The current short position in COMEX silver is mostly held by 8 major financial firms. We can only guess who they are because their identities are protected. According to the COT reports, the biggest 4 are short nearly 60 thousand contracts and the next 4 are short nearly 20 thousand contracts. That’s a total of 400 million silver ounces. Annual mining production of silver amounts to less than 800 million ounces. The short position in silver dwarfs any other commodity. Furthermore, it is concentrated in a few hands and thus open to manipulation.  Over the years, this shorting strategy has proven to be lucrative as the big shorts would buy back their short positions on price drops. Recently, the Justice Department and the CFTC punished JPMorgan, Bank of America/Merrill Lynch, Deutsche Bank and Scotia Bank with a deferred criminal prosecution agreement for the practice of spoofing which meant they were often putting in fake sell orders to spark a price drop.

In the last year things have changed, and the big shorts have found themselves unable to buy back their short position as they had in the past. In addition, JPMorgan, the ringleader of the big shorts, reversed gears and eliminated its short position in silver and gold. As gold and silver rose in price, the losses of the 8 big shorts began to mount and at years end totaled $14 billion. In the last few days, the picture for the big shorts has darkened even further. On January 20th, a 20-million-ounce silver deposit was made in the SLV. Following the explosion in trading volume of 150 million shares in SLV on Thursday (the most in my memory) a 34-million-ounce deposit came in. Friday’s 110 million share volume leads me to believe that total net purchases in the SLV for both days was 50 million ounces and a considerable remainder is still due to be deposited in SLV.

If such a large percentage of available silver in thousand-ounce bar form has been purchased, why has the price not exploded? The big shorts are selling new SLV shares. In other word, they are shorting additional silver to keep the price down and prevent a price run on silver. To make matters worse, they are borrowing or leasing the silver to deposit in SLV which is in effect another short since that silver must be paid back. (Harvey: Butler is correct on this//the leasee is JPMorgan)) The authorized participants doing this in SLV are no doubt connected to the 4 big shorts on the COMEX. The only reason they would sell so aggressively at such low prices and further compound their position by borrowing physical silver at such low prices is to prevent the SLV price from rising.

Another consideration is the dramatic tightening of inter-month spread differentials in both COMEX gold and silver futures contracts. Last spring the spreads blew out to unprecedented wide levels and now they have tightened in nearly as dramatically. My conclusion is that this is a strong indication of wholesale physical tightness in both gold and silver.

When something is cheap, as silver surely is, it makes sense to buy it and not sell it, and certainly not sell it short. Yet, that is precisely what the big shorts are doing on the COMEX and in SLV by leasing the metal they are depositing. Leasing is nothing more than another version of short selling. And the only possible motivation for the big new short selling by the big shorts is to keep prices from rising, which is about as illegal and manipulative as it gets.

Everyone watching silver has to be shocked by the developments of the past few days. You can be sure the big shorts were just as shocked. This Robinhood/Reddit development was a true bolt out of the blue, completely unexpected, and earthshaking in significance. The best the big shorts have been able to do in reaction is to short more COMEX contracts and borrow scads of physical metal to throw at the SLV and perhaps influence Robinhood to prevent its clients from buying SLV. The only question that remains, is will the big shorts succeed in stemming the rising price tide in silver?


Would you expect otherwise? A Chinese based miner operating in China is telling the world that China is going to confiscate is Xinjiang gold mine.

Serves them right for trying to operate in China!

Vancouver-based miner says China is trying to steal Xinjiang gold mine


By Robert Fife
The Globe and Mail, Toronto
Sunday, January 31, 2021

A Vancouver-based gold mining company denies it used forced labor in its open-pit mine in China’s Xinjiang region and is accusing the Chinese government of attempting to confiscate the operation worth an estimated US$1 billion.

Ivy Chong, chief executive of Dynasty Gold Corp., said in an interview that the company employed about 150 workers from different ethnic backgrounds and paid “equitable compensation” at its Qi2 gold mine in Hatu, a mining district in northwest Xinjiang.

She said “all protocols and culture practices were followed including special holidays for religious practices” at the mine, where there are nearby “re-education” centres for political indoctrination and skills training.

The junior mining company is locked in a legal battle over ownership of the project with its state-owned Chinese partners, and says in investor documents that it is “actively pursuing a settlement.” The mine has an estimated resource of 536,000 ounces of gold worth US$1 billion at current prices.

However, Ms. Chong said Dynasty’s minority partners are trying to steal the company away from her with help from Chinese courts. …

… For the remainder of the report:…