GOLD: $1240.90 DOWN $12.15(COMEX TO COMEX CLOSINGS)
Silver: $15.83 DOWN 31 CENTS (COMEX TO COMEX CLOSINGS)
Closing access prices:
Gold $1242.100
silver: $15.86
For comex gold:
JULY/
NUMBER OF NOTICES FILED TODAY FOR JULY CONTRACT:14 NOTICE(S) FOR 1400 OZ
TOTAL NOTICES SO FAR 29 FOR 2900 OZ (0.0902 tonnes)
For silver:
JUNE
1583 NOTICE(S) FILED TODAY FOR
7,915,000 OZ/
Total number of notices filed so far this month: 3471 for 17,355,000 oz
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Bitcoin: BID $6305/OFFER $6390: UP $460(morning)
Bitcoin: BID/ $6584/offer $6669: DOWN $749 (CLOSING/5 PM)
end
First Shanghai gold fix comes at 10 pm est
The second Shanghai gold fix: 2:15 pm
First Shanghai gold fix gold: 10 pm est: 1255.42
NY price at the same time: 1251.90
PREMIUM TO NY SPOT: $3.52
Second gold fix early this morning: 1252.28
USA gold at the exact same time:1248.25
PREMIUM TO NY SPOT: $4.03
AGAIN, SHANGHAI REJECTS NEW YORK PRICING.
WE WILL NOT PROVIDE LONDON FIXES AS THEY ARE NOT ACCURATE AS TO WHAT IS GOING ON AT THE SAME TIME FRAME.
Let us have a look at the data for today
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In silver, the total OPEN INTEREST FELL BY A SMALL 454 CONTRACTS FROM 209,605 DOWN TO 209,151 DESPITE FRIDAY’S 14 CENT GAIN IN SILVER PRICING. WE ARE STARTING TO WITNESS A CONSIDERABLE DROP IN COMEX OPEN INTEREST AT THE COMEX IN SILVER BUT AT THE SAME TIME WE SEE LARGE AMOUNTS OF PHYSICAL METAL STAND FOR DELIVERY.
WE HAVE NOW ENTERED THE ACTIVE DELIVERY MONTH OF JULY WHERE WE CONTINUE TO WITNESS LONGS PACK THEIR BAGS AND MIGRATE OVER TO LONDON IN GREATER NUMBERS. WE WERE NOTIFIED THAT WE HAD A STRONG SIZED NUMBER OF COMEX LONGS TRANSFERRING THEIR CONTRACTS TO LONDON THROUGH THE EFP: 0 EFP’S FOR JULY, 2256 EFP’S FOR SEPT. , 0 EFP’S FOR DECEMBER AND ZERO FOR ALL OTHER MONTHS AND THEREFORE TOTAL ISSUANCE: OF 2256 CONTRACTS. WITH THE TRANSFER OF 2256 CONTRACTS, WHAT THE CME IS STATING IS THAT THERE IS NO SILVER (OR GOLD) TO BE DELIVERED UPON AT THE COMEX AS THEY MUST EXPORT THEIR OBLIGATION TO LONDON. ALSO KEEP IN MIND THAT THERE CAN BE A DELAY OF 24-48 HRS IN THE ISSUING OF EFP’S. THE 2256 EFP CONTRACTS TRANSLATES INTO 11.28 MILLION OZ ACCOMPANYING:
1.THE 14 CENT GAIN IN SILVER PRICE AT THE COMEX AND
2. THE STRONG AMOUNT OF SILVER OUNCES WHICH STOOD FOR THE JUNE COMEX DELIVERY MONTH. (5.420 MILLION OZ) AND NOW JULY/ 2018 WITH 26.230 MILLION OZ INITIALLY STANDING FOR DELIVERY.
ACCUMULATION FOR EFP’S/SILVER/J.P.MORGAN’S HOUSE OF BRIBES, / STARTING FROM FIRST DAY NOTICE/FOR MONTH OF JUNE:
2256 CONTRACTS (FOR 1 TRADING DAY TOTAL 2256 CONTRACTS) OR 11.28 MILLION OZ: (AVERAGE PER DAY: 2256 CONTRACTS OR 11.28 MILLION OZ/DAY)
TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA AS TO THE HUGE SUPPLY THIS MONTH IN SILVER: SO FAR THIS MONTH OF JULY: 11.28 MILLION PAPER OZ HAVE MORPHED OVER TO LONDON. THIS REPRESENTS AROUND 1.61% OF ANNUAL GLOBAL PRODUCTION (EX CHINA EX RUSSIA)* LAST MONTH’S 345.43 MILLION OZ IS THE SECOND HIGHEST RECORDED ISSUANCE OF EFP’S AND IT FOLLOWED THE RECORD SET IN APRIL 2018 OF 385.75 MILLION OZ.
ACCUMULATION IN YEAR 2018 TO DATE SILVER EFP’S: 1,671.01 MILLION OZ.
ACCUMULATION FOR JAN 2018: 236.879 MILLION OZ
ACCUMULATION FOR FEB 2018: 244.95 MILLION OZ
ACCUMULATION FOR MARCH 2018: 236.67 MILLION OZ
ACCUMULATION FOR APRIL 2018: 385.75 MILLION OZ
ACCUMULATION FOR MAY 2018: 210.05 MILLION OZ
ACCUMULATION FOR JUNE 2018: 345.43 MILLION OZ
RESULT: WE HAD A SMALL SIZED DECREASE IN COMEX OI SILVER COMEX OF 454 DESPITE THE 14 CENT GAIN IN SILVER PRICE. WE HAVE NOW ENTERED THE NEW ACTIVE MONTH OF JULY AND THE CME NOTIFIED US THAT IN FACT WE HAD A STRONG SIZED EFP ISSUANCE OF 2256 CONTRACTS WHICH EXITED OUT OF THE SILVER COMEX AND TRANSFERRED THEIR OI TO LONDON AS FORWARDS. SPECULATORS CONTINUED THEIR INTEREST IN ATTACKING THE SILVER COMEX FOR PHYSICAL SILVER (SEE COMEX DATA) . FROM THE CME DATA: 0 EFP CONTRACTS FOR JULY, 2256 EFP’S FOR SEPT, 0 EFP’S FOR DECEMBER AND ZERO FOR ALL OVER MONTHS FOR A DELIVERABLE FORWARD CONTRACT OVER IN LONDON WITH A FIAT BONUS (TOTAL: 2256). TODAY WE GAINED A CONSIDERABLE: 2136 TOTAL OI CONTRACTS ON THE TWO EXCHANGES: i.e.2256 OPEN INTEREST CONTRACTS HEADED FOR LONDON (EFP’s) TOGETHER WITH AN DECREASE OF 120 OI COMEX CONTRACTS. AND ALL OF THIS DEMAND HAPPENED WITH A 14 CENT GAIN IN PRICE OF SILVER AND A CLOSING PRICE OF $16.14 WITH RESPECT TO YESTERDAY’S TRADING. YET WE STILL HAVE A GIGANTIC AMOUNT OF SILVER STANDING AT THE COMEX FOR DELIVERY IN THIS ACTIVE JULY DELIVERY MONTH OF ALMOST 26 MILLION OZ. IT SURE LOOKS LIKE A FAILED BANKER SHORT COVERING EXERCISE!!
In ounces AT THE COMEX, the OI is still represented by OVER 1 BILLION oz i.e. 1.048 MILLION OZ TO BE EXACT or 150% of annual global silver production (ex Russia & ex China).
FOR THE NEW FRONT JULY MONTH/ THEY FILED AT THE COMEX: 1583 NOTICE(S) FOR 7,915,000 OZ OF SILVER
IN SILVER, WE SET THE NEW RECORD OF OPEN INTEREST AT 243,411 CONTRACTS ON APRIL 9.2018. AND AGAIN THIS HAS BEEN SET WITH A LOW PRICE OF $16.51
ON THE DEMAND SIDE WE HAVE THE FOLLOWING:
- HUGE AMOUNTS OF SILVER STANDING FOR DELIVERY (MARCH/2018: 27 MILLION OZ , APRIL/2018 : 2.485 MILLION OZ MAY: 36.285 MILLION OZ / JUNE/2018 (5.420 MILLION OZ) AND NOW JULY 2018 AMOUNT INITIALLY STANDING: 26.230 MILLION OZ )
- HUGE RECORD OPEN INTEREST IN SILVER 243,411 CONTRACTS (OR 1.217 BILLION OZ/ SET APRIL 9/2018
- HUGE ANNUAL EFP’S ISSUANCE EQUAL TO 2.9 BILLION OZ OR 400% OF SILVER ANNUAL PRODUCTION/2017
- RECORD SETTING EFP ISSUANCE FOR ANY MONTH IN SILVER; APRIL/2018/ 385.75 MILLION OZ/ AND THE SECOND HIGHEST RECORDED EFP ISSUANCE JUNE 2018 345.43 MILLION OZ
AND YET, WITH THE EXTREMELY HIGH EFP ISSUANCE, WE HAVE A CONTINUAL LOW PRICE OF SILVER DESPITE THE ABOVE HUGE DEMAND. TO ME THE ONLY ANSWER IS THAT WE HAVE SOVEREIGN (CHINA) WHO IS ENDEAVOURING TO GOBBLE UP ALL AVAILABLE PHYSICAL SILVER NO MATTER WHERE, EXACTLY WHAT J.P.MORGAN IS DOING. AND IT IS MY BELIEF THAT J.P.MORGAN IS HOLDING ITS SILVER FOR ITS BENEFICIAL OWNER..THE USA GOVERNMENT WHO IN TURN IS HOLDING THAT SILVER FOR CHINA.(FOR A SILVER LOAN REPAYMENT).
In gold, the open interest ROSE BY A STRONG 7258 CONTRACTS UP TO 477,420 WITH THE RISE IN THE GOLD PRICE/FRIDAY’S TRADING (A GAIN IN PRICE OF $3.70). WE ARE NOW IN THE ACTIVE DELIVERY MONTH OF JULY. NO DOUBT THE BOYS ARE CASHING IN THEIR COMEX LONGS TO BEGIN THE PROCESS TO MOVE INTO LONDON FORWARDS. THE CME RELEASED THE DATA FOR EFP ISSUANCE AND IT TOTALED A TINY SIZED 1998 CONTRACTS : AUGUST SAW THE ISSUANCE OF: 1998 CONTRACTS, DECEMBER HAD AN ISSUANCE OF 0 CONTACTS AND THEN ALL OTHER MONTHS ZERO. The new OI for the gold complex rests at 477,440. ALSO REMEMBER THAT THERE WILL BE A DELAY IN THE ISSUANCE OF EFP’S. THE BANKERS REMOVE LONG POSITIONS OF COMEX GOLD IMMEDIATELY. THEN THEY ORCHESTRATE THEIR PRIVATE EFP DEAL WITH THE LONGS AND THAT COULD TAKE AN ADDITIONAL 48 HRS SO WE GENERALLY DO NOT GET A MATCH WITH RESPECT TO DEPARTING COMEX LONGS AND NEW EFP LONG TRANSFERS. . EVEN THOUGH THE BANKERS ISSUED THESE MONSTROUS EFPS, THE OBLIGATION STILL RESTS WITH THE BANKERS TO SUPPLY METAL BUT IT TRANSFERS THE RISK TO A LONDON BANKER OBLIGATION AND NOT A NEW YORK COMEX OBLIGATION. LONGS RECEIVE A FIAT BONUS TOGETHER WITH A LONG LONDON FORWARD. THUS, BY THESE ACTIONS, THE BANKERS AT THE COMEX HAVE JUST STATED THAT THEY HAVE NO APPRECIABLE METAL!! THIS IS A MASSIVE FRAUD: THEY CANNOT SUPPLY ANY METAL TO OUR COMEX LONGS BUT THEY ARE QUITE WILLING TO SUPPLY MASSIVE NON BACKED GOLD (AND SILVER) PAPER KNOWING THAT THEY HAVE NO METAL TO SATISFY OUR LONGS. LONDON IS NOW SEVERELY BACKWARD IN BOTH GOLD AND SILVER AND WE ARE WITNESSING DELAYS IN ACTUAL DELIVERIES.
IN ESSENCE WE HAVE A STRONG OI GAIN IN TOTAL CONTRACTS ON THE TWO EXCHANGES: 7258 OI CONTRACTS INCREASED AT THE COMEX AND A SMALL SIZED 1998 EFP OI CONTRACTS WHICH NAVIGATED OVER TO LONDON. THUS TOTAL OI GAIN: 9,056 CONTRACTS OR 905,600 OZ = 28.167 TONNES. AND STRANGELY ALL OF THIS DEMAND OCCURRED WITH A SMALL RISE IN THE PRICE OF GOLD TO THE TUNE OF $3.70.???
FRIDAY, WE HAD 1103 EFP’S ISSUED.
ACCUMULATION OF EFP’S GOLD AT J.P. MORGAN’S HOUSE OF BRIBES: (EXCHANGE FOR PHYSICAL) FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE : 1998 CONTRACTS OR 199,800 OZ OR 6.214 TONNES (1 TRADING DAY AND THUS AVERAGING: 1998 EFP CONTRACTS PER TRADING DAY OR 199,800 OZ/ TRADING DAY),,
TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA AS TO THE HUGE SIZE OF THESE EFP TRANSFERS : THIS MONTH IN 1 TRADING DAY IN TONNES: 6.214 TONNES
TOTAL ANNUAL GOLD PRODUCTION, 2017, THROUGHOUT THE WORLD EX CHINA EX RUSSIA: 2555 TONNES
THUS EFP TRANSFERS REPRESENTS 6.214/2550 x 100% TONNES = 0.2431% OF GLOBAL ANNUAL PRODUCTION SO FAR IN JULY ALONE.***
ACCUMULATION OF GOLD EFP’S YEAR 2018 TO DATE: 4,109.12* TONNES *SURPASSED ANNUAL PROD’N
ACCUMULATION OF GOLD EFP’S FOR JANUARY 2018: 653.22 TONNES (21 TRADING DAYS)
ACCUMULATION OF GOLD EFP’S FOR FEBRUARY 2018: 649.45 TONNES (20 TRADING DAYS)
ACCUMULATION OF GOLD EFP’S FOR MARCH 2018: 741.89 TONNES (22 TRADING DAYS)
ACCUMULATION OF GOLD EFP’S FOR APRIL 2018: 713.84 TONNES (21 TRADING DAYS)
ACCUMULATION OF GOLD EFP’S FOR MAY 2018: 693.80 TONNES ( 22 TRADING DAYS)
ACCUMULATION OF GOLD EFP FOR JUNE 2018 650.71 TONNES (21 TRADING DAYS)
WHAT IS ALARMING TO ME, ACCORDING TO OUR LONDON EXPERT ANDREW MAGUIRE IS THAT THESE EFP’S ARE BEING TRANSFERRED TO WHAT ARE CALLED SERIAL FORWARD CONTRACT OBLIGATIONS AND THESE CONTRACTS ARE LESS THAN 14 DAYS. ANYTHING GREATER THAN 14 DAYS, THESE MUST BE RECORDED AND SENT TO THE COMPTROLLER, GREAT BRITAIN TO MONITOR RISK TO THE BANKING SYSTEM. IF THIS IS INDEED TRUE, THEN THIS IS A MASSIVE CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD AS WE NOW WITNESS A MONSTROUS TOTAL EFP’S ISSUANCE AS IT HEADS INTO THE STRATOSPHERE.
Result: A STRONG SIZED INCREASE IN OI AT THE COMEX OF 7258 WITH THE $3.70 RISE IN PRICING GOLD TOOK ON FRIDAY // . WE ALSO HAD A SMALL SIZED NUMBER OF COMEX LONG TRANSFERRING TO LONDON THROUGH THE EFP ROUTE: 1998 CONTRACTS AS THESE HAVE ALREADY BEEN NEGOTIATED AND CONFIRMED. THERE OBVIOUSLY DOES NOT SEEM TO BE MUCH PHYSICAL GOLD AT THE COMEX. I GUESS IT EXPLAINS THE HUGE ISSUANCE OF EFP’S…THERE IS HARDLY ANY GOLD PRESENT AT THE GOLD COMEX FOR DELIVERY PURPOSES. IF YOU TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE 1998 EFP CONTRACTS ISSUED, WE HAD A STRONG NET GAIN OF 9,056 CONTRACTS IN TOTAL OPEN INTEREST ON THE TWO EXCHANGES:
1998 CONTRACTS MOVE TO LONDON AND 7258 CONTRACTS INCREASED AT THE COMEX. (in tonnes, the GAIN in total oi equates to 28.167 TONNES). ..AND BELIEVE IT OR NOT BUT ALL OF THIS DEMAND OCCURRED WITH A SMALL RISE OF $3.70 IN TRADING!!!. AT THE COMEX. THE COMEX IS AN OUTRIGHT FRAUD
we had: 14 notice(s) filed upon for 1400 oz of gold at the comex.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
With respect to our two criminal funds, the GLD and the SLV:
GLD...
WITH GOLD DOWN $12.15 TODAY: / A BIG CHANGE IN GOLD INVENTORY AT THE GLD/THE CROOKS RAIDED THE COOKIE JAR AGAIN TO THE TUNE OF A 1.47 TONNES OF GOLD WITHDRAWAL
/GLD INVENTORY 819.04 TONNES
Inventory rests tonight: 819.04 tonnes.
TO ALL INVESTORS THINKING OF BUYING GOLD THROUGH THE GLD ROUTE: YOU ARE MAKING A TERRIBLE MISTAKE AS THE CROOKS ARE USING WHATEVER GOLD COMES IN TO ATTACK BY SELLING THAT GOLD. IT SURE SEEMS TO ME THAT THE GOLD OBLIGATIONS AT THE GLD EXCEED THEIR INVENTORY
SLV/
WITH SILVER DOWN 31 CENTS TODAY /A MONSTER CHANGE IN SILVER INVENTORY AT THE SLV/A HUGE DEPOSIT OF 2.070 MILLION OZ INTO THE SLV VAULTS (DESPITE THE DRUBBING?)
/INVENTORY RESTS AT 322.465 MILLION OZ/
end
First, here is an outline of what will be discussed tonight:
1. Today, we had the open interest in SILVER FELL BY A TINY SIZED 454 CONTRACTS from 209,605 DOWN TO 209,485 (AND FURTHER FROM THE NEW COMEX RECORD SET /APRIL 9/2017 AT 243,411/SILVER PRICE AT THAT DAY: $16.53). THE PREVIOUS RECORD OTHER THAN WAS ESTABLISHED AT: 234,787, SET ON APRIL 21.2017 OVER ONE YEAR AGO. THE PRICE OF SILVER ON THAT DAY: $17.89. OUR CUSTOMARY MIGRATION OF COMEX LONGS MORPH INTO LONDON FORWARDS CONTINUES AS OUR BANKERS USED THEIR EMERGENCY PROCEDURE TO ISSUE:
0 EFP’S FOR JULY, 2256 EFP CONTRACTS FOR SEPT., 0 EFP CONTRACTS FOR DECEMBER AND ALL OTHER MONTHS: ZERO. TOTAL EFP ISSUANCE: 2256 CONTRACTS . EFP’S GIVE OUR COMEX LONGS A FIAT BONUS PLUS A DELIVERABLE PRODUCT OVER IN LONDON. IF WE TAKE THE OI LOSS AT THE COMEX OF 454 CONTRACTS TO THE 2256 OI TRANSFERRED TO LONDON THROUGH EFP’S, WE OBTAIN A NET GAIN OF 1802 OPEN INTEREST CONTRACTS. THUS IN OUNCES, THE GAIN ON THE TWO EXCHANGES: 9.01 MILLION OZ!!! AND YET WE HAVE A STRONG DEMAND FOR PHYSICAL AS WE WITNESS AN INITIAL STANDING OF OVER 26 MILLION OZ AND YET ALL OF THIS DEMAND OCCURRED WITH A SMALL 14 CENT GAIN IN PRICE??? . THE BANKERS ORCHESTRATED THEIR CONSTANT AND NEVER ENDING RAIDS DESPERATELY TRYING TO PARE THEIR GIGANTIC OPEN INTEREST SHORT ON BOTH EXCHANGES WITH HARDLY ANY SUCCESS. HOWEVER CONTINUAL AND DRAMATIC AMOUNTS OF EFP ISSUANCE IS HEADING OVER TO LONDON
RESULT: A SMALL SIZED DECREASE IN SILVER OI AT THE COMEX DESPITE THE THE 14 CENT GAIN THAT SILVER TOOK IN PRICING ON YESTERDAY. BUT WE ALSO HAD ANOTHER STRONG SIZED 2256 EFP’S ISSUED TRANSFERRING COMEX LONGS OVER TO LONDON. TOGETHER WITH THE STRONG SIZED AMOUNT OF SILVER OUNCES STANDING FOR JUNE, DEMAND FOR PHYSICAL SILVER CONTINUES TO INTENSIFY AS WE WITNESS SEVERE BACKWARDATION IN SILVER IN LONDON AS WELL AS THE STRONG AMOUNT OF PHYSICAL STANDING FOR METAL AT THE COMEX.
(report Harvey)
.
2.a) The Shanghai and London gold fix report
(Harvey)
2 b) Gold/silver trading overnight Europe, Goldcore
(Mark O’Byrne/zerohedge
and in NY: Bloomberg
3. ASIAN AFFAIRS
i)MONDAY MORNING/SUNDAY NIGHT: Shanghai closed DOWN 71.86 POINTS OR 2.52% /Hang Sang CLOSED HOLIDAY / The Nikkei closed DOWN 492.58 POINTS OR 2.21% /Australia’s all ordinaires CLOSED DOWN 0.26% /Chinese yuan (ONSHORE) closed DOWN at 6.6625 AS POBC EXERCISES ANOTHER HUGE DEVALUATION /Oil UP to 74,13 dollars per barrel for WTI and 78.99 for Brent. Stocks in Europe OPENED IN THE RED //. ONSHORE YUAN CLOSED DOWN AT 6.6625 AGAINST THE DOLLAR. OFFSHORE YUAN CLOSED DOWN ON THE DOLLAR AT 6.6782 :HUGE DEVALUATION/PAST SEVERAL DAYS//ONSHORE YUAN TRADING STRONGER AGAINST OFFSHORE YUAN/ONSHORE YUAN TRADING WEAKER AGAINST USA DOLLAR/OFFSHORE YUAN TRADING MUCH WEAKER AGAINST THE DOLLAR /CHINA RETALIATES WITH TARIFFS/ TRUMP RESPONDS TO NEW TARIFFS AND IT NOW A FULL TRADE WAR IS BEGINNING/
/NORTH KOREA/SOUTH KOREA
i)North Korea/South Korea/USA
Seems that North Korea is trying to deceive the USA;: they are adding to their nuclear stockpiles revealed by Satellite photos
(courtesy zerohedge)
b) REPORT ON JAPAN
3 c CHINA
i)China/USA
The yuan is collapsing and yuan is without a doubt weaponizing the yuan
( zerohedge)
4. EUROPEAN AFFAIRS
i)Trump is surely not going to like this: the EU threatens with its own 300 billion dollars in tariff retaliation if the USA moves ahead with its auto tariffs.
( zerohedge)
ii)Trump seems to be losing his battle to stop the Nordstream 2 project. Russia will continue to have influence on European gas sales once this becomes a reality
5. RUSSIAN AND MIDDLE EASTERN AFFAIRS
i)Turkey
Turkey and other nations are ready to defy the USA as they will keep importing Iranian crude
( zerohedge)
ii) Iran
Heavy fighting in the south of Iran as protesters are furious over water shortages as well as dirty tap water. This could be the beginning of the end of the regime of the Ayatollahs
(courtesy zerohedge)
(courtesy Tom Luongo)
6 .GLOBAL ISSUES
( Gefira)
7. OIL ISSUES
Sat. Morning:
Iran is furious after Trump calls on the Saudi King to pump an additional 2 million barrels of oil. The Saudi King states that he will look into the matter and as of yet, has not agreed to pump the additional amount needed by the USA
( zerohedge)
8. EMERGING MARKET
Argentina blew another billion dollars trying to keep its peso from collapsing to no avail
( zerohedge)
9. PHYSICAL MARKETS
i)The original owners return to this big Russian mine of Petropavlovsk( zerohedge)
ii)I received this James Rickard’s paper two weeks ago, but could not report on it because it was not in the clear. It is an extremely important paper and the data seems to suggest that China has pegged gold at 8200 yuan per oz. The paper also suggests that China does not mind trashing the yuan as it is picking up vast amounts of SDR’s. if you study the graph, you will find that there is a flat line of gold pricing over the past 5 or 6 months but that it’s value has been holding steady in SDR valuation at 8200 yuan per oz. Is China planning the end game?
( David Brady/Sprott Money/gATA)
iii)The yuan has its worst month ever. The question is whether China is sparking USA/China currency wars or they are continuing to purchase gold at the steady SDR price of 8200 yuan/oz (lower USA value per oz). Is China ready to play the end game?
( London’s Financial Times/gata)
iv)The following is very important and keep this in mind as you read Alasdair Macleod’s important paper:
the uSA dollar’s share of global currency reserves have fallen again in the first quarter of 2018 and it has dropped for 5 consecutive quarters. The reason for the drop is something that we have been highlighting to you for the past few years as nations continue to put a dagger into the heart of USA hegemony.
( Leong/Reuters/gata)
v)I have been pointing this out to you on several occasions: even though gold is falling in dollar terms it is rising in currency other than the dollar
( Ronan Manly/Bullionstar/gata)
vi)My goodness, it has taken a long time for Swiss authorities to realize the obvious: they are choosing real gold bullion over paper wealth
( Reuters)
vii)Nicholas B. has now concluded his 3 month analysis of the paper EFP’s which seem to have zero effect on London based inventories. He also comments on the huge turnover of Petroyuan oil contracts at Shanghai and believe it or not in total, its turnover now exceeds world demand in oil. The contract comes due in September and I can assure you that there will be many yuans chasing physical gold.
a must read..
( Nicholas Biezenek)
10. USA stories which will influence the price of gold/silver)
Take your pick as to what is going on in the USA manufacturing sector. Two competing data sources give polar opposite results. Put your money on the PMI as ISM has been out continually for over one yr
( zerohedge)
vii)SWAMP STORIES
a)Main Points:
- Rosenstein probably did not read the FISA warrant application that he signed
- Gohmert states (he is a judge) that any judge would not grant any application by Rosenstein because he did not read it prior to him presenting it.
- Gohmert is upset of the stonewalling by the Dept of Justice
- the lack of pursuit in the AWAN case
and for all of the above, that is the reason he is being spied on by the FBI/or DOJ
( zerohedge)
b)Major points:
( zerohedge)
( zerohedge)
d)We brought this to your attention last week: it sure seems that Senator Warner and Comey colluded as to order a stand-down ie. not release data from Assange which would have proved that the compromising of the DNC computers was indeed a leak and not a hack by the Russian govenment.
Trading Volumes on the COMEX
PRELIMINARY COMEX VOLUME FOR TODAY: 133,116 contracts
CONFIRMED COMEX VOL. FOR YESTERDAY: 255,914 contracts
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And now for the wild silver comex results.
Total silver OI FELL BY A SMALL SIZED 454 CONTRACTS FROM 209,605 DOWN TO 209,151 (AND A LITTLE FURTHER FROM THE THE NEW RECORD OI FOR SILVER SET APRIL 9.2018/ 243,411 CONTRACTS) DESPITE THE 14 CENT LOSS IN SILVER PRICING/ FRIDAY. SINCE WE ARE NOW INTO THE ACTIVE DELIVERY MONTH OF JULY, WE WERE INFORMED THAT WE HAD 0 EFP CONTRACT ISSUANCE FOR JULY, BUT A STRONG 2256 EFP CONTRACTS FOR SEPT., 0 EFP CONTRACTS FOR DECEMBER AND ZERO FOR ALL OTHER MONTHS. THESE EFPS WERE ISSUED TO COMEX LONGS WHO RECEIVED A FIAT BONUS PLUS A DELIVERABLE PRODUCT OVER IN LONDON. THE TOTAL EFP’S ISSUED: 2256. ON A NET BASIS WE GAINED 1802 SILVER OPEN INTEREST CONTRACTS AS WE OBTAINED A 454 CONTRACT LOSS AT THE COMEX COMBINING WITH THE ADDITION OF 2256 OI CONTRACTS NAVIGATING OVER TO LONDON.
NET GAIN ON THE TWO EXCHANGES: 1802 CONTRACTS
AMOUNT STANDING FOR SILVER AT THE COMEX
We are now in the active delivery month of JULY and here the front month fell by 1,831 contacts to stand at 3,358 contracts. We had 1888 notices filed on Friday so we continue where we left off last month as guys refuse to take any more silver ETF’s and instead seek physical delivery at the comex. We gained 57 contracts or an additional 285,000 oz of silver standing at the comex.
The next delivery month, after July is the non active delivery month of August and here we LOST 35 contracts to stand at 1131 The next active delivery month after August for silver is September and here the OI ROSE by 527 contracts UP to 162,018
We had 1583 notice(s) filed for 7,915,000 OZ for the JULY 2018 COMEX contract for silver
FROM LAST YEARS DATA, ON FIRST DATE NOTICE FOR THE JULY 2017 SILVER COMEX DELIVERY MONTH WE HAD 12.115 MILLION OZ OF SILVER STANDING FOR DELIVERY. AT MONTH’S END WE HAD 16.435 MILLION OZ EVENTUALLY STAND AS WE ALREADY HAD QUEUE JUMPING BEGIN IN EARNEST FROM APRIL 2017 ONWARD EVEN TO TODAY. SO WITH TODAY’S NUMBERS WE SURPASSED LAST YEAR’S LEVEL BY A WIDE MARGIN.
INITIAL standings for JULY/GOLD
JULY 2/2018.
| Gold | Ounces |
| Withdrawals from Dealers Inventory in oz | nil oz |
| Withdrawals from Customer Inventory in oz |
nil OZ
|
| Deposits to the Dealer Inventory in oz | NIL oz |
| Deposits to the Customer Inventory, in oz | nil
oz |
| No of oz served (contracts) today |
14 notice(s)
1400 OZ
|
| No of oz to be served (notices) |
185 contracts
(18,500 oz)
|
| Total monthly oz gold served (contracts) so far this month |
29 notices
2900 OZ
.0902TONNES
|
| Total accumulative withdrawals of gold from the Dealers inventory this month | NIL oz |
| Total accumulative withdrawal of gold from the Customer inventory this month | xxx oz |
For JULY:
Today, 0 notice(s) were issued from JPMorgan dealer account and 0 notices were issued from their client or customer account. The total of all issuance by all participants equates to 14 contract(s) of which 0 notices were stopped (received) by j.P. Morgan dealer and 0 notice(s) was (were) stopped/ Received) by j.P.Morgan customer account.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To calculate the INITIAL total number of gold ounces standing for the JULY. contract month, we take the total number of notices filed so far for the month (29) x 100 oz or 2900 oz, to which we add the difference between the open interest for the front month of JULY. (199 contracts) minus the number of notices served upon today (14 x 100 oz per contract) equals 21,400 oz,(.6656 tonnes) the number of ounces standing in this non active month of JULY
Thus the INITIAL standings for gold for the JULY contract month:
No of notices served (29 x 100 oz) + {(199)OI for the front month minus the number of notices served upon today (14 x 100 oz )which equals 21,400 oz standing in this NON – active delivery month of JULY .
We lost 4 contracts or an additional 400 oz will not stand for delivery and these guys morphed into London based forwards and received a good fiat sweetener on top of their forwards for their efforts
THERE ARE ONLY 7.4177 TONNES OF REGISTERED COMEX GOLD AVAILABLE FOR DELIVERY AGAINST 0.6656 TONNES STANDING FOR JULY
IN THE LAST 18 MONTHS 88 NET TONNES HAS LEFT THE COMEX.
end
And now for silver
AND NOW THE APRIL DELIVERY MONTH
JULY INITIAL standings/SILVER
| Silver | Ounces |
| Withdrawals from Dealers Inventory | nil oz |
| Withdrawals from Customer Inventory |
nil oz
|
| Deposits to the Dealer Inventory |
nil;
oz
|
| Deposits to the Customer Inventory |
801,981.795
oz
Delaware
Scotia
|
| No of oz served today (contracts) |
1583
CONTRACT(S)
(7,915,000 OZ)
|
| No of oz to be served (notices) |
1975 contracts
(9,875,000 oz)
|
| Total monthly oz silver served (contracts) | 3471 contracts
(17,355,000 oz) |
| Total accumulative withdrawal of silver from the Dealers inventory this month | NIL oz |
| Total accumulative withdrawal of silver from the Customer inventory this month |
we had 0 inventory movement at the dealer side of things
total dealer deposits: nil oz
we had 3 deposits into the customer account
i) Into JPMorgan: NIL oz
*** JPMorgan for most of 2017 and in 2018 has adding to its inventory almost every single day.
JPMorgan now has 141 million oz of total silver inventory or 52.0% of all official comex silver. (141 million/270 million)
ii) Into Delaware: 579,632.119 oz
iv) Into Scotia: 222,349,640 oz
total customer deposits today: 801,981.759 oz oz
we had 0 withdrawals from the customer account;
total withdrawals: nil oz
we had 0 adjustments/
total dealer silver: 72,930 million
total dealer + customer silver: 276.712 million oz
The total number of notices filed today for the JULY. contract month is represented by 1583 contract(s) FOR 7,915,000 oz. To calculate the number of silver ounces that will stand for delivery in JULY., we take the total number of notices filed for the month so far at 3471 x 5,000 oz = 17,355,000 oz to which we add the difference between the open interest for the front month of JULY. (3358) and the number of notices served upon today (1583 x 5000 oz) equals the number of ounces standing.
.
Thus the INITIAL standings for silver for the JULY/2018 contract month: 3471(notices served so far)x 5000 oz + OI for front month of JULY(3358) -number of notices served upon today (1583)x 5000 oz equals 26,230,000 oz of silver standing for the JULY contract month
PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES:
THE INITIAL STANDING FOR SILVER AT THE COMEX JULY 2017: 12,115 MILLION OZ ALTHOUGH AT MONTH’S END: 16.435 MILLION OZ. THIS COMPARES WITH TODAY’S INITIAL STANDING FOR SILVER OF 26.230 MILLION OZ.
WHEN WE WITNESS THE AMOUNT OF PHYSICAL INCREASE IN THE AMOUNT STANDING AT THE COMEX AND ESPECIALLY COMMENCING ON DAY 2 OF THE DELIVERY CYCLE, YOU CAN BET THE FARM THAT THIS AMOUNT WILL INCREASE FROM THIS DAY FORTH UNTIL THE CONCLUSION OF THE MONTH OF JULY. THIS IS KNOWN AS QUEUE JUMPING AND THIS PHENOMENON HAS BEEN FRONT AND CENTRE OF OPERATIONS IN SILVER FOR NOW OVER 14 MONTHS. SILVER IS BEING SOUGHT BY COMMERCIALS OVER ON THIS SIDE OF THE POND AS DWINDLING SUPPLIES VACATE THE GLOBAL ARENA.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ESTIMATED VOLUME FOR TODAY: 38,821 CONTRACTS
CONFIRMED VOLUME FOR YESTERDAY: 146,698 CONTRACTS absolutely criminal
YESTERDAY’S CONFIRMED VOLUME OF 146,698 CONTRACTS EQUATES TO 734 million OZ OR 105% OF ANNUAL GLOBAL PRODUCTION OF SILVER
COMMODITY LAW SUGGESTS THAT OPEN INTEREST SHOULD NOT BE MORE THAN 3% OF ANNUAL GLOBAL PRODUCTION. THE CROOKS ARE SUPPLYING MASSIVE PAPER TRYING TO KEEP SILVER IN CHECK.
The record level of silver open interest is 234,787 contracts set on April 21./2017 with the price at that day at $18.42
The previous record was 224,540 contracts with the price at that time of $20.44
end
NPV for Sprott
1. Sprott silver fund (PSLV): NAV RISES TO -2.88% (JULY 2/2018)
2. Sprott gold fund (PHYS): premium to NAV FALLS TO -0.79% to NAV (JULY 29/2018 )
Note: Sprott silver trust back into NEGATIVE territory at -2.88%-/Sprott physical gold trust is back into NEGATIVE/
(courtesy Sprott/GATA)
3.SPROTT CEF.A FUND (FORMERLY CENTRAL FUND OF CANADA): NAV FALLS TO -3.53%: NAV 12.91/TRADING 12.41//DISCOUNT 3.81.
END
And now the Gold inventory at the GLD/
JULY 2/WITH GOLD DOWN $12.15, THE CROOKS RAIDED THE GLD INVENTORY AGAIN BY 1.47 TONNES DOWN./INVENTORY RESTS AT 819.04 TONNES
JUNE 29/WITH GOLD UP $3.70/A WITHDRAWAL OF 1.18 TONNES OF GOLD FROM THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 820.51 TONNES
JUNE 28/WITH GOLD DOWN $5.15/NO CHANGES IN GOLD INVENTORY AT THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 821.69 TONNES
June 27/WITH GOLD DOWN $3.60// TWO ENTRIES:/STRANGELY THE CROOKS RETURNED THE WITHDRAWAL OF 4.42 TONNES LAST NIGHT (THUS WE HAD A DEPOSIT OF 4.42 TONNES/INVENTORY RESTS AT 824.63 TONNES. /THEN LATE THIS AFTERNOON A WITHDRAWAL OF 2.94 TONNES
INVENTORY RESTS AT 821.69 TONNES/THIS VEHICLE IS AN OUTRIGHT FRAUD.
june 26/LATE LAST NIGHT, WITH GOLD DOWN $9.10 WE HAD A HUGE WITHDRAWAL OF 4.42 TONNES OF GOLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 820.21 TONES
JUNE 25/WITH GOLD DOWN $1.45/NO CHANGE IN GOLD INVENTORY AT THE GLD.INVENTORY RESTS AT 824.63 TONNES
JUNE 22/WITH GOLD UP 25 CENTS TODAY, THE CROOKS WITHDREW A MASSIVE 4.13 TONNES OF GOLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 824.63 TONNES
JUNE 21/WITH GOLD DOWN $4.00/NO CHANGES IN GOLD INVENTORY AT THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 828.76 TONNES
JUNE 20/WITH GOLD DOWN $3.55/NO CHANGES IN GOLD INVENTORY AT THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 828.76 TONNES
JUNE 19/WITH GOLD DOWN $1.50/NO CHANGES IN GOLD INVENTORY AT THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 828.76 TONES
JUNE 18/WITH GOLD UP $1.90/NO CHANGES IN GOLD INVENTORY AT THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 828.76 TONNES
JUNE 15/WITH GOLD DOWN $28.90/NO CHANGE IN GOLD INVENTORY AT THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 828.76 TONNES
JUNE 14/WITH GOLD UP $7.10/NO CHANGE IN GOLD INVENTORY AT THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 828.76 TONNES/
JUNE 13/WITH GOLD UP $2.20/NO CHANGE IN GOLD INVENTORY AT THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 828.76 TONNES
JUNE 12/WITH GOLD DOWN $4.75:NO CHANGE IN GOLD INVENTORY AT THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 828.76 TONNES
JUNE 11/WITH GOLD UP 65 CENTS/THE CROOKS RAIDED THE COOKIE JAR FOR 3.83 TONNES/INVENTORY RESTS AT 828.76 TONNES
JUNE 8/WITH GOLD DOWN 10 CENTS/NO CHANGE IN GOLD INVENTORY AT THE GLD/INVENTORY REMAINS AT 832.59 TONNES./
JUNE 7/WITH GOLD UP $1.45, THE CROOKS DECIDED TO RAID AGAIN THE GLD GOLD COOKIE JAR TO THE TUNE OF 3.54 TONNES/GOLD INVENTORY LOWERS TO 832.59 TONNES
JUNE 6/WITH GOLD UP $1.30 TODAY, WE HAD NO CHANGES IN GOLD INVENTORY AT THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 836.13 TONNES
JUNE 5/WITH GOLD UP $5.30 TODAY, WE HAD A TINY WITHDRAWAL OF .29 TONNES AND THAT NO DOUBT WAS TO PAY FOR FEES/836.13 TONNES
JUNE 4/WITH GOLD DOWN ONLY $2.50, THE CROOKS UNLEASHED A MASSIVE WITHDRAWAL OF 10.61 TONNES OF GOLD FROM THE GLD/INVENTORY RESTS AT 836.42 TONNES
JUNE 1/WITH GOLD DOWN $5.10 TODAY, A HUGE 4.42 TONNES OF GOLD WAS WITHDRAWN FROM THE GLD AND THIS WAS USED IN THE RAID TODAY/INVENTORY RESTS AT 847.03 TONNES
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
JULY 2/2018/ Inventory rests tonight at 819.04 tonnes
*IN LAST 406 TRADING DAYS: 107,55 NET TONNES HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THE GLD
*LAST 356 TRADING DAYS: A NET 48.77 TONNES HAVE NOW BEEN ADDED INTO GLD INVENTORY.
end
Now the SLV Inventory/
JULY 2/WITH SILVER DOWN 31 CENTS/A HUGE 2.070 MILLION OZ DEPOSIT AT THE SLV/INVENTORY RESTS AT 322.465 MILLION OZ/
JUNE 29/WITH SILVER UP 14 CENTS TODAY, NO CHANGES IN SILVER INVENTORY AT THE SLV/INVENTORY RESTS THIS WEEKEND AT 320.395 MILLION OZ/
JUNE 28/WITH SILVER DOWN 18 CENTS, THE CROOKS ADDED 1.035 MILLION OZ OF SILVER INTO THE SLV/INVENTORY RESTS AT 320.395 MILLION OZ
JUNE 27.2018/WITH SILVER DOWN 8 CENTS/NO CHANGE IN SILVER INVENTORY/INVENTORY RESTS AT 819.360 MILLION OZ/
june 26./2018/WITH SILVER DOWN 8 CENTS, THE CROOKS WITHDREW THE DEPOSIT OF TWO DAYS AGO; 941,000 OZ OUT OF INVENTORY/INVENTORY RESTS AT 819.360 OZ
JUNE 25/WITH SILVER DOWN 12 CENTS/NO CHANGES IN SILVER INVENTORY AT THE SLV/INVENTORY RESTS AT 320.301 MILLION OZ/
JUNE 22/WITH SILVER UP 12 CENTS TODAY,ANOTHER BIG CHANGE IN SILVER INVENTORY AT THE SLV” A DEPOSIT OF 941,000 OZ INTO INVENTORY/INVENTORY RESTS THIS WEEKEND AT 320.301 MILLION OZ/
JUNE 21/WITH SILVER UP ONE CENT/ANOTHER CHANGE IN SILVER INVENTORY AT THE SLV/: A DEPOSIT OF 2.918 MILLION OZ/INVENTORY RESTS AT 319.360 MILLION OZ/ THUS FOR TWO STRAIGHT DAYS A TOTAL OF 5.26 MILLION OZ OF SILVER HAS BEEN ADDED WITH NO CHANGE IN PRICE.
JUNE 20/WITH SILVER DOWN ONE CENT/A HUGE CHANGE IN SILVER INVENTORY AT THE SLV/INVENTORY / A DEPOSIT OF 2.35 MILLION OZ/INVENTORY RESTS AT 316.442 MILLION OZ/
JUNE 19/2018/WITH SILVER DOWN 11 CENTS/NO CHANGE IN SILVER INVENTORY AT THE SLV/INVENTORY RESTS AT 314.090 MILLION OZ/
JUNE 18/WITH SILVER DOWN 6 CENTS TODAY/NO CHANGE IN SILVER INVENTORY/INVENTORY RESTS AT 314.090 MILLION OZ/
JUNE 15/WITH SILVER DOWN 75 CENTS/A BIG CHANGE IN SILVER INVENTORY AT THE SLV: A WITHDRAWAL OF 1.788 MILLION OZ//INVENTORY RESTS AT 314.090 MILLION OZ
JUNE 14/WITH SILVER UP 30 CENTS, THE CROOKS DECIDED THAT THEY NEEDED SILVER INVENTORY BADLY SO THEY RAID THE SLV OF 1.412 MILLION OZ/INVENTORY RESTS AT 315.878 MILLION OZ/
JUNE 13/WITH SILVER UP 11 CENTS TODAY/NO CHANGES IN SILVER INVENTORY AT THE SLV/INVENTORY RESTS AT 317.290 MILLION OZ/
JUNE 12/WITH SILVER DOWN 5 CENTS/A HUGE CHANGES IN SILVER INVENTORY AT THE SLV/ THE CROOKS RAID THE SILVER COOKIE JAR BY 1.976 MILLION OZ/INVENTORY LOWERS TO 317.290 MILLION OZ/
jUNE 11/NO CHANGE IN SILVER INVENTORY/319.266 MILLION OZ
JUNE 8/WITH SILVER DOWN 5 CENTS/A HUGE CHANGE IN SILVER INVENTORY AT THE SLV: A WITHDRAWAL OF 1.412 MILLION OZ//INVENTORY LOWERS TO 319.266 MILLION OZ/
JUNE 7/WITH SILVER UP ANOTHER 12 CENTS/A HUGE CHANGE IN SILVER INVENTORY AT THE SL: A WITHDRAWAL OF 1.883 MILLION OZ WITH ALL OF THAT SILVER DEMAND//INVENTORY RESTS AT 320.678 MILLION OZ/
JUNE 6/WITH SILVER UP 14 CENTS TODAY/NO CHANGE IN SILVER INVENTORY AT THE SLV/INVENTORY RESTS AT 322.561 MILLION OZ/
JUNE 5/WITH SILVER UP 10 CENTS NO CHANGE IN SILVER INVENTORY/INVENTORY RESTS AT 322.561 MILLION OZ
JUNE 4/WITH SILVER DOWN 1 CENTA SMALL CHANGE IN SILVER INVENTORY AT THE SLV: A DEPOSIT OF 522,000 OZ INTO THE SLV/.INVENTORY RISES AT 322.561 MILLION OZ/
JUNE 1/WITH SILVER DOWN 3 CENTS/NO CHANGE IN SILVER INVENTORY AT THE SLV/INVENTORY REMAINS AT 322.039 MILLION OZ/
JULY 2/2018:
Inventory 322.465 MILLION OZ
6 Month MM GOFO 2.11/ and libor 6 month duration 2.50
Indicative gold forward offer rate for a 6 month duration/calculation:
G0FO+ 2.11%
libor 2.50 FOR 6 MONTHS/
GOLD LENDING RATE: .39%
XXXXXXXX
12 Month MM GOFO
+ 2.76%
LIBOR FOR 12 MONTH DURATION: 2.54
GOFO = LIBOR – GOLD LENDING RATE
GOLD LENDING RATE = +.22
end
Major gold/silver trading /commentaries for MONDAY
GOLDCORE/BLOG/MARK O’BYRNE.
An extremely important paper. I had the luxury of reading this two weeks ago but I could not publish or discuss any of this because it was not in the clear.
Now Rickards has published this important paper.
ANDREW MAGUIRE’S KINESIS WHICH IS A”BITCOIN’ BACKED 100% BY ALLOCATED GOLD AND SILVER
Andrew Maguire’s Kinesis money which is a “bitcoin” but backed 100% by allocated gold and silver is set to go.
it think it would be a great idea to look at this!
please read at: https://kinesis.money/#/
(Andrew Maguire)
|
|
Dear Harvey Organ,
Thank you for your participation in our webinar on June 7th with our host and CEO of Kinesis, Thomas Coughlin.
The response we received has been incredible, we appreciate you taking the time to join us and hope you found it to be beneficial.
Due to such a high influx of questions we received we were unable to have them all answered. Nevertheless, if there was anything which requires more clarification, or you have a query which needs to be rectified, we invite you to join our telegram group:
We apologize for the technical issues we incurred during the webinar which resulted in it running a little over schedule, we hope that the next one we host will run seamlessly.
A video has been put together and uploaded onto our YouTube channel which can be found here:
Please share and subscribe to our YouTube channel to be notified of all the latest videos as they become available.
The rapid growth that we are currently experiencing has been incredible and with your support, is only going to get better.
We are working behind the scenes very hard to create a better experience for everyone involved! Stay tuned in as we have many more announcements to be released in the upcoming days.
Kind Regards,
![]() |
Kinesis Money
a:C/O ILS Fiduciaries (IOM) Limited, First Floor,Millennium House, Victoria Road, Douglas, Isle of Man IM2 4RW
|
The following is self explanatory
(courtesy GATA/Chris Powell and Harvey Organ)
GATA asks bank regulator to check risks of gold
futures maneuver
Submitted by cpowell on Sun, 2018-06-10 16:17. Section: Daily Dispatches
12:21p ET Sunday, June 10, 2018
Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:
GATA has appealed to the U.S. comptroller of the currency, who has regulatory authority over banks, to review financial risks certain banks may have incurred through derivatives in the monetary metals markets, particularly through the recent heavy use of the “exchange for physicals” mechanism of settling gold and silver futures contracts on the New York Commodities Exchange.
The appeal was made in a letter sent May 5 to the comptroller, Joseph M. Otting, whose office is part of the U.S. Treasury Department, by your secretary/treasurer and GATA futures market consultant Harvey Organ.
“Exchange for physical” settlements of futures contracts long were considered emergency procedures when a seller was not able to deliver metal from an exchange-approved warehouse and wanted to settle with delivery elsewhere. But now such settlements appear to constitute most gold and silver futures settlements on the Comex. It is a strange development that appears to have been necessitated by the increasing difficulties of central banking’s gold and silver price suppression policy.
GATA has received no acknowledgment of the letter. Its text is below and a PDF copy of it is here:
http://www.gata.org/files/ComptrollerOfCurrencyLetter.pdf
CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
CPowell@GATA.org
* * *
May 5, 2018
Joseph M. Otting, Comptroller of the Currency
U.S. Treasury Department
400 7th Street, SW
Washington DC 20219
Dear Comptroller Otting:
Please let us bring to your attention financial risks to major banks involving their possibly unreported exposure to derivatives in the monetary metals markets.
In recent months gold and silver future contracts issued by U.S. banks on the New York Commodities Exchange have been moved off-exchange for delivery through a mechanism known as “exchange for physical” (EFP) contracts. Until recently use of this mechanism was considered an emergency procedure when a seller did not have access to metal for delivery through Comex warehouses. Now the mechanism seems to be in use for a large share of front-month contracts for which delivery is sought.
Here is an example that is happening at the Comex in the front active month of April for gold and the inactive delivery month of April for silver.
In gold, there were 229,436 EFP contracts for 713.64 tonnes, an average of 10,925 contracts and 1,092,500 ounces per trading day.
In silver, there were 77,150 EFP contracts for 385,750,000 ounces, an average of 3,673 contracts and 18,369,000 ounces per trading day.
London Bullion Market Association rules suggest that these contracts may not be reported to regulators. The LBMA’s bylaws say:
“Figures above exclude any contracts not subject to risk-based capital requirements, such as FX contracts with an original maturity of 14 days or less, futures contracts, written options, and basis swaps. Therefore, the total notional amount of derivatives by maturity will not add to the total derivatives figure in this table.”
We are told that these EFP contracts are transferred from the Comex to London as what are called “serial forwards” and their duration is always less than 14 days, which exempts them from being reported.
It is our understanding that in each quarter your office prepares a report detailing risk undertaken by the banks under the comptroller’s supervision.
These risks include derivatives undertaken by U.S. banks and other obligations that may cause a bank to fail. Our concern is that your office may not be aware of large unreported derivative exposure by banks.
Could you review this matter and let us know your conclusions?
Sincerely,
CHRIS POWELL
Secretary/Treasurer
HARVEY ORGAN
Consultant
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
7 Villa Louisa Road
Manchester, Connecticut 06043-7541
END
The original owners return to this big Russian mine of Petropavlovsk
(courtesy zerohedge)
Rebel investors return former executives of
Petropavlovsk
Submitted by cpowell on Fri, 2018-06-29 13:13. Section: Daily Dispatches
By Thomas Biesheuvel
Bloomberg News
Friday, June 29, 2018
Rebel shareholders look to have ousted the leadership at Petropavlovsk Plc as the bitter battle for gold mines in Russia’s far east took another twist.
Kazakh cryptocurrency tycoon Kenes Rakishev, who controls a 22 percent stake, and the company’s co-founder Peter Hambro were among investors who sought to sack members of the existing board at a shareholder meeting in London today. They voted to bring back former Chief Executive Officer Pavel Maslovskiy and directors Roderic Lyne and Robert Jenkins.
“A preliminary assessment of the votes cast indicates that it is likely that Dr. Pavel Maslovskiy, Sir Roderic Lyne, and Mr. Robert Jenkins will be appointed as directors of the company,” Petropavlovsk said in a statement. Five directors, including Chairman Ian Ashby, won’t be reappointed, the gold producer said, adding that the final result would be announced in due course. …
… For the remainder of the report:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-29/shareholders-take-fig…
end
I received this James Rickard’s paper two weeks ago, but could not report on it because it was not in the clear. It is an extremely important paper and the data seems to suggest that China has pegged gold at 8200 yuan per oz. The paper also suggests that China does not mind trashing the yuan as it is picking up vast amounts of SDR’s. if you study the graph, you will find that there is a flat line of gold pricing over the past 5 or 6 months but that it’s value has been holding steady in SDR valuation at 8200 yuan per oz. Is China planning the end game?
(courtesy David Brady/Sprott Money)
David Brady at Sprott Money: Gold — the Chinese connection
Submitted by cpowell on Sat, 2018-06-30 13:43. Section: Daily Dispatches
9:46a ET Saturday, June 30, 2018
Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:
Market analyst and former fund manager David Brady, writing again at Sprott Money, observes today that, in devaluing the yuan against the U.S. dollar in recent weeks to offset rising U.S. tariffs, China also appears to be pegging the yuan to a gold price of around 8,200 yuan per ounce.
In his most recent Gold Speculator letter, which has not been posted in the clear, market analyst and fund manager James Rickards reported indications that for many months now, ever since inclusion of the yuan in the basket of currencies that constitutes the International Monetary Fund’s Special Drawing Rights currency, the gold price has been holding steady in SDR valuation.
The implication of both reports is that China is at the center of central bank rigging of the gold market so that China, foremost among dollar holders, more easily can obtain the monetary metal to hedge its gross foreign-exchange surplus of dollars, a hypothesis similar to that propounded by the U.S. economists Paul Brodsky and Lee Quaintance in an essay called to your attention by GATA in 2012:
http://www.gata.org/node/11373
Brady’s analysis is headlined “Gold — The Chinese Connection” and it’s posted at Sprott Money here:
https://www.sprottmoney.com/Blog/gold-the-chinese-connection-david-brady…
CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
CPowell@GATA.org
end
The yuan has its worst month ever. The question is whether China is sparking USA/China currency wars or they are continuing to purchase gold at the steady SDR price of 8200 yuan/oz (lower USA value per oz). Is China ready to play the end game?
(courtesy London’s Financial Times/gATA)
Renminbi’s worst month ever sparks U.S.-China currency war fears
Submitted by cpowell on Sun, 2018-07-01 14:01. Section: Daily Dispatches
Gabriel Wildau and James Kynge
Financial Times, London
Sunday, July 1, 2018
China-s currency suffered its largest-ever monthly fall against the U.S. dollar in June, sparking concern that Beijing is prepared to use currency devaluation as a weapon in an escalating trade war with the United States.
From 2005 to mid-2014, China systematically intervened in its currency markets to weaken the value of the renminbi, sparking accusations that Beijing was seeking an unfair competitive advantage for its exporters.
U.S. President Donald Trump revived those accusations during his 2016 campaign, though China had already switched to a policy of supporting the renminbi to prevent capital flight.
But the renminbi weakened by 3.3 percent against the dollar in June, the worst single-month decline since China established its foreign exchange market in 1994. Analysts say that so far the move looks more like market forces than an act of currency war. Still, they warn that continued weakness could further inflame trade tensions. …
In late 2015 China’s central bank announced it would begin targeting renminbi stability against a broad basket of global currencies, shifting away from a narrow peg to the dollar. That policy implies the renminbi should weaken alongside other currencies in periods of broad dollar strength. …
… For the remainder of the report:
https://www.ft.com/content/fdfb9dec-7ce2-11e8-bc55-50daf11b720d
end
The following is very important and keep this in mind as you read Alasdair Macleod’s important paper:
the uSA dollar’s share of global currency reserves have fallen again in the first quarter of 2018 and it has dropped for 5 consecutive quarters. The reason for the drop is something that we have been highlighting to you for the past few years as nations continue to put a dagger into the heart of USA hegemony.
(courtesy Leong/Reuters)
U.S. dollar’s share of global currency reserves keeps falling
Submitted by cpowell on Sun, 2018-07-01 19:46. Section: Daily Dispatches
By Richard Leong
Reuters
Sunday, July 1, 2018
The U.S. dollar’s share of currency reserves reported to the International Monetary Fund fell in first quarter of 2018 to a fresh four-year low, while euro, yuan, and sterling’s shares of reserves increased, according to the latest data from the International Monetary Fund.
The share of dollar reserves shrank for five consecutive quarters as the greenback weakened in the first three months of 2018 on expectations of faster growth outside the United States and bets that other major central banks would consider reducing stimulus. Still the dollar has remained the biggest reserve currency by far. …
… For the remainder of the report:
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-forex-reserves/u-s-dollar-share-of-gl…
end
I have been pointing this out to you on several occasions: even though gold is falling in dollar terms it is rising in currency other than the dollar
(courtesy Ronan Manly/Bullionstar)
Ronan Manly: Gold is rising in currencies other
than U.S. dollar
Submitted by cpowell on Sun, 2018-07-01 19:57. Section: Daily Dispatches
3:58p ET Sunday, July 1, 2018
Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:
As financial news organizations quote gold mainly in U.S. dollar terms, for months the monetary metal has seemed to be declining steadily. In fact, Bullion Star gold researcher Ronan Manly writes today, gold simultaneously has been rising in many other currencies. Manly’s analysis is headlined “Gold’s Price Performance: Beyond the U.S. Dollar” and it’s posted at Bullion Star here:
https://www.bullionstar.com/blogs/ronan-manly/golds-price-performance-be…
CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
CPowell@GATA.org
end
My goodness, it has taken a long time for Swiss authorities to realize the obvious: they are choosing real gold bullion over paper wealth
(courtesy Reuters)
Switzerland chooses gold bullion over paper wealth backed by US dollar
Published time: 30 Jun, 2018 06:02
Switzerland chooses gold bullion over paper wealth backed by US dollar
© Ruben Sprich / Reuters
Another country is betting on physical gold. Switzerland’s pension fund has boosted its investments in bullion, switching from the paper-backed securities in US dollars.
“The Swiss government Pension System decided to change from paper gold in the amount of 700 million CHF into physical gold and store it in Switzerland. The 700 million only stands for 2 percent of the total assets, but it is quite a surprise that they do this,” Claudio Grass, an independent precious metals advisor and Mises Ambassador told RT.com.
According to Grass, it is a strong signal that people should take seriously, since a pension fund is an investment vehicle that has a long-term strategy.
“Physical gold is the best way to hedge as well as to accumulate wealth over decades. If you would have purchased for $100,000 gold in mid 70ties the holding without doing anything would be worth more than $2 million,” the analyst said. Another factor why the pension fund demanded physical gold was that they understand that paper gold just represents a claim on gold in a highly paper-leveraged gold market, Grass explained.
“It makes common sense under the actual circumstances to assure it is stored in the home country, Switzerland, instead of London or the US, which reminds me of the central bank repatriation,” the analyst added.
“The last geopolitical shift that started with WWI and ended with WWII, put the US in a dominant position and it owned and stored 70 percent of the gold reserves of the free world. This is also one of the main reasons why the US won the Empire over from the Brits. Now we can witness another geopolitical power shift, with the rise of the East,” he said.Grass adds that countries are noting the geopolitical shift from West to East and that is why they are buying more real gold instead of the US dollar- based papers.
The global debt burden continues to grow, while more than 65 percent of all monetary reserves on this planet are in US dollars, Grass notes. “Holding physical gold is definitely the best hedge against all sorts of fiat money risks, but from a central bank perspective it is definitely the best hedge against a weakening dollar that is on its way to reaching its intrinsic value which is zero,” he said.
https://www.rt.com/business/431329-switzerland-gold- paper-dollar/
-END-
Ted’s problem: we do not know how much JPMorgan’s short position is in London and how much EFP’s were transferred with them on the hook
do not read too much into this..
(courtesy Ted Butler)
| The Perfect Double Cross |
| — Published: Monday, 2 July 2018 | Print | 4 Comments
For the past few weeks, I’ve been intensely focused on what I believe to be a double cross in COMEX gold futures by JPMorgan of other trading entities, particularly other commercial participants. I would define the double cross as JPMorgan positioning itself so flawlessly so as to be nearly perfect in its execution, including the avoidance of any widespread knowledge of what has occurred. After all, a double cross always includes the element of surprise and this one promises to be a doozy. Data from recent Commitments of Traders (COT) reports indicate unprecedented changes in concentration and category positioning pointing to JPMorgan buying back massive numbers of short gold contracts disproportionate to anything previously seen. While it is fairly widely known that the market structure in COMEX gold is extremely bullish, thanks to very aggressive managed money selling and commercial buying, it is virtually unknown what special role JPMorgan has played in the process. That’s because you can count on one hand (with a few fingers left over) the number of commentators who even mention the concentration data in COT reports. JPMorgan has been, by far, the largest single buyer of COMEX gold futures contracts over the past month and a half and particularly over the past three reporting weeks, buying back what I would estimate to be a minimum of 50,000 net short contracts and reducing its net short position to be little more than 40,000 contracts. It is important to put this number of COMEX gold contracts into perspective – 50,000 COMEX gold contracts is the equivalent of 5 million ounces of gold. The world sits up and takes notice when Russia buys 600,000 ounces of gold in a month, as it did last month; yet practically no one noticed JPMorgan’s purchase of 5 million oz of paper gold in littler more than a month. Yes, Russia bought actual gold (largely from its own mines, same as China), but the 5 million paper ounces that JPMorgan bought are much more meaningful in terms of profit and loss, especially future profits to JPM, as I’ll explain momentarily. It goes without saying that JPM made a large profit on its buyback of gold short contracts since it sold those contracts short at much higher prices; but the biggest payday for the bank lies ahead. It would hardly be noteworthy if JPMorgan had bought back the bulk of its gold short contracts from the managed money traders which are invariably on the losing end of the ongoing COMEX wash, rinse and repeat positioning cycle most have become familiar with. While nearly as regular as the tides, the commercial snookering of the managed money traders can hardly be called a double cross in that there is never a surprise in that outcome – nothing is more expected than the commercials taking advantage of the managed money traders. But that is not what happened in JPMorgan’s massive buyback of gold shorts this time around. While there was some managed money selling that JPMorgan used to buy back a portion of its gold shorts, the biggest sellers to JPM were other commercials, not the managed money traders. This is what makes the whole thing unprecedented and in the “man bites dog” category. To be sure, JPMorgan has purchased even larger quantities of COMEX gold contracts in the past, such as the 160,000 contracts it purchased in 2013, when it turned its short market corner in gold of 75,000 contracts into a long market corner of 85,000 contracts, as gold plunged more than $400 an ounce over eight months. But the main sellers to JPMorgan were the managed money traders and other speculators, not other commercials. That’s what makes the current set up so special – this time the main sellers to JPMorgan have been other commercials. Let me explain why I think JPMorgan’s actions may be profound for the price of gold and silver. Remember, it’s not the data alone that matter, but what the data portend. In this case, I believe JPMorgan’s pronounced buyback of short positions portends a very sharp price rally for gold and silver and other metals. The COMEX gold market structure, by virtue of recent aggressive managed money selling, is easily capable of a sudden rally of $100 or more. After all, the price of gold is now $50 below its key moving averages and the commercials would have little trouble rigging prices higher to the moving averages and an equivalent amount above. This is, after all, the main, if not sole driver of price and what the rinse and repeat cycle is all about. But what makes it special this time is JPMorgan’s pronounced buyback of short positions. By buying back at least 50,000 gold short contracts, the equivalent of 5 million oz, JPMorgan has just sidestepped the loss of $500 million should gold rally a quick $100 an ounce, as seems almost inevitable given the overall market structure. Should gold rally $200, something that to my mind seems quite reasonable, JPMorgan will have sidestepped a billion dollars of loss thanks to the buyback of its 5 million oz of short contracts. And every $100 gold rally that might come, JPM will have been better off by $500 million thanks to its recent buyback of gold shorts. But wait a minute, I can almost hear some ask – what about the 40,000 contracts or 4 million gold oz JPMorgan might still be short – wouldn’t it lose $400 million for every $100 that gold rises? Yes, but I think JPMorgan may now be short even less than that and there is even a more important consideration – the 20 million physical ounces that I’ve maintained that JPMorgan has accumulated over the past five or so years. Even if JPMorgan is still short 4 million oz of paper silver (and I think it is now less), its 20 million oz physical position means it is net long the equivalent of 16 million ounces of gold. That means for every $100 that gold climbs, JPMorgan will make $1.6 billion net, even if it is still short 40,000 COMEX gold contract. Even though JPMorgan may still be short a certain amount of COMEX paper gold, it is unquestionably big net long by virtue of its massive physical gold holdings and will be the biggest winner of all on a sharp gold rally. Just as unquestionable is that it “saved” itself at least $500 million for every hundred dollars that gold rises by virtue of the 50,000 short contracts it bought back very recently. Don’t ever forget that these guys are the true masters of the market. What about silver – haven’t I written that JPMorgan recently added 20,000 new short contracts, the equivalent of 100 million oz? So maybe JPMorgan is only interested in a major gold rally and not one in silver? Fair question, so let’s look closer. Over the past two weeks, JPM has bought back 10,000 contracts of the silver shorts it added, so I think JPM’s silver short position is now down to 30,000 contracts, the equivalent of 150 million oz. Let me work with that round number, but it may be even lower than that. At the same time JPMorgan had bought back 5 million oz of paper gold shorts, it had added 50 million oz (10,000 contracts) of silver shorts at last count. What gives? From my perspective, it looks like a master move from the master manipulator. The only reason JPMorgan added silver shorts is because there was no one else willing to do so. If JPM didn’t short when it did, the price of silver would have unquestionably moved higher, most likely pulling gold higher as well. That would have interfered with JPM’s plan to buy back as many gold shorts as it did because JPM needed to have the price of gold stay below the key moving averages, or the managed money traders would have plowed onto the buy side. JPMorgan needed the price of gold to move a bit higher, enough to attract selling by other commercials, but not too high (over the moving averages) which would have set off managed money buying. It pulled this off by capping the price of silver with much heavier short sales than it would have likely preferred, with the purpose of keeping gold from moving high enough to set off managed money buying which would have prevented JPM from buying the massive amount of gold contracts it was able to buy. In terms of dollars and sense, it was a masterful move. As just discussed, if gold does jump quickly in price by $100, JPMorgan will have saved $500 million. If silver also jumps by the amount it usually does on a $100 gold move, we’re talking about a two dollar move in silver, maybe a bit more. Two dollars on the 10,000 silver contracts JPM has added will cost JPM $100 million, maybe a bit more. My point is that the 5 million oz of gold shorts that JPM bought back saves it close to $400 million when factoring in the additional 50 million oz of paper silver it had to sell short to keep the gold price from moving too high before it finished buying from the other commercials. Even if silver were to jump $4 (instead of $2) on a $100 move up in gold, JPM would still be net ahead $300 million on its master move. But just like JPMorgan is massively long physical gold, to the tune of 20 million oz, the bank still owns at least 700 million oz of physical silver and likely more than that. It’s been a while since I’ve updated JPM’s silver holdings and there have been strong signs the bank is still acquiring physical silver (primarily though conversions of shares of SLV into metal). What this means is that even if JPM is short 150 million oz of paper silver, it is still net long silver to the tune of 550 million oz at a minimum (just like it is net long gold to the tune of 16 million oz). What this means is that for every $100 higher in gold, JPMorgan stands to make $1.6 billion and for every dollar higher in silver, JPMorgan stands to make $550 million. With potential profits of that magnitude at hand, it’s impossible to imagine JPMorgan not setting off the big precious metals move higher at some point. As always, the question is when and just as always, the answer is unknowable beforehand. But here’s where the double cross premise may kick in. What JPMorgan has just pulled off, namely, the massive buyback of gold short positions thanks to sales from other commercials was unprecedented and, therefore, not easily replicated. When something occurs that is unprecedented there must be a reason for it. When that unprecedented something involves JPMorgan and gold and silver, I sit up and take notice. It goes without saying that JPMorgan is intending to benefit itself in everything it does, so it’s only natural to think along the lines of how can JPMorgan benefit the most from the recent actions it has taken. Let me not beat around the bush – the most plausible conclusion for the unprecedented buyback of gold short positions by JPMorgan is that we’re looking down the gun barrel of an explosive move higher in gold and silver and other metals because that would benefit JPMorgan the most. Sure, there may be a bit more to go in terms of slightly lower prices since JPMorgan will likely buy even more gold and silver contracts than it has so far, but that’s always the case. For what it’s worth, I’m using what I believe to be these last salami slices lower to buy way too many crazy out of the money kamikaze call options, but I just mention that as an indication of how I view current conditions. I know I have treated every market structure bottom over the years as the set up for the big move higher and I don’t need to be reminded that the big one has yet to appear (hey, I already got a wife). I also know that JPMorgan has been in position to let gold and silver prices rip higher by virtue of its massive accumulation of physical silver and gold and has failed to do so yet. And it may turn out that JPMorgan doesn’t go for the jugular this time around either and instead is content to short anew after a mediocre advance in the gold and silver price. But I also know that JPMorgan has never been in a better position to let her rip to the upside than now, based upon a tactic it has never deployed before – a double cross of other commercials. Therefore, I’m treating it as the opportunity I believe it to be, namely, that we’re on the cusp of the once in a lifetime opportunity that should have been realized long before now. It looks like it has taken a maneuver by JPMorgan that almost no one sees, including those most double crossed, but even that is fitting in the overall scheme of things. Ted Butler July 2, 2018 |
Nicholas B. has now concluded his 3 month analysis of the paper EFP’s which seem to have zero effect on London based inventories. He also comments on the huge turnover of Petroyuan oil contracts at Shanghai and believe it or not in total, its turnover now exceeds world demand in oil. The contract comes due in September and I can assure you that there will be many yuans chasing physical gold.
a must read..
(courtesy Nichols Biezenek)
Nicholas to Bill Murphy and myself
Superb, unique investigative commentary by Nicholas, with the full title for his fine effort being: “EFPs=Extended Fraudulent Posturing (Exorcist II, The Beginning-‘Your Regulator is not here today, Priest’). Petroyuan turnover now exceeds world demand.”
Member’s auto-logon: www.lemetropolecafe.com/entrance.cfm
EFPs=Extended Fraudulent Posturing (Exorcist II, The Beginning-‘Your Regulator is not here today, Priest’).Petroyuan turnover now exceeds world demand.
by
Nicholas Biezanek
The first major reported crime committed by false computer generated records is reported as the Equity Funding Corporation of America, where fictitious policies were computer generated in the sixties. No one at the time felt competent to question these computer generated records. One analyst started to get suspicious, however, when he reviewed the company’s forecasts and realized that the company would have to underwrite about four insurance policies for every single American in order to achieve these compounding projections. Perhaps the world is now even more dumbed down than half a century ago. Let us examine the position with this new genre of opaque ‘transactions’, termed EFPs (Exchange for Physical.)The situation in respect of this EFP manipulation is now indeed a far more obvious fraud than the Equity Funding Corporation of America fiasco, and yet there is not one iota of mainstream comment and regulators on both sides of the Atlantic refuse to even acknowledge queries.
Volumes in respect of 2018 (only) Exchange for Physical Transfers to LBMA:
Here is a summary of Harvey Organ’s meticulous daily chronicling of the farcical 2018 daily transfers from the COMEX to the LBMA. (Apparently this manipulation has been ongoing for some time, but has only recently received Harvey’s attention.)
-
Data from Harvey Organ
EFP gold
EFP silver
Tonnes
000 Ounces
Jan
2018
653
236,879
Feb
2018
649
244,950
March
2018
742
236,670
April
2018
714
385,750
May
2018
694
210,055
June
2018
651
345,430
Total EFPs
4,103
1,659,734
% of annual production (excluding Russia /China)
171%
237%
One big ‘give-away’ to the totally absurd and fraudulent nature of these EFP transfers is these 6 months’ volumes as a percentage of total annualmine production (excluding Russia and China). Nearly two and half times total annual silver production has been sold in just six months, which is impossible. Let us now examine the impact of these EFP transactions on the LBMA total vault holdings before reaching any further conclusions.
LBMA disclosed loco London Precious Metal Holding:
The LBMA only releases data on loco London gold/silver holdings three months in arrears whilst the CME releases custodial data (to three decimal points) within hours of each trading session. Those who genuflect to the volumes generated by the ‘unregulated’ and disgustingly corrupt COMEX paper market perhaps could view in a more charitable light the weekly elapse of 72 hours before COT data is released compared to this absurd three month delay at the LBMA. (On the other hand, how anybody can believe any data at all that emanates from the Comex is beyond my comprehension). Obviously the intention of the LBMA is to seek to render its data as useless as possible despite masquerading under its war cry of ‘transparency’, but for what it is worth, we can have a look at the 31 stMarch 2018 data released on Monday 2ndJuly 2018. We must bear in mind the following.
‘SLV gives investors direct exposure to silver by physically holding the metal in vaults in London. As such, investors get exposure to spot silver (determined by the London Silver Fix), less fund expenses’.( from SLV web site) The BOE does not hold any silver, in so far as there is no reference to this fact on its website although its gold holdings are disclosed each month.
-
LBMA data is available per month from July 2016 onwards
LBMA total loco London silver holdings
SLV holdings with JP Morgan as sole custodian.
Residual holdings of silver in loco London
000
000
000
Ounces
Ounces
Ounces
July 2016
951,433
349,720
601,713
Dec 2017
1,106,489
323,459
783,030
Jan 2018
1,108,613
313,896
794,717
Feb 2018
1,104,999
316,590
788,409
March 2018
1,086,259
320,395
765,864
| Data from: | http://www.lbma.org.uk/london-precious-metals-physical- holdings-statistics | |||||
| LBMA data is available per month from July 2016 onwards | LBMA total loco London gold holdings | BOE total vault holdings (included in LBMA data) | Residual gold held with all other LBMA custodians | Residual gold held with all other LBMA custodians in tonnes | GLD holdings with various custodians and sub custodians | Non BOE float, excluding GLD custodial gold, available for allocated gold holders etc. |
| A | B | A-B | A-B | C | A-B-C | |
| 000 | 000 | 000 | ||||
| Troy ozs. | Troy ozs. | Troy ozs. | Tonnes | Tonnes | Tonnes | |
| July 2016 | 234,144 | 158,939 | 75,205 | 2,339.14 | 958.09 | 1,381.05 |
| Dec 2017 | 251,622 | 171,086 | 80,536 | 2,504.95 | 837.05 | 1,667.90 |
| Jan 2018 | 251,678 | 170,979 | 80,699 | 2,510.02 | 841.35 | 1,668.67 |
| Feb 2018 | 251,356 | 169,590 | 81,766 | 2,543.21 | 831.03 | 1,712.18 |
| March 2018 | 250,142 | 168,020 | 82,122 | 2,554.28 | 846.12 | 1,708.16 |
The above tables indicate that the levels of vault holdings of precious metals at the LBMA are metronomically constant and no metal at all is leaving loco London. It is manifestly obvious that the term Exchange for Physical (EFP) is an outright fraud, high jacking the term ‘physical’ to give a false and misleading impression that somehow the LBMA is a source of copious physical delivery on demand for precious metals and that any and all COMEX fraudulent paper contracts are as good as the physical metal in light of this symbiosis between the COMEX and LBMA. Indeed Harvey Organ provides a daily disclaimer:
WHAT IS ALARMING TO ME (Harvey Organ), ACCORDING TO OUR LONDON EXPERT ANDREW MAGUIRE IS THAT THESE EFP’S ARE BEING TRANSFERRED TO WHAT ARE CALLED SERIAL FORWARD CONTRACT OBLIGATIONS AND THESE CONTRACTS ARE LESS THAN 14 DAYS. ANYTHING GREATER THAN 14 DAYS, THESE MUST BE RECORDED AND SENT TO THE COMPTROLLER, GREAT BRITAIN TO MONITOR RISK TO THE BANKING SYSTEM. IF THIS IS INDEED TRUE, THEN THIS IS A MASSIVE CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD AS WE NOW WITNESS A MONSTROUS TOTAL EFP’S ISSUANCE AS IT HEADS INTO THE STRATOSPHERE.
Despite this daily warning, so many commentators apparently do not get as far as this warning when reviewing Harvey’s daily posting and continue to discuss EFPs as though this gargantuan fraud may have some semblance of being based in reality. Attempts to get clarification from the CFTC, the Comptroller of the Currency and the General Council of the LBMA do not even receive acknowledgement. Is this at all surprising? The current world order is predicated on the construct that 7.4 tonnes of COMEX registered gold is a foundation for the issuance of limitless naked short paper contracts and consequently chartists’ death crosses’ etc. can be engineered at will with total impunity. Indeed such pervasive manipulation accords with the dictates of the central planners so no wonder that these pathetic regulators witness no contraventions that fall within their mandates. Who are the counter parties to these EFPs? Maybe the ESF is involved or possibly some other major player (there is a potential short list of one candidate) or, most likely, these paper EFP machinations are merely the cabal members making internal paper transfer entries. There is no discrete EFP product with its own terms and conditions, merely the co-mingling of worthless COMEX futures with unallocated paper obligations on the LBMA. Whilst the LBMA belatedly reports loco London physical gold holdings, the totality of claims on this gold are never reported. Indeed is there any centralized credible data in respect of all allocated and unallocated claims on loco London gold and silver? There is no mechanism at all that enables the verification of where and how these EFP transfers are recorded as liabilities at the LBMA as a contra entry to their removal from the COMEX Open Interest. EFPs are merely an extension of the embedded fractional reserving fraud, but this colossal edifice is now as vulnerable as Tower 7, hours after the ‘collapse’ of the Twin Towers.
Insights from Andrew Maguire:
In a KWN interview on 23rdJune 2018,Andrew Maguire spoke about a recent two day Comex/Globex trading period when no less than 50,000 tonnes of synthetic paper silver were dumped onto the market along with 2,750 tonnes of synthetic gold. At the same time a confirmed Chinese order for just 15 tonnes of physical gold kilo bars has meant that Swiss refiners are now booked solid until at least the end of August 2018.Gold refiners are reporting that the physical gold market is on fire, even in this current traditionally quiet period. Rob Kirby corroborated this opinion on KWN on 1st July 2018.Just reflect on the insanity of the synthetic /physical imbalance inherent in the above disclosures. It is also reported that kinesis.money will be launched in Sept 2018 with $10 billion committed to this ICO. I await with interest the forthcoming impact of this kinesis ICO on the current physical gold market, in which just 15 tonnes of physical demand can have a very influential impact on physical gold supply availability. There is a hundred (not ninety nine) percent correlation with a sharp movement down in the paper price of gold/silver in the hours and days following any weekend posting of Andrew Maguire on KWN.The central planners have nowhere else to go but to seek to distract from these critical messages by further frantic paper manipulation. Nothing to see here; all is right as right can be.
The Petro Yuan Contract Turnover Exceeds June 2018 World Oil Consumption:
Below is the three months turnover data in respect of the inaugural petro yuan contract, identified as SC1809. The 18thJune 2018 was a Chinese public holiday and the day after resulted in only 35 billion yuan in turnover so these figures were generated in only 19 days of full trading.
| SC1809 | Turnover Data from | |||
| Shanghai Energy Exchange | ||||
| YUAN | ||||
| April | 2018 | 533,735,069,200 | ||
| May | 2018 | 1,764,654,402,200 | ||
| June | 2018 | 2,157,886,598,200 | ||
| Total | 4,456,276,069,600 | |||
There is a note 3 on the data site which states that turnover is in 10,000 yuan, which is quite explicit and makes sense given the size even of the abridged turnover figure. (All attempts to get confirmation from the Shanghai Energy Exchange that the above numbers were a correct interpretation resulted in returned emails with cryptic messages about attempted ‘spam’).
(The turnover on the first trading day of July 2018 on the SC1809 was a healthy 143 billion yuan, topped only by 145 billion yuan on 21st June 2018.)
Daily global oil consumption is about 100 million barrels per day which would be 3 billion barrels for the month of June 2018 and, at a closing valuation of 494.64 yuan per barrel, global physical oil consumption can be valued at about 1.484 trillion yuan in the month of June 2018. Unlike central bankers, I find that computing and interpreting numbers in the trillions to be quite intimidating, but I have tried to ensure that the odd zero has not been misplaced (if so, I apologize); one has to utilize excel, as all desk calculators become completely obsolete in respect of figures of this magnitude, and these figures are outside the parameters to which I could apply normal ‘sanity checks’. On the basis of these calculations, the petroyuan inaugural contract traded about 145% of global oil consumptionfor the month of June 2018. Before you say ‘impossible’, please consider the annual LBMA gold/silver trading turnover that is nearly four times the annual mine production for both precious metals, and this is for a market with virtually no physical delivery. Ultimately this SC1809 contract only finally settles in the first week of September 2018 and settlement is via physical delivery only.
Whilst never mentioned in MSM, I believe that this petroyuan contract is clearly now beyond material in dictating future imminent shifts in global trading patterns and in determining the future generally accepted media of exchange/settlement and moreover clearly portends the demise of the petrodollar hegemony, in place since 1973.Whilst the glacial pace of Chinese financial reforms may, hitherto, have installed complacency, clearly the rapid acceptance of the petroyaun trading platform is good evidence that the advent of the much heralded ‘reset’ is drawing nigh. Although the precise mechanics of this ‘reset’ are still work in progress, gold will certainly be a component of the structures that emerge to compliment (hopefully eventually replace) the delinquent and corrupted fiat USDollar. Come September 2018, the educated prognosis is that an awful lot of yuan will be seeking convertibility into physical gold on the Shanghai Gold Exchange, compounded by all the goons who hold paper contracts in the West seeking to arbitrage on this ‘reset’ physical gold price. It could all become a bit disorderly; maybe more disorderly than most of us can possibly imagine.
Conclusion:
Maybe one can only appreciate how truly degenerate, dysfunctional and atrophied the USA has become from an external vantage point. Compound the problems of this totally insolvent nation with the loss of the exorbitant privilege of the US Dollar’s exclusive reserve currency status, then the world enters unchartered territory. Russia recently has already disposed of more than half of its USD Bond Holdings and purchased additional gold and engineering a war with Iran is clearly an important Deep State objective .All these nations in the crosshairs of American displeasure are increasing their accumulation of gold reserves and the attempts of the western planners to maintain the hegemony of paper gold have become as manifest as they are pitiful. September will witness the first maturity of a petroyuan contract (and every month thereafter) combined with kinesis.money going live. Could be more than interesting. A countdown clock to the reset of the physical gold price will not miraculously appear. Don’t worry, I will watch the paper gold price climb through certain near term chart points and then I will make my play-in the paper markets? Please just think about the full implications of the totality of the meaning of ‘reset’ in all its many dimensions and take time off to think about the full extent of the unravelling of the current fractionally reserved paper gold price, as the Chinese, Indians Russians, Iranians and Turks and many others are doing right now. I demand to replace my paper gold contracts for physical gold, or novate these vaporous contracts in exchange for substance. No one will even take your call. Force majeure will prevail in all things ‘paper’ since no one could possibly have seen any of these developments or envisaged the emergence of a market platform in the precious metals in which the commands and grotesque engineering of the algos become as potent as dandelions wafting in the wind. (Don’t confuse ‘the reset’ with ‘the rapture’-the reset is now happening but its impact may indeed feel like a religious experience to anyone who is short gold in any form).
P.S Just In case any reader believes that Western central banks have sufficient physical gold reserves to mitigate/nullify the impact of ‘the reset’, I repeat below some relevant comments.
COMMENTS ON CENTRAL BANK REPORTED GOLD RESERVES.
As a concluding topic, let us examine the conventional list of the top seven disclosed gold hoardings. There could be a further problem here-‘the gold is gone’; the two countries best prepared for the reset, China and Russia, are the subject of perpetual diplomatic/economic attack by the USA, although the most recent indications are that war with Iran is now the preferred option to distract from the forthcoming reset. It should also be noted that in the last decade, Turkey has increased its reported gold reserves to 565 tonnes.
|
Location |
Tonnes |
Comments |
|
USA |
8,133? |
Unaudited since 1953 in respect of a credible audit process- probably dishoarded long ago-the US probably also has a massive deficit in respect of physical gold allegedly held in (‘deep’?) storage for other central banks. Total secrecy is a fundamental and obsessive cornerstone of US gold related policy. Possible that there is a large stock of tungsten bars replacing ‘stolen gold’. Nobody would accept western gold unless rerefined. Refer GATA’s large advert in WSJ of 31st Jan 2008 entitled “Anybody Seen our Gold? ’ |
|
Germany |
3,374 |
No Comment-some reserves still held externally and are therefore vulnerable/impaired? |
|
IMF |
2,814? No- Definitely NIL |
These purported gold reserves are merely quota allocations from the reserves of the IMF’s founding nations in the ‘forties’ and as such have been double counted since inception and are non-existent. This fact was publicly acknowledged in documents seventy years ago, but is now hushed up, like all inconvenient truths. |
|
Italy |
2,452? |
Italy’s gold reserves were almost certainly impaired at the time of the LTCM crisis. By the Banca d’Italia’s own admission, half of its gold is stored at the Fed as well as additional deposits with BIS, SNB and BoE. It is difficult to place full (indeed any) credibility on stories emanating from Italy. |
|
France |
2,436? |
Of the Banque de France, Milling-Stanley (formerly of the world gold council) said in 2012 ‘it has “recently become more active in this space [mobilizing gold into the market], acting primarily as an interface between the Bank for International Settlements in Basel [BIS] and commercial banks requiring dollar liquidity. These commercial banks are primarily located in Europe, especially in France”.’Mobilization into the market’almost certainly means the gold is nowswapped/leased/loaned. Has the BIS’s demand for gold possibly diminished since 2012 or has every ounce of physical been now commandeered to prolong gold suppression? |
|
China |
+?1,842 |
China and all its universe of parastatals and sovereign wealth funds etc. has true gold reserves of many multiples of this reported figure in preparation for the reset. No gold mined in China is ever exported. |
|
Russia |
+?1,828 |
The gold reserves stored under the Kremlin are many multiples of the reported figure. Russia is even better prepared for the reset than China. No gold mined in Russia is ever exported. |
Conclusion
CFTC, Comptroller of the Currency 5th May Gata,General Councel of the LBMA Busy engineering death crosses on paper whilst on fire
Russia disposes of 50% of its US bond holdings and buys more gold.
Merely an exchange of Comex futures for London pool commitments on a perpetual rolling basis under a maturity categorization of less than 14 days. Not a product .The true liability for aggregate claims of allocated/unallocated contracts is unknown. Glacial but inevitable pace of Chinese reform-Stephen Leeb
Anything involving China happens at glacial pace but SC1809 indicates a ratcheting up- a reset is coming.The inaugural petro yuan contract settles in early September (at the same time as the launch of kinesis. Money) and alternative system,CIPS,is in place of SWIFT. The pressure is being ratcheted up on Iran etc so the advent of a reset is definitely approaching after years of paper price suppression and hegemony and no one will advertise a countdown clock
Google=God is not here today
Algos will be neutered in respect of seeking to arbitrage on a Shanghai physical gold price which cannot be accomplished by any kind of paper contract novation.PetroUSD is in decline and hence status of USD as world’s reserve currency
Atrophied USA going to lose exclusive reserve currency status
Your early MONDAY morning currency, Asian stock market results, important USA/Asian currency crosses, gold/silver pricing overnight along with the price of oil Major stories overnight/9 AM EST
i) Chinese yuan vs USA dollar/CLOSED DOWN TO 6.6725/HUGE DEVALUATION FOR THE PAST 14 DAYS /shanghai bourse CLOSED DOWN 71,86 POINTS OR 2.52%// HANG SANG CLOSED HOLIDAY
2. Nikkei closed DOWN 492.58 / /USA: YEN RISES TO 110.78/
3. Europe stocks OPENED DEEPLY IN THE RED / /USA dollar index FALLS TO 94.81/Euro FALLS TO 1.1635
3b Japan 10 year bond yield: FALLS TO . +.03/ !!!!(Japan buying 100% of bond issuance)/Japanese yen vs usa cross now at 110.63/ THIS IS TROUBLESOME AS BANK OF JAPAN IS RUNNING OUT OF BONDS TO BUY./JAPAN 10 YR YIELD FINALLY IN THE POSITIVE/BANK OF JAPAN LOSING CONTROL OF THEIR YIELD CURVE AS THEY PURCHASE ALL BONDS TO GET TO ZERO RATE!!
3c Nikkei now JUST BELOW 17,000
3d USA/Yen rate now well below the important 120 barrier this morning
3e WTI:: 74.13 and Brent: 78.89
3f Gold DOWN/Yen DOWN
3g Japan is to buy the equivalent of 108 billion uSA dollars worth of bond per month or $1.3 trillion. Japan’s GDP equals 5 trillion usa./“HELICOPTER MONEY” OFF THE TABLE FOR NOW /REVERSE OPERATION TWIST ON THE BONDS: PURCHASE OF LONG BONDS AND SELLING THE SHORT END
Japan to buy 100% of all new Japanese debt and by 2018 they will have 25% of all Japanese debt. Fifty percent of Japanese budget financed with debt.
3h Oil UP for WTI and UP FOR Brent this morning
3i European bond buying continues to push yields lower on all fronts in the EMU. German 10yr bund RISES TO +.31%/Italian 10 yr bond yield DOWN to 2.75% /SPAIN 10 YR BOND YIELD DOWN TO 1.31%
3j Greek 10 year bond yield FALLS TO : 3.99
3k Gold at $1249.20 silver at:15.98 7 am est) SILVER NEXT RESISTANCE LEVEL AT $18.50
3l USA vs Russian rouble; (Russian rouble DOWN 27/100 in roubles/dollar) 63.04-
3m oil into the 74 dollar handle for WTI and 78 handle for Brent/
3n Higher foreign deposits out of China sees huge risk of outflows and a currency depreciation. This can spell financial disaster for the rest of the world/
JAPAN ON JAN 29.2016 INITIATES NIRP. THIS MORNING THEY SIGNAL THEY MAY END NIRP. TODAY THE USA/YEN TRADES TO 110.78 DESTROYING JAPANESE CITIZENS WITH HIGHER FOOD INFLATION
30 SNB (Swiss National Bank) still intervening again in the markets driving down the SF. It is not working: USA/SF this morning 0.9933 as the Swiss Franc is still rising against most currencies. Euro vs SF is 1.1522 well above the floor set by the Swiss Finance Minister. Thomas Jordan, chief of the Swiss National Bank continues to purchase euros trying to lower value of the Swiss Franc.
3p BRITAIN VOTES AFFIRMATIVE BREXIT/LOWER PARLIAMENT APPROVES BREXIT COMMENCEMENT/ARTICLE 50 COMMENCES MARCH 29/2017
3r the 10 Year German bund now POSITIVE territory with the 10 year FALLING to +0.31%
The bank withdrawals were causing massive hardship to the Greek bank. the Greek referendum voted overwhelming “NO”. Next step for Greece will be the recapitalization of the banks and that will be difficult.
4. USA 10 year treasury bond at 2.83% early this morning (THIS IS DEADLY TO ALL MARKETS). Thirty year rate at 2.97%
5. Details Ransquawk, Bloomberg, Deutsche bank/Jim Reid.
(courtesy Jim Reid/Bloomberg/Deutsche bank/zero hedge)
“It’s Not A Happy Start”: Second Half Opens
With Sea Of Red Across Global Markets
JPMorgan’s warning that the Chinese rout is far from over “as 2018 becomes 2015” proved prescient, and overnight global sentiment quickly shifted to “risk off” as soon as China opened for trading, leading to a resumption of selling first in China, then across Asia, and finally around the world, resulting in a market snapshot which this morning is another sea of redahead of this Friday’s deadline for the US-Chinese trade war, when 25% tariffs kick in on some $34 billion in Chinese exports to the US.
The underlying concerns are well known: trade-war jitters, political risk in Europe and divergence in fiscal and monetary policy and economic performance between the US and the rest of the world weighed on investors’ minds.
“It’s not a happy start to the second half,” Saxo commodity head Ole Hansen said. “Trade war concerns, U.S. sanctions, Trump’s rants and political problems in Europe, as well as worries about slowing emerging-market growth are all playing their part.”
Political risks dragged the euro and pound down, the Mexican peso’s rally was short lived after the election of the country’s first leftist president in decades, while Treasuries climbed and dollar strength again slammed emerging markets. Overnight, Mexico’s Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador won a decisive victory in the Presidential election with quick count results showing he received 53.0%-53.8% of votes, while an exit poll also showed that Lopez Obrador is set to get a majority at the lower house.
Once again, it started with China, whose stocks took another battering on Monday as selling returned amid concern about a falling currency, housing curbs and the impact of trade tariffs. The Shanghai Composite Index extended last month’s 8% rout – with real estate and bank stocks heavily offered as leverage and credit exposure is under increasing pressure – sliding another 2.5% on Monday and bringing its bear market rout to -22% since the January high….
… while the yuan touched its weakest level since Oct. 3, resuming its sharpest drop since China’s August 2015 devaluation….
… after another unexpectedly sharp overnight selloff, sent the offshore Yuan down 0.6% to 6.6760 and fast approaching the 6.70 barrier.
What is curious is that the PBOC set the Yuan stronger than the expected fixing, suggesting that China is not yet using yuan depreciation as an active tool in its trade conflict with the U.S., and will likely step in to avert any disorderly decline, according to Morgan Stanley. “The PBOC could step up intervention if depreciation risk intensifies,” according to China economists at the bank, led by Robin Xing in Hong Kong. Goldman strategist on Friday also concluded that the PBOC has been “leaning against excessive depreciation in recent days.” We wonder what will happen if China decides to lean in…
Adding to concerns about China, over the weekend, China’s June PMI indicated weaker-than-expected manufacturing data and showed that new export orders slid into contraction, suggesting that trade war concerns are starting to seep through the Chinese economy.

It wasn’t just China: trade also weakened in export powerhouse South Korea, which reported June exports which were modestly down Y/Y.

The Asian turmoil quickly spread to Europe, where nearly all members of the Stoxx Europe 600 Index retreated. Miners were the biggest losers in Europe as metals fell and West Texas oil traded near $74 a barrel after U.S. President Donald Trump called for 2 million barrels in increased Saudi production. The Stoxx 600 Banks Index fell as much as 1.3%, led by drops in Italian and Spanish lenders. The Spanish Ibex 35 Banks Index fell 2%, with all 6 members dropping. The reason: BBVA and Banco Sabadell are among Spanish companies with exposure to Mexico where leftist Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador won Sunday’s presidential elections. Separately, Deutsche Bank once again tumbled, slides as much as 3.4% to €8.91 and near its all time low, but it has since found a bid.
Italian bonds made the European party complete with BTP futures sliding again, as yields rose as much as 9bps across 2- to 10-year sectors, widening vs core bonds as risk appetite continues to sour following European open.
Needless to say, investors are no longer enamored with Europe, which in Q2 saw the biggest quarterly ETF outflow in 2 years.
The US wasn’t immune to the global rout and futures on the S&P 500, Nasdaq and Dow all dropped, with the S&P set to erase all of Friday’s gains (which were far less as a result of that last hour selling rush).
There was more turmoil in FX: after rallying the most in a month Friday, the euro slipped -0.4% on Monday, erasing all earlier losses, as concern about a potential escalation in the German political crisis provides investors with another reason to fade rallies. On Monday, Merkel’s CDU and Bavarian CSU are holding last-ditch talks to reach a compromise over migration policy disputes.
On Sunday, Germany Interior Minister and CSU party leader Seehofer offered to resign, which follows a meeting over the weekend with Chancellor Merkel that Seehofer described as pointless and in which he rejected the migration deal that was negotiated at the EU summit. However, reports later stated that Seehofer is said to remain in politics if Chancellor Merkel’s CDU party backs down regarding migration, while he also said he wants to avoid the collapse of Merkel’s government and is said to be seeking one more discussion with the CDU. SU caucus chief Dobrindt opposed the resignation and requested an internal vote, while there were also comments from Economy Minister Altmaier who stated that the German coalition is in a serious situation.
As a result of the escalating German political crisis, the common currency dropped as much as -0.5% to touch 1.1626 day low, before paring losses. CFTC data published on June 29 shows hedge funds sold the euro for a seventh week in a row, a bearish momentum unseen in more than five years.
Some were quick to assure traders not to dump the euro: “Principally, it can be quite relevant for the euro if the political situation in Germany changes dramatically,”wrote Commerzbank FX strategist Esther Maria Reichelt. “However, for now there is little reason to doubt that all parties who might be suitable for a formation of the government support a similar economic and principally pro-European course. That means that the stability of the euro is not under threat even if the disagreements on asylum escalate further.”
Similarly, the Mexican peso turned lower, reversing an early advance of 1.3%, after Mexicans elected leftist Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador as their first left-wing president in decades.
On the other hand, the dollar kicked off the second half of the year on a strong footing as global equities slid amid trade concerns, while the yuan hit a nine-month low.
The return of dollar strength led to another drop in emerging-market stocks, which gave up half of Friday’s gain.
Crude futures gap lower at the Globex reopen, pressured as markets react to a tweet from US President Trump over the weekend that he spoke with Saudi Arabia’s King Salman on raising production maybe by as much as 2mln barrels and that prices were too high which the Saudi ruler agreed with. However, the White House were quick to clarify that Saudi Arabia stated they could raise output if required and that there was no actual agreement to raising output by the said amount. In regards to this, Iran’s OPEC Governor Ardebili said on Saturday “there is no way one country could go 2mln BPD above their production allocation unless they are walking out of OPEC”. An Iranian official later stated that adjustments to the OPEC output levels would require an emergency meeting
Elsewhere, gold (-0.3%) is subdued by a slightly firmer dollar as the yellow metal continues to be detached from the risk sentiments. Chinese iron ore futures fell almost 2% on Monday, due to a fresh increase in iron ore stocks at China’s ports, after a hat trick of positive closes last week.
Looking ahead, highlights include US mfg PMIs, US construction spending, ISM manufacturing and ECB’s Praet.
Market Snapshot
- S&P 500 futures down 0.6% to 2,705.00
- STOXX Europe 600 down 0.9% to 376.36
- MXAP down 1.2% to 164.11
- MXAPJ down 0.7% to 535.26
- Nikkei down 2.2% to 21,811.93
- Topix down 2.1% to 1,695.29
- Hang Seng Index up 1.6% to 28,955.11
- Shanghai Composite down 2.5% to 2,775.56
- Sensex down 0.5% to 35,240.17
- Australia S&P/ASX 200 down 0.3% to 6,177.79
- Kospi down 2.4% to 2,271.54
- German 10Y yield fell 0.9 bps to 0.293%
- Euro down 0.4% to $1.1637
- Italian 10Y yield fell 9.9 bps to 2.413%
- Spanish 10Y yield fell 1.4 bps to 1.307%
- Brent Futures down 1.1% to $78.39/bbl
- Gold spot down 0.3% to $1,248.72
- U.S. Dollar Index up 0.4% to 94.83
Top Overnight News from Bloomberg
- Mexicans elected Lopez Obrador as their first left-wing president in decades, according to exit polls that showed him headed for a landslide victory over two business-friendly rivals
- Fate of German Chancellor Merkel’s ruling bloc is due to be decided Monday as a coalition dispute over migration policy reaches its endgame
- German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union and its Bavarian sister party will hold joint talks later Monday in Berlin in an effort to broker an 11th-hour compromise after separate discussions failed to end the standoff over migration policy
- Chinese stocks took another battering on Monday as selling resumed amid concern about a falling currency, housing curbs and the impact of trade tariffs. The Shanghai Composite Index extended last month’s 8 percent rout, while the yuan touched its weakest level since Oct. 3
- A one-day rally in Chinese stocks fizzled out as the yuan resumed declines and data showed further signs of weakness in the economy. Purchasing manager index readings for June released Saturday showed a gauge of export orders tumbled
- Commodity powerhouse Australia warned that rising trade protectionism will hurt global growth, adding its voice to a chorus of alarm just days before the U.S. and China slap duties on each other, risking a spiral of tit-for-tat tariffs
- Confidence among Japan’s large manufacturers cooled after reaching a 13-year high at the end of last year. While trade tensions are casting a shadow over companies globally, big producers in Japan cited a lack of workers and the rising cost of materials as key concerns
- After decades of pleading for easier access to the China’s car market, manufacturers saw duties on overseas imports almost halved to 15% on Sunday. But the reprieve for producers of those models is set to end in five days. For BMW AG, Tesla Inc. and other global automakers whose future is ever-more dependent on China’s burgeoning market, any gains from lower import tariffs this week will likely be short-lived — thanks to President Donald Trump’s trade war
Asian equity markets began H2 softer with the region constrained by disappointing data releases including Chinese Official & Caixin Manufacturing PMIs which both fell short of estimates, while the latest BoJ Tankan survey was mixed with headline Large Manufacturing Index also below forecasts. As such, ASX 200 (-0.3%) and Nikkei 225 (-2.2%) were lacklustre although strength in Property and Healthcare sectors kept Australia afloat for most the session, while Japan was dampened following mixed Tankan data but with a weaker JPY intiially limiting the downside. Elsewhere, Shanghai Comp. (-2.5%) was among the underperformers after both the Official and Caixin Manufacturing PMI missed estimates, while PBoC inaction resulting to a net daily drain and the absence of participants in Hong Kong for public holiday also ensured a subdued tone. Finally, 10yr JGBs were marginally higher amid the cautious risk tone in Japan and BoJ’s presence in the market, while the less than impressive BoJ tankan survey and source reports the BoJ are to revise lower its CPI forecasts at this month’s Outlook Report is also seen to likely to keep the BoJ maintaining its ultra-loose policy for a prolonged period.
Top Asian News
- Global Automakers Prepare for ’Nightmare’ China Tariff Whiplash
- Sentiment Sours in Asian Stocks as Trade War Hits China Exports
- Top Iron Ore Shipper Cuts Outlook as Price Seen Back in $50s
European equities kick off the week in negative territory, albeit off lows (Eurostoxx 50 -1.0%) following the tone seen in the AsiaPac session, with sentiment also dampened by the latest developments in Germany. Over the weekend, German Interior Minister Seehofer rejected Chancellor Merkel’s deal with the EU on migration whilst also threatening to resign. Trade war woes continue to linger after the EU threatened to impose new retaliatory tariffs worth USD 300bln if the US continues with the EU auto tariffs. Financials and industrials underperform amid the uncertainty surrounding the potential fall of the German government (Interior Minister Seehofer is to meet Chancellor Merkel today) and the fall of base metals. Energy names take a hit following the recent decline in oil prices. In terms of stocks specifics, Microfocus (+5.1%) shares were lifted following reports they’re to sell their SUSE business to EQT partners for USD 2.4bln. Vedanta (+26.8%) shares spiked higher after Volcan approached the company with a buyout offer. Meanwhile, Playtech (-29.3%) shares slumped after the company lowered their guidance.
Top European News
- UBS Makes Sweeping Changes to Europe Investment Bank Leadership
- Brexit Banker Kids Leave Top U.K. Schools With Rare Empty Seats
- German Banks Are Plotting a Counter-Attack Against MiFID II
- U.K. Manufacturing Growth Holds Up in June After Subdued Quarter
In FX, the EUR has been under pressure in early EU trade, as 1.1700 held firm vs the Usd amidst reports of decent selling against vs the JPY after the cross breached 129.00 to the downside, from 128.95 to 125.80. Meanwhile, a prominent US bank has also implemented a short Eur position on unstable German political grounds and despite the prospect of SNB intervention via the CHF around 1.1550, targeting 1.1200 with a 1.1660 stop. Back to the headline pair, 1.1623 represents 10 DMA support just below the base so far. USD – Although the Dollar has retreated from best levels vs several major counterparts the DXY remains underpinned above 94.500 with Usd/Jpy holding midway between 110.50-111.05 and the Greenback broadly firmer across the board. Sub-forecast Chinese PMIs suggest that trade wars may hit the world’s 2nd largest economy more than the US, and the YUAN continues to weaken in response if not by design. AUD/NZD – Among the G10 underperformers on the latest downturn in overall risk sentiment, and with the Aud also undermined by a slower PMI print and decline in job ads overnight, as it slips further below 0.7400 vs its US peer and pivots 1.0900 against the Kiwi that is striving to keep its head above 0.6750 vs the Usd. MXN – Off recent peaks vs the Usd, but with the Peso still holding above 20.000 in wake of the election and convincing win for AMLO
In commodities, oil traded lower with WTI (-0.4%) and Brent (-0.9%) pressured as markets react to a tweet from US President Trump over the weekend that he spoke with Saudi Arabia’s King Salman on raising production maybe by as much as 2mln barrels and that prices were too high which the Saudi ruler agreed with. However, the White House were quick on clarifying that Saudi Arabia stated they could raise output if required and that there was no actual agreement to raising output by the said amount. In regards to this, Iran’s OPEC Governor Ardebili said on Saturday “there is no way one country could go 2mln BPD above their production allocation unless they are walking out of OPEC”. An Iranian official later stated that adjustments to the OPEC output levels would require an emergency meeting. Amongst the weekend comments, Saudi crude output reached a near-record 10.7mln BPD according to a survey while Russian June output reached over 11mln BPD according to the oil ministry. Libya’s NOC declared a force majeure at Hariga and Zeutina ports while weekend reports suggested around 850K BPD may be offline in the country. Elsewhere, gold (-0.3%) is subdued by a slightly firmer dollar as the yellow metal continues to be detached from the risk sentiments. Chinese iron ore futures fell almost 2% on Monday, due to a fresh increase in iron ore stocks at China’s ports, after a hat trick of positive closes last week.
Looking at today’s calendar, in the US the June ISM manufacturing will also be closely watched in the afternoon. Other data due out includes May PPI and the unemployment rate reading for the Euro area. Meanwhile the ECB’s Praet is due to speak.
US Event Calendar
- 9:45am: Markit US Manufacturing PMI, est. 54.7, prior 54.6
- 10am: Construction Spending MoM, est. 0.5%, prior 1.8%
- 10am: ISM Manufacturing, est. 58.5, prior 58.7
- 10am: ISM Employment, prior 56.3
- 10am: ISM Prices Paid, est. 74.8, prior 79.5
- 10am: ISM New Orders, prior 63.7
DB’s Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap
Welcome to the second half of the year. For all the fire and fury in H1, the S&P 500 continues to be the star core equity market performer but at +2.6% in total return terms, it has struggled to maintain its flying start where it was +5.7% alone in January. The large majority of equity markets are lower in 2018 with EM leading the way as trade wars and higher US yields and a firmer dollar take their toll. Actually June saw the Renminbi (-3.3%) see its worst month since FX markets were established in China back in 1994. On the other hand the best performer in our global suite of assets in June, Q2 and YTD has been Oil.
This weekend the main stories have concerned Mrs Merkel, US/China tariffs and a Trump tweet on Saudi Oil production. The other main story is that one of Russia, Croatia, Sweden, Switzerland, Colombia or England will be in the World Cup final in just under 2 weeks!! Expect the low expectations previously seen in England to reach fever pitch optimism before tomorrow’s game!
Firstly on Germany, according to the DPA, the CSU party leader Mr Seehofer has offered his resignation as German interior minister following policy differences on migration issues with Merkel, but said he’ll stay in politics if she backs down. The Euro initially traded higher but later reversed gains to be -0.2% lower this morning. Looking ahead, both the CSU and CDU are expected to reconvene for more meetings today, with Mr Seehofer telling reporters in the early hours of Monday morning that “all other steps will be decided after the discussion” with Mrs Merkel’s Party. So it could still be a big day for German politics and the survival of Germany’s government.
Moving onto oil, which rose 8.1% last week (WTI) to a fresh c3.5 year high. Over the weekend Potus indicated mixed messages on oil on social media and in a live interview. This morning, WTI oil is trading -1.2% lower.
In terms of trade tensions, Canada’s retaliatory tariffs on $12.6bn worth of US goods went into effect yesterday. The country has imposed a 25% tariff on metal products and a 10% tariff on 250 other goods. The Canadian Foreign minister Freeland noted “we’ll not escalate and we’ll not back down”. Meanwhile, the US treasury department is also due to release its report outlining investment restrictions on Chinese investments in certain US industries soon.
This morning in Asia, markets are trading lower with the Nikkei (-1.35%), Kospi (-1.57%) and Shanghai Comp. (-1.13%) all down while the Hang Seng is closed for holiday. In Mexico, exit polls by El Financiero showed Lopez Obrador winning the election with 49% of the votes where he will be the country’s first left wing President in c4 decades (as per Reuters). The Mexican Peso is trading c0.9% higher this morning. Datawise, over the weekend China’s June manufacturing PMI slowed 0.4pt mom to 51.5 (vs. 51.6 expected), but this was partly offset by a stronger non-manufacturing PMI print of 55, leading to a still solid composite PMI of 54.4 (-0.2pt mom). Earlier this morning, the June Caixin China manufacturing PMI also edged down 0.1pt to 51 (vs. 51.1 expected).
As for this week, it will be a disjointed one as the US celebrates AMEXIT day on Wednesday with markets closing early tomorrow ahead of this. Around this the data highlights are today’s final global PMIs/US ISM, Wednesday’s services equivalent in Europe (Thursday in US) and then Friday’s US payrolls. Current consensus is for a 195k print (May was 223k). Average hourly earnings is expected to come in at a solid +0.3% mom which, if realised, would push the annual rate up one-tenth to +2.8% yoy and back to the January highs just before the vol shock. We also have the latest Fed minutes on Thursday where more details should emerge about the hawkish hike seen a few weeks back. Elsewhere, outside of this weekend’s trade stories, Friday is when the US is scheduled to impose tariffs on $34bn of Chinese goods. So plenty of time for some more trade headlines.
As for markets back on Friday. European equities were all higher (Stoxx 600 +0.81%; DAX +1.06%), boosted by a rebound in tech stocks and a lift in sentiment as EU leaders reached a preliminary agreement on migration issues. In the US, the S&P also traded c1% higher initially, but fell late in the session following an Axios report which suggested President Trump was keen for the US to withdraw from the WTO. Later on, White House officials denied the story, but the damage was partly done with the S&P only closing +0.08% higher.
Meanwhile European bond yields were broadly lower, in part as Reuters reported that the ECB is considering recycling more of its maturing assets into longer-term bonds. Across the region, the 10y yields on Bunds (-1.7bp), OATs (-4bp) and Italian BTPs (-10.1bp) were all down, while treasuries (+2.4bp) and Gilts (+1.5bp) nudged higher. In FX, the US dollar index weakened for the first time in four days (-0.88%) while the Euro and Sterling both jumped +0.99%.
Before we take a look at today’s calendar, we wrap up with other data releases from Friday. In the US, the May core PCE was firmer than expected at 0.213% mom, leading to an annual growth of 2% yoy (vs. 1.9% expected) – the highest since April 2012. The three-month and six-month annualized rates of inflation also nudged up to 2.2% and 2.3% saar respectively. Meanwhile the May personal income growth was in line at 0.4% mom while personal spending was weaker than expected at 0.2% mom (vs. 0.4% expected). Elsewhere, the June Chicago PMI was above market (64.1 vs. 60 expected) while the final reading of the June University of Michigan consumer confidence index was revised down by 1.1pt to 98.2. Following the above, the Atlanta Fed’s estimate of Q2 GDP growth was cut by seven-tenths to 3.8% saar.
In Europe, the Euro area’s core June CPI edged down 0.1ppt mom to an in line print of 1% yoy while France’s CPI was also in line at 2.4% yoy. In Germany, the June unemployment rate was in line at 5.2% while the May retail sales disappointed at -1.6% mom (vs. 1.9% expected). Over in the UK, the final reading of the 1Q GDP was unchanged at 1.2% yoy. Elsewhere, the May mortgage approvals was the highest since January (64.5k vs. 62.3k expected) while the net lending on secured dwellings also beat at £3.9bn (vs. £3.7bn expected).
Looking at today’s calendar, the flash June manufacturing PMIs for Spain, Italy and the UK along with final June manufacturing PMI reads for France, Germany, the Eurozone and the US are due. In the US the June ISM manufacturing will also be closely watched in the afternoon. Other data due out includes May PPI and the unemployment rate reading for the Euro area. Meanwhile the ECB’s Praet is due to speak.
3. ASIAN AFFAIRS
i)MONDAY MORNING/SUNDAY NIGHT: Shanghai closed DOWN 71.86 POINTS OR 2.52% /Hang Sang CLOSED HOLIDAY / The Nikkei closed DOWN 492.58 POINTS OR 2.21% /Australia’s all ordinaires CLOSED DOWN 0.26% /Chinese yuan (ONSHORE) closed DOWN at 6.6625 AS POBC EXERCISES ANOTHER HUGE DEVALUATION /Oil UP to 74,13 dollars per barrel for WTI and 78.99 for Brent. Stocks in Europe OPENED IN THE RED //. ONSHORE YUAN CLOSED DOWN AT 6.6625 AGAINST THE DOLLAR. OFFSHORE YUAN CLOSED DOWN ON THE DOLLAR AT 6.6782 :HUGE DEVALUATION/PAST SEVERAL DAYS//ONSHORE YUAN TRADING STRONGER AGAINST OFFSHORE YUAN/ONSHORE YUAN TRADING WEAKER AGAINST USA DOLLAR/OFFSHORE YUAN TRADING MUCH WEAKER AGAINST THE DOLLAR /CHINA RETALIATES WITH TARIFFS/ TRUMP RESPONDS TO NEW TARIFFS AND IT NOW A FULL TRADE WAR IS BEGINNING/
3 a NORTH KOREA/USA
North Korea/South Korea/usa
Seems that North Korea is trying to deceive the USA;: they are adding to their nuclear stockpiles revealed by Satellite photos
(courtesy zerohedge)
3 b JAPAN AFFAIRS
c) REPORT ON CHINA/HONG KONG
The yuan is collapsing and yuan is without a doubt weaponizing the yuan
(courtesy zerohedge)
4. EUROPEAN AFFAIRS
Trump is surely not going to like this: the EU threatens with its own 300 billion dollars in tariff retaliation if the USA moves ahead with its auto tariffs.
(courtesy zerohedge)
EU Threatens $300 Billion Retaliation If US
Moves Ahead With Auto Tariffs
More than a week after President Trump threatened to slap a 20% tariff on auto imports from the European Union, Brussels has issued a written warning to the US Department of Commerce with a threat of its own: If the Trump administration moves ahead with the auto tariffs,the bureaucrats in Brussels won’t hesitate to respond with tariffs on $300 billion in US goods, according to the Financial Times. The threat comes as Trump doubled-down on his trade threats in an interview with Fox Business’s Maria Bartiromo that aired Sunday morning, where Trump criticized the EU’s $151 billion trade surplus. Trump initially threatened to impose the 20% tariffs if the EU doesn’t eliminate trade barriers to US automotive imports.
The warning marked the first time that Brussels has filed a written submission with the Commerce Department, which is presently considering Section 232 auto tariffs. In the letter, which was obtained by the FT, Brussels warned that Trump’s threatened auto tariffs would risk sparking a global trade war that could ultimately harm employment in the US and slice billions of dollars off US GDP. That echos a warning from GM, issued in comments to the Commerce Department’s investigation, where the carmaker said tariffs would lead to a “smaller company.”
In a sign of the EU’s exasperation at Mr Trump’s confrontational trade policy, which has already stoked tensions over steel and aluminium, the document said the move “could result in yet another disregard of international law” by the US. It said imposing the car tariffs would not be accepted by the international community and would “damage further the reputation” of the US.
A trade group representing global automakers recently warned that Trump’s threatened tariffs could raise prices for US consumers by up to $6,000 per car. The $300 billion figure proposed by the EU is roughly equivalent to the value of US imports of cars and parts, which reached $330 billion last year, according to the FT.
The EU also argued that the Trump administration’s national security concerns – which it has used to justify its aggressive trade policy under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act – has “no basis in fact.”
The EU has also firmly rejected Mr Trump’s use of national security arguments to justify restrictive trade measures, saying it has no basis in fact and risks undercutting the entire rules-based system of international trade.
This development harms trade, growth and jobs in the US and abroad, weakens the bonds with friends and allies, and shifts the attention away from the shared strategic challenges that genuinely threaten the market-based western economic model,” the document said.
The document, submitted to US authorities on Friday, marks the latest step in the EU’s campaign to get Mr Trump to step back from the brink before it is too late.
Finally, the EU devoted part of its letter to what appeared to be subtle political threats, pointing out that EU-based car companies operate plants in several Republican-dominated states across the Southern US, meaning that Trump voters would likely absorb the brunt of the EU’s retaliation. The implication is clear: it’d be a shame if something were to happen to those jobs. But even if the EU chose not to retaliate, the tariffs threatened by Trump would still harm the US by knocking $14 billion off of US GDP due to “market fragmentation.”
The commission document said that, according to its “internal analysis” and other expert studies, the tariffs would be an “own goal” for the US economy even before other economies retaliated. The interconnectedness of the car industry, and its high degree of regional specialisation, mean that imposing additional 25 per cent tariffs on imports would cause a hit to US gross domestic product “in the order of” $13bn-$14bn, according to the document.
The paper, submitted by the EU’s representation in Washington, also underlines that EU-owned car companies account for more than a quarter of US car production, with plants “across the country, including in South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi and Tennessee” — all strongly Republican states — and that the majority of this production was for export.
EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker will have a chance to follow up on these threats in person when he travels to Washington later this month. And EU officials have said they will take part in a two-day Department of Commerce hearing set to begin July 19.
end
Trump seems to be losing his battle to stop the Nordstream 2 project. Russia will continue to have influence on European gas sales once this becomes a reality
6 .GLOBAL ISSUES
A terrific commentary from Gefira as they talk about how the global economy is running out of its most valuable resource: people. This leads to debt being shared by lesser amounts of people and thus higher DEBT per GDP
(courtesy Gefira)
Sat. Morning:
Iran is furious after Trump calls on the Saudi King to pump an additional 2 million barrels of oil. The Saudi King states that he will look into the matter and as of yet, has not agreed to pump the additional amount needed by the USA
(courtesy zerohedge)
8. EMERGING MARKET
Argentina blew another billion dollars trying to keep its peso from collapsing to no avail
(courtesy zerohedge)
Your early morning currency/gold and silver pricing/Asian and European bourse movements/ and interest rate settings MONDAY morning 7:00 am
Euro/USA 1.1635 DOWN .0044/ REACTING TO MERKEL’S FAILED COALITION/ SPAIN VS CATALONIA/REACTING TO +GERMAN ELECTION WHERE ALT RIGHT PARTY ENTERS THE BUNDESTAG/ huge Deutsche bank problems + USA election:///ITALIAN CHAOS /AND NOW ECB TAPERING BOND PURCHASES/JAPAN TAPERING BOND PURCHASES /USA RISING INTEREST RATES /FLOODING/EUROPE BOURSES IN THE RED /
USA/JAPAN YEN 110.78 UP 0.112 (Abe’s new negative interest rate (NIRP), a total DISASTER/SIGNALS U TURN WITH INCREASED NEGATIVITY IN NIRP/JAPAN OUT OF WEAPONS TO FIGHT ECONOMIC DISASTER/
GBP/USA 1.3158 DOWN 0.0037 (Brexit March 29/ 2017/ARTICLE 50 SIGNED/BREXIT FEES WILL BE CAPPED
USA/CAN 1.3169 UP .0047 (CANADA WORRIED ABOUT TRADE WITH THE USA WITH TRUMP ELECTION/ITALIAN EXIT AND GREXIT FROM EU/(TRUMP INITIATES LUMBER TARIFFS ON CANADA/CANADA HAS A HUGE HOUSEHOLD DEBT/GDP PROBLEM)
Early THIS MONDAY morning in Europe, the Euro FELL by 44 basis points, trading now ABOVE the important 1.08 level FALLING to 1.1635; / Last night Shanghai composite CLOSED DOWN 71.86 POINTS OR 2.52% /Hang Sang CLOSED HOLIDAY /AUSTRALIA CLOSED DOWN 0.26% / EUROPEAN BOURSES IN THE RED /
The NIKKEI: this MONDAY morning CLOSED DOWN 492.58 POINTS OR 2.21%
Trading from Europe and Asia
1/EUROPE OPENED ALL IN THE RED
2/ CHINESE BOURSES / :Hang Sang HOLIDAY / SHANGHAI CLOSED DOWN 71,86 POINTS OR 2.52%
Australia BOURSE CLOSED DOWN 0.26%
Nikkei (Japan) CLOSED DOWN 492.58 POINTS OR 2.21%
INDIA’S SENSEX IN THE RED
Gold very early morning trading: 1248.80
silver:$15.96
Early MONDAY morning USA 10 year bond yield: 2.83% !!! DOWN 3 IN POINTS from FRIDAY night in basis points and it is trading WELL ABOVE resistance at 2.27-2.32%. (POLICY FED ERROR)/
The 30 yr bond yield 2.97 DOWN 2 IN BASIS POINTS from FRIDAY night. (POLICY FED ERROR)/
USA dollar index early MONDAY morning: 94.81 UP 34 CENT(S) from FRIDAY’s close.
This ends early morning numbers MONDAY MORNING
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And now your closing MONDAY NUMBERS \1: 00 PM
Portuguese 10 year bond yield: 1.76% DOWN 3 in basis point(s) yield from FRIDAY/
JAPANESE BOND YIELD: +.030% DOWN 6/10 in basis points yield from FRIDAY/JAPAN losing control of its yield curve/
SPANISH 10 YR BOND YIELD: 1.30% DOWN 2 IN basis point yield from FRIDAY/
ITALIAN 10 YR BOND YIELD: 2.650 DOWN 3 POINTS in basis point yield from FRIDAY/
the Italian 10 yr bond yield is trading 135 points HIGHER than Spain.
GERMAN 10 YR BOND YIELD: FALLS TO +.300% IN BASIS POINTS ON THE DAY
END
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
IMPORTANT CURRENCY CLOSES FOR MONDAY
Closing currency crosses for MONDAY night/USA DOLLAR INDEX/USA 10 YR BOND YIELD/1:00 PM
Euro/USA 1.1677 DOWN .0074(Euro DOWN 74 Basis points/ represents to DRAGHI A COMPLETE POLICY FAILURE/
USA/Japan: 110,85 UP 0.270 Yen DOWN 18 basis points/
Great Britain/USA 1.3126 DOWN .0009( POUND DOWN 9 BASIS POINTS)
USA/Canada 1.3213 UP .0092 Canadian dollar DOWN 92 Basis points AS OIL ROSE TO $74.11
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This afternoon, the Euro was DOWN 74 to trade at 1.1606
The Yen FELL to 110.85 for a LOSS of 18 Basis points as NIRP is STILL a big failure for the Japanese central bank/HELICOPTER MONEY IS NOW DELAYED/BANK OF JAPAN NOW WORRIED AS AS THEY ARE RUNNING OUT OF BONDS TO BUY AS BOND YIELDS RISE
The POUND LOST 9 basis points, trading at 1.3126/
The Canadian dollar LOST 92 basis points to 1.3213/ WITH WTI OIL RISING TO : $74.13
The USA/Yuan closed AT 6.6680
the 10 yr Japanese bond yield closed at +.03000% DOWN 6/10 IN BASIS POINTS / yield/
Your closing 10 yr USA bond yield UP 2 IN basis points from FRIDAY at 2.86 % //trading well ABOVE the resistance level of 2.27-2.32%) very problematic USA 30 yr bond yield: 2.99 UP 3 in basis points on the day /
THE RISE IN BOTH THE 10 YR AND THE 30 YR ARE VERY PROBLEMATIC FOR VALUATIONS
Your closing USA dollar index, 96.07 UP 60 CENT(S) ON THE DAY/1.00 PM/
Your closing bourses for Europe and the Dow along with the USA dollar index closing and interest rates for MONDAY: 1:00 PM
London: CLOSED DOWN 21.30 POINTS OR 0.28%
German Dax :CLOSED DOWN 67.83 OR 0.55%
Paris Cac CLOSED DOWN 46.77 POINTS OR 0.88%
Spain IBEX CLOSED DOWN 64.40 POINTS OR 0.67%
Italian MIB: CLOSED DOWN 199.05 POINTS OR 0.92%
The Dow closed UP 35.77 POINTS OR 0.15%
NASDAQ closed UP 57.38 points or 0.76%4.00 PM EST
WTI Oil price; 74.11 1:00 pm;
Brent Oil: 77.91 1:00 EST
USA /RUSSIAN ROUBLE CROSS: 63.58 UP 80/100 ROUBLES/DOLLAR (ROUBLE LOWER BY 80 BASIS PTS)
TODAY THE GERMAN YIELD FALLS TO +.300% FOR THE 10 YR BOND 1.00 PM EST EST
END
This ends the stock indices, oil price, currency crosses and interest rate closes for today 4:30 PM
Closing Price for Oil, 4:00 pm/and 10 year USA interest rate:
WTI CRUDE OIL PRICE 4:30 PM:$73.92
BRENT: $77.28
USA 10 YR BOND YIELD: 2.87% the dropping yields signify markets are in turmoil
USA 30 YR BOND YIELD: 2.99%/
EURO/USA DOLLAR CROSS: 1.1642 down .0038 ( down 38 BASIS POINTS)
USA/JAPANESE YEN:110.85 UP 0.187 (YEN DOWN 19 BASIS POINTS/ .
USA DOLLAR INDEX: 94.86 up 39 cent(s)/
The British pound at 5 pm: Great Britain Pound/USA: 1.3140 down 0.0055 (FROM LASTDAY NIGHT down 55 POINTS)
Canadian dollar: 1.3190 down 67 BASIS pts
German 10 yr bond yield at 5 pm: +,300%
VOLATILITY INDEX: 15.61 CLOSED DOWN 0.48
LIBOR 3 MONTH DURATION: 2.336% .
And now your more important USA stories which will influence the price of gold/silver
TRADING IN GRAPH FORM FOR THE DAY
Bitcoin Bounced, Tesla Trounced, Platinum
Pummelled, Yield Curve Crushed
“It’s not a happy start to the second half. Trade war concerns, U.S. sanctions, Trump’s rants and political problems in Europe, as well as worries about slowing emerging-market growth are all playing their part.” – Saxo’s Ole Hansen.
China was ugly overnight…
Europe also closed red – but rebounded from the gap down open…
But US equities shrugged it all off as Trump walked back his WTO comments somewhat and all major indices went bid…
The Dow closed below its 200DMA for the 6th day in a row…
The percentage of stocks in bear territory is also rising sharply with over 22% of the MSCI World names now down more than 20% – more than three times as many seen at the end of January.
Tesla pumped (on “hitting” an aribtrary milsetone) then tumbled on “missing” the deadline…
Treasury yields roundtripped on the day. After being bid overnight, bonds were sold from 830ET on today back to around unchanged… (short-end underperformed)
The yield curve reverses Friday’s sudden steepening…
The Dollar was a one-way street higher today – erasing Friday’s losses – until later in the day when the dollar began to roll over…
The Mexican Peso slipped overnight after AMLO’s election victory but bounced into the close…
Emerging Market FX continues to push lower against the dollar…
And cryptos all surged today on the heels of some major short liquidations in Bitcoin…
All the major commodities were weaker on the day (with a notable gap down open last night)…
As the dollar strengthened, precious metals slipped lower, led by Platinum…
Gold and Silver were monkey hammered lower at the 830am fix and never looked back…
Platinum plunged today – dropping the most since 2011 to its lowest since 2008…
And finally – because it’s the big thing that everyone is ignoring – Offshore Yuan continues its freefall, accelerating today…
end
MARKET DATA
Take your pick as to what is going on in the USA manufacturing sector. Two competing data sources give polar opposite results. Put your money on the PMI as ISM has been out continually for over one yr
(courtesy zerohedge)
USA ECONOMIC STORIES
Sunday night:
Axios leaks a Trump bill which intends to basically blow up the World Trade Organization
quite a report
(courtesy zerohedge)
Axios Leaks Trump Bill To Blow Up World Trade
Organization
If passed, the bill (entitled the “United States Fair and Reciprocal Tariff Act”) would effectively blow up the WTO, an organization that the US helped create back in the 90s, by allowing Trump to unilaterally ignore the two most important principles:
The “Most Favored Nation” (MFN) principle that countries can’t set different tariff rates for different countries outside of free trade agreements;
“Bound tariff rates” — the tariff ceilings that each WTO country has already agreed to in previous negotiations.
“It would be the equivalent of walking away from the WTO and our commitments there without us actually notifying our withdrawal,” one anonymous source reportedly told Axios.
The bill asks Congress to hand over to Trump unilateral power to ignore WTO rules and negotiate unilateral trade agreements.
The leak of the draft bill follows another WTO-related scoop from Axios, published last week, where Swan reported that Trump has repeatedly badgered his aides about pulling the US out of the WTO, which the president has famously criticized as a “disaster”.
The bill’s chances of making it through Congress are extremely low. However, if Trump has taught us anything about his trade agenda, it’s never say never.
- “The good news is Congress would never give this authority to the president,” the source added, describing the bill as “insane.”
- “It’s not implementable at the border,” given it would create potentially tens of thousands of new tariff rates on products. “And it would completely remove us from the set of global trade rules.”
Trump was reportedly briefed on the draft in late May. Most of the individuals who were involved in the drafting of the bill assumed it would be “dead on arrival” – that is, all but Trump advisor Peter Navarro, who repeatedly encouraged Trump’s anti-free-trade positions. The White House, the US Trade Representative and the Department of Commerce were consulted during the drafting of the bill.
While the bill might be able to find enough support to pass in the extremely pro-Trump House, Republican proponents of free trade in the Senate would likely balk at the prospect of trashing the existing free trade order, while Democrats would be reluctant to hand more unilateral authority to the president.
It’s also worth noting that Congress is already trying to roll back Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs in the form of a bipartisan bill authored by Republican Sens. Bob Corker and Pat Toomey and Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet.
- In a White House meeting to discuss the bill earlier this year, Legislative Affairs Director Marc Short bluntly told Navarro the bill was “dead on arrival” and would receive zero support on Capitol Hill, according to sources familiar with the exchange.
- Navarro replied to Short that he thought the bill would get plenty of support, particularly from Democrats, but Short told Navarro he didn’t think Democrats were in much of a mood to hand over more authority to Trump.
White House spokeswoman Lindsay Walters acknowledged that the bill was genuine, but cautioned that the public shouldn’t take it too seriously – after all, Trump’s frustrations with the WTO are already widely known.
- But Walters signaled that we shouldn’t take this bill as anything like a done deal. “The only way this would be news is if this were actual legislation that the administration was preparing to rollout, but it’s not,” she said.
- “Principals have not even met to review any text of legislation on reciprocal trade.”
- Between the lines: Note the specificity of Walters’ quote above. Trump directly requested this legislation and was verbally briefed on it in May. But he hasn’t met with the principals to review the text.
The report sent US futures lower off the gate as trade tensions once again reared their ugly head, although the BTFDers promptly emerged, and with their traditional non-challance and disregard for risk or news, quickly sent futures back to unchanged.
Dismantling the WTO risks sparking a global trade war, which could have some very serious consequences.
Read the draft bill below:
end
Inflation will now start to gather steam as Pfizer hikes 100 over the counter pharmaceutical products
(courtesy zerohedge)
Pfizer Hikes 100 Drug Prices Despite Trump’s
Promise Of “Massive Cuts”
Despite the fanfare with which the White House unveiled its “American Patients First” initiative earlier this year, it appears American pharmaceutical giants didn’t get the memo, and are still going ahead with their annual “price modifications.” As the Financial Times reports, Pfizer, the largest drug company in the US, has raised prices on 100 products.
The price hikes were announce just weeks after President Trump claimed that US drug companies would soon announce “massive” voluntary price cuts. Pfizer’s decision “threatens to fuel the backlash over the soaring cost of medicines used in the US” as the price increases hit some of the company’s most popular drugs, including erectile-dysfunction drug “Viagra” (the “little blue pill”).
The increases are effective as of July 1. In most cases, the increases are just over 9%, which is in line with the annual 10% price hikes adopted by most drug companies. Putting that number in context, core inflation printed at 2% last week.
While news of the price hikes occupied the headlines, Pfizer would like consumers to know that its price “modifications” also included lowering the prices of five drugs by between 16% and 44%. According to the FT, this is Pfizer’s second round of price hikes this year.
Drug prices were a major issue during the 2016 campaign, with both Trump and his Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton. Last year, Trump accused the pharmaceutical industry of “getting away with murder.” However, one insider pointed out that it’s “business as usual” for the pharmaceutical industry as, when accounting for the increases in price as of January, some drug prices have risen by almost 20%.
“The latest increases signal that it is ‘business as usual’ rather than the voluntary concessions that Trump indicated were coming,” said Michael Rea, chief executive of Rx Savings Solutions, which makes software that helps employers and health insurers lower the amount they spend on prescription drugs.
Viagra and Chantix have endured price hikes of 20% and 17%, respectively, so far this year. Pfizer defended its decision by arguing that the “list price” for most of its inventory remains untouched. Furthermore, insurers and customers rarely pay the sticker price.
Pfizer said: “The list price remains unchanged for the majority of our medicines. We are modifying prices for 10 per cent of our medicines, including some instances where we’re decreasing the price.”
“List prices do not reflect what most patients or insurance companies pay,” the company added, pointing out that the net price increase – which accounts for discounts and rebates — was expected to be in the “low single digits.”
In response to scrutiny from politicians, most pharmaceutical companies have switched from raising drug prices twice per year to raising prices once per year, and Pfizer certainly hasn’t been the only company to hike prices this month. Of course, bringing the pharmaceutical companies to heel will be no easy task for the administration, as the industry spends more on lobbying than the next two biggest spenders combined.

end
Now the uSA Chamber of Commerce head turns against Trump with a campaign to oppose tariffs
(courtesy zerohedge)
Chamber Of Commerce Turns On Trump With
Campaign To Oppose Tariffs
The US Chamber of Commerce has been opposed to President Trump’s trade war since before Trump even won the Republican nomination. Back in March 2016, CoC President Tom Donohue warned that Trump “would be impeached” if he followed through with his threats of slapping tariffs on China and Mexico. Now, more than two years later, the chamber – which bills itself as the largest interest interest group representing US businesses – is launching an all-out offensive to oppose Trump’s trade policies, according to Reuters.
The campaign, which officially launched Monday, is described as “an aggressive effort by the business lobbying giant. Using a state-by-state analysis, it argues that Trump is risking a global trade war that will hit the wallets of US consumers.”
“The administration is threatening to undermine the economic progress it worked so hard to achieve,” said Chamber President Tom Donohue in a statement to Reuters. “We should seek free and fair trade, but this is just not the way to do it.”
Of course, Donohue’s criticism begs the question: If this isn’t the solution to achieving “free and fair” trade, then what is?
The campaign represents a major shift in the Chamber’s stance toward the administration after it applauded the Trump tax cuts. The CoC represents 3 million members and has historically worked closely with Republican presidents and lawmakers. Yet, as it turns out, its plan of attack isn’t all that different from the European Union’s attempts to dissuade Trump from moving ahead with his tariffs, lest they spark a global trade war. To wit, both entities have resorted to warning Trump about the negative economic impact his tariffs might have on states that he won during the 2016 race.
Of course, just because Trump’s trade policies might trigger an economic backlash doesn’t mean his blue-collar voters will abandon him en masse. Workers at Harley-Davidson’s Menomonee Falls plant told the FT that they support Trump’s trade moves despite the fact that “they could end up as collateral damage.”
We wonder how effective the chamber’s argument will be considering that the president can already point to tangible results from his policies in the form of a collapsing US trade deficit.
SWAMP STORIES
Main Points:
- Rosenstein probably did not read the FISA warrant application that he signed
- Gohmert states (he is a judge) that any judge would not grant any application by Rosenstein because he did not read it prior to him presenting it.
- Gohmert is upset of the stonewalling by the Dept of Justice
- the lack of pursuit in the AWAN case
and for all of the above, that is the reason he is being spied on by the FBI/or DOJ
(courtesy zerohedge)
Congressman Investigating FISA Abuse, Awan Says DOJ Spying On Him
Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) says that agents working for Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein have been spying on his office, Gohmert told WMAL’s “Morning on the Mall” Friday.
“I don’t doubt for a minute that he has people who have been looking into my background. I’ve been told as much by some other folks,” said the Congressman, who added that he did not believe such an operation was overseen by Rod Rosenstein personally.
“There’s always deniability,” he said.
Gohmert recounted a fiery exchange with Rosenstein during Congressional testimony last week in which the Congressman grilled the Deputy AG over not having read a FISA warrant renewal he signed.
“If I were a FISA judge,” Gohmert told WMAL, “now that we have him on record refusing to say that you even read it – I would never accept an application signed by you again, because you don’t even know what you were signing“
Gohmert also expressed frustration over the DOJ’s efforts to stall Congressional investigations.
“He think that if they drag their feet long enough like Eric Holder did with fast and furious, we won’t do anything about it,” suggesting that Rosenstein would seek to run out the statute of limitations on various allegations.
Awans
Gohmert has been tirelessly pushing for the DOJ to investigate the Pakistani IT family which had unprecedented access to top secret information via computers and other electronic devices belonging to House Democrats.
Gohmert gave a rousing speech in early June, imploring the DOJ to act on the Awan case, noting that there are “dozens and dozens” of potential felonies involved.
“The FBI has had opportunities to have those invoices presented to them, and each time, they have instructed, ‘Don’t bring any of those documents; we don’t want to see any of that, we just want to talk to [him],’” Gohmert said. Instead, the FBI has insisted that there’s “no evidence of anything other than this false statement.”
“They have instructed, ‘We don’t want to see the documents that proved those cases.’ They’re readily available, for any federal officer that wants to see them, but [the FBI] don’t want to see them, so they can keep reporting to the new U.S. attorney that there’s no evidence, nothing there,” Gohmert said.
And for his efforts to get to the bottom of two massive D.C. scandals, Rep. Louie Gohmert now says he’s being spied on.
-END-
Major points:
1.The Associated Press talks with the FBI about a storage locker held by Manafort which has a major portion of his business records.
2. the FBI then in conjunction with Manafort’s assistant raid that box. The major question, is did the assistant have the power to release the documents
3. Flynn is given another 2 month reprieve on sentencing. Seems the FBI have cold feet on sentencing this guy who may be innocent of the lying charge because of the tampering of “302’s”
4 FBI agent, Pientka was one of the officials who interviewed Flynn along with Strzok. The FBI refuses to allow Pientka to be interviewed and this fellow could prove once and for all that the 302 reports were altered. If Pientka concurs that 302’s were altered,, then everything goes nuclear..
(courtesy zerohedge)
As Manafort Battles FBI, Mueller Gives Flynn Another Unexpected Reprieve
Recent developments in separate cases against former Trump officials Paul Manafort and Mike Flynn have left many scratching their heads.
On Friday, Politico reported that the Associated Press may have tipped off the FBI to a storage locker that the bureau then raided, according to an FBI agent who gave an unexpected testimony at a federal court hearing in Alexandria, Virginia.
A meeting last year where Associated Press reporters discussed with federal officials the news outlet’s investigation of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort’s finances may have led the FBI to a storage locker the bureau raided, an FBI agent testified Friday. –Politico
Congressional investigators have inquired into the April 2017 meeting between AP and officials from both the DOJ Criminal Division and the FBI.
Manafort’s attorneys have sought to suppress the materials obtained through the searches as part of a broader attempt to discredit the Mueller investigation.
In response to an earlier question about how the FBI became aware that Manafort had a secret storage locker used for all of his business-related files, FBI agent Jeff Pfeiffer said “Either through my investigative efforts or through a meeting that occurred with reporters of The Associated Press.”
Present at the meeting with the Associated Press was Mueller investigator Andrew Weissmann – who is also a top prosecutor in the Criminal Division’s Fraud section.
It was Weissman’s presence in the meeting with Associated Press reporters that first generated interest from congressional Republicans. In a January letter to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes indicated he was interested in obtaining “records related to the details of an April 2017 meeting between DOJ Attorney Andrew Weissmann … and the media.” The disclosure of the meeting in Nunes’ letter led to speculation among Trump allies that Weissmann had aided the reporters’ stories. –Politico
AP’s director of media relations, Lauren Easton, confirmed that AP journalists met with DOJ officials “in an effort to get information on stories they were reporting, as reporters do,” and claimed that the journalists asked the DOJ about the storage locker but never identified its location.
Following the FBI’s meeting with AP, Manafort assistant Alex Trusko eventually helped federal officials obtain access to the locker and consented to its search. While Manafort’s attorneys have argued that Trusko lacked the authority to grant access, he was listed as the “occupant” on the locker’s lease, and he had a key to it.
Flynn gets another reprieve
Meanwhile, special counsel Mueller has asked for yet another delay in the sentencing of former national security adviser Michael Flynn, according to court documents filed on Friday – the third such request.
Mueller’s team asked for two more months before scheduling his sentencing – with a request to file another status report by August 24.
“Due to the status of the Special Counsel’s investigation, the parties do not believe that this matter is ready to be scheduled for a sentencing hearing at this time,” reads a joint status report filed on Friday in a D.C. federal court.
Flynn worked on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election and was briefly Trump’s national security adviser before being fired for misleading Mike Pence about his contacts with Russian officials. While an incoming national security director communicating with Russia would be absolutely expected – Flynn’s statements to White House officials and the FBI led to his firing and subsequent prosecution by the special counsel.
McCabe didn’t think they had a case
In May, an unredacted House Intel Committee report revealed that former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told Congressional investigators that the FBI had virtually no case against former National Security Advisor Mike Flynn, and “The two people who interviewed [Flynn] didn’t think he was lying[.]”
“[N]ot [a] great beginning of a false statement case.” McCabe told the Committee.
The same House Intel report revealed that James Comey contradicted himself in a Fox News interviewwhen he denied telling lawmakers those agents thought Flynn was telling the truth, when in fact he did. Meanwhile, there has been an unconfirmed rumor that McCabe instructed agents to alter their “302” forms from the Flynn interview, effectively changing their written accounts.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) has been zeroing in on the Flynn interview – demanding the 302 forms, as well as a sit-down with Special Agent Joe Pientka – who Grassley revealed as the second FBI agent in the Flynn interview aside from Peter Strzok.
Grassley demanded a transcribed interview with Pientka– who would be able to testify as to whether or not McCabe had him alter his 302 form, which would send things nuclear.
Thus far, the DOJ has told Grassley to pound sand…
end
Cohen ready to turn state’s evidence against Trump
(courtesy zerohedge)
Cohen Warns Trump He’ll “Put Family And Country First” In First Interview Since FBI Raid
Since the FBI raided Trump attorney Michael Cohen’s home, office, and hotel room earlier this year, the press has speculated that the former Trump Organization attorney would turn state’s evidence against his former boss if it might help him get out from under possible bank fraud and campaign finance charges. Both Cohen and Trump had refused to comment on the rumors, until now…
In his first interview since the raid, Cohen told ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos (President Bill Clinton’s former press secretary) that he would put his “family and country first” if prosecutors decide to file charges against him.
But in his first in-depth interview since the FBI raided his office and homes in April,Cohen strongly signaled his willingness to cooperate with special counsel Robert Mueller and federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York – even if that puts President Trump in jeopardy.
According to Stephanopoulos, Cohen disagreed with Trump’s criticism of federal prosecutors, and said that his family is “my first priority” in response to a question about what he would do if he had to choose between protecting himself and protecting President Trump. Stephanopoulos added that Cohen “did not praise” the president during their conversation.
This from the man who once said that he’d “take a bullet” for Trump, a man he’d “do anything” to protect. ABC also pointed out that once Cohen’s new lead attorney, Guy Petrillo, takes over, a joint defense agreement between Cohen’s legal team and Trump’s legal team will be rendered ineffective.
Asked what he would do if Trump and his legal team came after him, Cohen said he wouldn’t be “a punching bag” as part of anybody’s defense strategy.
“I will not be a punching bag as part of anyone’s defense strategy,” he said emphatically. “I am not a villain of this story, and I will not allow others to try to depict me that way.”
[…]
“My wife, my daughter and my son have my first loyalty and always will,” Cohen told me. “I put family and country first.”
Cohen refused to discuss the prosecution, adding that “I respect the prosecutors…I respect the process” and that he doesn’t agree with “those who demonize or vilify the FBI” – a remark that appeared to be directed at the president and his allies.
“I respect the prosecutors. I respect the process,” Cohen said. “I would not do or say anything that might be perceived as interfering with their professional review of the evidence and the facts.”
[…]
“I don’t agree with those who demonize or vilify the FBI. I respect the FBI as an institution, as well as their agents,” Cohen told me. “When they searched my hotel room and my home, it was obviously upsetting to me and my family. Nonetheless, the agents were respectful, courteous and professional. I thanked them for their service and as they left, we shook hands.”
In the past, Cohen has insisted that he made a $130,000 “hush money” payment to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels on his own initiative. But when asked about the payment by Stephanopoulos, Cohen offered a slightly different take.
“I want to answer. One day I will answer,” he said. “But for now, I can’t comment further on advice of my counsel.”
Moving on to the subject of the Russia investigation, Cohen said he condemned Russia for interfering in the 2016 election, adding that accepting Russian President Vladimir Putin’s denial was “unsustainable.”
“As an American, I repudiate Russia’s or any other foreign government’s attempt to interfere or meddle in our democratic process, and I would call on all Americans to do the same,” he said.
And in a direct rebuttal to President Trump, who sent out a tweet last week repeating Vladimir Putin’s claim that Russia did not interfere in our election, Cohen added this: “Simply accepting the denial of Mr. Putin is unsustainable.”
Back in April, President Trump tweeted that he didn’t expect Cohen to turn on him to save himself.
If he didn’t have the president’s full attention before, Cohen almost certainly has it now.
Did Sen. Warner And Comey ‘Collude’ On Russia-gate?
Authored by Ray McGovern vi ConsortiumNews.com,
The U.S. was in talks for a deal with Julian Assange but then FBI Director James Comey ordered an end to negotiations after Assange offered to prove Russia was not involved in the DNC leak…
An explosive report by investigative journalist John Solomon on the opinion page of Monday’s edition of The Hill sheds a bright light on how Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) and then-FBI Director James Comey collaborated to prevent WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange from discussing “technical evidence ruling out certain parties [read Russia]” in the controversial leak of Democratic Party emails to WikiLeaks during the 2016 election.
A deal that was being discussed last year between Assange and U.S. government officials would have given Assange “limited immunity” to allow him to leave the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where he has been exiled for six years. In exchange, Assange would agree to limit through redactions “some classified CIA information he might release in the future,” according to Solomon, who cited “interviews and a trove of internal DOJ documents turned over to Senate investigators.” Solomon even provided a copy of the draft immunity deal with Assange.
But Comey’s intervention to stop the negotiations with Assange ultimately ruined the deal, Solomon says, quoting “multiple sources.” With the prospective agreement thrown into serious doubt, Assange “unleashed a series of leaks that U.S. officials say damaged their cyber warfare capabilities for a long time to come.” These were the Vault 7 releases, which led then CIA Director Mike Pompeo to call WikiLeaks “a hostile intelligence service.”
Solomon’s report provides reasons why Official Washington has now put so much pressure on Ecuador to keep Assange incommunicado in its embassy in London.
Assange: Came close to a deal with the U.S. (Photo credit: New Media Days / Peter Erichsen)
The report does not say what led Comey to intervene to ruin the talks with Assange. But it came after Assange had offered to “provide technical evidence and discussion regarding who did not engage in the DNC releases,” Solomon quotes WikiLeaks’ intermediary with the government as saying. It would be a safe assumption that Assange was offering to prove that Russia was not WikiLeaks’ source of the DNC emails.
If that was the reason Comey and Warner ruined the talks, as is likely, it would reveal a cynical decision to put U.S. intelligence agents and highly sophisticated cybertools at risk, rather than allow Assange to at least attempt to prove that Russia was not behind the DNC leak.
The greater risk to Warner and Comey apparently would have been if Assange provided evidence that Russia played no role in the 2016 leaks of DNC documents.
Missteps and Stand Down
In mid-February 2017, in a remarkable display of naiveté, Adam Waldman, Assange’s pro bono attorney who acted as the intermediary in the talks, asked Warner if the Senate Intelligence Committee staff would like any contact with Assange to ask about Russia or other issues. Waldman was apparently oblivious to Sen. Warner’s stoking of Russia-gate.
Warner contacted Comey and, invoking his name, instructed Waldman to “stand down and end the discussions with Assange,” Waldman told Solomon. The “stand down” instruction “did happen,” according to another of Solomon’s sources with good access to Warner. However, Waldman’s counterpart attorney David Laufman, an accomplished federal prosecutor picked by the Justice Department to work the government side of the CIA-Assange fledgling deal, told Waldman, “That’s B.S. You’re not standing down, and neither am I.”
But the damage had been done. When word of the original stand-down order reached WikiLeaks, trust evaporated, putting an end to two months of what Waldman called “constructive, principled discussions that included the Department of Justice.”
The two sides had come within inches of sealing the deal. Writing to Laufman on March 28, 2017, Waldman gave him Assange’s offer to discuss “risk mitigation approaches relating to CIA documents in WikiLeaks’ possession or control, such as the redaction of Agency personnel in hostile jurisdictions,” in return for “an acceptable immunity and safe passage agreement.”
On March 31, 2017, though, WikiLeaks released the most damaging disclosure up to that point from what it called “Vault 7” — a treasure trove of CIA cybertools leaked from CIA files. This disclosure featured the tool “Marble Framework,” which enabled the CIA to hack into computers, disguise who hacked in, and falsely attribute the hack to someone else by leaving so-called tell-tale signs — like Cyrillic, for example. The CIA documents also showed that the “Marble” tool had been employed in 2016.
Misfeasance or Malfeasance
Comey: Ordered an end to talks with Assange.
Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity, which includes among our members two former Technical Directors of the National Security Agency, has repeatedly called attention to its conclusion that the DNC emails were leaked — not “hacked” by Russia or anyone else (and, later, our suspicion that someone may have been playing Marbles, so to speak).
In fact, VIPS and independent forensic investigators, have performed what former FBI Director Comey — at first inexplicably, now not so inexplicably — failed to do when the so-called “Russian hack” of the DNC was first reported. In July 2017 VIPS published its key findings with supporting data.
Two month later, VIPS published the results of follow-up experiments conducted to test the conclusions reached in July.
Why did then FBI Director Comey fail to insist on getting direct access to the DNC computers in order to follow best-practice forensics to discover who intruded into the DNC computers? (Recall, at the time Sen. John McCain and others were calling the “Russian hack” no less than an “act of war.”) A 7th grader can now figure that out.
Asked on January 10, 2017 by Senate Intelligence Committee chair Richard Burr (R-NC) whether direct access to the servers and devices would have helped the FBI in their investigation, Comey replied: “Our forensics folks would always prefer to get access to the original device or server that’s involved, so it’s the best evidence.”
At that point, Burr and Warner let Comey down easy. Hence, it should come as no surprise that, according to one of John Solomon’s sources, Sen. Warner (who is co-chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee) kept Sen. Burr apprised of his intervention into the negotiation with Assange, leading to its collapse.

Maxine Waters Turns On Schumer: “He’ll Do Anything To Protect His Power”
Maxine Waters (D-CA) is now attacking establishment Democrats after they denounced her calls to form into mobs and attack Trump officials – blasting Senate and House Minority Leaders Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi after they called for civility and debate in the wake of her inflammatory comments.
“Leadership like Chuck Schumer will do anything that they think is necessary to protect their leadership,” said Waters during a Sunday appearance on MSNBC’s “AM Joy. “What I have to do is not focus on them. I’ve got to keep the focus on the children.”
Waters has chosen the “separated migrant children” hill to die on politically after viral images of “caged” migrant children under the Obama administration was wrongly attributed to President Trump. In the ensuing debate over roughly 2,000 migrant children, the American public learned that it also happened under Bush and Obama, and that the Obama administration placed nearly 300,000 migrant children in “cages” after they were apprehended at the border.
Pelosi rebuked comments Waters’ late-June call for supporters to physically confront Trump administration officials, when she said: “If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”
Responding over Twitter, Pelosi said “In the crucial months ahead, we must strive to make America beautiful again. Trump’s daily lack of civility has provoked responses that are predictable but unacceptable.”
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer also laid into Waters last Monday, saying “No one should call for the harassment of political opponents. That’s not right. That’s not American.”
President Trump, meanwhile, tweeted: “Congresswoman Maxine Waters, an extraordinarily low IQ person, has become, together with Nancy Pelosi, the Face of the Democrat Party. She has just called for harm to supporters, of which there are many, of the Make America Great Again movement. Be careful what you wish for Max!”
Waters’ comments came on the heels of several incidents in which Trump administration officials have been harassed or ejected from public spaces, while protesters have begun to show up at the houses of various White House employees.
In Mid-June, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was ejected from a Lexington, VA restaurant because the gay staff was too triggered by her presence. After the story went viral, Sanders posted to Twitter: “Last night I was told by the owner of Red Hen in Lexington, VA to leave because I work for @POTUS and I politely left. Her actions say far more about her than about me. I always do my best to treat people, including those I disagree with, respectfully and will continue to do so.”
At the end of the day, the fractured left is eating its own. Pelosi and Schumer likely realize that Waters’ calls for physical confrontation with Trump admin officials isn’t the best way to message going into midterms, while an entirely different wing of Democrats has swung so far left that they’re embracing Democratic Socialism – which will be hard to defend in a debate when the left’s leading Democratic Socialist, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, can’t even explain what it is.
Meanwhile, the Venezuelan military just seized control over water supplies as their socialist infrastructure collapse.
We wonder if Waters’ comments will have a negative impact in November when she faces GOP challenger Omar Navarro.
Fed Waterboarding Deutsche Bank – Rob Kirby
By Greg Hunter On July 1, 2018 In Market Analysis
By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com (Early Sunday Release)
Macroeconomic analyst Rob Kirby says there is a lot you are not seeing with all the bad news coming from Deutsche Bank (DB). You’ve seen DB stock hit all-time lows, the Fed downgrading them and flunking the bank on a recent stress test. Rob Kirby says it’s much worse than you think and explains, “Basically, it is the German regulator telling DB you are going to get out of this pool, then the Americans realizing how hostile the Germans have become to the criminal activity of the U.S. monetary complex. They basically said you are getting out of our pool? Well, we’re going to waterboard you first, and we’re going to bring public shame upon you.”
Is Kirby worried about DB going under? Kirby says, “I think Deutsche Bank could go under. It might very well deserve to go under, but will they be permitted to go under? In my view, there is no doubt what-so-ever that Morgan Stanley was insolvent in the 2008 and 2009 time frame. Their stock was at $5, and it looked like it was going to $0. They pulled out the stops and papered over the shortcomings at Morgan Stanley.” Kirby thinks European central bankers will do the same for DB.
Kirby goes on to say, “What we are really seeing here . . . is a trade war that has been going on for quite some time. This is a frictional description I am giving characterizing the regulatory relationship between American regulatory interests and German regulatory interests.”
Kirby cites the example of Germany building an engine plant in Russia in 2015 against the wishes of the U.S. Kirby says, “The U.S. wanted to put Russia in an economic penalty box. . . . As the date approached for the VW engine plant opening in Russia, so did the rhetoric between the U.S. EPA and VW regarding emissions on their diesel engines. They got a huge fine. . . . You could not have a closer measure of cause and reaction than this engine plant opening in Russia, and days later, this . . . very, very punitive fine on VW.”
Kirby says what this all boils down to is pro-dollar dollar forces vs. anti-dollar forces. Kirby contends, “Three, four and five years ago, countries taking anti-dollar actions would have included only China, Russia and a few other smaller Asian players. Now, we are starting to see friction that is not just Asian players, now it’s Germany. Who’s next? Is it going to be the whole European Union . . . going to drift into the anti-dollar camp as well? America is becoming isolated.”
Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with macroeconomic analyst Rob Kirby.
After the Interview:
Below is the entire article Rob Kirby wrote in preparation for this interview for USAW:
Doings at Deutsche Bank
A recent ZeroHedge article chronicled a very large one day loss suffered by German banking giant, Deutsche Bank in the first quarter of 2018. This one day loss was reported as being “12 times VaR“. So what is VaR anyway? The definition/explanation of VaR is can be read at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency [OCC] latest quarterly derivatives report – page 11 – at this link. Boiled down in layman’s terms VaR is a proprietarily calculated measure, unique to each financial institution – expressing how much money they could likely lose on any given day on a worst-case-basis.
A Bit of Deutsche Bank’s Recent History
On June 26, 2015 we learned from a Reuters article citing sources at the Financial Times that German bank regulators were concerned that Deutsche Bank chairman [at the time] Anshu Jain may have lied to them when interviewed back in 2012 when they were investigating rumours of interest rate rigging in the 2012 timeframe. Back in 2012 rumours were also rampant that precious metals prices were rigged too – so it is not a stretch to believe that German bank regulators were investigating this as well. Sidebar: Coincidentally, or perhaps not, it was in 2012 that The German Federal Court of Auditors asked for an inspection [audit] of their foreign gold reserves held at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY – and were denied.
German bank regulator, BaFin, reportedly ordered back in 2012 that Deutsche Bank face “special banking supervisory measures” as a result.
A Few Words on German Bank Regulation From the Horse’s Mouth
“The German national central bank is the Deutsche Bundesbank. In banking supervision, the Deutsche Bundesbank works in close co-operation with BaFin and the ECB. Because of its role in the European System of Central Banks, the Eurosystem and its participation in the euro payment system TARGET2, it has genuine access to much data relating to banks. In addition, regular reporting by the financial sector is addressed to the Deutsche Bundesbank, which performs a quantitative analysis of a financial institution’s figures. If a problem occurs, the Deutsche Bundesbank will promptly involve BaFin.”
From the preceding, we can logically assume that Deutsche Bank [DB] was and with recent developments remains in the crosshairs and a tight leash of German bank regulators.
Overlying Parallel Macro Developments
Much has been written about the size of Deutsche Bank’s derivatives book – which peaked at $75 Trillion in notional around the time when regulators began looking into Deutsch Bank’s books. Since then DB’s derivatives book has shrunk dramatically [43 Trillion Euro at Dec 32/16].
A few more milestones:
After being denied audit of their Gold holdings at the Fed in NY in 2012, Germans requested return of their gold and were denied again
A seemingly revolving door at the head of DB, CEO Joseph Ackermann replaced by Anshu Jain May 2012. Jain replaced by John Cryan June 2015. Cryan replaced by Christian Sewing April 2018. Who’s really steering the ship?
In 2014, DB quits the gold and silver fix in London
In June 2015, DB’s Frankfurt offices raided
In April, 2016 DB admits rigging the price of gold and silver
Analysis
For the past dozen years I have researched/written about interest rate derivatives [interest rate swaps and FRA’s] and how they were utilized by the US Treasury [ESF] working in conjunction with the NY Fed in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to force interest rates to zero. When the US Treasury/ESF executed these trades [NY Fed acting as broker], select banks were made captive, risk free buyers of unthinkable amounts of US government debt. In effect, US monetary policy was being executed/instituted through the derivatives books of the largest commercial banks. This was more than an American operation – there were foreign banks involved too – DB being one of them.
When German regulators began accessing DB’s books in 2012, they “freaked out” at the complicity of DB with the US monetary apparatus and they put an end to it. There is no doubt, this would have been construed as a hostile act on the part of Germany by US monetary elites, that is, a rift was created. While investigating DB’s books, German regulators would have also taken note of the “American centric” criminal price suppression in the precious metals arena. This is why DB was “ORDERED” out of the pool in the gold and silver markets and does much to explain why Germany requested their sovereign gold be returned.
Remember folks, control of the price of precious metals and interest rates are “lynch pins” to underlying global perceptions of the worth of the US dollar.
A FUNDAMENTAL rift has opened between Germany and the US. In my view, German regulators DO NOT approve of American hegemony/monetary stewardship. An “undeclared” Trade War has been smouldering in the background for a number of years already folks. Consider the following coincidences:
VW opens engine plant in Russia Sept 4, 2015
Coincidentally [or perhaps not?] Sept. 2015 VW diesel emissions scandal erupts in US
Germany pushes for exemptions to US sanctions on Russia
Getting back to DB’s most recent one-day-loss of 12 times VaR – it has the appearance or odour of being ‘ordered’. Given all that has occurred, German regulators would/should have been aware of this situation. It would not surprise me if we find out that this “loss” was the result of German regulators ordering DB to “shutter” another misguided business line. ###
Video Link
https://usawatchdog.com/fed- waterboarding-deutsche-bank-rob-kirby/
-END-
WE WILL SEE YOU ON TUESDAY NIGHT.
HARVEY










































































[…] by Harvey Organ of Harvey Organ Blog […]
LikeLike