaker.
That was really the extent of the excitement in markets though. Given the holidays in Europe volumes were thin and price action was pretty benign as a result (Stoxx 600 ending -0.06%). Meanwhile it was business as usual for US equity markets again where – despite the energy sector doing its best to weigh on broader indices – the S&P 500 (+0.44%) rose for the sixth consecutive session and in doing so notched up yet another record high. The longest consecutive winning streak for the S&P this year came in February when it rose for seven sessions on the trot. Some better than expected results in the retail sector, namely from Best Buy and PVH, appeared to be the driving force yesterday while the VIX also finished the day lower and closed below 10.00 (at 9.99) for the first time in over 2 weeks. In fact it’s now closed below that level 3 times this year, including yesterday. From 1990-2016, it had actually only closed below 10 on a total of 9 occasions.
There was a similar lack of excitement in Treasuries yesterday where yields finished the day little changed after spending much of the session in a tight range. We did hear from the Fed and specifically from Governor Lael Brainard who said that she is encouraged by a brightening global economic outlook and that downside risks from certain economies appear to be fading. Brainard has previously been one of the most dovish Fed officials for what it’s worth.
While we’re on the Fed, it’s worth highlighting that yesterday our US economists made some small timing changes to their Fed call for the rest of the year in light of Wednesday’s FOMC minutes. They note that if the Fed intends to begin reducing its holdings of Treasury and MBS securities this year, then policymakers are likely to announce a change in their reinvestment policy at the conclusion of the September 20 FOMC meeting. The details of this policy should be made known well in advance – most likely after the June meeting (press conference and/or minutes). The team go on to say that given the committee’s concerns about a subsequent over-tightening of financial conditions once the process of reinvestment tapering begins, it is unlikely that the Fed will raise the fed funds rate at the same time that they announce a change in reinvestment policy. As a result the team has now shifted their view of a June and September hike to a June and December hike, with the Fed staying put at the September meeting.
Elsewhere, President Trump’s overseas tour continues with Trump yesterday causing some ripples at the NATO summit after criticising allies for “chronic underfunding”. Meanwhile the travel ban is back in focus overnight after the US attorney general said that the White House will appeal its latest courtroom defeat in the US Supreme Court. Also worth pointing out is the Washington Post reporting that investigators are now focusing on Trump’s son-in-law and advisor Jared Kushner in connection with the Russia-Election investigation. Kushner was said to have held meetings with Russia in December, however it remains to be seen if this is the person of interest that was mentioned in press reports (like Washington Post) last week.
In Asia this morning it’s been a much more mixed start for major bourses. While the Nikkei (-0.35%), and ASX (-0.65%) are down, mostly as a result of weakness in the energy sector, the Shanghai Comp and Hang Seng are flat and the Kospi (+0.48%) has edged higher. US equity futures are also little changed. Meanwhile the big mover in FX this morning is Sterling which is down -0.42% versus the Dollar after a YouGov poll for the Times (conducted over 24-25 May) showed the Conservatives as holding just a 5% lead over Labour at 43% to 38%. That is the smallest lead for the Tories since May became PM back in July last year. The last YouGov poll (18-19 May) showed the Conservatives as holding a 9% lead at 44% to 35%. Other opinion polls showed a lead for the Tories of as much 12-13% just over a week ago, so it’s worth keeping an eye on this trend over the next week or two. The other news to highlight from overnight is the PBoC announcing that it is planning a change in the formula behind the daily yuan fixing to include a ‘counter-cyclical adjustment factor’. The suggestion is that it’ll dampen the impact of big swings. There has been little change in either the onshore or offshore yuan following that news. Finally inflation data in Japan this morning didn’t throw up any real surprises with headline (+0.4% yoy), core (+0.3% yoy) and core-core (+0.0% yoy) rates all up slightly versus March and more or less matching expectations.
In terms of yesterday’s economic data, in the US the advance goods trade balance reading in April revealed a slightly wider than expected deficit of $67.6bn. Away from that initial jobless claims continue to hover at multi-decade lows after printing at 234k for last week. The four-week average is now at 235k. Meanwhile the Kansas City Fed’s manufacturing activity index for May edged up 1pt to +8 (vs. +9 expected) with the details showing that both new orders and employment were a little firmer which is in contrast to the data we saw in the Richmond Fed’s survey. The other data was the April wholesale inventories print which came in at -0.3% mom and will likely result in downward pressure on some of the GDP trackers. In Europe the only data came from the UK where Q1 GDP was revised down to +0.2% qoq from +0.3% with the big negative contribution coming from net trade.
Looking at the day ahead now, with no data of significance due out in Europe this morning the focus will be on the US this afternoon where there are a number of important releases due. First up is the second estimate of Q1 GDP where the consensus is for an upward revision in growth to +0.9% qoq from +0.7%. Our US colleagues expect a small upward revision to +0.8% qoq. Importantly for growth in the current quarter we’ll also receive the April durable and capital goods orders report where the consensus is for a weak headline durable goods orders print to be offset by a healthy gain in both ex-transportation orders (+0.4% mom expected) and core capex orders (+0.5% mom expected). Also due out this afternoon is the final May University of Michigan consumer sentiment print where it’s worth keeping an eye on the various inflation expectations indicators too.
Away from the data there isn’t much central bank speak to highlight but it’s worth keeping an eye on the G7 summit where Trump, May, Macron and Merkel are gathering. That meeting concludes on Saturday with closing press conferences due to take place so we’ll have a recap in Monday’s EMR of any important snippets. Fingers crossed we’ll also be opening Monday on the back of an FA Cup final win for Arsenal tomorrow. We need one positive to come away from what has otherwise been a fairly depressing season for Arsenal fans.
3. ASIAN AFFAIRS
i)Late THURSDAY night/FRIDAY morning: Shanghai closed UP 2.28 POINTS OR 0.07% / /Hang Sang CLOSED UP 8.49 POINTS OR 0.03% The Nikkei closed DOWN 126.29 POINTS OR 0.64%/Australia’s all ordinaires CLOSED DOWN 0.64%/Chinese yuan (ONSHORE) closed WELL UP at 6.8560/Oil DOWN to 48.63 dollars per barrel for WTI and 51.06 for Brent. Stocks in Europe OPENED IN THE RED ..Offshore yuan trades 6.8224 yuan to the dollar vs 6.85603 for onshore yuan. NOW THE OFFSHORE IS HUGELY STRONGER TO THE ONSHORE YUAN/ ONSHORE YUAN STRONGER (TO THE DOLLAR) AND THE OFFSHORE YUAN IS A MUCH STRONGER TO THE DOLLAR AND THIS IS COUPLED WITH THE SLIGHTLY WEAKER DOLLAR. CHINA NOT HAPPY WITH THE NEWS THAT ITS DEBT HAS BEEN DOWNGRADED BUT IS HAPPY WITH THE WEAKER DOLLAR/CHINA UNDERGOES MASSIVE INTERVENTION LAST NIGHT
3a)THAILAND/SOUTH KOREA/NORTH KOREA
i)NORTH KOREA/SOUTH KOREA
b) REPORT ON JAPAN
c) REPORT ON CHINA
CHINA/GREAT BRITAIN
huge story last night: the yuan rises sharply on Chinese central bank intervention and cable (British Pound/USA dollar) cracks on poor confidence numbers ahead of the British June election
(courtesy zero hedge)
FX Chaos – Cable Cracks Lower On Election/Confidence; Chinese Yuan Spikes To 3-Month Highs
A kneejerk lower in Cable overnight (on Tory poll numbers dropping and weak confidence) started the fun in FX markets but (aside from Bitcoin), but Yuan is the big mover once more with a big figure spike to 6.85 – strongest since early Feb, extending the gains post-FOMC Minutes.
A new poll from Reuters shows the Tory lead fading fast in the UK election…
In a sign that the election could be more closely contested than has previously been thought, YouGov said on Thursday May’s party was on 43 percent, down 1 percentage point compared to a week ago, while Labour was up 3 points on 38 percent. The previous YouGov poll had given May a lead of nine points.

Then YouGov/CEBR consumer confidence tumbled to the weakest since weeks after Brexit vote…
- Consumers the least confident about their current financial situation since December 2014
- Expectations about their finances over the next 12 months also fell
- Perceptions of job security were at a four-year low
“It looks like this may be the point where the slowing GDP figures start to translate to people’s everyday lives,” Stephen Harmston, Head of YouGov Reports, said. “The figures indicate that they are starting to experience a downturn.”
And that prompted notable weakness in Cable…

But Yuan is now 4 handles higher since The Fed Minutes…snapping higher again tonight
Pushing Yuan to 3-month highs…
END
ii) China/USA
( zero hedge)
Two Chinese Fighter Jets Attempted “Intercept” Of US Surveillance Plane
A day after China confronted a US warship that came within 12 miles of one of China’s artificial reefs in the South China Sea,Reuters is reporting that Beijing decided to respond by sending two Chinese fighter jets to intercept a US military surveillance plane near Hong Kong, with one plane coming within 200 yards of the American aircraft.
A P-3 Orion surveillance plane was flying 150 miles (240 km) south east of Hong Kong when it was approached by two Chinese fighter jets. In the ensuing “unsafe intercept,” the Chinese aircraft came within 200 yards (182 meters) of the P-3 and one plane flew in front of the US aircraft, “restricting its ability to maneuver.”
If report is accurate, it means there were two near-confrontations between Chinese and American forces on the same day – a clear sign that, despite Trump’s turn toward friendly rhetoric in his dealings with the Chinese, tensions between the world’s two largest economies continues to rise.
The report follows a similar incident from last week, when two Chinese Su-30 fighter jets came within 150 feet of a U.S. Air Force WC-135 radiation detection plane while it was flying over the Yellow Sea in international airspace.
Responding to that incident, China’s Defense Ministry said the US account did “not accord with the facts” and urged Washington to stop its surveillance flights near Chinese borders. “The relevant action [of the Chinese pilots] was professional and safe,” the ministry said in a statement, quoted by Reuters. “We hope that the US side stops relevant surveillance activities, to avoid this kind of incident happening again.”
The US has a habit of flying its planes in the immediate vicinity of foreign nations. In the period 2014-2016, there were dozens of similar “unsafe” flybys flagged by the Pentagon involving Russian fighter jets, which however took plane not over the Gulf of Mexico, or Alaska, for example, but kilometers away from the Russian border. Perhaps the most surprising things to result from all these provocations is that nobody has gotten hurt, yet.
4. EUROPEAN AFFAIRS
5. RUSSIAN AND MIDDLE EASTERN AFFAIRS
EGYPT
This saddens me greatly; Gunman kills 23 Coptic Christians in an Egyptian attack, many of whom are children. The attack occurred in Minya, 140 miles south of Egypt
(courtesy zerohedge)
“Many Were Children”: Gunmen Kill 23 Coptic Christians In Egypt Attack
The attacks on Egypt’s Coptic Christian minority continued Friday as gunmen opened fire on a convoy of vehicles carrying worshippers to a desert monastery, leaving 23 dead and another 25 injured, the New York Times reports.
“A Christian official in Minya Province, south of Cairo, said the attackers opened fire on a pickup truck carrying workmen and a bus carrying worshippers as they traveled in convoy to St. Samuel’s monastery. Many of the worshippers were children.
‘We are having a very hard time reaching the monastery because it is in the desert. It’s very confusing. But we know that children were killed,’ said the official, Ibram Samir.”
Minya is about 140 miles south of Cairo, NBC News reports. No group has claimed responsibility for the attack as of yet.
Coptic Christians, who account for about 10% of Egypt’s population of 80 million, have become the victims of an intensifying campaign of bombings and shootings masterminded by ISIS, which is trying to expand its footprint in Egypt.
In April, at least 37 people were killed and more than 100 injured in two separate bombings at Christian Coptic churches packed with worshippers in northern Egypt one week before Coptic Easter.
end
ESTONIA/RUSSIA
This does not look good. Estonia which borders with Russia and is a firm NATO country expels two Russian diplomats and no reasons given. Russia responds that this unfriendly action will not go unanswered. Remember the Estonia has weapons pointing towards Russia
(courtesy zero hedge)
Estonia Expels Two Russian Diplomats; Moscow Warns This “Unfriendly Action Will Not Go Unanswered”
Two senior Russian diplomats, Consul General Dmitri Kazjonnov and Consul Andrei Surgjev, have been ordered to leave Estonia the country’s foreign ministry said on Friday.It was not immediately clear what prompted the expulsion, and the Estonian foreign ministry gave no other details. “We can only confirm that two diplomats have been expelled,” said spokesperson Mariann Sudakov.

Russian flag at the Russian Embassy in Tallinn.
According to a local news portal, the duo were posted at Moscow’s consulate in the northeastern town of Narva on the Estonian-Russian border. Delfi, the local Estonian news portal, cited unidentified sources for its report on the two diplomats.
“This is one more unfriendly and groundless action that will not go unanswered,” TASS agency cited a Russian foreign ministry official as saying in an initial reaction from Moscow. According to diplomatic practice, it can be expected that the Russian Federation may send an Estonian diplomat out of Russia in response.
Estonia, a member of NATO and the European Union, has had a tense relationship with its large neighbor Russia. According to Reuters, earlier in May, an Estonian court handed out a five-year prison sentence to a Russian national for spying for Russia’s main intelligence directorate, the foreign intelligence unit of the Russian armed forces.
The expulsion comes four months ahead of large-scale Russian military exercises which are set to take place in September near the Baltic states which according to western military commanders “pose heightened risks for a miscalculation that could lead to a crisis.”
The exercises, which Western officials estimate will involve nearly 100,000 troops, will be the first to roll out after a new NATO force in the region reaches full strength. They will also take place at the same time as military drills by Western forces in Sweden, across the Baltic Sea.
U.S. and NATO officers have warned this year’s version of Russia’s annual Zapad exercises could create more tensions than they have in years, even recalling those that arose during the Cold War. The exercise is set to take place at a time when Trump has infuriated NATO with his demands that alliance member states boost their contribution to NATO’s bottom line, although he has not explicitly threatened with removing US support should any NATO article be triggered.
6 .GLOBAL ISSUES
ESPN/Sports’ Bubble
A great commentary on another bubble bursting: the sports bubble and ESPN
(courtesy William Anderson/Mises Institute)
ESPN And The Bursting Of The Sports Bubble
Authored by William Anderson via The Mises Institute,
When the cable TV sports giant ESPN announced 100 layoffs recently, including letting go a number of high-profile broadcasters, a lot of people took notice, and well they should: things no longer are business as usual in sports broadcasting, and we are not even at the beginning of the end, and maybe not even the end of the beginning.
Like the slow crashing of the retail sector as online purchase firms like Amazon begin their domination, we are seeing a sea change in sports broadcasting and that is going to mean big changes are down the road not only for ESPN, but for all of the sports entities that depend upon the huge payouts that ESPN provides. To put it mildly, a lot of people are about to see their lives change drastically as consumer choices drive sports broadcasting in a new direction.
Enough with the superlatives. What is happening with ESPN, and why is it important? As Clay Travis of the sports website Outkick the Coverage has been writing for more than a year, the main ESPN business plan, the one that brings in the most revenues to the firm, is doomed to near-extinction, and there is nothing ESPN can do about it. Writes Travis:
In the past five years ESPN has lost 11,346,000 subscribers according to Nielsen data.
If you combine that with ESPN2 and ESPNU subscriber losses this means that ESPN has lost over a billion dollars in cable and satellite revenue just in the past five years, an average of $200 million each year. That total of a billion dollars hits ESPN in the pocketbook not just on a yearly basis, but for every year going forward.
It’s gone forever.
Since it began to grow in popularity in the late 1970s, cable (and later, satellite) television has offered its customers coverage with “bundles,” that is different payments allow cable subscribers to expand their viewership as payments increase. For example, a “basic” cable subscription would allow the customers to view, say, 15 channels including the ABC-CBS-NBC-PBS lineup plus other channels such as CNN or Fox. A higher-tier subscription would add other channels, including ESPN and its associated channels and others such as The Food Channel or assorted movie channels.
One problem with bundling, of course, is that subscribers will pay for channels that they rarely or do not watch. For example, I have a basic subscription with Direct TV, but maybe watch 10 channels at most, even though dozens are available. (I don’t include ESPN or any of the other sports channels in my monthly package.)
As technology has improved in telecommunications, the ability of providers to further segment packages has meant that cable and satellite subscribers are able to eliminate the channels they don’t want to watch, and that means that many are unhooking from ESPN. Continues Travis:
ESPN is losing 10,000 subscribers every day so far in 2017. In the past six years they have lost 13 million subscribers and that subscriber loss is escalating each year. That’s billions of dollars in lost revenue.
Every year for the next five years ESPN is spending more and bringing in less. You don’t have to be Warren Buffett to see that’s a business problem.
He goes on to the heart of the matter:
ESPN is spending over eight billion dollars on sporting rights this year and by 2021 I believe they will be losing money regardless of how many people they fire. ESPN can’t fire employees into profitability. It’s just not possible. These firings are going to become a yearly thing and they still aren’t going to prevent the business from dying.
True, ESPN, as well as all commercial broadcasters, receive advertising revenue, but advertising alone, along with subscriptions from people who choose to purchase ESPN in their cable/satellite packages, will not be enough for the network to meet its obligations to the various organizations it pays for the rights to broadcast their events. From the National Football League (NFL), to the National Hockey League (NHL), to the National Basketball Association (NBA) to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), ESPN has paid billions of dollars, money that is funneled into high athlete salaries, not to mention salaries of coaches, university athletic directors, and, indirectly into the building and maintaining of magnificent sports facilities.
The revenues lost to ESPN are lost forever, and even given the rise of smart phones and Internet streaming, the current state of affairs is unsustainable and the sports landscape is going to change, and the changes will be extensive. It is here that Austrian economics gives us insight into how at least some of the changes will proceed.
Carl Menger, who we know as the “founder” of the Austrian school of economics, in his path-breaking book Principles of Economics in 1871 demonstrated conclusively that the value of the factors of production was based not on costs derived from other costs of production, but rather the value of the factors was imputed via the value consumers placed upon the final goods. This view contradicted the standard British classical view that the value of consumption goods was derived from the value of the factors of production, and it placed Menger in the Pantheon of the early Marginalists.
In laying out his theory, Menger used tobacco and the factors used to produce it. If people suddenly stopped using tobacco, he reasoned, then the value of the factors would change quickly relative to their ability to be transferred to other uses. The more specialized the factor, the greater the change in its value. For example, the land on which tobacco is grown would then be used for other purposes, such as growing corn or wheat, or even pasture for cows or sheep. Highly-specialized tools used only for growing or harvesting tobacco, however, would see a steep drop in value and maybe would have to be abandoned altogether.
What does this have to do with the demise of ESPN? As noted earlier, the network pays billions of dollars for rights to broadcast sports events, and it is unlikely that as ESPN loses the revenues that permit it to pay large sums, other networks will be able to take up that slack. That means the organizations that now receive this money are looking at “haircuts” down the road, which includes the NCAA and collegiate athletic teams.
The ESPN funding allows for the network to broadcast a number of collegiate sports events that ordinarily would not rate enough of an audience, and its large payouts also allow for coaches to receive record-high salaries that would not be possible if these programs depended just on ticket sales and other donations. And while it is tempting to say that “ESPN pays for this,” in reality, it is the consumer of cable/satellite television that ultimately decides the size of the ESPN payouts, and consumers are stating their preferences with their checkbooks, and there is nothing ESPN can do about it.
Without cable/satellite subscribers being willing to pay extra for the sports channels, and without the viewership that draws advertisers, ESPN revenues will fall, and that means that the factors that make up the “product” that appears on ESPN broadcasts also are going to lose value, as long as other networks don’t take up the slack (and it is doubtful they will). Thus, one is looking at a long, steady decline and the world of televised sports is going to have to adjust to the new reality.
Unfortunately, as Travis has pointed out many times, ESPN during this ratings slide has taken a hard turn toward the political left, which has further alienated a lot of conservative viewers. Writes Travis:
As ESPN has lost 10,000 cable and satellite subscribers every day in 2017, seen ratings collapse for all original programming, and recently embarked on the firing of 100 employees as part of a desperate cost cutting move to save its business. The network’s sports media defenders have desperately argued that the network’s embrace of far left wing politics has not had any impact on its collapsing viewership. That’s despite the fact that there have been two different studies that have demonstrated Republican voters have abandoned the network’s original programming in the past year.
In that regard, one can argue that ESPN has done what numerous (and especially elite) colleges and universities have done the past several years: create a hostile atmosphere for white male students all the while wanting them to be paid customers. One cannot both seek to offend and attack the same people one wishes to purchase their services without courting disaster, yet higher education and ESPN are doing just that.
To a certain extent, one can argue that both higher education and ESPN have benefited from “bubble” economies, and as consumer choice becomes directed elsewhere, the bubbles burst. As Carl Menger demonstrated, the bursting of the bubbles will mean that some factor owners will have to receive less pay in order to remain employed, while other factors will have to be transferred to other uses altogether or simply become unemployed. All soothing rhetoric aside, the world of sports broadcasting is going to see major changes in the next decade as consumers have their say.
7. OIL ISSUES
Finally Wall Street gets the picture and throws up on OPEC. Barclay’s is very negative on the future of oil pricing as they see no light at the end of the tunnel
(courtesy zero hedge)
Wall Street Throws Up On OPEC: Barclays Sees “No Light At The End Of The Tunnel”; MS Cuts WTI Price Target
Oil bulls were unhappy with yesterday’s OPEC announcement, which disappointed by adding nothing to the 9 month supply cut extension announcement which had already been leaked and largely priced in while leaving key questions unanswered, including what it has planned for the long-term.
The broader Wall Street commentary was similarly downbeat: “To say that yesterday’s performance was disappointing for bulls is an understatement,” Tamas Varga, analyst at PVM Oil Associates wrote in an emailed report. “It is, however, not a foregone conclusion that the trend is definitely turning. The question now is whether yesterday’s sharp drop in oil prices was a panic long-liquidation or the technical picture is now firmly turning bearish.”
Barclay’s analyst Michael Cohen captured the mood best with a note overnight titled “No light at the end of the tunnel:, in which he writes that “OPEC and several non-OPEC countries finalized plans to extend production cuts for an additional nine months (through Q1 2018) without specifically articulating an exit strategy. During the press conference, Saudi Energy Minister Khalid Al-Falih expressed confidence in the plan to extend the cuts through Q1 2018, saying that inventories would fall below the five-year average before year-end, but cuts should remain in place during Q1 2018 due to seasonal demand weakness, which we highlighted yesterday (OPEC’s Vienna Meeting: Intermission, May 24, 2017). By our calculations, if half of the supply deficit is applied to OECD stocks, we do not see the inventory level approaching the five-year average by this timeframe.”
This is exactly what we warned about in “The Math Behind OPEC’s Revised Production Cut Still Does Not Work.”
Below we excerpt some other of the key highlights from MS, which was clearly soured on the outlook for oil prices after OPEC’s meeting:
- OPEC may still be underestimating shale. Saudi Oil Minister Khalid Al-Falih made several comments that highlighted an interpretation contrary to our thinking about the state of the US shale industry.
- Cost inflation is not yet an issue for US E&Ps. The first comment related to “significant cost inflation” that has hit the industry this year. This belief runs counter to reports from many US E&Ps and the oilfield service companies during their Q1 earnings calls (Figure 3). Those that are experiencing cost inflation have been able to mitigate total well costs through further efficiency gains.
- Most US E&Ps are still drilling their core acreage. The second comment was that as activity ramps up, producers are moving into more expensive shales, which runs counter to E&P reports that the industry has several years of tier 1 (low breakeven) drilling inventory.
- The US oil and gas sector is focused on growth and will slow when prices dictate. The third comment related to a “hope” that shale producers would moderate production. US E&Ps will moderate activity only if prices constrain activity. At current price levels, many producers will continue to meet or exceed their 2017 production guidance.
- The extension should afford some price stability over the next nine months, allowing US producers to move forward with 2017 and even 2018 development plans. During Q1 2017, many E&Ps used $50 oil to provide guidance for 2017. In our view, producers will not diverge from guidance unless prices are significantly below this level ($40-45) for a sustained period.
- The JMMC will monitor country production levels and recommended adjustments if necessary. As we highlighted yesterday, the JMMC is the new mechanism to make recommendations and will be meeting on a bi-monthly basis to discuss the progress of the deal. This new function adds additional uncertainty to what balances will look like over the coming months. If prices fall or rise too much, the JMMC may propose actions to re-stabilize prices.
- The recasting of a new producer group, “NOPEC,” which includes 24 countries that account for around 60% of production. Russian energy minister Novak and Saudi Minister Al Falih took pains to highlight that through regular interaction the group can promote “healthy markets.” Furthermore, the countries are “better poised to approach challenges that might lie ahead.”
- Equatorial Guinea has joined OPEC. This will end up being an accounting change. We expect its almost 300 kb/d of output to decline next year.
Next, Barclays’ implications and outlook:
Market balance implications: If OPEC is taken at its word and maintains 100% compliance over the summer, the balances would likely be 500-600 kb/d tighter than what we currently assume, and this would coincide with an inventory draw that presents upside risk to our $56/b forecast in 2H17 and 1Q18 and downside risk to our forecast in the remainder of 2018 assuming no further changes to OPEC output. For now, we maintain our forecast, as other prevailing factors would likely offset further oil price appreciation, such as accelerated US tight oil growth and demand destruction that would occur as prices increase. We will publish an update to our comprehensive market balance in our upcoming Blue Drum monthly publication. We are already calling for US liquids production to grow 1.2 mb/d from Q4 2016 to Q4 2017 and an additional 1 mb/d from Q4 2017 to Q4 2018. With this agreement, there is scope for output to move even higher over the next 18 months.
The implication of OPEC’s action creates a situation that will force it gradually to exit its market management mode. Minister Al Falih tried to assuage fears that it has an exit strategy in mind by saying it will cross that bridge when it comes to it in November 2017 and next year. In our view, the more accelerated declines we will see in stocks in the coming quarters and the floor OPEC has provided for the coming nine months are likely to result in aggressive growth in US tight oil, which we are already forecasting, and OPEC is likely to struggle to find a big enough hole to fit its incremental supply, keeping the proverbial light at the end of the tunnel out of reach for longer than just the first quarter of 2018.
* * *
Separately, in a just as disappointed note released overnight by another recent oil bull, Morgan Stanley’s Martijn Rats, the commodity analyst echoed what Goldman said yesterday, and lowered its year end oil price forecast from $60 to $55 because while “OPEC’s extended cut will likely lead to stock draws in 2Q/3Q and provide some oil price support, when this agreement ends, and coincides with strong shale growth, the market looks oversupplied again. This has become our expectation for 2018, and we lower price forecasts as a result.”
Other higlights:
OPEC chooses the lesser of two evils: In recent weeks, OPEC found itself faced with a difficult choice: extend the production cuts to bring down bloated inventories, or end the cuts to prevent further loss of market share. The experience of the 1980s has shown that the latter can become as problematic as the former. Clearly, OPEC decided for the former, but it is storing up problems for 2018, in our view.
Near-term we see inventories drawing and providing support for oil prices: Global oil inventories finally started drawing in March, at a rate of ~0.9 mb/d based on monthly data. Weekly data suggests this has continued in April and May. With demand getting a seasonal tailwind, and OPEC extending its cuts, we expect inventory draws to accelerate in 3Q. Altogether, we estimate that global stocks will fall by ~100 million bbl in the balance of the year. Although these draws are smaller and are coming later than we once expected, this should nevertheless provide some price support in coming months. We forecast WTI to end 2017 at $55/bbl, down from our previous forecast of $60/bbl.
But the outlook for 2018 is starting to look troublesome – End of OPEC agreement + Strong shale growth = Loose market: We do not expect that OPEC will extend its output cuts much beyond 1Q. By historical standards, that would be an unusually long period of output restraint. However, non-OPEC production has already returned to year-on-year growth and is set to accelerate in 2018, driven by shale. When the end of the OPEC production cuts meet strong shale growth, the market is almost certainly oversupplied again. As a result, we lower our end-2018 WTI price forecast to $55/bbl, from $60/bbl before, although we could still see lower prices at some point during 2018.
All of this has implications for long-term prices too: Our previous long-term price forecast of ~$70/bbl for WTI by 2019/20 was based on our estimate that ~1.5 mb/d of 2020 demand would need to be supplied by projects that have not been sanctioned yet, but that have break-even oil prices around that level. However, with stronger shale growth, slightly weaker demand and some additional cost deflation, the reliance on this 1.5 mb/d has almost entirely been wiped out. We still see 1.6 mb/d of 2020 demand that needs to come from projects with break-evens of $55-65/bbl, so we lower our end-2020 WTI forecast to $60/bbl.
How long until OPEC is back to the drawing board, or at least jawboning, of even more cuts, and even longer production halts? The answer: not long at all, as this hit moments ago from Reuters:
- RUSSIA’S NOVAK SAYS OPEC+ MONITORING COMMITTEE MAY DISCUSS POSSIBILITY OF ADJUSTING GLOBAL OIL OUTPUT CUT DEAL IN JULY
end
This ought to be “good” for the price of oil: USA crude production hits a 21 month high and rig counts rises for the 19th straight week;
(courtesy zero hedge)
US Crude Production Hits 21-Month Highs As Rig Count Rises For 19th Straight Week
For the 19th week in a row, the number of US oil rigs rose (up 2 to 722). This is the largest number of oil rigs since April 2015 as Lower 48 crude production (much to the chagrin of OPEC) surges to its highest since August 2015.
Lagged WTI prices lead rising rig counts…NOITE – if the relationship holds then we would expect the rig count rised to stall here…
And rising rig counts lead US crude production…
And this is why it matters…
And prices are holding their post-OPEC losses…
“It was so well telegraphed a lot of people were probably thinking they’d take it the extra mile,” Jasper Lawler, senior market analyst at London Capital Group, told Bloomberg. “One of the things worth noting is that the ramp-up into the meeting and the drop down have averaged out; markets are definitely not as optimistic as they were”
8. EMERGING MARKET
end
Your early morning currency/gold and silver pricing/Asian and European bourse movements/ and interest rate settings FRIDAY morning 7:00 am
Euro/USA 1.1195 DOWN .0014/REACTING TO + huge Deutsche bank problems + USA election:/TRUMP HEALTH CARE DEFEAT//ITALIAN REFERENDUM DEFEAT/AND NOW ECB TAPERING BOND PURCHASES/ /USA RAISING INTEREST RATES/EUROPE BOURSES IN THE RED
USA/JAPAN YEN 110.98 UP 0.211(Abe’s new negative interest rate (NIRP), a total DISASTER/SIGNALS U TURN WITH INCREASED NEGATIVITY IN NIRP/JAPAN OUT OF WEAPONS TO FIGHT ECONOMIC DISASTER/KURODA: HELICOPTER MONEY ON THE TABLE AND DECISION ON SEPT 21 DISAPPOINTS WITH STIMULUS/OPERATION REVERSE TWIST
GBP/USA 1.2838 DOWN .0091 (Brexit March 29/ 2017/ARTICLE 50 SIGNED
USA/CAN 1.3465 DOWN .0019 (CANADA WORRIED ABOUT TRADE WITH THE USA WITH TRUMP ELECTION/ITALIAN EXIT AND GREXIT FROM EU/TRUMP INITIATES LUMBER TARIFFS ON CANADA)
Early THIS FRIDAY morning in Europe, the Euro FELL by 14 basis points, trading now ABOVE the important 1.08 level FALLING to 1.1195; Europe is still reacting to Gr Britain HARD BREXIT,deflation, announcements of massive stimulation (QE), a proxy middle east war, and the ramifications of a default at the Austrian Hypo bank, an imminent default of Greece, Glencore, Nysmark and the Ukraine, along with rising peripheral bond yield further stimulation as the EU is moving more into NIRP, and now the Italian referendum defeat AND NOW THE ECB TAPERING OF ITS PURCHASES/ THE USA’S NON tightening by FAILING TO RAISE THEIR INTEREST RATE AND NOW THE HUGE PROBLEMS FACING TOO BIG TO FAIL DEUTSCHE BANK + THE ELECTION OF TRUMP IN THE USA+ TRUMP HEALTH CARE BILL DEFEAT AND MONTE DEI PASCHI NATIONALIZATION / Last night the Shanghai composite CLOSED UP 2.28 POINTS OR 0.07% / Hang Sang CLOSED UP 8.49 POINTS OR 0.80% /AUSTRALIA CLOSED DOWN 0.63% / EUROPEAN BOURSES OPENED RED
We are seeing that the 3 major global carry trades are being unwound. The BIGGY is the first one;
1. the total dollar global short is 9 trillion USA and as such we are now witnessing a sea of red blood on the streets as derivatives blow up with the massive rise in the rise in the dollar against all paper currencies and especially with the fall of the yuan carry trade. The emerging market which house close to 50% of the 9 trillion dollar short is feeling the massive pain as their debt is quite unmanageable.
2, the Nikkei average vs gold carry trade ( NIKKEI blowing up and the yen carry trade HAS BLOWN up/and now NIRP)
3. Short Swiss franc/long assets blew up ( Eastern European housing/Nikkei etc.
These massive carry trades are terribly offside as they are being unwound. It is causing global deflation ( we are at debt saturation already) as the world reacts to lack of demand and a scarcity of debt collateral. Bourses around the globe are reacting in kind to these events as well as the potential for a GREXIT>
The NIKKEI: this FRIDAY morning CLOSED DOWN 126.29 POINTS OR 0.64%
Trading from Europe and Asia:
1. Europe stocks OPENED IN THE RED
2/ CHINESE BOURSES / : Hang Sang CLOSED UP 8.49 POINTS OR 0.03% / SHANGHAI CLOSED UP 2.28 POINTS OR 0.07% /Australia BOURSE CLOSED DOWN 0.630% /Nikkei (Japan)CLOSED DOWN 126.29 POINTS OR 0.64% / INDIA’S SENSEX IN THE RED
Gold very early morning trading: 1266.11
silver:$17.29
Early FRIDAY morning USA 10 year bond yield: 2.234% !!! DOWN 2 IN POINTS from THURSDAY night in basis points and it is trading JUST BELOW resistance at 2.27-2.32%.
The 30 yr bond yield 2.904, DOWN 2 IN BASIS POINTS from THURSDAY night.
USA dollar index early FRIDAY morning: 97.26 UP 1 CENT(S) from THURSDAY’s close.
This ends early morning numbers FRIDAY MORNING
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And now your closing FRIDAY NUMBERS
Portuguese 10 year bond yield: 3.144% DOWN 5 in basis point(s) yield from THURSDAY
JAPANESE BOND YIELD: +.042% DOWN 4/15 in basis point yield from THURSDAY/JAPAN losing control of its yield curve
SPANISH 10 YR BOND YIELD: 1.543% DOWN 4 IN basis point yield from THURSDAY (this is totally nuts!!/
ITALIAN 10 YR BOND YIELD: 2.10 DOWN 2 POINTS in basis point yield from THURSDAY
the Italian 10 yr bond yield is trading 54 points HIGHER than Spain.
GERMAN 10 YR BOND YIELD: +.331% DOWN 3 IN BASIS POINTS ON THE DAY
END
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
IMPORTANT CURRENCY CLOSES FOR FRIDAY
Closing currency crosses for FRIDAY night/USA DOLLAR INDEX/USA 10 YR BOND YIELD/1:00 PM
Euro/USA 1.1164 DOWN .0045 (Euro DOWN 45 Basis points/ represents to DRAGHI A COMPLETE POLICY FAILURE/
USA/Japan: 111.40 DOWN 0.344 (Yen UP 34 basis points/
Great Britain/USA 1.2785 DOWN 0.0145( POUND DOWN 145 basis points)
USA/Canada 1.3457 DOWN .0028 (Canadian dollar DOWN 28 basis points AS OIL ROSE TO $49.46
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This afternoon, the Euro was DOWN by 45 basis points to trade at 1.1164
The Yen ROSE to 111.40 for a GAIN of 34 Basis points as NIRP is STILL a big failure for the Japanese central bank/HELICOPTER MONEY IS NOW DELAYED/BANK OF JAPAN NOW WORRIED AS AS THEY ARE RUNNING OUT OF BONDS TO BUY AS BOND YIELDS RISE /OPERATION REVERSE TWIST ANNOUNCED SEPT 21.2016
The POUND FELL BY 145 basis points, trading at 1.2785/
The Canadian dollar ROSE by 28 basis points to 1.3457, WITH WTI OIL RISING TO : $49.46
Your closing 10 yr USA bond yield DOWN 0 IN basis points from THURSDAY at 2.252% //trading well ABOVE the resistance level of 2.27-2.32%) very problematic USA 30 yr bond yield: 2.917 DOWN 1/4 in basis points on the day /
Your closing USA dollar index, 97,49 UP 25 CENT(S) ON THE DAY/1.00 PM
Your closing bourses for Europe and the Dow along with the USA dollar index closing and interest rates for FRIDAY: 1:00 PM EST
London: CLOSED UP 29.92 POINTS OR 0.40%
German Dax :CLOSED DOWN 19.54 POINTS OR 0.15%
Paris Cac CLOSED DOWN 0.52 POINTS OR 0.01%
Spain IBEX CLOSED DOWN 33.50 POINTS OR 0.31%
Italian MIB: CLOSED DOWN 81.15 POINTS/OR 0.38%
The Dow closed DOWN 2.67 OR 0.01%
NASDAQ WAS closed up 4.94 POINTS OR 0.08% 4.00 PM EST
WTI Oil price; 49.46 at 1:00 pm;
Brent Oil: 52.00 1:00 EST
USA /RUSSIAN ROUBLE CROSS: 56.51 UP 38/100 ROUBLES/DOLLAR
TODAY THE GERMAN YIELD FALLS T0 +0.331% FOR THE 10 YR BOND 4.PM EST EST
END
This ends the stock indices, oil price, currency crosses and interest rate closes for today
Closing Price for Oil, 5 pm/and 10 year USA interest rate:
WTI CRUDE OIL PRICE 5:00 PM:$49.80
BRENT: $52.21
USA 10 YR BOND YIELD: 2.250% (ANYTHING HIGHER THAN 2.70% BLOWS UP THE GLOBE)
USA 30 YR BOND YIELD: 2.916%
EURO/USA DOLLAR CROSS: 1.1176 DOWN .0033
USA/JAPANESE YEN:111.28 down 0.461
USA DOLLAR INDEX: 97.44 up 20 cent(s) ( HUGE resistance at 101.80 broken TO THE DOWNSIDE)
The British pound at 5 pm: Great Britain Pound/USA: 1.2803 : UP .01240 OR 124 BASIS POINTS.
Canadian dollar: 1.3443 up 41 pts
German 10 yr bond yield at 5 pm: +.331%
END
And now your more important USA stories which will influence the price of gold/silver
TRADING IN GRAPH FORM FOR THE DAY
Stocks Surge For 7th Straight Day As US Macro Data Hits 15-Month Lows
“Smells Like Victory” – Happy Memorial Weekend…
Let’s start with this…
S&P at record highs as US macro data topples to 15-month lows…
Nasdaq hit record highs as Earnings Expectations slump to 2017 lows…
Small Caps remain underwater post-Trump-Dump… Nasdaq is now up 7 days in a row – longest streak since early Feb
NOTE – today was different – no big spike in stocks
Today saw S&P and Dow glued to the flatline…with a very chaotic end
Volume continues to collapse in this levitation off the Trump Dump…
As the cap-weighted S&P continues to dramatically outperform the equal-weighted S&P (i.e. the big tech names are driving)
S&P Equal weight remains below the March highs…Simply put, without FANG stocks, th emarket has gone nowhere in almost 3 months…
As Citi notes, a close today above 2,405 on the S&P 500 suggests we can rally towards 2,500+ in the coming weeks:
- Even within trends, markets do not move in straight lines. Rather, market rallies are interspersed between sideways moving markets. In some cases, the majority of a rally is spent in consolidation with the big moves in the trend happening quickly. Such a dynamic is currently at play in the S&P 500.
- Since the bullish break seen in July 2016, the S&P 500 rallied 14% over 46 weeks through today (this came after over a year of the S&P 500 consistently failing around the 2,100 area). However, most of that time has been spent with the equity market in consolidation/ranges. The actual gains have taken place over just 14 of those 46 weeks in the shape of quick market rallies.
- We may now be on the verge of another such move. In the prior three rallies since July, a weekly close through the top of the prior range has signaled the start of a multi-week rally. Another break like this would be confirmed with a close today above 2,405.
- If this is a bullish break, how high can we go? The average rally after the prior three breaks (from the break level) has been 4.2% and a similar move this time would suggest a move to 2,506 in the coming weeks.
- Beyond that, we continue to view the overall global economic and market backdrop to be positive for Equities and continue to think a move towards 2,750 by year end can be seen
Finally, while AMZN dropped after testing towards $1000 agains today, it closed modestly green again (for the 7th straight day)
Here is a helpful chart in case you were wondering what was driving AMZN’s success?
VIX is down 7 straight days and clsoed at the lowest weekly close since 1993…
Short-term VIX crashed a record low…
Treasuries ended the week marginally higher in yield…
But the yield curve (2s10s and 2s30s) have tumbled to cycle lows…
The Dollar index managed to close green on the week after bouncing off the post-Fed drop…
Cable was by far the weakest against the greenback and Yuan the strongest…
Despite dollar ended higher, gold and silver gained on the week…
WTI and RBOB both fell on the week after OPEC disappointed…
Gold and Silver had a great week (with the last now well above pre-fed rate hike lows)
Finally, Bitcoin was hitting the headlines every day this week and ended on a weak note (biggest drop since January) but still up over 10% on the week…
end
My goodness: this is ridiculous. Washington Post writes that Kushner is under FBI scrutiny. The facts suggest otherwise:
(courtesy zero hedge)
Jared Kushner “Under FBI Scrutiny” In Russia Probe: NBC
Update: Just like last week’s bombshells, the Washington Post managed to publish an almost identical confirmation of NBC’s story within minutes…almost like they coordinated…
And, just like NBC, the Washington Post was careful to hedge their salacious title (though multiple paragraphs down in the body of the article) by pointing out that Kushner is not technically a “target” in any investigation and has not been accused of any wrongdoing.
The Post has not been told that Kushner is a target — or the central focus — of the investigation, and he has not been accused of any wrongdoing. Target is a word that generally refers to someone who is the main suspect of investigators’ attention, though prosecutors can and do bring charges against people who are not marked with that distinction.
Last week when the Washington Post first reported that a senior White House adviser and “someone close to the president” was under scrutiny by investigators looking into possible coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign, we noted speculation from the Twittersphere suggesting that that “someone” might be Jared Kushner (see “Unnamed White House Official Under FBI Investigation In Russia Probe“). Now, at least according to NBC, and information garnered from more anonymous sources, it seems that speculation may have been accurate.
Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and one of his senior advisers, has come under FBI scrutiny in the Russia investigation, multiple U.S. officials told NBC News.
Investigators believe Kushner has significant information relevant to their inquiry, officials said. That does not mean they suspect him of a crime or intend to charge him.
The FBI’s scrutiny of Kushner places the bureau’s sprawling counterintelligence and criminal investigation not only on the doorstep of the White House, but on the cusp of the Trump family circle. The Washington Post first reported last week that a senior White House official close to Trump was a “person of interest,” but did not name the person.
Not surprisingly, NBC’s report is lacking on actual facts on why Kushner may be a “person of interest” in the FBI’s inquiry but is long on innuendo as they point out that he met at least once in December with the Russian ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, and he also met last year with a Russian banker, Sergey Gorkov.
Meanwhile, Kushner’s lawyer told NBC that he expects to cooperate if contacted in regards to any inquiry.
“Mr. Kushner previously volunteered to share with Congress what he knows about these meetings,” Kushner’s lawyer, Jamie Gorelick, told NBC News. “He will do the same if he is contacted in connection with any other inquiry.
Of course, despite the sensational headline, NBC’s report still offers no facts to support their larger thesis of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign…but it does help advance the provocative narrative just a bit further…
END
Trump will appeal the travel ban to the Supreme Court
(courtesy zero hedge)
Trump Will Appeal Travel Ban To Supreme Court
Well, Trump did warn he would appeal the travel ban all the way to the Supreme Court if he had to, and that’s precisely what he plans on doing.
On Thursday afternoon, shortly after the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 10-3 vote that Trump’s travel ban likely violates the constitution and ruled against the executive order, Attorney General Jeff Sessions said the Justice Department will ask the Supreme Court to review the appeals court ruling. The 4th Circuit (based in Richmond, Va) is the first appeals court to rule on the revised travel ban unveiled in March. A second appeals court, the 9th U.S. Circuit based in San Francisco, is also weighing the revised travel ban after a federal judge in Hawaii blocked it.
The first travel ban issued Jan. 27 was aimed at seven countries and triggered chaos and protests across the country as travelers were stopped from boarding international flights and detained at airports for hours. Trump tweaked the order after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused to reinstate the ban. Following the revision, Trump’s administration had hoped it would avoid the legal problems that the first version from January encountered, but it was not meant to be.
The new version made it clear the 90-day ban covering those six countries doesn’t apply to those who already have valid visas. It got rid of language that would give priority to religious minorities and removed Iraq from the list of banned countries. But critics said the changes don’t erase the legal problems with the ban.
As described previously, a core question in the case before the 4th Circuit was whether courts should consider Trump’s public statements about wanting to bar Muslims from entering the country as evidence that the policy was primarily motivated by the religion. Trump’s administration argued the court should not look beyond the text of the executive order, which doesn’t mention religion. The countries were not chosen because they are predominantly Muslim but because they present terrorism risks, the administration said.
But Chief Judge Roger L. Gregory wrote that the government’s “asserted national security interest … appears to be a post hoc, secondary justification for an executive action rooted in religious animus and intended to bar Muslims from this country.”
President Donald Trump’s revised travel ban “speaks with vague words of national security, but in context drips with religious intolerance, animus and discrimination,” the appeals court also said Thursday in ruling against the executive order.
To this, Jeff Sessions responded that the court’s ruling blocks Trump’s “efforts to strengthen this country’s national security” adding that Trump is not required to admit people from “countries that sponsor or shelter terrorism until he determines that they can be properly vetted” and don’t pose a security threat.
The three dissenting judges, all appointed by Republican presidents, said the majority was wrong to look beyond the text of the order. Calling the executive order a “modest action,” Judge Paul V. Niemeyer wrote that Supreme Court precedent required the court to consider the order “on its face.” Looked at that way, the executive order “is entirely without constitutional fault,” he wrote.
As for SCOTUS, according to AP, the Supreme Court would likely step into the case if asked as the justices almost always have the final say when a lower court strikes down a federal law or presidential action. Trump could try to persuade the Supreme Court to allow the policy to take effect, even while the justices weigh whether to hear the case, by arguing that the court orders blocking the ban make the country less safe. If the administration does ask the court to step in, the justices’ first vote could signal the court’s ultimate decision.
Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University, said if the Supreme Court follows a partisan divide, the Trump administration may fare better since five of the nine are Republican nominees. Still, he said, it’s difficult to make a confident prediction because “Supreme Court justices don’t always vote in ideological lockstep.”
Critics of Trump’s order were delighted with the outcome:
The case ruled on by the 4th Circuit was originally brought in Maryland by the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Immigration Law Center on behalf of organizations as well as people who live in the U.S. and fear the executive order will prevent them from being reunited with family members from the banned countries.
“President Trump’s Muslim ban violates the Constitution, as this decision strongly reaffirms,” said Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, who argued the case. “The Constitution’s prohibition on actions disfavoring or condemning any religion is a fundamental protection for all of us, and we can all be glad that the court today rejected the government’s request to set that principle aside.”
And now it will be up to the Supreme Court to rule once again on this issue, hopefully finally making it go away. Travel ban aside, the upcoming case will be a litmus test of just what (and how strong) the ideological leanings of the revised SCOTUS bench are, now that Gorsuch is in town.
END
FISA court blasts the FBI for their disregard for rules and illegally shares spy data with private contractors
(courtesy zerohedge)
FISA Court Blasted “FBI’s Apparent Disregard For Rules”; Illegally Shared Spy Data With “Private Contractors”
Earlier this week we highlighted sections of a recently unclassified FISA Court order which found that the Obama administration routinely conducted “widespread” illegal searches of American citizens, an issue which the court described as a “serious fourth amendment issue” (see “FISA Court Finds “Serious Fourth Amendment Issue” In Obama’s “Widespread” Illegal Searches Of American Citizens“).
Today, as highlighted by Circa, we find the that FBI, led by James Comey, was one of the biggest offenders when it came to improper usage of foreign-sourced intelligence on American citizens. Per the FISA court order (which can be found here), the DOJ conducted a review of the FBI’s handling of so-called “Section 702-acquired information” beginning on March 9, 2016 and what that review found was fairly disturbing.
Among other things, the DOJ found that the FBI routinely shared “raw FISA information” on American citizens with “private contractors”…to paraphrase, the FBI took illegally sourced intelligence on American citizens (no warrants required) and shared it with random private citizens working at non-government firms.
“On March 9, 2016, DOJ oversight personnel conducting a minimization review at the FBI’s [redacted] learned that the FBI had disclosed raw FISA information, includined but not limited to Section 702-acquired information, to [redacted]...largely staffed by private contractors.”
But it wasn’t just that one time…
“For these reasons, the government concluded that the FBI had given the information to the private entity [redcated], not to an assisting federal agency.”
All of which resulted in the following punchline from the FISA Court:
“The Court is nonetheless concerned about the FBI’s apparent disregard of minimization rules and whether the FBI may be engaging in similar disclosures of raw Section 702 information that have not been reported.”
But sure, our intelligence agencies should be blindly trusted to spy on American citizens without the hassle of warrants…they would never abuse those powers, right? Plus, it’s for our own good…
“Those who would give up essen
Trump takes on the Germans with their huge trade surplus with the uSA. Trump vows to stop this
(courtesy zerohedge)
Trump Slams “Very Bad” Germans For Selling Millions Of Cars In US: “We Will Stop This”
A day after Trump stunned his fellow NATO leaders, shoving one of them out of the way for a photo-op and demanding that they “must do more” to offset defense costs which are mostly borne by the US, Trump lobbed another bomb at the European center-right consensus by renewing his attacks on the German auto industry during a closed door meeting with two high-ranking European Union officials, according to a report in German magazine Der Spiegel, that was picked up by Bloomberg and CNBC.
Citing unidentified attendees, Spiegel quoted Trump as saying that “the Germans are bad, very bad” and adding “look at the millions of cars that they sell in the U.S. Terrible. We’re going to stop that.” The comments were said to have been made during a closed-door meeting with the EU President Jean-Claude Juncker and the European Council President Donald Tusk, who reportedly both stood up for Germany, according to CNBC.
Trump administration officials immediately went into damage-control mode, even as Juncker said the reports of the comment in question had been exaggerated. National Economic Council Director and former Goldman Sachs President Gary Cohn clarified that the US has concerns with the US-German trade balance, not with Germany itself.
“He said they’re very bad on trade, but he doesn’t have a problem with Germany. He said his dad is from Germany. He said, ‘I don’t have a problem Germany, I have a problem with German trade’,” according to Bloomberg.
The German trade surplus rose to a record €235 billion ($284 billion) last year, while the US trade deficit widened in January to its highest level since March 2012. Excluding the EU, Germany is the third largest exporter in the world, after China and the US.
Shares of German automakers were down slightly in Frankfurt trading following Trump’s comments, which apparently reminded investors of his January threat to slap BMW AG with a 35% tariff.
Trump reportedly tried to negotiate a bilateral trade deal with German Chancellor Angela Merkel when she visited Washington in March, according to CNBC. But Merkel insisted that all trade deals with the EU must be made unilaterally.
Following his meeting with Merkel back in March, Trump claimed that the Germans owe “vast sums of money” to NATO, and that the US “must be paid more” for the defense services it provides to Germany.
To be sure, Trump wasn’t the first U.S. leader to complain that most NATO nations, including Germany, weren’t meeting the alliance’s goal that members spend 2% of their GDP on defense. Germany spends about 1.2% currently.
In fact, none other than President Barack Obama in 2016 said in an interview with The Atlantic about his foreign policy doctrine that “free riders aggravate me.”
END
A bill in California to raise the minimum wage to $15.00 will no doubt cause a huge number of teenagers to be fired especially if the Democrats wins Congress in 2018.
(courtesy zero hedge)
Pelosi Vows To Get A Bunch Of Teenagers Fired If Democrats Win Congress
Top congressional Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer and Bernie Sanders, held a press conference earlier today to officially introduce their “Fight For $15” minimum wage legislation, dubbed the Raise the Wage Act. Among other things, the bill primarily serves to more than double the federal minimum wage from it’s current level of $7.25 to $15 by 2024.
The Raise the Wage Act would raise the minimum wage to $15 per hour by 2024 and would be indexed to the median wage growth thereafter. These increases would restore the minimum wage to 1968 levels, when the value was at its peak. The bill would also gradually increase the tipped minimum wage, which has been fixed at $2.13 per hour since 1991, bringing it to parity with the regular minimum wage. Moreover, it would also phase out the youth minimum wage, that allows employers to pay workers under 20 years old a lower wage for the first 90 calendar days of work. This legislation would give more than 41 million low-wage workers a raise, increasing the wages of almost 30 percent of the wage-earning workforce in the United States.
The Raise the Wage Act is front loaded to provide the biggest impact to workers. Upon enactment, the federal minimum wage would be increased from $7.25 to $9.25. The following increases are: $10.10 (2018); $11 (2019); $12 (2020); $13 (2012); $13.50 (2013); $14.20 (2023); $15.00 (2024).
Meanwhile, foreshadowing the Democrats’ key campaign promise in 2018, undoubtedly designed to win back working class voters of the Midwest who abandoned them ‘yugely’ in 2016, Nancy Pelosi vowed her party would pass a $15 per hour minimum wage within the first 100 hours if they manage to recapture Congress during the next election cycle.
“We’re willing to fight for $15, and I’ll tell you one thing for sure, we win the election and in the first 100 hours we will pass a $15 per hour minimum wage.”
“We’d rather have it now. We’d rather win on the issue than worry about the election.”
Of course, seemingly no amount of empirical evidence will ever convince progressives that raising minimum wages to artificially elevated levels is a bad idea. Somehow the basic idea that raising the cost of a good ultimately results in lower consumption of that good just doesn’t compute.
So while it will undoubtedly fall on deaf ears, we would once again point Ms. Pelosi to a recent study from the American Action Forum (AAF) which estimated that 2.6 million jobs will be lost around the country over the next several years as states phase-in minimum wage hikes that have already been passed (see “State Minimum Wage Hikes Already Passed Into Law Expected To Cost 2.6 Million Jobs, New Study Finds“). Shockingly, and only after running a lot of really complicated math using complex equations that most of us stupid people just wouldn’t understand, AAF ultimately concluded the whole elasticity of demand thing actually works (a.k.a. ‘the higher shit is priced the less people will buy of it’).
Moreover, as Dunkin’ Donuts’ CEO recently pointed out, a significant number of Americans working for minimum wage are teenagers and not the “older, blue-collar workers” that Bernie and Nancy say they want to help. Which, of course, means that to the extent they get to keep their jobs a fair portion of the minimum wage increases will simply flow to teenagers who may already be a part of affluent families.
But goodluck with the crusade, Nancy and Bernie! If you get hungry along the way, we highly recommend you try out a sandwich from this new “Big Mac ATM” which comes with McDonald’s special sauce and all the fixin’s but requires exactly 0 of your minimum wage workers to prepare.
END
You will recall that Republican candidate Gianforte assaulted a reporter the day before the election in Montana. It had no effect on that election as Gianforte wins handily. We were waiting to see any anti Trump backlash which was not to be
(courtesy zerohedge)
Republican Gianforte Wins Montana Special Election Despite Assault Charge
Political pundits were closely watching last night’s special election in Montana for two reasons: to see if there is an anti-Trump sentiment shift in this hard-line republican state, and whether the “body slamming” scandal that sent shockwaves just one day prior would cost Republican frontrunner Greg Gianforte the election.
The results emerged early on Friday morning, when Republican Greg Gianforte, a wealthy technology executive who had urged voters to send him to Congress to help Trump, was projected to win Thursday’s special election for Montana’s lone House seat with about 50% of the vote, while challenger Democrat Rob Quist had 44% at the time of the call, according to the Montana secretary of State’s website. Quist, a banjo player and first-time candidate, had focused his campaign on criticism of the Republican effort to repeal and replace former President Barack Obama’s healthcare law.
Gianforte’s victory came only hours after a shocking physical altercation with Guardian reported Ben Jacobs, whose audio was recorded and disseminated, led to the local sheriff filing a misdemeanor assault charge against the republican. Gianforte is scheduled to appear in county court sometime before June 7—the charge carries a maximum fine of $500 or a prison term of no more than six months.
And while the news blanketed the news and prompted three major Montana papers to pull their endorsement of Gianforte, the Republican was buoyed by how many voters sent in their ballots early, making their choice before the altercation. According to Reuters, it was unclear if Gianforte’s assault had an impact on the vote. More than a third of the state’s registered voters had already submitted ballots before it happened, state election officials said, and some Gianforte supporters shrugged off the charges or said they did not believe published accounts.
“I feel like, it’s all just propaganda, you know what I mean, it’s hard for me to believe anything the media tells me,” said Nathaniel Trumper, who cast a vote for Gianforte at a polling station in Helena.
The assault occurred as Jacobs tried to ask Gianforte about healthcare, according to an audio tape. Fox News Channel reporter Alicia Acuna, who was preparing to interview Gianforte, said the candidate “grabbed Jacobs by the neck with both hands and slammed him to the ground.”
Speaking to cheering supporters in Bozeman after his win, Gianforte apologized for the incident and said he was not proud of his actions. “I should not have responded the way I did, and for that I’m sorry,” Gianforte said. “I should not have treated that reporter that way.”
Gianforte specifically addressed his apology to Jacobs. “Last night I made a mistake,” he said, adding: “I’m sorry, Mr Ben Jacobs.”
The victory will calm Republicans who had grown restless with the rapidly tightening race in what had been a safe Republican seat for years. And it deals a blow to Democrats who had hoped to frame a victory as a rebuke of President Trump that would give them a shot of momentum ahead of the 2018 midterms.
Meanwhile, Quist, who raised more than $6 million for his upstart bid, said the experience gave him insight into the economic struggles some people face. He campaigned last weekend with U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who won the state’s 2016 Democratic presidential primary against Hillary Clinton.
As for the consequences of Gianforte’s bodyslamming of Jacobs, the republican could face additional, more serious charges once prosecutors review the evidence, Gallatin County Attorney Marty Lambert told Reuters.
Gianforte has two weeks to enter a plea to the misdemeanor citation issued by the Gallatin County Sheriff’s Office, according to Lambert, who said he would likely review the case before then to decide whether it should be treated as a felony offense, which would supersede the current charge. “There’s always the possibility that when we get the case and the details, that we might look differently at the charging decision,” Lambert said.
Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel called Gianforte’s apology “a good first step toward redemption” and said she hoped he “continues to work toward righting his wrong.” Gianforte will take the House seat vacated when Trump named Ryan Zinke as secretary of the interior. Trump and Vice President Mike Pence recorded robocalls to voters on Gianforte’s behalf, and Republican groups poured millions into ads criticizing Quist for property tax liens and unpaid debts, which Quist said stemmed from a botched gallbladder surgery.
end
Core durable goods/new orders plunge in April
(courtesy zero hedge0
Core Durable Goods New Orders Plunge In April
Headline durable goods orders tumbled 0.7% MoM (the worst of the year), but beat expectations of a 1.5% drop. However, Core Durable Goods New Orders fell 0.4% (dramatically worse than the +0.4% expectation) for the worst performance since June 2016.
- Non-Defense ex-Aircraft new orders were unchanged in April (huge miss) – weakest in 2017
- Shipments Ex-Aircraft fell 0.1% in April (huge miss) – weakest in 2017
Worst still, Headline New Orders are unchanged year-over-year…

end
strange: Q1 DGP revised upwards to 1.2% on stronger spending despite corporate profits tumbling. Still no word on 2nd quarter GDP but expect a huge downdraft with yesterday’s poor inventory numbers and today’s poor durable goods report
(courtesy zero hedge)
Q1 GDP Revised To 1.2% On Stronger Spending, Capex, While Corporate Profits Tumble
Q2 GDP is starting to get in trouble with Durable Goods piling on after inventories weakness yesterday.
We have one question – when does this revert?
After a very disappointing first Q1 GDP print of only 0.7%, on Friday the BEA reported that its second estimate of first quarter growth showed a sizable rebound, with annualized GDP growing at 1.2%, above the 0.9% estimate. The growth rate, however, was still well below the 2.1% print from Q4 2016.
The increase in real GDP was accounted for by increases in business investment, housing investment, consumer spending on services, and exports. These increases were partly offset by decreases in inventory investment, and government spending. Imports, which are a subtraction from GDP, increased. The upward revision to the second estimate of GDP growth reflected upward revisions in business investment, consumer spending in services, and state and local government spending. These upward revisions were partly offset by a downward revision to inventory investment.
Of note, personal consumption contributed 0.44% to the bottom GDP line, up nearly double from the 0.23% reported one month ago. In a longer-term context, however, it was still a disappointing number.
Similarly, fixed investment rose to 1.85% in the second revision, up from 1.62% reported in the first revision.
Yet while the headline data showed a modest improvement, one which will likely subtract from “pent up” Q2 GDP growth, a more troubling observation was revealed in the corporate profits estimation, which decreased 1.9% at a quarterly rate in the first quarter of 2017 after increasing 0.5 percent in the fourth quarter of 2016.
- Profits of domestic nonfinancial corporations decreased 1.4 percent after decreasing 4.9 percent.
- Profits of domestic financial corporations decreased 5.5 percent after increasing 5.4 percent.
- Profits from the rest of the world increased 1.4 percent after increasing 11.0 percent.
- Y/y corp. profits grew 3.7% in 1Q after rising 9.3% prior quarter
- Financial industry profits declined 5.5% in 1Q after rising 5.4% prior quarter
- Federal Reserve bank profits up 2.7% in 1Q after falling 1.8% prior quarter
- Nonfinancial sector profits fell 1.6% in 1Q after falling 4.9% prior quarter
A big part of the reason why this number differs so notably from the alleged surge in profitability, is that it avoid non-GAAP adjustments and various other gimmicks used by management teams to boost their stock prices and increase stock-linked compensation.
As the WSJ notes, a main driver behind the drop was that legal settlements trimmed top-line numbers. Profits after tax without inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustment, a number that reflects figures reported by companies, was down 0.3% from the fourth quarter of 2016, Commerce Dept says. Financial corporate profits were hit after the federal government imposed a $3.1B penalty on a unit of Deutsche Bank and a $2.48B penalty on a unit of Credit Suisse, and nonfinancial profits were reduced by $4.3B following a settlement with Volkswagen.
Of course, for stock market purposes, these settlements are “adjusted” out. However, when it comes to real data, what matters is the actual, GAAP bottom line, and here we just suffered the biggest drop in over a year.
And now we await for the sellside to start cutting their Q2 GDP estimates as a result of this “pulling forward” of growth back to Q1.
end
Soft data report U. of Michigan confidence report shows a huge divide between Republicans and Democrats. However what it does agree with on both sides, it that it is time to sell your house
(courtesy zero hedge)
UMich Confidence Shows Partisan Divide Widest Ever But All Agree It’s Time To Sell Your House
UMich confidence is stable at its post-Trump plateau for now, but the partisan divide between Republicans (robust economic growth ahead) and Democrats (recession looms) has never been wider. However, one thing they all agree on is that for the first time since the peak of the housing market in 2006, home-buyers are negative on home prices with home-sellers most dominant since 2005.
The current conditions dropped but hope rose once again…
As UMich’sRichard Curtin notes, Consumer sentiment has continued to move along the high plateau established following Trump’s election. The final May figure was virtually unchanged from either earlier in May or the April reading. Indeed, the May figure was nearly identical with the December to May average of 97.3.
Moreover, the partisan divide between Democrats and Republicans has also remained largely unchanged, with the first expecting a recession and the other more robust economic growth. How long will economic expectations be dominated by partisanship? Unlike differences in expectations across age, education, or income groups, which usually reflect actual differences in prospects for employment and income expectations, for example, partisanship is reflected by economic policy preferences. Since no major policies, such as healthcare, taxes, or infrastructure spending have yet been adopted, the partisan divide may reflect differences in policy preferences expressed as expected economic outcomes. Thus, the extreme partisan divide may persist until passage is deemed either inevitable or impossible. While extremes may well narrow, it is unlikely that the impact of partisanship on economic expectations will disappear.
Despite the expected bounce back in spending in the current quarter, personal consumption is expected to advance by 2.3% in 2017, although this is based on averages across the political divide, which has never been as extreme as it is currently.
Selective perception of economic news still dominates. Favorable news about recent economic developments were reported by 84% of Republicans but just 37% of Democrats; unfavorable developments were reported by just 19% of Republicans but by 73% of Democrats. Nearly all of the difference involved references to jobs and economic policies, with Republicans holding much more favorable views on jobs and policies than Democrats. The impact of these disparate views led 79% of Republicans to anticipate a continuous expansion over the next five years and 66% of Democrats to anticipate a recession.
While the partisan gap on the year-ahead outlook for the economy was slightly narrower than three months ago, it is still substantial. Economic conditions were anticipated to improve during the year ahead by 75% of Republicans but only by 16% of Democrats; this gap of 59 percentage points was slightly better than the 68 percentage points recorded three months ago.
However, there is one thing that all respondents agree on… Home Prices are a huge concern…
Simply put – it’s a seller’s market!! And the last time that happened, things escalated quickly (as we are now seeing in San Francisco)
end
The G7 leaders got nowhere with Trump to back a climate deal and that was to be expected.
(courtesy zero hedge)
G7 Leaders Fail To Persuade Trump To Back Climate Deal After “Controversial” Debate
The Group of Seven world leaders, or rather Six excluding Trump, tried to tame the US president… and failed. Which means on Saturday the group will sign off on a significantly “pared-down” statement at the close of their meeting in Sicily – an indication of deep divisions on climate change, trade and various other issues between Trump and the rest of the developed world. Pushing hard to persuade Trump to back the landmark Paris climate accord deal, after hours of talks that were described by Angela Merkel as “controversial” the G-7 leaders failed to get Trump’s endorsement.
The leaders did, however, issue a joint statement on fighting terrorism, admonishing internet service providers and social media companies to “substantially increase” their efforts to rein in extremist content. According to Italy’s Prime Minister and host, Paolo Gentiloni, the group was also inching closer to finding common language on trade, a controversial for Trump who has repeatedly pushed for an “America first” agenda.
But on the issue of climate, there was no breakthrough.
“There is one open question, which is the U.S. position on the Paris climate accords,” Gentiloni told reporters according to Reuters, referring to a 2015 deal on reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
“All others have confirmed their total agreement on the accord.” U.S. officials had signaled beforehand that Trump, who dismissed climate change as a “hoax” during his campaign, would not take a decision on the climate deal in Taormina, the cliff-top town overlooking the Mediterranean where G7 leaders met.
Other leaders, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel and new French President Emmanuel Macron, had hoped to sway the president at his first major international summit.
They failed, despite what Merkel described as a “controversial” climate debate and added that there was a “very intensive” exchange of views. One can only imagine.
Speaking separately, Trump’s economic adviser Gary Cohn said Trump’s views on climate were “evolving” and that he would ultimately do what was best for the United States.
* * *
The tense summit, held at a luxury hotel that was once a Dominican monastery and base for the Nazi air force during World War Two, took place one day after Trump blasted NATO allies for spending too little on defense and described Germany’s trade surplus as “very bad” in a meeting with EU officials. As noted yesterday, Trump’s NATO speech shocked allies, who had been expecting him to reaffirm Washington’s commitment to Article 5, the part of the military alliance’s founding treaty which describes an attack on one member as an attack on all.
Italy chose to stage the summit in Sicily to draw attention to Africa, which is 140 miles (225 km) from the island at its closest point across the Mediterranean. More than half a million migrants, most from sub-Saharan Africa, have reached Italy by boat since 2014, taking advantage of the chaos in Libya to launch their perilous crossings.
In addition to trade and climate, drafts of the communique as of Friday were due to address topics such as migration and gender equality. The “ongoing large-scale movement” of migrants and refugees calls for “coordinated efforts,” according to a draft of the communique seen by Bloomberg News.
“We reaffirm the sovereign rights of states to control their own borders and set clear limits on net migration levels, as key elements of their national security and economic well-being,” according to the draft.
The nations are also set to say gender equality is fundamental for human rights. The leaders also issued a separate statement on counter-terrorism efforts that called on social media companies to do more in the fight against terrorism.
As the leaders attended a concert and gala dinner on Friday night, their aides worked to finalize the draft wording. “On the major theme of global trade, we are still working on the shape of the final communique, but it seems to me the direct discussions today have produced common positions that we can work on,” said Gentiloni.
The final G7 communique traditionally outlines the common positions
of the member states’ leaders on the economy and other global issues
requiring joint action by the world’s leading powers. This year’s
statement is on pace to be less than 10 pages, or less than a third the 32-page memo signed last year in Japan, according to Bloomberg.
“You can test this stuff empirically. A shorter communique tends to mean the less they actually produce by way of commitments,” John Kirton, director of the University of Toronto’s G7 Research Group, told Bloomberg. He downplayed the relative scale of divisions:
“I don’t think it’s more divided than it’s ever been before,” he said, citing
the 1982 summit as a failure where the issue of a Soviet gas pipeline,
opposed by Ronald Reagan, divided the countries. “So they patched over
some communique, but then they all ran off to their post-summit
briefings and said ’we don’t agree with it, we don’t agree with it.’ So
it made things worse. They kind of publicized their failure.”
* * *
There was one thing the group could agree on: a crackdown on the “internet abuse.”
“We will combat the misuse of the Internet by terrorists,” the statement said. The G-7 “calls for communication service providers and social media companies to substantially increase their efforts to address terrorist content.”
end
Let us wrap up with week with this offering from Greg Hunter of uSAWatchdog
(courtesy Greg Hunter/USAWatchdog
Still No Proof of Trump/Russia Collusion, Economic Update, MSM Is Fake News
By Greg Hunter On May 26, 2017

Former CIA Director John Brennan testified on Capitol Hill this week and told Congress that he was “concerned” and “aware of information and intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between Russian officials and . . . the Trump campaign.” The big headline buried in the mainstream media (MSM) reporting was Brennan admitting in the same hearing, “I don’t know whether or not such collusion . . . existed. I don’t know.” That means there is still zero evidence that anyone in the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians. The “Witch Hunt” continues.
The Fed warns of “vulnerabilities” from elevated asset prices. Noble Prize winner in economics Robert Shiller opines the stock market could go up “50%” from here. Legendary investor Asher Edelman admits on CBNC, “I have no doubt” the Plunge Protection Team in the federal government is propping up the stock market. What gives? Why all the wild predictions? Gregory Mannarino of TradersChoice.net says, “Nobody can get their head around the magnitude of the distortions in the markets. . . . They are off the charts.” This is the reason for the wild calls both up and down, according to Mannarino.
There is a new Harvard poll out, and it proves the mainstream media’s (MSM) biased reporting is nothing more than propaganda and “fake news.” According to the new Harvard-Harris poll, “65% of voters believe the MSM publishes fake news.” That poll says it all and proves the MSM is killing its own business with its biased political reporting.
Join Greg Hunter as he looks at these stories and more in the Weekly News Wrap-Up.
(There is much more in the video newscast.)
Video Link
http://usawatchdog.com/still-no-proof-of- trumprussia-collusion-economic-update-msm-is-fake-news/
end
Well that about does it for today
To all our American friends a safe and happy Memorial Holiday weekend
I will see you all on Tuesday night
h.

Silver ore in mines is getting less-rich. That makes sense, because miners dig up the rich stuff first. And silver, like gold, is a depleting asset. That’s why primary silver miners’ average yield has fallen from 13 ounces per ton in 2005 to 7.4 ounces per ton in 2016. This is a 43% decline in just 12 years.



























































[…] MAY 26/GOLD BREAKS THROUGH $1264 AND FINISHES THE COMEX SESSION AT $1267.75/SILVER ALSO PERFORMS ADM… […]
LikeLike
Rated 5 out of 5 by ARice from Perfect!
LikeLike